Rick
When listing 'unfunded liabilities', you left out a BIG one; the medical care 'we' provide to (current) members of the military and their families, and the ongoing medical care 'we' are obligated to provide to veterans. With all the veterans of Iraq, and Afganistan, this is a HUGE amount of $, over the next 30 years, and it is difficult or impossible to even estimate how much it will be. Just the current benefits being provided is swallowing up an ever increasing 'share' or Defence dept. funding, and its only going to go up.
I COULD be wrong, of coarse. My 'take' is that the gun control 'legislation' (specifically 'assault' weapons 'ban', and High capacity magazine, aren't intended to pass. To do so would benefit Repubs, and hurt Dems. I THINK they want to propose the legislation, but have it defeated. THEN they can 'blame' the defeat on Repubs. Problem is, if this legislation actually comes to a vote, many Dems will feel they have to vote against it, or lose in their next election. I'm wondering if this might not be a case of hubris, on the part of Dems, and they will have to find some procedural way of NOT having the legislation actually come to a vote; I THINK its all about trying to use the issue, to give them an advantage in 2012, and I'm hard pressed to see how they benefit, from a vote they lose because 'too many' Dems vote against it.
Its ALL 'political manuevering', from both sides. Now they are all starting to 'make nice', as they have decided neither can benefit from continuing to 'deadlock' on financial issues. And, they are looking at some kind of compomise on immigration, as well.
Oh, and isn't another option in your scenarios, where the gov't just continues to make the debit cards 'good', by 'printing'more $, leading to hyper-inflation?
And what about 'creditors' finally moving away from the $, leading to a debt 'crises', for REALS? Just so many ways 'we' (Washington) can F*CK ourselves!
5150; I guess I'm more inclined to 'passive' resistance; if the sheeple 'wake up', all they need to do is agree to stop participating in the 'system', and the 'system' will collapse. There ain't enough cops or soldiers to go door to door, and force everyone to go to work. If as little as 25-30% of people went 'on strike', it can bring down any Gov't in fairly short order. Gov'ts are PREPARED for armed citisens 'storming the gates', but there is little than can do to address such a 'passive' resistance, refusal to 'participate'. Jim
Flush twice, its a LOoong way to D.C. Jim
When listing 'unfunded liabilities', you left out a BIG one; the medical care 'we' provide to (current) members of the military and their families, and the ongoing medical care 'we' are obligated to provide to veterans. With all the veterans of Iraq, and Afganistan, this is a HUGE amount of $, over the next 30 years, and it is difficult or impossible to even estimate how much it will be. Just the current benefits being provided is swallowing up an ever increasing 'share' or Defence dept. funding, and its only going to go up.
I COULD be wrong, of coarse. My 'take' is that the gun control 'legislation' (specifically 'assault' weapons 'ban', and High capacity magazine, aren't intended to pass. To do so would benefit Repubs, and hurt Dems. I THINK they want to propose the legislation, but have it defeated. THEN they can 'blame' the defeat on Repubs. Problem is, if this legislation actually comes to a vote, many Dems will feel they have to vote against it, or lose in their next election. I'm wondering if this might not be a case of hubris, on the part of Dems, and they will have to find some procedural way of NOT having the legislation actually come to a vote; I THINK its all about trying to use the issue, to give them an advantage in 2012, and I'm hard pressed to see how they benefit, from a vote they lose because 'too many' Dems vote against it.
Its ALL 'political manuevering', from both sides. Now they are all starting to 'make nice', as they have decided neither can benefit from continuing to 'deadlock' on financial issues. And, they are looking at some kind of compomise on immigration, as well.
Oh, and isn't another option in your scenarios, where the gov't just continues to make the debit cards 'good', by 'printing'more $, leading to hyper-inflation?
And what about 'creditors' finally moving away from the $, leading to a debt 'crises', for REALS? Just so many ways 'we' (Washington) can F*CK ourselves!
5150; I guess I'm more inclined to 'passive' resistance; if the sheeple 'wake up', all they need to do is agree to stop participating in the 'system', and the 'system' will collapse. There ain't enough cops or soldiers to go door to door, and force everyone to go to work. If as little as 25-30% of people went 'on strike', it can bring down any Gov't in fairly short order. Gov'ts are PREPARED for armed citisens 'storming the gates', but there is little than can do to address such a 'passive' resistance, refusal to 'participate'. Jim
Flush twice, its a LOoong way to D.C. Jim
Comment