Rotational force is not pulling things into the center i.e. gravity - it is spitting it out. On the other hand, spinning force, under specific conditions does create magnetism.
@Cloudseeder; see my 'anti'-gravity word again. By failure of another suitable word that is the only one to use for some sort of description. We can not make or create anti-gravity. It is like anti-matter. But what we need is exactly similar to the ionic devices. Something that can re-direct the 'gravitons' (again gravitons is used because of lack of better word at present.)
We need something that will like open the radiant energy in the direction you wish to move, re-direct it around the object and then close it behind the object in such a way that it pushes the object in the direction of the 'vacuum'. So we need some kind of force that will repel and another pole of the same that will attract the ‘gravitational matter’
Thanks for the heads up on: ‘Impossible’ Device Could Propel Flying Cars // Current That is exactly the kind of device I am expecting to emerge in next few years. Sounds stupid? “… create thrust from a Closed System…” Hey, that is exactly what I tried to describe before on this Energetic somewhere? Vimana, mercury gas, ions…
ANY such proven developments will make one extremely wealthy. The hero and villain of the next 100 millennia. To be able to harness and control such force will not only be an extreme weapon of war, but it will generate electricity with no ‘fuel’ no residue – it will move, it will shine, it will create life it will kill. Is that not why Tesla did choose to destroy his notes, not to reveal his knowledge?
Now here is a hidden lead: Why does the floaters work? Because they 'direct' the ions - aka Ionic Devices. So then what are these 'ions', where do they come from? Are those not behaving exactly like electrons ?
So we only need to learn how to control two units of matter - Electrons and Photons - but are they not basically the same?
Like I always say below here ....
@Cloudseeder; see my 'anti'-gravity word again. By failure of another suitable word that is the only one to use for some sort of description. We can not make or create anti-gravity. It is like anti-matter. But what we need is exactly similar to the ionic devices. Something that can re-direct the 'gravitons' (again gravitons is used because of lack of better word at present.)
We need something that will like open the radiant energy in the direction you wish to move, re-direct it around the object and then close it behind the object in such a way that it pushes the object in the direction of the 'vacuum'. So we need some kind of force that will repel and another pole of the same that will attract the ‘gravitational matter’
Thanks for the heads up on: ‘Impossible’ Device Could Propel Flying Cars // Current That is exactly the kind of device I am expecting to emerge in next few years. Sounds stupid? “… create thrust from a Closed System…” Hey, that is exactly what I tried to describe before on this Energetic somewhere? Vimana, mercury gas, ions…
ANY such proven developments will make one extremely wealthy. The hero and villain of the next 100 millennia. To be able to harness and control such force will not only be an extreme weapon of war, but it will generate electricity with no ‘fuel’ no residue – it will move, it will shine, it will create life it will kill. Is that not why Tesla did choose to destroy his notes, not to reveal his knowledge?
Now here is a hidden lead: Why does the floaters work? Because they 'direct' the ions - aka Ionic Devices. So then what are these 'ions', where do they come from? Are those not behaving exactly like electrons ?
So we only need to learn how to control two units of matter - Electrons and Photons - but are they not basically the same?
Like I always say below here ....
Comment