If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Inventing incredibly high voltage analogues to the diode and transistors
I think yer on to something here Inquorate. Can you set up a timing circuit to pulse it and how fast can it be pulsed?
What I'm woundering, is the radiant energy still flowing even though the electrons are stopped.
Can you post a Scematic of what you have done?
I'd like to try adding a tank circuit or some such to see what type of spikes are developing
when turning on and off etc. You may be able to develop charging capability and produce power directly????
FrznWtr
What I hope to do eventually, is cause the aether to move independently of the electrons, then have that aether stream impact on a metal surface, where it should then create electrons.
A man can dream, so why not dream big
Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.
@ FrozenWaterLab - drew up the schematic for you; take care as my ignition coil hv plug arced thru the plastic on the top, to the coil inside.. The resistor and pressure release spark gap are important, otherwise if you're magnetically stopping the spark gap diode, things start rupturing.
Hubbard, in addition to inventing this funky coil that was rumored
to have COP > 3, has a patent for a radio-active spark plug.
He claims that the spark gap can be widened to 1/4 inch,
and that the fuel burns much hotter burning up all carbon
and allowing for a weaker fuel mix.
Sounds crazy to me.
But, suppose you could make a spark plug that did do that
using magnets NOT radium zinc sulphite like Hubbard used.
That is certainly a novel way of converting act to dc.. Thankyou for posting it in this thread.
For people who's partners won't let them spend 100 au on an 80kv bridge rectifier, it certainly looks worth investigating..
There appears to be many ways to create more resistance to current flow in one direction than another..
However, while I invite ppl to share such investigations here, I will be continuing with the magnetic vortex idea of suppressing dielectric breakdown across a spark gap.
I hope to use such a transistor type arrangement to investigate in parallel to dr Stiffler's Exciter circuit and Karl Palsness's resurgent inquiries into tesla's hairpin circuit.
The electromagnet is nowhere near strong enough to suppress the dielectric breakdown. I had limited success when I could match the spark gap distance to how fast the capacitors filled, but without a rather expensive electromagnet, I can't see it being reliable.
There's more hope in a variable capacitor and adjustable spark gap setup when an adjustable frequency of discharge is needed..
Back to the drawing board
Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.
How about utilizing the rectifying arc instead of alternating sparc? The problem is you have to keep the temperature low to sustain the arc property. You have to reduce the voltage to be under spark region but not lower than arc region:
This make the solution only work for spesific range of voltage though.
From Theory and calculation of electrical circuit posted by dmonarch.
Comment