"You can't 'Con' an honest person"
Its true; if someone really has no interest in getting something for nothing, they can't be conned by a con artist; the con artist uses the victims greed; the fact that the person wants to believe.
Similarly, people WANT to believe what they are being told; thats what makes it work.And in many cases, the people disemminating the disinformation or misinformation ALSO believe what they are saying.
It has to do with the nature of lieing, and of denial; You are a most convincing liar, when you can convince yourself of the lie.Then you come across as totally sincere, and others are more likely to believe.
To me, this is so obvious, with this whole Fuktupishima thing; we're not seeing a prepared, orchestrated disinformation campaign, because the proponents of nuclear energy BELIEVED their own lies. They BELIEVED that something like this could never happen, and so unlike 911, Obamas citesenship, etc. they had no cover story prepared.And what we're hearing is not a result of them conspiring behind closed doors and coming up with a concocted story, its them sitting there in front of the camera, and repeating the lies they've told themselves for 30+ years, even tho they make no sense.
See an 'expert' on day 5 saying "There is no way radiation from Japan could reach US, theres 5000 miles of ocean between Japan and US.5 days later, a concession that radiactive fallout HAS reached the US. Its like watching an alcoholic saying "I don't have a drinking problem!" when to everyone who knows them or observes them its OBVIOUS their an alcoholic. Its denial; that 'river in Egypt'.
But, there are undoubtedly many watching, who listened to the first statement, "No way radiation can reach US" and were reassured, cause they WANTED to believe. And 5 days later, when same experts admitted radioactive fallout HAD reached the US, believed same experts when they said "Its an infinitesimally small amount, and can't possibly cause any harm" because, again, they WANT to believe.
And very, very few want to accept or even think about all the consequences of NOT using Nuclear energy, at all.Of the major disruptions to the economy, and our centralised lifestyle that would be necessary in order for us to just stop using Nuclear energy.Even on this forum, many are wanting to say "Lets come up with alternative forms of energy, that will allow us to continue to use massive amounts of energy, to support our current lifestyle." Few are ready to seriously reconsider the basic premise; the centralised lifestyle.This too, is a form of denial. "I'm all for alternative energy, as long as I don't have to be inconvenienced too much." As long as my job, and current 'way of life' can be preserved." So, "THEY" are 'giving' us what 'WE' want,...and maybe what "WE" deserve, even if it is the shaft.Jim
Its true; if someone really has no interest in getting something for nothing, they can't be conned by a con artist; the con artist uses the victims greed; the fact that the person wants to believe.
Similarly, people WANT to believe what they are being told; thats what makes it work.And in many cases, the people disemminating the disinformation or misinformation ALSO believe what they are saying.
It has to do with the nature of lieing, and of denial; You are a most convincing liar, when you can convince yourself of the lie.Then you come across as totally sincere, and others are more likely to believe.
To me, this is so obvious, with this whole Fuktupishima thing; we're not seeing a prepared, orchestrated disinformation campaign, because the proponents of nuclear energy BELIEVED their own lies. They BELIEVED that something like this could never happen, and so unlike 911, Obamas citesenship, etc. they had no cover story prepared.And what we're hearing is not a result of them conspiring behind closed doors and coming up with a concocted story, its them sitting there in front of the camera, and repeating the lies they've told themselves for 30+ years, even tho they make no sense.
See an 'expert' on day 5 saying "There is no way radiation from Japan could reach US, theres 5000 miles of ocean between Japan and US.5 days later, a concession that radiactive fallout HAS reached the US. Its like watching an alcoholic saying "I don't have a drinking problem!" when to everyone who knows them or observes them its OBVIOUS their an alcoholic. Its denial; that 'river in Egypt'.
But, there are undoubtedly many watching, who listened to the first statement, "No way radiation can reach US" and were reassured, cause they WANTED to believe. And 5 days later, when same experts admitted radioactive fallout HAD reached the US, believed same experts when they said "Its an infinitesimally small amount, and can't possibly cause any harm" because, again, they WANT to believe.
And very, very few want to accept or even think about all the consequences of NOT using Nuclear energy, at all.Of the major disruptions to the economy, and our centralised lifestyle that would be necessary in order for us to just stop using Nuclear energy.Even on this forum, many are wanting to say "Lets come up with alternative forms of energy, that will allow us to continue to use massive amounts of energy, to support our current lifestyle." Few are ready to seriously reconsider the basic premise; the centralised lifestyle.This too, is a form of denial. "I'm all for alternative energy, as long as I don't have to be inconvenienced too much." As long as my job, and current 'way of life' can be preserved." So, "THEY" are 'giving' us what 'WE' want,...and maybe what "WE" deserve, even if it is the shaft.Jim
Comment