The American Ruling Class

[rickoff]

In several earlier posts in this thread we have talked about the Rothschild bankster family and how they gained and maintained a stranglehold on the economies and natural resources of nearly every nation on this Earth. Today I'd like to post a link to what I consider to be the most complete and accurate account regarding the Rothschilds. This features a detailed timeline covering the period from 1743 to 2006, offers proofs of the conspiracy in the words of the perpetrators themselves, and explains a heck of a lot regarding world history, where the deception began, how it progressed, and where we're headed if this crap is allowed to continue. Since it is a 263 year timeline, it takes considerable time to read all of it, but is well worth the time spent. As I said, we have discussed much of this here in the past, but never in such well connected detail, so I recommend this as "must read" material.

The History of the House of Rothschild (1743-2006) – Anonymous

[Danny B]

3 terms for obummer

The war mongers of the West are absolutely frothing at the mouth at the prospect of Trump as president.
Rense; Watch - New Overview Of Clinton's Failing Health
Emails Show Hillary Severely Ill, 'Always Exhausted'
WikiLeaks Documents Say Hillary Is Seriously Ill
OK, so what are they going to do? Trump could very well engineer a grid-lock in congress so that funding for wars came to an end. Martin Armstrong insists that they will kill Trump rather than risk an end to empire building.

"In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War." Page not found - Waking Times Media

There is almost no chance that Killary will be able to make it to the election. What will they do? It is a possibility that Trump will be killed. Naturally obummer will volunteer to carry on. There is a precedent that might indicate their plans. Israel Primary Canceled, Netanyahu to Lead Likud Through 2023

[rickoff]

Regarding the 2016 elections....

As in every other election in which I was old enough to vote in, making a choice in who to vote for unfortunately boils down to deciding which one of the major candidates is the lesser of two evils. In the last national election, I would have voted for Ron Paul if he had stayed in, but opted to vote for Gary Johnson as a protest vote because I couldn't possibly support the Republican or Democrat candidate. This time around I am not very enthused about any of the candidates. Gary Johnson is out for me because of two factors:
1. He can't possibly win.
2. Like Clinton, he supports open borders.

When faced with voting for one of the remaining two viable candidates, the decision is a no-brainer. I can't possibly bring myself to vote for Hitlery Clinton, as I see her as being even worse than the current usurper-in-chief. It's rather amazing that even the lamestream media is willing to admit that only about 11% of Americans regard her as trustworthy, but of course that's probably because they realize that if they pumped that number up higher then their data would be recognized as being highly questionable. The 11% of Americans they are talking about, if the number is actually that high, are either low or no information voters, or Democrat and Republican Ruling Class party elitists who don't give a damn how dishonest she is as long as voting for her maintains the status quo.

This election is definitely shaping up to become the most provocative one in American history. The American people are largely fed up with the status quo and wanting real change in direction. Trump's rise and nomination is undoubtedly indicative of the people's disdain and distrust of politicians in general, and Republicans feeling betrayed by their party leadership. It also demonstrates, by way of their approval of Trump's many blatant put-downs of media pundits, that the people don't believe much of what they see in the media and are glad to see someone have the fortitude to stand up against the pundits and call them out when it is deserved. The Ruling Class elite, and their controlled media, are constantly barraging the American people with "information" in their effort to shape public opinion. Every day the lamestream media informs Americans of some new poll which declares that Hitlery Clinton is favored by voters over Donald Trump, and many Americans have traditionally accepted such polls as gospel truth. The actual truth is that polls have always been a tool utilized by the Ruling Class elite to shape and sway public opinion. No voter wants to end up on the losing side in an election, and voters who are undecided and uncommitted are prone to make their final decision late in the game and based upon who they believe will most likely win the election. Thus, by constantly reporting manipulated polling results, which are often based upon answers from 100 to 1,000 voters who are selected for the poll because they live in an area known to have a high concentration of Democrats, the liberal media is able to sway many voters who are currently "on the fence."

The question remains, though, as to whether the number of uncommitted voters would actually be able to sway the election in favor of the Ruling Class elite's chosen candidate. If the currently reported polling results are accurate estimates of voter choices, then that would seem to be the case, as nearly all polls being currently reported show Hitlery Clinton having a slight lead over Trump. The strategy behind reporting such polling results, of course, is to get people to believe this is going to be a very close election which either major candidate could win. A "close" election is the best kind for the Ruling Class to stage, because then even though the "losers" feel bad about losing, they end up believing that they almost succeeded, so are more willing to suck it up and accept the outcome which was preplanned all along.

