The American Ruling Class

[aljhoa]

Law
Statements of law were, in the past, considered to be free from claims of misrepresentation because it is equally accessible by both parties and is "...as much the business of the plaintiff as of [the defendants] to know what the law [is]."[11]. This has since changed and it is now more recognised that statements of law should be treated as akin to statements of fact rather than occupy a special isolation[12]. As stated by Lord Denning "...the distinction between law and fact is very illusory."[13].

Statement to the Misled
An action in misrepresentation can only be brought by a representee. This means that only those who were an intended party to the representation can sue. This principle can be seen in Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377, where the plaintiff sued the directors of a company for indemnity.

Types of misrepresentation
Four types of misrepresentations are identified with different remedies available:
Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false. An action for fraudulent misrepresentation allows for a remedy of damages and rescission. One can also sue for fraudulent misrepresentation in a tort action. Fraudulent misrepresentation is capable of being made recklessly.

In India, the federal laws defines misrepresentation under "Misconception Of Fact". This is dealt with under the Indian Penal Code in Section 90, which states:
Consent given firstly under fear of injury, and secondly under a misconception of fact, is not consent at all.
Misrepresentation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Al

[dutchdivco]

I'm with ya, so far

On the issue of not being able to plead 'ignorance' in order to 'get out of' a contract, any contract signed under coercion is invalid.Any contract in which deciet or deception is used by one of the parties, is invalid.Seems like this would apply to many of the contracts people have 'unknowingly' signed, with this U.S. Corporation.Not wanting to 'jump ahead', Jim

[rickoff]

On the issue of not being able to plead 'ignorance' in order to 'get out of' a contract, any contract signed under coercion is invalid.Any contract in which deciet or deception is used by one of the parties, is invalid.Seems like this would apply to many of the contracts people have 'unknowingly' signed, with this U.S. Corporation.Not wanting to 'jump ahead', Jim

Yes, any contract that one is forced or coerced to sign, can be invalidated provided the signer can prove that he or she was forced or coerced to do so. That would not apply, of course, to the many contracts that we have willfully signed.

I would agree that we have been deceived by the state corporations, and by Corporation U.S., but we would never stand a chance of being allowed to prove that deception in any existing court, whether state or federal. Once we reestablish our original jurisdiction state and federal governments, and those governments reestablish a lawful judicial system, the case can finally be made on behalf of all the people, the corporations' hold on us will be legally broken, and we will be able to reassert our individual sovereignty.

[Joit]

‪USA and Russia Unite To Fight Financial Terrorists In 1863‬‏ - YouTube
‪Tiny Tim Geithner-You will never Audit the Fed‬‏ - YouTube

[aljhoa]

‪USA and Russia Unite To Fight Financial Terrorists In 1863‬‏ - YouTube

Nothing about the banking empire that dwarfed the Roths?! The American banking empire that overshadowed the Jewish empire of Roths. This video gets my thumbs down. The Roths had nothing to do with the Fed reserve. This video is just antisemitic.
tempss 5 months ago



Webster Tarpley exposes czar John P. Holdren
This is the trailer for an interview with Dr. Webster Tarpley. In this interview, Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current Whitehouse science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite's true agenda, world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.
‪Webster Tarpley - Elite's Global Extermination Plan (Interview Trailer)‬‏ - YouTube

‪Webster Tarpley(P1)Elite's Global Extermination Plan‬‏ - YouTube
While there is nothing I like about the Obama administration, Webster Tarpley is a Zionist disinformation agent who uses half truths to spin hate at the Anglo-sphere.
kmg501 1 month ago

Al

[Joit]

Alhoja
Lol, the bad antisemitic World.
But it seems like this Guy 'tempss' does not really Think about, when he states Rothschild have nothing to do with the FED.

He should inform hisself better about History, especially the Banking System from the Rothschilds and they History, it seems he is pretty clueless,
especially when Rothschilds entered 2006 the Chinese Financial Market,
but , yeah right, they do not have something to do with the FED. NOT.
Webster is may not the only Disinformations Agent out there, beside naive Peoples, what thinks anything is OK.

But beside, i found another Story about the Rothschilds here.

Log in

The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, as is documented in the following timeline. However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be. The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so- called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

In some Cases Lies stay Lies, so as Liars stay as Liars, no matter if you call it antisemitic or whatever.

