I'm afraid this has a lot of "questions"; but doesn't offer much in the way of "answers" . But perhaps together, we can work out what the heck is going on with this very strange event!
April, 1979 ... The date of the major Patent being awarded on Howard Johnson's all-magnet motor technology.
April 2009 (EXACTLY THIRTY YEARS LATER): A highly controversial new replication of the Howard Johnson "Stonehenge" all-magnet motor has taken up the interest of the Open Source and Free Energy communities... Polarizing them into 2 camps, and causing more uproar than has been seen in years.
Q1 [Question One] : What is the significance, if any, of the "Exactly 30 Years" time frame here?
... Just coincidence?
Could it be that there was an ordered "30 Year Ban" on this technology... And that ban is finally now over? If so, how does the alleged inventor, Mylow, fit into all this?
Q1A: Is it that Mylow just happened to have an all-magnet motor at just the right time to escape the usual suppression? In other words, was he simply the "first" to come along when the ban was nearly over, so he was mainly left alone when many previous inventors over the years with similar discoveries were suppressed?
Q1B: Or could it be... That behind the scenes, this inventor Mylow is being nearly 100% manipulated and controlled by the government, and is being used as the means to get this technology out to the public? That Mylow IS the "carpenter statuette", the Pawn that is only a small part in a huge plan (a reference to the very odd video he posted, where he repeatedly referred to the "symbolism" of the little statuette)?
Q1C: Or is the whole thing a carefully crafted, professionally done fraud? We can see from what has transpired, that this thing is either "for real"... Or if not "real", then it is no prank or individual's hoax. In this scenario, it was planned and started well in advance (at least 10 months previously), and there are signs of a significant budget and resources being used here (and we would then have Sterling being lied to about the "NSA involvement" from the Congressional Office, or his friend "JB", which Mylow could not have perpetrated by himself). In this scenario, the "30 years" is just another piece of data that could possibly be used as false "proof".
Of course the main and VERY VALID and sustainable reasons for still adhering to this "fraud" possibility despite the several convincing videos are Mylow's continued and inexplicable refusals for allowing any Independent Verifications to be done... And also the very strange comments filtered through Sterling Allen from Mylow that have raised eyebrows.. Specifically the ones about "MIB" / NSA involvement that are quite astonishing, and when taken at face value, frankly very hard to believe for many (since we have seen instances over the years of fakers hiding behind "MIB Suppression" stories).
Going back to "Q1B", the "Controlled Mylow as Pawn" scenario.... There are several reasons to support this, imo:
> As the end of the "30 year ban" approached, the government needed a means of getting the technology released in such a way that questions about the years of suppression, and the topic of energy suppression in general, were avoided (this was important as there are several highly important technologies, such as the Stanley Meyer system for very efficient generation and combustion of Hydroxy, still "on the shelves" that they DO NOT yet want released.. Despite the highly questionable and frankly unbelievable comments about a "Summer Release" of technologies).
> So a private citizen was chosen as a DENIABLE means of getting the technology released to the world. This person was ordered by the government to do and say what it would take to get the Open Source and free energy communities to embrace and replicate the technologies; so that it appeared it was a "natural" occurrence. This possibly included "coaching" to complete a working device, and even added in the "secret spice" about "MIB involvement" as a "hook".
> In support of this scenario, note the original device had channel magnets on the rotor. These proved hard to find. For this and other reasons, only a hand-full of people in the community took up the challenge to replicate. None were successful. Then a few weeks later, we have a second device: This time with much easier-to-find bar magnets on the Rotor, and curved DC electric motor magnets on the Stator. It is almost as if they WANTED more replications... By making it easier to do so.
