Joseph Newman Principles

[Pierre phee]

Hello Ted,

I am Pierre a new member from Quebec. I want to contact you and this was the only way. I saw part of your trying, in harvesting Schauberger.

Been there and basically did the same as you. But I found few interesting things, which prove schauberger.

I am actually missing ressources to pursue the work, but I can probably help you making big step quickly.

Contact me if you are interest in.
Pierre
phee@videotron.ca

[dave_cahoon]

Hi patmac, thanks for reply. I just noticed Bedini in the tesla switch thread made reference that the energy is outside the wire and prove of this I think comes when a batteries terminals become corroded and even though one may clean the actual contacts that touch the battery posts, it does not matter because the flow of energy is external to the wire. In counter rotating spirals just outside the wire. The more wire the better.
peace love light
Tyson

Hey, very good observation! Try a copper aluminum contact connection and run power thru it for a few years. Its (also) as if they mix. (like, etron goes -> and the atoms <- tho at a vastly slower speed). From what i understand the electron flowing thru a wire move at a snails pace. BUT power moves at +- c

Seems were defiantly missing some fundamentals.

[Vinyasi]

How to Replicate the Byron Brubaker’s Modified Upgrade of Newman’s Flawed Original Design

And…
Free Energy, aka Imaginary Power

[Vinyasi]

Text of a series of emails sent to…

jref@randi.org

In regards to…

Commentary, March 22, 2000 - Crackpot Inventions (randi.org), at…

https://archive.randi.org/site/jr/03-22-2000.html

I have this to say about the Newman device…

Has anyone tried to recreate Joseph Newman’s perpetual motion machine

In short...

Newman's original design was not overunity since it was hampered by the low frequencies of his use of iron permanent magnets. An iron cored transformer is well-known to reduce the frequencies which that transformer is capable of entertaining. Air-cored coils, such as contained within modern-day so-called “Tesla coil” devices, can oscillate at much higher frequencies due to their lack of an iron core material their coils.

Byron Brubaker suggested to Newman (in private) to replace his permanent magnets with canisters constructed of electrically insulative materials filled with helium and the outside of these canisters was to be wrapped with an open coil. If you look at the picture at the top of my blog post, up-above, you'll notice that those look like PVC sewage pipe canisters fitted with end-caps and painted the color of brown. I would guess that he may have used a latex paint so as to electrically isolate the open coil from the much larger air-core, copper coil (which his device was famous for) and prevent arcing.

The only reason Byron contacted me was due to my having posted my findings of having simulated the Newman device in LTSPICE according to the specifications which were outlined within Newman's book, 8th edition, which I purchased (used) for $400.

My conclusions? It was not overunity, nor could it become overunity even at the suggestion which Newman made in his text of "just make it bigger". I tried all combinations and permutations of capacitances and inductances with no good results.

Yet, if I sped up the revolutions to 6 million RPMs, it became overunity. I was dumbfounded. Yet, I posted my data.

Then, along comes Byron and fills me in as to how my results could be built and how they were built in the Newman device to satisfy my data.

The significance of the Newman device is not any sort of electrical gain since the gain is minor although it does help sustain his device to constitute being a self-runner.

Perpetual motion machines break down and stars blow up so that very little in the universe could be considered perpetual motion.

But since the reversal of current sent back to the battery pack of less than one ampere manages to top off the batteries and prevent them from becoming discharged over time, it *is* a self-runner and the voltage of his massive air-core coil is never depleted. That massive voltage can then deliver a mechanical gain making his device a torque-oriented motor which is not capable of speed and so it could never satisfy the requirements of an electric car as Joseph Newman would have liked it to become, because that’s impossible. But to pump water or run a conveyor belt in a manufacturing plant is definitely a strong possibility for the application of his device when built according to the modifications which Byron Brubaker gave to Newman and Newman put in his demonstration model, such as: “big Bertha”, but he never put this new information in his book and never gave Byron the credit instead claiming that God gave him the information that he (Newman) had received.

Another way to look at [the overunity gain of Newman’s device] is to say that the massive back EMF of Newman’s massive, copper, air-core coil is put to good use because that’s a baby step halfway to becoming something useful, instead of it remaining a problem.

Byron Brubaker’s suggestion turns it into an asset because a small amount of amperage (amounting to no more than a few hundred milliamps) can be sent back to the battery pack to prevent the circuit from ceasing and desisting from its continuous activity.

Newman’s advice (as stated in his book) to make his device bigger — if you’re not getting overunity in your replication of his design — only applies if it is *not* applied to Newman‘s original design contained in his book but is (instead) applied to Byron‘s modification of Newman‘s flawed, original design. Then it is true that making the coil bigger will give you more power if you do not use a permanent magnet rotor but use Byron‘s suggestion, instead.

In other words, increasing the size of his massive coil will increase its back EMF which in turn will increase the mechanical gain of torque that his device is capable of producing and may also slightly increase the amount of amperage reversing and being sent back to his battery pack. But mostly, the gain will be in the output of torque. So, if you want more torque, then you wind a bigger coil.

[Vinyasi]

Commentary on the Malthusian Doctrine of Limited Electrical Resources which our Western Civilization Espouses

Posted onto the following blog, but not approved…

The Search for Things that Matter | Centauri Dreams (centauri-dreams.org)

I'm surprised that the premise for your argument hinges, entirely, upon energy dependency. I was expecting something else. But since I've been studying the subject for over half a dozen years, and have even managed to publish an article in a peer reviewed journal, along with blogging (mostly on Quora as “Vin Yasi”) and podcasting (on podbean as “Magical Me”) and self-publishing on Amazon (as “vinyasi”), I can safely say that it is theoretically possible to harness the imaginary power of apparent (complex) power without depending upon any real source of power any greater than the millionth parts of volts which is readily available from our environment in the form of: trees, plants, animals, and the space which is immediately above the ground, etc. This is not a "source" so much as it is a catalyst for evoking excessively enlarged quantities of imaginary power to erupt from out of the mutual relationship among the dielectric and magnet fields of pairs of coils and capacitors interacting with one another in a parametric manner not unlike that which is elucidated on Wikipedia within its articles concerning parametric amplification in the audio industry.