But the main Point from the Video above is actually, that they install her System at any Cost.
They initiate Wars, when someone dont agree, kill Presidents or Politicans and Peoples.
So, you may can change the System once for one Generation, what last 60 Years,
but then they come back and set it up again.
And i actually cant estimate, how far the Mafia Connections are involved there, they may do the dirty Work,
when it is about to kill someone, like it was at the Case from Kennedy,
and dont think, payed Killers are stupid, when it is about, to give out a Statement about, what they did.
But so far it is about the Money and Control they are may all in the same Boat.
Groups like Mafia similar Structures are the first ones, what have the Money to buy big Companys and take the Power over, legal or illegal.

[rickoff]

Part 3(a) of a Historical Review - Where it all went wrong.

As I stated in Part 2 of this Historical Review, things went along rather nicely up until the Civil War, but that's where it all began to go astray. Here is what happened:

1. Congress proposed and ratified a constitutional Amendment in 1865 to abolish slavery. Section 1 of the Amendment reads as follows:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

This Amendment came to be recognized later as the 13th Amendment, but should have been the 14th Amendment since we already had a 13th Amendment (the Titles of Nobility Act, or TONA). Anyways, although this freed the slaves, the question as to how they would fit in with society, and what rights they would have, had not yet been settled. To establish a legal definition for the US Statutes at Large, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was labeled as “an act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.” Note the use of the word “Persons,” and its capitalization, signifying the importance and elevation of the term. The Act was the first attempt to define the term “citizen of the United States,” and stated the following:

“That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Make note of the fact that this not only defined a US citizen as not being “subject to any foreign power,” but also made no mention of the US citizen being a subject of the United States. This was correctly not included, because the People were sovereigns, not subjects. But in 1868 a new Amendment was proposed that would redefine the meaning of US citizen. This later became known as the 14th Amendment, although for the reason stated earlier, it was actually the 15th Amendment. Section 1 of the Amendment stated,

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Take special note of the words which I emphasized in bold text. There are huge problems with this Amendment:
First of all, as discussed beforehand, the People are sovereign. The People are not subjects of, nor subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government, or any government body for that matter, even though they are born in the United States. This Amendment actually turned the relationship between the People and the government upside down. The 14th Amendment made it possible for the People to voluntarily become subjects, and this is what we have unwittingly done through contracts with Corporation U.S. While the 13th Amendment ended involuntary servitude and slavery, voluntarily servitude remained completely legal, and the Fourteenth Amendment is exactly that - if one accepts to be a Citizen of the United States as defined by the 14th Amendment, then one voluntarily subjects himself or herself to the federal government, the new slave Master. Same applies to the several States, in that one voluntarily subjects himself or herself to the State government through certain contracts, registrations, and licenses. As a 14th Amendment Citizen, one is only entitled to whatever the State or federal government grants to him or her, and only has privileges, not rights. Privileges are not unalienable rights, and they can be taken away at any time by the grantor of those rights. Prior to the 14th Amendment, the People were recognized as sovereigns equal to a King or Queen, with a sovereignty superior to that of the government, and subject only to the common law of the other Kings and Queens. The People are superior to the government, while the government is superior to "citizens" as redefined under the 14th Amendment. The inverted relationship defined in the 14th Amendment is absurd and unconstitutional. Before the 14th Amendment, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States used the term "Citizen" as a person having unalienable rights and who is equal to all other persons. The Declaration of Independence stated that the purpose of government, which is instituted by the people, is to secure these unalienable rights, and that the government derives "their just powers from the consent of the governed." So in reality, that consent is a privilege that we the people grant to our lawful government for as long as it faithfully performs the limited tasks we delegated to it, but is a privilege that we may rightfully take away from government "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends," and "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."

The second problem with the 14th Amendment is section 4, which states,

“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, …….. shall not be questioned.”

This was obviously placed in the Amendment at the request of the big bankers who didn’t want to be left holding the bag at the end of the Civil War. To this very day, the Federal Reserve, World Bank, and the IMF, all point to this clause as guaranteeing that we will continue to owe and pay to them all debts that have accrued as a result of borrowing and interest charges.

The third, and undoubtedly the largest problem of all with the 14th Amendment is the fact that it was not constitutionally ratified. There were 37 States at that time, and ratification by at least 28 states would have been required. The ten southern states of Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, rejected the Amendment, so in order to pass it the Congress of the United States of America first expelled all Senators and Representatives from those states. This is clearly a violation of the Constitution for the United States of America. According to Article V, “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” To accomplish ratification without the free will consent of the southern States, the Congress passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867. The Act described the ten Southern States as “rebel States” and declared that, “no legal State governments” existed there. Furthermore, the Act divided the ten Southern States into military districts, subjected them to military authority and to military law of the United States, and all districts would be commanded by a Brigadier General or higher selected by the President of the United States of America. Then Senator Doolittle of Wisconsin described the situation thusly:

“The People of the South have rejected the constitutional amendment, and therefore we will march upon them and force them to adopt it at the point of the bayonet, and establish military power over them until they do adopt it.”

