scalar wave detector

[Inquorate]

The scope probes must be shielded as well.

Further, it might be true that the scope itself should LIVE in
a faraday cage too and be powered by a supply quite
separate from your circuit.

The common-ground between your circuit and the scope
presents a problem-challenge.

Companies like Tektronix sell all sorts of wild & crazy & expensive
probes for scopes -- operative word here being "expensive".

You might be able to "convert" signals to light with opto-electronics,
rather inexpensively, and have a fibre cable over to your scope.
Let the scope be on the receiving side of the light beam, converting
back to voltage. This is probably a cheaper way to go and the
oscilloscope can probably live OUTSIDE a faraday cage.
Fibre cable may be easier to sheild electro-statically.

Morpher, the probe leads are covered in foil and my scope has an actual ground as a copper pipe in the dirt outside. However, I probably should have it plugged into the isolation transformer. Thanks for the advice

[morpher44]

Dr. Robert K. Golka

Tonight I learned about Dr. Roberto K. Golka, who
apparently has spent many years trying to figure out
how to reproduce the ball lightning affect:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...DHeDgeFhLH4SAQ

[morpher44]

caduceus coil again...

A friend sent me this link...

Dailymotion - ScalarWaves - une vidéo Hi-Tech et Science

[morpher44]

use Rodin coil?

I had a thought for an experiment.

The scalar wave detector would have you place a magnet
in a coil, and then the two are placed in a Faraday cage.

How about using a Rodin coil for the pick-up coil?
One interesting thing about the Rodin coil, as a pick up,
is that the singularity area is highly sensitive.
So place the magnet in the center, take care
to also prevent mechanical vibrations by placing
the "receiver" unit on a surface that is highly massive
such as a large concrete floor.

Then, sit back and let the universe PING your magnetic.

If there is a small earthquake, the vibrating magnet could also
serve as a earthquake detector -- perhaps giving an early
warning of fore-shocks.

[morpher44]

LIGO - gravity waves

LIGO - Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory

Watch "Einstein's Messengers: An NSF movie about LIGO" if interested.

[morpher44]

Coils instead of Lasers...

Thinking out loud here...

LIGO uses laser interferometers.

Suppose you designed a device with two LONG cylinder coils.
One going North say, and another going EAST.
If they both had the exact same length of wire,
and had a very large number of turns,
a wave entering to both should appear exactly the
same when output at the end point.

Using a comparator of these two signals, one from the
EAST coil and one from the NORTH coil might detect
subtle signal differences in the coils.

Going further with this idea, there could be coils
arranged this way in every compass direction providing
a larger detector footprint.

Instead of using laser interferometry, why not use coils and
go for lower frequency disturbances?

[morpher44]

constructive interference detection...

Another idea....

Stiffler's SEC exciter is this oscillator that emits several in-phase frequencies up and down various bands.

Suppose what is wanted in terms of scalar detection is not
a detector that detects ONE frequency ... but rather
a detector that observes the reception of the same WAVE
(same phase, same shape ... not necessarily same amplitude),
occurring on several frequencies within the spectrum.

When such waves are broadcast, some matter may respond
by resonating to certain of these frequencies. In that matter
may be set up a constructive interference that builds to a
large AMPLITUDE as the full effect of these various
frequencies interplay on the mass.

The mass will be "tweaked" by this interference pattern ...
and will SING back!!!

[morpher44]

constructive interference and power-of-two harmonics

I was just thinking about the Hubbard Coil and how
it uses power-of-two harmonics for some reason.

Power-of-two harmonics are very nice for constructive interference.
8 become 4 which can become 2 which can become 1...

Suppose you had a radio receiver design that wasn't
designed to receive ONE frequency ... but rather
had a very wide-band filter and could discriminate
several frequency which are a power-of-two relative to each other.

When thinking of NMR, to keep life simple, it is discussed with
respect to one "fixed" and constant magnetic field.
But the real-world doesn't work that way.
A magnetic field has a shape that blossoms out and
vibrates and distorts.

The detection of a power-of-two harmonic transmission
implies more of a conic shaped field with
small radius spin, then a larger radius, etc. etc.

