Tweet
Richard Hoagland's work centers around 19.5 degrees,
tetrahedrons and spheres.
I sat thru the hours and hours of lecture by
Nassim Haramein. Great talk.
He too discusses the importance of tetrahedron geometry and spheres.
Every planet and the SUN have energy vortexes at 19.5 north
or south latitude -- as predicted by a tetrahedron circumscribed
within a sphere. The corners of the tetrahedron TOUCH at these
places.
How can this knowledge be exploited in a a renewable energy device?
It occurs to me that if someone was able to make a Plasma ball,
with a tetrahedron INSIDE as the filament instead of an inner sphere,
it should be clear that the various 4 apexes of the tetrahedron would
be closest to the surface of the glass, and hence vortex streamers
would emit from those places ONLY -- creating a STABLE effect.
This would be a model of the CORE inside our planet and how,
a large voltage differential would manifest on the surface of
the sphere in places like Hawaii, or the great spot or Jupiter, etc.
To improve the model, the sphere, and the tetrahedron within,
would need to be rotated -- not necessarily at the same
rate. Imagine an inner core of molten metal -- magnetic --
forming into a complex crystalline platonic solid.
Models of these geometries might help us understand how
energy can be extracted from the planets.
I would like to create a thread here to encourage experimenters
to brainstorm on devices that could tap into some of the ideas
that fall out of this hyper-dimensional view of physics.
Pyramid power -- taping the power of the vortex --
exploiting the golden ratio -- fractal universe -- etc. etc.
Inventors such as Hubbard (with his coil), seem to have
tripped over the important of the golden ratio to
electro-magnetism.
Experimenters with high-voltage AC have observed that
streamers and ARCs branch out like fractal geometry.
A good understanding of these geometries are crucial for
coils -- as Rodin seems to have dreamed.
These really feel like the early days of an important understanding
of new science in harnessing natures power--
just as the late 1800s to early 1900s were
the start of the industrial revolution.
tetrahedrons and spheres.
I sat thru the hours and hours of lecture by
Nassim Haramein. Great talk.
He too discusses the importance of tetrahedron geometry and spheres.
Every planet and the SUN have energy vortexes at 19.5 north
or south latitude -- as predicted by a tetrahedron circumscribed
within a sphere. The corners of the tetrahedron TOUCH at these
places.
How can this knowledge be exploited in a a renewable energy device?
It occurs to me that if someone was able to make a Plasma ball,
with a tetrahedron INSIDE as the filament instead of an inner sphere,
it should be clear that the various 4 apexes of the tetrahedron would
be closest to the surface of the glass, and hence vortex streamers
would emit from those places ONLY -- creating a STABLE effect.
This would be a model of the CORE inside our planet and how,
a large voltage differential would manifest on the surface of
the sphere in places like Hawaii, or the great spot or Jupiter, etc.
To improve the model, the sphere, and the tetrahedron within,
would need to be rotated -- not necessarily at the same
rate. Imagine an inner core of molten metal -- magnetic --
forming into a complex crystalline platonic solid.
Models of these geometries might help us understand how
energy can be extracted from the planets.
I would like to create a thread here to encourage experimenters
to brainstorm on devices that could tap into some of the ideas
that fall out of this hyper-dimensional view of physics.
Pyramid power -- taping the power of the vortex --
exploiting the golden ratio -- fractal universe -- etc. etc.
Inventors such as Hubbard (with his coil), seem to have
tripped over the important of the golden ratio to
electro-magnetism.
Experimenters with high-voltage AC have observed that
streamers and ARCs branch out like fractal geometry.
A good understanding of these geometries are crucial for
coils -- as Rodin seems to have dreamed.
These really feel like the early days of an important understanding
of new science in harnessing natures power--
just as the late 1800s to early 1900s were
the start of the industrial revolution.
.
Comment