> Another interesting angle to the "Mylow As Controlled Pawn" scenario is that it could explain the otherwise "inexplicable" refusals to have any independent verifications such as eyewitness visits and tests & measurements performed on the device. He could have done this many times, easily and by a multiplicity of ways, but always found an excuse not to (... And imo, some of the excuses were quite transparent). If this is all true, and Mylow was / is only a "Pawn" to get the technology released in a plausibly deniable way... Then his controllers did not want him to be the "main focus":
They want the independently done REPLICATIONS to be the focus... Thus minimizing the chance of the government people being exposed as pulling all the strings "behind the curtain". When multiple replications are finally seen, Mylow's role would become much less important, and the new replications take center stage... Thus helping to insure that the controllers stay in the shadows. These people LOVE to have others do their "dirty work": They are masters at manipulation, and when a "regular citizen" can be used, it lowers their vulnerability to exposure.
> In the above scenario, this points out a significant FAILURE on the part of the government "handlers".... They expected more replications to happen sooner. They apparently completely mis-read how we would view this, and underestimated our ability to "smell" something fishy going on. They thought we would all immediately jump on the band-wagon and start replicating, without serious question! Thus they had to come out with the later design with the cheaper and more common rotor bar magnets, and create the more convincing videos.
Lol, if this is the case, it appears they are not only going to leave any future replicators alone and not "bother" them; but they are probably shaking their heads and wondering what it will take to get us off our collective duffs and replicate the device!
The above are theories based on observations... And i do not claim to know any answers, or even to be the first one to think of them. My ONLY interest here is to get an article about this technology out there into the public realm ASAP... Lol, but certainly not until i know what is going on here!!
Please comment if you have any ideas about what is going on with this strange affair! I am not interested in arguing my points (yours would be just as valid), just finding some "truth"... And imo, the one thing many of us can agree on is this:
It is EXTREMELY unlikely that this event could transpire exactly as claimed. Something, i don't know exactly what yet, is "odd" about it. I'm not suggesting anyone is a "liar" or a "scammer"... And if there is a big difference between the reported events and the actual truth, imo it is probably because there is another force at work here behind the scenes... And any blame must be put on this force, not their victims.
It is my experience that life is not "Black and White": It comes in 256 shades of Gray. And it is my opinion that this affair has another answer than either: "Mylow is a scammer!", Or that "Mylow is telling the truth!". Just where this gray-scale leads us, is the ultimate Question.
April, 1979 ... The date of the major Patent being awarded on Howard Johnson's all-magnet motor technology.
April 2009 (EXACTLY THIRTY YEARS LATER): A highly controversial new replication of the Howard Johnson "Stonehenge" all-magnet motor has taken up the interest of the Open Source and Free Energy communities... Polarizing them into 2 camps, and causing more uproar than has been seen in years.
Q1 [Question One] : What is the significance, if any, of the "Exactly 30 Years" time frame here?
... Just coincidence?
Could it be that there was an ordered "30 Year Ban" on this technology... And that ban is finally now over? If so, how does the alleged inventor, Mylow, fit into all this?
Q1A: Is it that Mylow just happened to have an all-magnet motor at just the right time to escape the usual suppression? In other words, was he simply the "first" to come along when the ban was nearly over, so he was mainly left alone when many previous inventors over the years with similar discoveries were suppressed?
Q1B: Or could it be... That behind the scenes, this inventor Mylow is being nearly 100% manipulated and controlled by the government, and is being used as the means to get this technology out to the public? That Mylow IS the "carpenter statuette", the Pawn that is only a small part in a huge plan (a reference to the very odd video he posted, where he repeatedly referred to the "symbolism" of the little statuette)?
Q1C: Or is the whole thing a carefully crafted, professionally done fraud? We can see from what has transpired, that this thing is either "for real"... Or if not "real", then it is no prank or individual's hoax. In this scenario, it was planned and started well in advance (at least 10 months previously), and there are signs of a significant budget and resources being used here (and we would then have Sterling being lied to about the "NSA involvement" from the Congressional Office, or his friend "JB", which Mylow could not have perpetrated by himself). In this scenario, the "30 years" is just another piece of data that could possibly be used as false "proof".
