Marko Rodin

[rave154]

We are still going about this Rodin coil thing with conventional thinking. I know I'm guilty of it but it's hard to break out of what we know and what has been ingrained in us. One of the ideas I had was to have a custom toroid made out of NdFeB and then wrapped this with high voltage wire in the 3, 6, and 9 space then magnetized the toroid with the same energy you would to make a N52 neodymium magnet. Then take off that wire and wrap the toroid with copper wire according to the best Rodin coil method in the 1,7,4 and 2,8,5 space to get "magnetricity".

This may not work at all but I know there's a way to use Marko's work to get pure and free energy without having to input anything other than intention and design! Scientists today scoff at the phrase "Perpetual Motion" but they are not looking around. Electrons are in perpetual motion around their nucleus as well as our planets and galaxies. Perpetual motion is everywhere. All we have to do is build a device that mimics the universe and we have it. Marko has provided the math. It's up to us to interpret it and be the New Builders.

Jamie

Jamie,

I like that idea very and i agree, i have found myself "stuck" too, its kind of hard to break past the "theres no point even trying THAT, it just wont work, it sounds too ridculous" kind of blockage.

Having said that, i still have a gut feeling that due to the fact that the coil produces...well....lets just say...a more intense/focused field than a standard coil (with less wire i might add ) that with the right "pickup" design something could be built that while it might not power a house or even a bank of 60 watt bulbs, it would serve as another "proof of concept" device to get sceptics interested.


David. D

[rave154]

I just found this,

I'll post it simply because it's pretty ( and maybe more )

YouTube - Torus

[morpher44]

Rodin Thermopile?

While reading the Stubblefield thread,
one member (@Tishatang) pointed to this book found on
scribd.
The Boy Electrician Reloaded

What a thrill to see this old book again. I remember seeing
it in the early 60s when I was very young.

Chapter XX "How Electricity May be Generated From Heat"
got me thinking..

In that chapter is presented a simple thermopile that
you can build that the books says can produce upwards
to 6 volts, .25 amps (1.5 watts). I find that
pretty hard to believe ... but upon researching thermopiles
from the past, some designs could produce pretty
decent power.

It occurs to me that the Rodin winding style may present
an opportunity for "pickup" ala thermpoile.
If a Rodin coil could be wound such that the wires
bridge from copper to silver ... or copper to steal ..
just at the aperture - that this would not be unlike what
is described in chapter XX.

A Rodin could be placed over a flame and possible generate
electricity in this way.

If the OUTER diameter was essentially a heat sink ... there
would be a temperature differential set up between
the outside diameter windings ... and the inner windings
exposed to the heat source.

Further, as current is generated, a vortex shaped magnetic field
would build around the flame ... possibly keeping the ions
in a magnetic bubble.

Just throwing out yet another crazy "Rodin" idea.

[jtstatic]

Hmm... what do I see again, if it isn't the shape of cubeoctahedron - looking from top with one of the square shape sides facing towards you.



Here could be the crossing of two planes from the cuboctahedron:



Here's also another interesting finding, just recently updated at Energy Research

Again same shape, just from different angle. The cuboctahedron has inverted pyramids facing in. If you connect two at these sections you get like cells connected together..

I believe this is the common problem - if your mind gets fixated on something, you just start seeing "evidence" everywhere. I confess this kind of behaviour so please don't take me too seriously. But it still makes you wonder..

[rave154]

For Jamie, Jbig, Wdot & others

I just found that the signal generator part of Virtins Multi-instrument has user-defined waveforms section.... :-)

so i'm about to program a 3 part DC square-wave consisting of 1/3rd A-ON, followed by 1/3rd B-On....followed by 1/3rd A+B OFF...i will compare this in various ways ( coils, magnets, multi-meter etc ) with a 2 part square-wave from consisting of 1/2 A-ON, 1/2 B-on.....and see if there is any difference/gain in allowing a 1/3rd "space" for the God-part so to speak.

Ive attached an image to show the 2 waveforms ill be using for comparison.

The "space" of 1/3rd left for the "god" winding is shown in orange on the lower 3-part waveform.

David. D

[rave154]

Seems like Alex Petty has been VERY busy lately :-)

Energy Research

Mapped the Rodin torus number map onto......of all things......a pyramid

and things connected to pyramids, i'll say no more

[Dogood]

i noticed a severe degredation in the square wave being put out by my soundcard at higher freq's

I have tested the quality of my soundcard output which is pretty good (soundblaster Audigy 2) thrue the entire sound spectrum 10hz to 10khz and I must say the quality is bad. Especially at higher frequencies but the lower ones weren't too great either.