If nature works using vortexes, then some natural
phenomenon may transmit on several frequencies simultaneously
and may have subtle effects on mass that appear
like gravity waves.

A wave can spin particles and yet also have another velocity component (another frame of reference) that have a scalar direction.
The vortex can MOVE and the spin can be maintained as it travels.

So perhaps ... just throwing this crazy idea out there ...
what we are looking to detect is the passing of a vortex that
is creating a local spin at several diameters simultaneously.

[Inquorate]

Worth a shot

Another idea....

Stiffler's SEC exciter is this oscillator that emits several in-phase frequencies up and down various bands.

Suppose what is wanted in terms of scalar detection is not
a detector that detects ONE frequency ... but rather
a detector that observes the reception of the same WAVE
(same phase, same shape ... not necessarily same amplitude),
occurring on several frequencies within the spectrum.

When such waves are broadcast, some matter may respond
by resonating to certain of these frequencies. In that matter
may be set up a constructive interference that builds to a
large AMPLITUDE as the full effect of these various
frequencies interplay on the mass.

The mass will be "tweaked" by this interference pattern ...
and will SING back!!!

That is certainly worth playing with. Cheap, etc. Would be difficult to shield hertzian waves but could be cheap.

Thanks for sharing your ideas morpher

I have another idea, but will do some tests first; involving capacitance and dielectrics as I'm now unsure if scalar waves have a detectable magnetic imprint

Love and light

[morpher44]

Spiral

OMG ... check this out!!!

Mystery as spiral blue light display hovers above Norway | Mail Online

[Raui]

Now that.....is......plain.......awesome. What is pathetic is they are putting the blame onto a failed Russain test missle. That looks like a massive implosion, missiles explode if I am not mistaken. WOW thank you morpher!

Raui

[Aromaz]

Light travels at 299792458 meters per second.

However, do scalar waves travel faster?

I was reading Tesla's patent #787412. In that patent he has
the curious statement when discussing how to PUMP a wave
into the earth from his coil:

"Third. The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be not less than one-twelfth or probably .08484 of a second and which is taken in passing to and returning from the region diametrically opposite the pole over the earth's surface with a mean velocity of about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second."

471240000 / 299792458 = 1.572 x speed of light

So I'm wondering why Tesla came up with such a FAST speed.
Also, the speed of light was known to him, I would think, in 1905.
Hippolyte Fizeau measured it in 1849.
Leon Foucault improved on Fizeau's method in 1862.

Tesla's measurement may have been off a bit .... OR ... he
was measuring something that went FASTER than light.
I suppose Occam's Razor would have us believe that Tesla was WRONG.
But that is no fun. :-)

@morpher44 !!!! Where did you get this quote of Tesla? Can you possibly send me this whole document? This is great revelation and possible proof of something I suspect a while. Tunguska Russia 1908! Man this is HOT!~

During 1908 Tesla visited his other tower which was in Canada. That region corresponds geometrically with almost exact cross-pole and distance to Tungguska. Tesla might have used the North Pole as mirror. Why, that is another revelation - the poles are such energy righ, they can act like mirrors! Somewhere else here on energetic I posted much more about that a few months ago.

Now, witnesses said there were a number of 'fireballs' I think Tesla did use scalar waves, but at pulsing frequency and when they hit in resonance they actually forms a fireball like energy.

And when he learned of what actually happened, he got scared and dropped the whole experiment. Later references and regret in his life most probably hinted to this experiment.

[DrStiffler]

OMG ... check this out!!!

Mystery as spiral blue light display hovers above Norway | Mail Online

Wonderful find.

If this does not turn out to be a hoax (I doubt it) then it would be a great example of a 'Temporal Vortex Wave caused by Torsion Wave Excitation'. Hope it is real and hope to hear all pundits try to explain it.

[ren]

I read this story just then. Very interesting.

Does it appear to anyone else that the photos seem to portray the lights being projected, in some way?

Regards

[Inquorate]

Conspiracy theory

Could be testing a holographic broadcast. Take note of the public reaction, etc.

War of the worlds here we come