And that is exactly what happened. The so-called 14th Amendment was improperly and unconstitutionally ratified in 1868 under duress. The state of Martial Law that was imposed by the Lincoln administration still remains in effect to this very day and, as I mentioned earlier, is the basis for Presidential executive decisions which allow the President to bypass Congress.

You may want to review the lower section of Part 2 at this time, which explains how Washington D.C. became a US government corporation under the Organic Act of 1871. What is important to realize is that forming this corporation was legal, and that the corporation was owned and operated by the actual government of the United States of America. The President, Vice President, and all members of Congress, served both as duly elected government officials as well as officers of the corporation, and since the corporation’s purpose was to conduct the business of the federal government, there was originally no conflict of interest. By 1913, that suddenly changed. After forming Corporation U.S., Congress began issuing bonds to finance the expenses of running the government. Seven wealthy and powerful families bought up these bonds, and demanded to be paid for them when their redemption date became due in 1912. Neither Corporation U.S., nor its owner – the actual government – had sufficient funds to pay that debt, but the 7 families agreed to accept all of the assets of the nation’s Treasury, along with all of the assets of the Corporation U.S. Treasury, thus “saving” the United States from bankruptcy. By 1913 the government still had no funds to operate Corporation U.S. with, and so they went to the seven families and asked if they could borrow more money. At first the families refused, saying that Corporation U.S. had already demonstrated it was unreliable by failing to pay its previous debt obligation in full, but the families had actually foreseen the situation and opportunity that would arise, and a year earlier had formed a private banking corporation which they cunningly named The Federal Reserve Bank. After a meeting held at Jekyll Island in 1913, the families agreed to fund the government with notes of credit (Federal Reserve Notes) if the government would enact a Federal Reserve Act making the 7 family banking cartel the central bank of the United States and giving them authority to print their notes as legal United States tender. This hideous Act would probably never have passed both houses of Congress had it been properly voted on, but to ensure its passage the vote was hastily called and taken on December 23rd, when most of Congress was absent and on Christmas vacation. Furthermore, while Congress had the Constitution granted right to produce coins or paper currency, the Constitution did not grant Congress the authority to delegate or assign that right to a non-governmental entity.


- continued in Part 3(b)

[rickoff]

Part 3(b) of a Historical Review - Where it all went wrong.

As you can see, 1913 was a very destructive year, not only because of passage of the Federal Reserve Act, but also because this was followed up by passage of the so-called 16th and 17th Amendments, which as I pointed out in Part1 were never properly ratified. These three outrageous changes, which were only made possible by the fact that the bankers had the upper hand and had the politicians in their pockets, were clearly designed to create wealth and opportunity for the banking elite, while at the same time further enslaving the nations citizens to endless debt. These changes accomplished the following:

• The Federal Reserve Act created a monster that granted enormous power and wealth to the already powerful elite families of the Federal Reserve banking cartel, allowing them to perpetually strip our nation of its wealth and resources.
• The so-called 16th Amendment, the “Income Tax” Amendment was established to guarantee a steady revenue income stream that would allow for any funds borrowed from the Federal Reserve to be repaid with interest. Besides being unratified, the Amendment also violated the Constitution. According to Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, it has always been unconstitutional for the U.S. Federal Government to directly tax We the People in their property, wages, salaries, or earnings. It is interesting to note that in the US Supreme Court decision inBrushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 the justices rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes by stating that it,

  "created no new power of taxation" and that it "did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals."

