Latest: No back torque generator.

[broli]

Boreli,

Well I was thinking that if this thing generates anything it is based on the N-effect and will produce low voltages. Jbignes5 could not see anything because of the very low voltage produced.

Elias

The voltage may be low but definitely not lower than a Milli volt as he has sufficient amount of windings. I can't speak about his magnets though.

I believe I have the polls right but ill reverse them just in case. No picts yet. Very low rpm like 200-300 rpm should be suffiecient to get alittle movement out of the needle. Both direction I have tried.
I'll try reversing the poles to see if that helps but i didn't get anything from the rotation at all. Not even a blip.

Did you also try and attach some led(s) on the rotor itself?

[Jbignes5]

yeah...

Yeah that was the first thing I tried was superbright led. That didn't work. So I decided to make a communtator just for kicks to see what kind of action was going on. Nothing at all. But I'll try the polereversal today and see if that changes it. I doubt it will because reversing the poles would be like changing the direction of spin in my honest opinion.

[broli]

Yeah that was the first thing I tried was superbright led. That didn't work. So I decided to make a communtator just for kicks to see what kind of action was going on. Nothing at all. But I'll try the polereversal today and see if that changes it. I doubt it will because reversing the poles would be like changing the direction of spin in my honest opinion.

Reversing the pole might give an unexpected result. Because I realized in this setup there's a force I neglected. This force can give a back torque or if the poles are reveres and the same direction of rotation is maintained it can give a torque in the direction of rotation.

But that doesn't explain why you are having zero results. My magnets should arrive in a few days so I can see for myself.

[jessie]

hi Broli, I am a fresher of this forum and I am wondering where did you get the formula that you have posted.

thanks

[jessie]

... the formula was:

U= pi/15*B*r^2*rpm*N.

then, why did you do B=1/pi Tesla?

thanks

[broli]

... the formula was:

U= pi/15*B*r^2*rpm*N.

then, why did you do B=1/pi Tesla?

thanks

To get a whole number as a result. Btw this thread is quite old.

[pboserup]

Hi Broli, have you made any progress with your idea?

[jessie]

this is not an answer,

but thanks anyway

[bluejay]

This is my first time on Energetic Forum. I just registered but still don't know how to see the picture referred to in the post.