I have no doubts that Hitlery Clinton is by far and away the Ruling Class elite's preferred choice as puppet-in-chief to carry their agenda forward, and there should be no doubt that the Ruling Class elite have the wherewithal to ensure that Clinton wins, but will they resort to those election fraud tactics this time around? Of that I'm not so sure. After all, it is almost a certainty that it is now too late to prevent an economic collapse unless Congress was to do all the things necessary to prevent that (eliminate the Federal Reserve and IRS, declare the so-called "national debt" to be bogus, have the Treasury print debt free currency, and drastically cut the size of federal government by eliminating all bloated or unnecessary agencies and programs), but in reality what is the chance that Congress would do that no matter who is elected? Therefore, the Ruling Class elite has the rather comfortable option of allowing Trump to win, and then blaming Trump, and all those who elected him, for all the nation's ills when the economy implodes. And thus, to me at least, this seems like a better option to them than ensuring that Clinton wins, and I can easily envision this as having been their plan all along. After all, if this wasn't their plan, then why would they have chosen Clinton, of all people, to be their anointed one? Surely there are countless other Democrats who have far less baggage, scandals, and controversies surrounding them, and yet Clinton was assured the Democrat nomination well before the primaries even began. Sanders was the only one who offered Democrat voters any alternative to Hitlery, but pretty much handed her the nomination when he refused to use her involvement in the Benghazi scandal against her. And we all know that the DNC did whatever was necessary to ensure Bernie's defeat in the primaries. There can be no doubt that Hitlery Clinton was chosen by the Ruling Class elite, and chosen years ago, to run as a candidate in this election, and the only question should be why.

Interestingly, there is a new nationwide poll that none of the media pundits are talking about. It sampled 1,000 registered voters in every state for a total of 50,000 participants, and intentionally selected the participants in a ratio of 33% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 34% Independent, based upon voter registration rolls. This ensured a totally fair and honest outcome. What's so interesting about the results of this poll is that it shows Trump leading Clinton by 67% to her 19% among these voters, a more than 3 to 1 margin. Of course 67% + 19% = 86%, which shows that another 14% of voters are either undecided or plan to vote for an alternative party candidate like the Libertarian party's Gary Johnson or Green party's Jill Stein, but it also shows that neither of those candidates, which are the major alternatives, can possibly win. If the vote was simply between Trump and Clinton, the poll figures could be revised to 78% for Trump versus 22% for Clinton, and that's quite a gap.

Read more about this little known poll at this link.

[aljhoa]

History In The Making

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bemC4oAQEaw[/VIDEO]

Al

[Danny B]

New movie plots

"Meet the Jews Who Own Hollywood and the Media — “As a proud Jew,” says Joel Stein, “I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.”
Evidently, the jews are on a mission to provide new stories and plot lines for the Hollywood producers.
"Ex Mossad chief: Israel's biggest threat is potential civil war, not Iran "
“Internal division,” Pardo said, “can lead us to civil war – we are already on a path toward that"
Ex Mossad chief: Israel's biggest threat is potential civil war, not Iran - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

OK, so internal divisions are growing. What are they doing to relieve that?
"FINALLY! Israel Officially Calling For Third Temple to Replace al-Aqsa Mosque!"
“The first Temple was destroyed in 586 BCE, the second Temple in 70 CE"
"He then went on to say “Al-Aqsa Mosque is currently in the place of the temple, despite the temple being much holier than it. Al-Aqsa Mosque is only the third most holy mosque in Islam.”

So far, here are 2 good stories to be made into movies. What about Dontell Jackson. They could make a movie about him,,, ,though they probably won't. We thought they were white - Home
There are several things that could be made into movies.
Israeli protests: 430,000 take to streets to demand social justice ...
Tens of Thousands March in Tel Aviv to Protest Housing Shortage ...
Israeli Police Try to Shut Down Another Huge Tel Aviv Peace Protest ...

Lots of ideas for Hollywood to follow up on. Imagine them tearing down Al-Aqsa Mosque.

[rickoff]

With the 15th anniversary of September 11, 2001 events approaching, we are sure to see the same old news stories in magazines and TV specials that are designed to support the "official" story while mocking those who question that account. Interestingly, though, the 9/11 truth movement is making significant headway in its efforts to expose the "official" story for what it is. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are distributing a new publication titled World Trade Center Physics to 35,000 scientists and engineers during the 15th anniversary.