Of course the main and VERY VALID and sustainable reasons for still adhering to this "fraud" possibility despite the several convincing videos are Mylow's continued and inexplicable refusals for allowing any Independent Verifications to be done... And also the very strange comments filtered through Sterling Allen from Mylow that have raised eyebrows.. Specifically the ones about "MIB" / NSA involvement that are quite astonishing, and when taken at face value, frankly very hard to believe for many (since we have seen instances over the years of fakers hiding behind "MIB Suppression" stories).
Going back to "Q1B", the "Controlled Mylow as Pawn" scenario.... There are several reasons to support this, imo:
> As the end of the "30 year ban" approached, the government needed a means of getting the technology released in such a way that questions about the years of suppression, and the topic of energy suppression in general, were avoided (this was important as there are several highly important technologies, such as the Stanley Meyer system for very efficient generation and combustion of Hydroxy, still "on the shelves" that they DO NOT yet want released.. Despite the highly questionable and frankly unbelievable comments about a "Summer Release" of technologies).
> So a private citizen was chosen as a DENIABLE means of getting the technology released to the world. This person was ordered by the government to do and say what it would take to get the Open Source and free energy communities to embrace and replicate the technologies; so that it appeared it was a "natural" occurrence. This possibly included "coaching" to complete a working device, and even added in the "secret spice" about "MIB involvement" as a "hook".
> In support of this scenario, note the original device had channel magnets on the rotor. These proved hard to find. For this and other reasons, only a hand-full of people in the community took up the challenge to replicate. None were successful. Then a few weeks later, we have a second device: This time with much easier-to-find bar magnets on the Rotor, and curved DC electric motor magnets on the Stator. It is almost as if they WANTED more replications... By making it easier to do so.
> Another interesting angle to the "Mylow As Controlled Pawn" scenario is that it could explain the otherwise "inexplicable" refusals to have any independent verifications such as eyewitness visits and tests & measurements performed on the device. He could have done this many times, easily and by a multiplicity of ways, but always found an excuse not to (... And imo, some of the excuses were quite transparent). If this is all true, and Mylow was / is only a "Pawn" to get the technology released in a plausibly deniable way... Then his controllers did not want him to be the "main focus":
They want the independently done REPLICATIONS to be the focus... Thus minimizing the chance of the government people being exposed as pulling all the strings "behind the curtain". When multiple replications are finally seen, Mylow's role would become much less important, and the new replications take center stage... Thus helping to insure that the controllers stay in the shadows. These people LOVE to have others do their "dirty work": They are masters at manipulation, and when a "regular citizen" can be used, it lowers their vulnerability to exposure.
> In the above scenario, this points out a significant FAILURE on the part of the government "handlers".... They expected more replications to happen sooner. They apparently completely mis-read how we would view this, and underestimated our ability to "smell" something fishy going on. They thought we would all immediately jump on the band-wagon and start replicating, without serious question! Thus they had to come out with the later design with the cheaper and more common rotor bar magnets, and create the more convincing videos.
Lol, if this is the case, it appears they are not only going to leave any future replicators alone and not "bother" them; but they are probably shaking their heads and wondering what it will take to get us off our collective duffs and replicate the device!
The above are theories based on observations... And i do not claim to know any answers, or even to be the first one to think of them. My ONLY interest here is to get an article about this technology out there into the public realm ASAP... Lol, but certainly not until i know what is going on here!!
Please comment if you have any ideas about what is going on with this strange affair! I am not interested in arguing my points (yours would be just as valid), just finding some "truth"... And imo, the one thing many of us can agree on is this:
It is EXTREMELY unlikely that this event could transpire exactly as claimed. Something, i don't know exactly what yet, is "odd" about it. I'm not suggesting anyone is a "liar" or a "scammer"... And if there is a big difference between the reported events and the actual truth, imo it is probably because there is another force at work here behind the scenes... And any blame must be put on this force, not their victims.
It is my experience that life is not "Black and White": It comes in 256 shades of Gray. And it is my opinion that this affair has another answer than either: "Mylow is a scammer!", Or that "Mylow is telling the truth!". Just where this gray-scale leads us, is the ultimate Question.
Comment