I just found that the signal generator part of Virtins Multi-instrument has user-defined waveforms section.... :-)

I hope this will do the trick. If not I will look at it again. I was thinking an oldschool sequencer could also be used for making the waves. I remember one called FastTracker 2 had a wave editor in it.

[Vortex]

Hmm... what do I see again, if it isn't the shape of cubeoctahedron - looking from top with one of the square shape sides facing towards you.



Here could be the crossing of two planes from the cuboctahedron:



Here's also another interesting finding, just recently updated at Energy Research

Again same shape, just from different angle. The cuboctahedron has inverted pyramids facing in. If you connect two at these sections you get like cells connected together..

I believe this is the common problem - if your mind gets fixated on something, you just start seeing "evidence" everywhere. I confess this kind of behaviour so please don't take me too seriously. But it still makes you wonder..

jtstatic, Energy Research is a great find.
"so please don't take me too seriously" .. that's nonsense talk!
Your observations are needed.
Observation is something those in the heat of battle sometimes greatly lack
due to the awe of it all.
Making connections is of great help to those fixated with tunnel vision upon
what they are currently doing ..
Somethings are hidden in plain sight and are hard for most to see.

[jtstatic]

Here is a tone generator I've found earlier that allows you to play simple waveforms simultaneously. The sound quality is not too great though:

http://www.rangeguide.net/tonegen/tone.exe

Here is a (long) thread discussing solfeggio scales, rodin math etc.

"Sacred Solfeggio" Frequencies - Abrahadabra Forums

Btw, tried playing with the solfeggio scales. I noticed one interesting thing, if you play the signal in stereo and place the signals starting with same number in left ear and right (try with headphones) you get a nice stereo effect. Also a sweep from 147/174 to 936/963 and also in reverse sounds / feels interesting.

For example:
left right
147 174
258 285
369 396
417 471
528 582
639 693
714 741
825 852
936 963

[MythMath]

I was the initiator of that 'Solfeggio Tone' thread and another
one (The 81 Lo Shu Tones within the 729 Fabric) that builds
on the research from that original (Solfeg) thread...

The reason I joined up here was to present our research and
to see if there is in fact any connection to the Rodin Tech...

I would suggest that anyone who may be interested should
start with the 'Lo Shu Tone' thread as it represents a
culmination and distillation of the many things we uncovered
in the much larger and more difficult to navigate 'Solfeg' thread...

[jtstatic]

Thx mythmath, I might want to join abrahadabra also to discuss this further as I have some background in music myself (more like a previous hobby of mine, not really a professional). I didn't know of the other thread but I did read through the first thread and found some great inspiration from it.

-edit- Removed to avoid confusion (that happens when typing late at night) will get back to this later -edit-

btw, it's interesting how all things start coming together. There is also an interesting thread about Rodin on David Icke forum. Now I'm not particularly fond of Icke myself, but there seem to be some bright individuals there. Here is the page that led me to the fibonacci series:

The Vortex Maths - Marko Rodin Thread - Page 9 - David Icke's Official Forums

[jtstatic]

Musical Note Frequencies

What are the frequencies of music notes?

Frequencies of Musical Notes

Here are a couple of useful links to better understand the correlation between the found "sacred frequencies" and the ones we generally use. I sure know I needed the rehearsal , so maybe useful for someone else too..

I actually never thought about the frequencies and have always played by ear (like I said earlier I'm not educated in music). What I found interesting though is how I usually always liked to play melodies around C4 G4 and C5 D5 D#5. C5 is very close to 528 which is also known as "the DNA repair frequency", and C4 also interestingly hits very near 258.

What is also interestin is grouping of A's -> 110 220 440 880, which would be 111 222 444 888 in sacred freq. And this leading to 3 6 12 24.. Now I wonder where I've seen that before..

Anyway I think I'll leave it to that for now and leave room for other discussion.

[Cloxxki]

When talking about frequencies, we're always using the second as time base. Vibrations per second, right?
Is the second something random, or cosmic? And should we have used another time base (let's say a "breath's" time), would the math of the frequency numbers still exhibit itself in beautiful patterns?

[MythMath]

Many of us have read that '528 is the DNA repair frequency'...

What does that actually mean...?

And what is the original source of that data...?

I've looked online and I only find vague references to
Horowitz, etal. and 'it has been reported that biochemists
have found that 528hz repairs broken DNA (etc)'...

I've not found any substantial proof of the statement...

[jtstatic]

'it has been reported that
biochemists have found that 528hz repairs broken DNA (etc)'...

I've not found any substantial proof of the statement...

Yeah, that's precisely why I added the "" -marks.