On the international front, the magazine of the European Physical Society, Europhysics News, has published a 3,000-word feature article by Dr. Steven Jones, Dr. Robert Korol, Tony Szamboti, and Ted Walter, entitled 15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses. Europhysics News is a highly respected publication within the European physics community, and has a circulation of about 25,000 copies per issue. You can read the online version of this article here. This report exposes many holes in the "official" story, and perhaps most notably those that are found in the collapse theory proposed by Zdenek Bazant, who is recognized as the main defender of that story. Bazant is a professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science at Northwestern University, and published a report in 2002 detailing his collapse theory. NIST accepted and pronounced that theory as being the best possible explanation for the collapse of WTC Building 7, so never adequately investigated the actual cause of Building 7's near freefall collapse into its own footprint. NIST's investigation began with the predetermined causative factor being fires, and never even considered the far more likely theory that the collapse was brought about by controlled demolition. NIST's objective was to convince the public that the "official" account of the WTC collapses was correct and indisputable, and that no evidence existed that would point to any other conclusion. More than 2,600 architects and structural engineers disagree with NIST and Bazant, and very thoroughly and convincingly explain why. This is well worth reading, and passing along to others.

[rickoff]

Trump's trip to Mexico

There was much talk by TV news pundits this morning regarding Trump's acceptance of an invitation to meet with Mexico's president today. It was supposed that the conversation between these men would naturally focus on Trump's earlier statements about building a wall and having Mexico pay for it. The pundits, of course, would have us believe that this was foolish talk by Trump, and that Mexico would never agree to paying the bill for such a construction project. Former Mexican president Vincente Fox, appearing in a televised interview with Jorge (pronounced *****-hey) Ramos in February of this year, said, "I'm not going to pay for that f**king wall."

Now there's a new Mexican President, and he probably has a similar attitude regarding the proposed wall, but are the TV pundits correct in assuming that Trump couldn't force the Mexican government to pay for the wall? Well, yes and no. The US government, or more correctly the US taxpayers, would pay for the wall, but Trump would facilitate the building of the wall (estimated to cost around $8 Billion) by deducting the cost from the normal amount of foreign aid given to Mexico, so in a very real sense Mexico would bear the cost. The problem with this method, of course, is that Mexico receives about $420 million in annual foreign aid from the US, so even if all US foreign aid to Mexico was cut off until the wall was paid for, it would take about 20 years to pay it off. Of course it would actually take much longer than that because the funds to build such a wall would have to be borrowed at interest.

For those who would say that holding back foreign aid to Mexico would have a devastating effect on the Mexican people, that argument has no basis in reality. The amount of US aid which finds its way to the Mexican people filters down to a measly $3 per person, so in reality would have no appreciable ill effects on the Mexican people. On the other hand, though, the Mexican government receives more than $70 million each year in US military aid, and would hate losing that. Therefore, Trump does have a strong bargaining chip to use in his talks with the new Mexican president. I suspect that, during these talks, Trump will impress upon the Mexican president that it is in his best interests to begin tightening up border security in Mexico, in order to slow down and halt the mass exodus of Mexicans and other South Americans who are entering the US from Mexico. Currently, the Mexican government does nothing to stop this, and a change in that open door policy is long overdue.

As we have pointed out in earlier posts to this thread, a physical barrier wall probably isn't going to be an effective answer to illegal immigration. What we really need to do is to eliminate the factors which cause illegal immigrants to come here. I'll talk more about that in another post.

[aljhoa]

Old movie plot

Symbolism in Kubrick's "EYES WIDE SHUT"

EYES WIDE SHUT

Watch Free Movies Online - Free Streaming Movies | fmovies


Al

[rickoff]

EPA's human experimentation program

Here's a link to an article exposing the EPA's illegal human experimentation program. The EPA has used this program to intentionally cause respiratory distress to Americans, and for the simple reason that doing so provides them with what is needed to expand their agency, obtain additional funding, and increase their grasp of power and control over the people. It's a classic example of the problem-reaction-solution tactic being used by a government agency in order to implement something that the Ruling Class desires as part of their agenda. In other words, the EPA uses junk science to sway public opinion towards believing that a certain problem exists, and then uses their experimentation program to actually create that very problem. The public gets scared, demands that "something must be done," and that provides the impetus for the EPA to step forward with a solution to the problem. The solution will be what the Ruling Class had wanted all along - increased spending, higher taxes, bigger government, and more control over our lives.

[rickoff]

More on illegal immigration.......