There are three main categories of implementing the benefits of the colloquialism known as: "free energy" (not to be confused with the same term used by physicists to imply various things of a completely different nature). There is the:

1. Recycling of the imaginary component of apparent power. Jim Murray’s S.E.R.P.S. technology accomplishes this. And the…
2. Harnessing of the imaginary component of apparent power from the environment. This category subdivides into two subcategories of natural sources of imaginary power and manmade in which the latter variety is renamed the "theft of power" from the utility grid. Charles Earl Ammann was arrested for doing this when he crossed into the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C., to deliver his batteryless EV to the Patent Office 100 years ago. And last, but not least, the…
3. Evocation of an undefined limit to the imaginary component of apparent power from out of what has previously been named the: Aether (ether), counter-space, vacuum state and the zero-point thereof, etc. When imaginary numbers are squared, they become negative real numbers and are, thus, enumerated within electronic simulation software as “negative watts” which Jim Murray has renamed “reactive watts” when he coauthored his S.E.R.P.S patent with Paul Babcock.

Negative watts is the generic definition of the generation of power (so named by simulation software and by electrical theorists). Hence, a “free energy” circuit generates its own imaginary power using a paltry sum of real power acting, not as a significant prime mover, but as a mere catalyst. In fact, this is the first citation…

(PDF) Low Frequency Oscillations in Indian Grid (researchgate.net)

…of my peer reviewed article…

The Relativity of Energy and the Reversal of Time is a Shift in Perspective (ijcionline.com)

Now, electrical engineers would love to have us believe that, yes, it is theoretically possible to harness an infinite supply of the imaginary component of apparent power, but with their caveat that it is useless (when retained in the format of imaginary power). This is not true.

The correct term is not useless, but lossless. Yet, when passed through a resistive load, imaginary power becomes real power and can boil water to rotate a steam driven turbine shackled to the axle of a rotary generator and, thus, become useful.

Since no one has proven that imaginary power is a conserved quantity under the laws of physics, imaginary power is theoretically infinite. Thus, there is no excuse for our dependency upon anything else (apart from the minuscule quantity of real power which is required for initiating an abundant imaginary response) unless we have ulterior motives, such as (but not limited to): the production of plutonium for the manufacturing of nuclear warheads, or sustaining the destruction of our environment through the use of fossil fuels, etc.

In other words, there is an ample supply of renewable energy available for initiating an overunity response from a properly designed circuit. And there is no need for the advocacy of additional nuclear power plants. This latter reality turns the Russian war against the Ukraine into a tragedy of epic proportions.

I have performed simulations in which it is theoretically possible to unhinge the real power production from the real power inception – using the imaginary side-step in between these two endpoints – to such a degree that it no longer matters how much input power is available since the same quantity of input can power any quantity of output using zero and infinity as our asymptotic limits.

True, an overunity free energy circuit can become comatose. But it can just as readily blow itself up without warning with anything in between as a possibility of outcomes.

It is also possible that an overunity circuit can strobe its surges in a periodic manner with a frequency of strobing which is fast enough to be tolerated by our power converters prior to being fed into our appliances.

Electrical engineers like to call overunity circuits by their acceptable nomenclature of being “unstable” due the essential tendency for overunity circuits to surge to their self-destruction if not regulated (ie, prevented) from doing so.

So, this is a delicate artistry since it is more difficult to design an overunity circuit than it is to design a “flashlight circuit” since an overunity circuit could more readily go comatose than any other response. And it would be awkward if it were easy to produce overunity and spontaneously explode our universe by accident or by intention. So, Nature makes it a challenge – and rightly so.

But it is not impossible. It just takes more intelligence rather than brute force to evoke an overunity response from a free energy circuit.

We use the brute force of the application of significant levels of input voltage in order to prevent the over-reactance of Foster’s Reactance Theorem in which impedances become negative and our circuit becomes a generator of power.

So, again, it is a delicate artistry which lies outside of conventional training among students of electrical engineering.

Or, in the words of an electrical engineer on Quora, “If it is not commercially viable, then it is not a scientific fact!”

I had to learn my skills by trial and error on various simulators.

The advent of 64-bit registers has – for all intents and purposes – obliterated any possibility for “round-off error” and the false positives of overunity which can result.

Descending from out of the stratosphere of theory, the simplest application of “free energy” is to replicate the Joseph Newman device, not as he directed us to build it, but as Byron Brubaker suggested to Newman how to improve it so that it could become overunity. This, Newman did, but without giving Byron the credit. These modifications were implemented into Newman’s demonstration models (big Bertha), but left out of the numerous editions of his books and was not submitted to the Patent Office.

Vin Yasi's answer to Has anyone tried to recreate Joseph Newman's perpetual motion machine? - Quora

Postscript

I’m not surprised that my commentary was not approved.

[Vinyasi]

what does Newman, Lockridge, Brubaker, and Falstad have in common?/

give up?
The answer is a custom-made rotor in the Lockridge instance… That’s what makes all the difference!

The link among the three, to help us understand all three, is Byron Brubaker’s suggestion on how to make improvements to the Newman motor.

In other words, Lockridge custom fabricated the rotor for his device. Not all of the components were made by his assistants. He actually did more than merely assemble all of the components. He also custom fabricated the rotor and combined it with all the other components that were made for him by his mentally challenged assistants.