Not so much 'Low',as,..DESPERATION
Latest #'s came out, and O'bummercare is DEFINETLY in a 'death spiral' trajectory, if not already in a death spiral; only 4 million signed up, and only a couple of weeks to the 'deadline' where they needed 7 million.
Even MORE 'telling' is the demographics; not enough 'young, invincibles', and too many older/chronically ill. The real 'death nell' will come in 2015, when insurance companies,having look at the 'actuarials', will raise their rates, and/or simply stop writing policies in certain areas.
And the question will then be; "O.K., WHAT are supposed to do, NOW?"
Extreme liberals will chortle and rub their palms, and insist the ONLY answer is to go to a 'single payor' nationalised healthcare system; bacally, delete "Over 65 from the medicare law.
But, Dems are looking to LOSE, in next election (midterm), in part BECAUSE of O'bummercare. Once 'wound', we can't/won't simply unwind this whole thing, at least I can't see it.
The individual mandate is a false threat, I've already changed my withholding situation, LEGALLY, I might add, so as to get no Fed. return, and therefore give Uncle Sammie no way to penalise me.
What such a disfunctional Washington is going to be able to come up with, is anyones guess, this point. Its going to be,...interesting!
Anyway, his appearence on between 2 shrubs, or whatever it was, is just a sign of how DESPERATE they are, to get young invincibles to sign up. Overall, polls show the young have deserted O'bummer in DROVES. Idealism is fine, but once you start messing with MY 'pocketbook', its amazing how PRACTICAL I can become! LOL Jim
Latest #'s came out, and O'bummercare is DEFINETLY in a 'death spiral' trajectory, if not already in a death spiral; only 4 million signed up, and only a couple of weeks to the 'deadline' where they needed 7 million.
Even MORE 'telling' is the demographics; not enough 'young, invincibles', and too many older/chronically ill. The real 'death nell' will come in 2015, when insurance companies,having look at the 'actuarials', will raise their rates, and/or simply stop writing policies in certain areas.
And the question will then be; "O.K., WHAT are supposed to do, NOW?"
Extreme liberals will chortle and rub their palms, and insist the ONLY answer is to go to a 'single payor' nationalised healthcare system; bacally, delete "Over 65 from the medicare law.
But, Dems are looking to LOSE, in next election (midterm), in part BECAUSE of O'bummercare. Once 'wound', we can't/won't simply unwind this whole thing, at least I can't see it.
The individual mandate is a false threat, I've already changed my withholding situation, LEGALLY, I might add, so as to get no Fed. return, and therefore give Uncle Sammie no way to penalise me.
What such a disfunctional Washington is going to be able to come up with, is anyones guess, this point. Its going to be,...interesting!
Anyway, his appearence on between 2 shrubs, or whatever it was, is just a sign of how DESPERATE they are, to get young invincibles to sign up. Overall, polls show the young have deserted O'bummer in DROVES. Idealism is fine, but once you start messing with MY 'pocketbook', its amazing how PRACTICAL I can become! LOL Jim
Comment