Something I didn't have time to mention in my post yesterday is that CNN ran a video segment in which they attempted to take the onus off illegal immigration, and make it look like a good thing, by interviewing a commercial landowner who hires illegal immigrants to harvest cantaloupe melons. The landowner said that he would hire anybody who wanted to pick the melons, but that out of the 300 people currently under hire by him, only two are American citizens while all the rest are illegal immigrants. He claimed that the reason he hires illegals is because they are the only ones willing to do this work - that Americans don't want to. He says that he pays the illegals $12 an hour for this work. Of course the premise of this narrative was that illegal immigrants are desperately needed for such harvests, that there would be little to no produce appearing in supermarkets if illegals were not doing the harvesting, and that illegals from Mexico and other central and South American countries only perform work that US citizens will not do.

Everything stated in this CNN "documentary" narrative is bogus, and here's why:

• First of all, the belief that illegals only perform work that Americans won't do is a false notion which has been sustained only because the public has been indoctrinated by political parties and mainstream media to believe this. While it is true that the majority of illegal immigrants start out by working in agricultural jobs, they soon move on to other pursuits such as found in the construction trades, supermarkets, and factories, where they further displace American workers while hordes of new illegal immigrants take over in the harvest fields.
• The illegals who do pick crops know exactly when and where to go to find harvest work, and so many show up to do this work that the commercial farming enterprises that hire them have no need to advertise that they need help. Thus, these jobs never get listed in newspapers or in online postings of job opportunities made available by private or state employment agencies.
• There are great numbers of unemployed or underemployed Americans who could be doing the work that illegal immigrants are currently doing. Can it really be true that none of these people would want or agree to do that work for $12 an hour when current minimum wage is just $7 per hour in most locations, and American workers fill the majority of those positions? I don't think so. Sure, there obviously are many freeloaders who would object to doing any kind of work at all when they can avoid that by sitting on their butt and collecting welfare handouts, but the "government" has created that problem by making it easy for freeloaders to opt for that lifestyle. What if choosing such a lifestyle was no longer an option?

Let's suppose for a moment that Trump wins in a landslide election, has the people's mandate to change things regarding illegal immigration, and that the Congress either has the fortitude or fear necessary to finally do what's right. Here's what could then happen:

• Congress could immediately pass legislation to prohibit "sanctuary cities" from receiving any federal funds, and this would cause those cities to finally expel and deport illegals. The illegals who are currently holding down jobs in those cities would be replaced by Americans, and the funding currently being used to provide all sorts of welfare programs to illegals in those cities would then be realized as immense savings to taxpayers.
• Congress could also immediately pass legislation that would cause those who hire illegals to face stiff fines for doing so, and face imprisonment for any repeat offense. Bounties could be offered to Americans who inform authorities about employers who hire illegals, and those bounties would be paid from the fines collected (say 50%, as that sounds like a fair amount and would be high enough to get a lot of bounty hunters activated). The remaining 50% from the fines could be used to pay for the costs of rounding up and deporting illegals.
• Included in such legislation could be provisions which provide for imprisonment of anyone in a position of local, state, or federal authority who fails to swiftly act to halt the employment of illegals and bring such employers to justice after being notified of violators by bounty seekers. After all, what good is legislation if there is no enforcement?
• Finally, to ensure that unemployed or underemployed Americans do replace the illegal immigrants and fill the jobs that media and establishment politicians say no American wants, it is imperative to establish go-to-work programs whereby those who are currently receiving welfare payments for not working would be assigned to work crews in the agriculture, manufacturing, and construction industries. Quite simply, they must either perform the assigned work or their welfare entitlements end. Once all those jobs are filled by Americans, those Americans who are still unemployed or underemployed could be assigned to work in other positions - day care facilities, public works projects, etc. There is no end to the employment possibilities if those in charge of implementing the go-to-work provisions have enough imagination. Heck, inner city youths (who currently face the highest unemployment rates) could be bused to harvest farms or to sweep sidewalks and pick up roadside litter, among many other possibilities.

As a final thought, in the state of California, which has the greatest number of illegal immigrants employed in agricultural activities, roughly 35% of all youth between the age of 16 and 19 (in other words, those who are the best physically qualified for harvest work) are unemployed. Does this make sense? One hundred percent employment, for all those Americans below retirement age who are physically capable of working at some job, is not at all impossible and should in fact be the norm.

[aljhoa]

As a final thought, in the state of California, which has the greatest number of illegal immigrants employed in agricultural activities, roughly 35% of all youth between the age of 16 and 19 (in other words, those who are the best physically qualified for harvest work) are unemployed. Does this make sense? One hundred percent employment, for all those Americans below retirement age who are physically capable of working at some job, is not at all impossible and should in fact be the norm.