  So you see that we have no obligation to pay these income taxes, other than through contractual obligations that we have voluntarily, though unwittingly, subjected ourselves to in relationship with Corporation U.S. While it clearly would have been illegal for the government to require payment of individual income taxes, there was nothing illegal about Corporation U.S. contracting with people to voluntarily pay a portion of their income to the IRS. Incidentally, because of the 16th Amendment, the IRS workload increased tenfold, requiring massive restructuring.
• The so-called, but unratified 17th Amendment, was unconstitutional and changed the way that US Senators were placed in office. Because of this, all Senators elected by popular vote after 1913 were unlawfully seated to government office, and were only elected as officers of Corporation U.S. This effectively brought our original jurisdiction federal government to extinction. Having these corporate officers installed through popular vote was extremely advantageous to the bankers, because it meant that they could now hand pick each Senator simply by ensuring that the candidate’s campaign war chest was very well funded. This ensured that the Senate seats would go to the highest bidders, and was the very reason why the Founding Fathers had devised a method of Senatorial appointments by State legislatures that would avoid this corruption. As we can see today, the Senators (and all officers of Corporation U.S., for that matter) who take in the largest campaign contributions are the ones who become elected, and as soon as they are elected they immediately begin spending more time on photo-ops and building their re-election war chest than they do on legislative matters.

If you have followed along this far in this review of historical facts, you will understand how, where, and when things went wrong, and who was responsible. Of course the ultimate responsibility and blame lay with the People of this nation, for they either failed to understand what was transpiring, lacked the vigilance to keep a watchful eye on Congress, lacked the courage to demand that Congress abide by the Constitution, or, more likely, failed in all three of these essential duties.

These hideous Acts and unconstitutional Amendments set the stage, and made it possible, for what would follow later on. In 1917, Corporation U.S. entered World War I and passed the Trading With The Enemy Act, and in 1933, after Corporation U.S. went bankrupt, they adjusted the Act to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corporation U.S. As I reported earlier, this Act is still in effect. You may, or at least should, recall that in recent years the so-called Department of Homeland Security has been defining precisely who are enemies by labeling certain groups as likely domestic terrorist threats (white people, TEA Party members, gun owners, and those who cite the Constitution, for example).


In 1935, Corporation U.S. passed the Social Security Act, which in reality was just another scheme to impose more new taxes on the citizens. For each person who applied for a Social Security card since 1935, the Social Security Administration (SSA) created a new entity which had the same name as the bearer of the card, but which was spelled out in all capital letters. All payments, by you or your employer, to the SSA through payroll deductions goes straight to the United States General Trust Fund, not to a Social Security Trust Fund, and not to an account under the number listed on your card. In fact, the card number, and the card itself, is not yours – it belongs to Corporation U.S. If all the Social Security tax payments that were received by Corporation U.S. had actually gone into a Social Security Trust Fund, and used for no other purpose than to pay benefits to the retired or disabled, there would currently be enough assets to pay expected benefits for the next twenty years, but Corporation U.S. has continuously used the assets in the General Trust Fund to fund other programs and pay for debt obligations. Thus, there is nothing left to show for these Social Security assets other than worthless IOU’s issued by Corporation U.S. in the form of Bonds secured by worthless Federal Reserve notes.

The final act of desperation by the government owned Corporation U.S. was the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944, which effectively quit-claimed Corporation U.S. to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as a World War II settlement for war debts owed to the international bankers. As a result, Corporation U.S. thereafter became a foreign owned corporation owned and controlled by Great Britain's Bank of International Settlements. Under the Agreement, the United States Treasury became the Individual Drawing Account of the IMF. Now I know that anyone reading this must be shaking their head in disbelief and thinking, “this just can’t be,” but if you examine the facts you will see that it actually did happen this way. What you have to keep in mind is that it was not the United States of America, nor the Treasury of the United States of America, that was quit-claimed to foreign interests, which would never have been allowed under the Constitution. Instead, it was Corporation U.S (otherwise known as Washington, D.C.), and the Corporation U.S. Treasury, that was quit-claimed to the IMF. Remember too that although seemingly treasonous for our nation’s capitol to be given up to foreign interests, this was done by officers of a corporation, and not by our government, as our federal governing body no longer existed. The government, if it had still existed, could not have made this Agreement. Besides being unconstitutional, it would have been regarded as a Treaty, and would have required the Senate to approve the President’s signature on the Treaty with a 2/3 majority vote, which never happened. In fact, it was the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference which drew up the Agreement and authorized the “President of the United States” (actually the Corporation U.S. president) to sign.

