Hi Tyson,
Thanks for the NESARA link in post 193. I had looked up NESARA in Wikipedia, and I'm not at all surprised to see they had the NESARA name acronym stated incorrectly. I have had quite a few arguments with Wikipedia articles, especially 911 related events.
I do like some of the NESARA suggestions, but I'm still opposed to a national sales tax as a replacement to Federal Income tax, even if it is only on "non-essential items." Under the current Federal tax, most Americans actually have no tax liability whatsoever if the tax laws are applied correctly, as pointed out by H2O. As the losthorizons.com articles point out, the only persons who must pay income tax are those who are foreigners earning income in the US, US citizens earning income outside the US, and all persons who are employed by the US government, either directly or indirectly. For example, I worked for the US Postal Service until retiring, and was therefore required to pay income tax. As the losthorizons.com articles point out, a national sales tax really isn't needed to provide operational funds for government, because the Founding Fathers provided adequate means for that through the Constitution. A national sales tax is just an idea that the Ruling Class devised to make people think that it would be better than the Federal income tax, but for the vast majority of Americans it won't be. It's really just another extortion scheme presented in Problem-Reaction-Solution format, with the expectation that the people will actually demand passage of this so-called "Fair Tax."
One of the NESARA proposals, #5 in your post #193 above, I find to be quite alarming. It states that, "Federal Reserve facilities and most personnel are absorbed into the US Treasury Bank System." I see no problem with FED facilities being taken over by the Treasury department, but the FED personnel should not be absorbed and given Treasury jobs. They should be thrown out into the streets - Geithner, and his cronies too. The very idea of FED officials being in charge of, or working at the Treasury department, is very disturbing to me, and I can't see why NESARA would include such a stipulation unless it was designed to benefit the Ruling Class. As for NESARA, I'm left wondering why it is said that Congess passed the Act. Surely everyone in Congress would have realized that they would be thrown out of office if the Act passed, so why would they deliberately approve such legislation? I can see why they would be reluctant to announce such an Act, but why would they approve it in the first place, and where is the proof of such approval? I have seen it stated that the NESARA was initiated in secret by Congress in March of 2000, approved by Congress on September 9, 2001, and again passed in November, 2001, but have yet to see substantiated proof of this. Did it ever actually happen? I'm not convinced, but would like to see what others can dig up on this.
Rick
Thanks for the NESARA link in post 193. I had looked up NESARA in Wikipedia, and I'm not at all surprised to see they had the NESARA name acronym stated incorrectly. I have had quite a few arguments with Wikipedia articles, especially 911 related events.
I do like some of the NESARA suggestions, but I'm still opposed to a national sales tax as a replacement to Federal Income tax, even if it is only on "non-essential items." Under the current Federal tax, most Americans actually have no tax liability whatsoever if the tax laws are applied correctly, as pointed out by H2O. As the losthorizons.com articles point out, the only persons who must pay income tax are those who are foreigners earning income in the US, US citizens earning income outside the US, and all persons who are employed by the US government, either directly or indirectly. For example, I worked for the US Postal Service until retiring, and was therefore required to pay income tax. As the losthorizons.com articles point out, a national sales tax really isn't needed to provide operational funds for government, because the Founding Fathers provided adequate means for that through the Constitution. A national sales tax is just an idea that the Ruling Class devised to make people think that it would be better than the Federal income tax, but for the vast majority of Americans it won't be. It's really just another extortion scheme presented in Problem-Reaction-Solution format, with the expectation that the people will actually demand passage of this so-called "Fair Tax."
One of the NESARA proposals, #5 in your post #193 above, I find to be quite alarming. It states that, "Federal Reserve facilities and most personnel are absorbed into the US Treasury Bank System." I see no problem with FED facilities being taken over by the Treasury department, but the FED personnel should not be absorbed and given Treasury jobs. They should be thrown out into the streets - Geithner, and his cronies too. The very idea of FED officials being in charge of, or working at the Treasury department, is very disturbing to me, and I can't see why NESARA would include such a stipulation unless it was designed to benefit the Ruling Class. As for NESARA, I'm left wondering why it is said that Congess passed the Act. Surely everyone in Congress would have realized that they would be thrown out of office if the Act passed, so why would they deliberately approve such legislation? I can see why they would be reluctant to announce such an Act, but why would they approve it in the first place, and where is the proof of such approval? I have seen it stated that the NESARA was initiated in secret by Congress in March of 2000, approved by Congress on September 9, 2001, and again passed in November, 2001, but have yet to see substantiated proof of this. Did it ever actually happen? I'm not convinced, but would like to see what others can dig up on this.
Rick
Comment