Welcome to CLAWS at whywork.org.
We're a pro-leisure and anti-wage-slavery group of people dedicated to exploring the question:
why work?
This site provides information, support, and resources for
those looking for alternatives to traditional employment.


Al

[rickoff]

Sandy Hoax

Here's a link to some excellent proof of a crisis actor playing two roles in the Sandy Hook hoax - FBI sniper, and grieving parent.

[rickoff]

World Trade Center Physics

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth has produced an informative booklet titled World Trade Center Physics specifically for the purpose of informing other architects and engineers, scientists, and the public, as to why the so-called "collapse" of three steel framed World Trade Center buildings defies the laws of physics and points instead to the destruction of these buildings having been pre-planned demolitions.

The booklet is now available in pdf format as a free Internet download, and I highly recommend that forum participants download and read this publication. The facts presented are directly related to the laws of physics, and are therefore inarguable. That is why this is great stuff to have in hand when talking to people who are of the mistaken belief that the "official" story of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001 was a truthful account. Download the file, and then share the link with as many people as possible so that we can spread the truth and raise awareness of the deception that has been perpetrated against us for 15 years.

[rickoff]

9-11 billboard in NY City is now up

Here's a photo showing the billboard that Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth have put up across the street from the New York Times building. It should make the NY Times editorial staff feel a bit anxious over never having investigated the World Trade Center demolitions after suing the City of New York to obtain the testimonies of 118 Fire Department witnesses who reported hearing multiple explosions.

[aljhoa]

All In The Family

Well, that was post 2,000. I guess that this is 2001.
We are moving towards a complete breakdown in the debt and credit markets at the same time that GOV is prosecuting a war on cash.

"It is not just central banking, but also globalisation, which is demonstrably failing. The same confused, greedy and corrupt central authorities which have set up the global economy for a major bust through their dysfunctional use of existing powers, are now seeking far greater central control, in what would amount to the ultimate triumph of finance over people. They are now moving to tax what ever people have left over after paying taxes. It has been tried before. As previous historical bubbles began to collapse, central authorities attempted to increase their intrusiveness and control over the population, in order to force the inevitable losses as far down the financial foodchain as possible. "

"Such attempts at total financial control are exactly what one would expect at this point. A herd of financial middle men are used to being very well supported by the existing financial system, and as that system begins to break down, losing that raft of support is unacceptable.
Even if the ultimate failure of central control is predictable, momentum towards greater centralisation will carry forward for as long as possible, until the system can no longer function, at which point a chaotic free-for-all is likely to occur.
Dissent is increasingly being criminalised, with legitimate dissenters commonly referred to, and treated as, domestic terrorists and potentially subjected to arbitrary asset confiscation:

"The state will make more and more use of “threats of terrorism” to seize financial assets. It is already talking about expanding the definition of “terrorist threat” to include critics of government like myself.
"Governments do not trust their citizens (‘potential terrorists’) either, hence the perceived need to monitor and limit the scope of their decisions and actions. The powers-that-be know how angry people are going to be when they realise the scale of their impending dispossession, and are acting in such a way as to (try to) limit the power of the anger that will be focused against them. It is not going to work."

"Without trust we are likely to see throwbacks to the 14th century….at the dawn of banking coming out of the Dark Ages.”. It is no coincidence that this period was also one of financial, socioeconomic and humanitarian crises, thanks to the bursting of a bubble two centuries in the making:

The 14th Century was a time of turmoil, diminished expectations, loss of confidence in institutions, and feelings of helplessness at forces beyond human control. Historian Barbara Tuchman entitled her book on this period A Distant Mirror because many of our modern problems had counterparts in the 14th Century." Six hundred and fifty years ago came the climax of the worst financial collapse in history to date. The 1930’s Great Depression was a mild and brief episode, compared to the bank crash of the 1340’s, which decimated the human population. "

"Just as in the 14th century, the cracks in the system have been visible for many years, but generally ignored. The coming credit implosion may appear to come from nowhere when it hits, but has long been foreshadowed if one knew what to look for. Watching more and more people seeking escape routes from a doomed financial system, and the powers-that-be fighting back by closing those escape routes, all within a social matrix of collapsing trust, one cannot deny that history is about to repeat itself yet again, only on a larger scale this time."

"The advent of negative interest rates indicates that the endgame for the global economy is underway. Governments and central banks would very much like to frighten people away from cash, but that only underlines its value
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/20...war-on-cash-4/

Laughing It Up


Al