As I stated in post #1981, all of the States eventually lost their original jurisdiction governments as they formed sub-corporations under Corporation U.S. which effectively also made the State corporations possessions of, and controlled by, foreign interests. The people didn’t understand what had happened, the media never reported it, our history books mentioned none of this, and it is quite likely that many of the people who think they are duly elected state legislators or Governors do not understand that they are simply officers of a foreign controlled corporation. The same could be true of many who sit in the nation’s Capitol, although there is no way I can bring myself to believe that everyone there is oblivious to the facts. I would say that all of the establishment career politicians, as well as our so called “President,” are fully aware of the situation. This is the only plausible explanation as to why we see so many of those in Washington, D.C. as having no regard whatsoever for our Constitution, and why the so-called Supreme Court justices will not even hear cases concerning alleged violations of the Constitution (such as Obama’s eligibility, for example). And this is why I believe it would be next to impossible to “fix” what has gone wrong by attempting to correct it from within the rotten framework that currently exists. Remember that we have no lawful government whatsoever, either at the State or federal level, and that we also do not have a lawful judicial system. Even in the US Supreme Court, where justices are appointed to serve life terms, there is no currently seated justice who was appointed by a legally elected President, or confirmed by a legally sitting Congress.

Again, as I stated in my conclusion of post #1981, to right the wrongs that were perpetrated against the People and our nation, we must first stop referring to those in Washington, D.C., and in our State Capitols as our “government.” Secondly, we must work diligently to ensure that our original jurisdiction government is properly reseated (first at the State level, and then the federal). In my next installment, I will explain how this can be accomplished by 2012, in a peaceful and lawful manner.

[rickoff]

Conclusion of a Historical Review - What we can do to right the wrongs

Fortunately for us, the plan of action to restore our lawful constitutional government has already been drawn up by some very capable people, and the plan has already advanced much farther than we might have expected. In fact, the first step in the plan, which involves reseating the original jurisdiction Governors of the 48 states which existed in 1913, is well underway already. It is not necessary to reseat the Governors of Alaska and Hawaii, as these states (which were added by Corporation U.S. in 1959) were never lawfully accorded statehood by a lawful government, since that government ceased to exist after 1913, as explained earlier in this Historical Review. Incidentally, since Hawaii never lawfully became a State of the United States of America, Barack Obama could not possibly have been born a "natural born citizen" of the lawful United States of America even if he actually was born in Hawaii (which still remains unproven). Therefore, if Obama could prove his alleged Hawaiian birth, he would still only be questionably eligible to serve as President of Corporation U.S. under Corporation U.S.’s constitution.

According to currently available information, eligible electors (voters) in nearly all the original jurisdiction States have already successfully elected an original jurisdiction Governor. If your state does not currently have an elected original jurisdiction Governor, please think seriously about running for Governor yourself, or becoming an Elector and convincing a friend or family member to run for Governor. Even if your state already has a lawfully elected original jurisdiction Governor, you still need to get involved with ensuring that he or she is properly re-elected or succeeded by an earnest Governor, and that proper Senate appointments are made. And to ensure that everything remains on track and that the o.j. government does not fall into the hands of traitors and tyrants, or once again cease to exist, we must remain involved and ever vigilant for the remainder of our lives, and teach our children and grandchildren that this is also their duty to carry forward.

Unlike the situation with the State corporation officers, one not need be a person of wealth or influence, a lawyer, or even of superior knowledge, to become an original jurisdiction Governor. The most important factor at this time is to simply have actual and eligible persons so elected by eligible Electors (voters). It doesn't require a horde of voter turnout to elect a Governor, either. In fact, if just one eligible Elector casts a vote for an original jurisdiction Governor, and there is no other eligible candidate running who receives more votes, then that single vote will elect a lawful Governor! As you might imagine, one could register as a candidate and vote himself or herself into office, and this has in fact been done successfully. Naturally, to assure success in the government restoration effort, it would be wise to garner as many votes as possible, and that is why a coordinated effort is needed. You can safely bet that Corporation U.S., as well as the corporation States, are already aware of this plan to take our nation back, and therefore it is quite probable that they will attempt to seat their own hand-picked original jurisdiction Governors who would then attempt to thwart the legitimate movement's efforts. As they say, there is safety in numbers, and obtaining the largest number of eligible Electors to vote for a true candidate will be imperative.

Once all the governors are in place, they can, according to the Constitution, appoint United States Senators, who will in turn have the power to lawfully confirm an Electoral College vote for President and Vice President of the United States of America, and the framework for restoring our constitutional original jurisdiction government will be in place. We can accomplish all of this by 2012 if we simply make a determined grassroots effort. Remember, phase 1, the election of original jurisdiction State Governors is already nearly completed! If you are ready and willing to help move this effort ahead, please Click Here To Help!

The qualification for being an eligible Elector can vary from state to state, but would be spelled out in the various State constitutions that applied before the time of the State becoming a sub-corporation of Corporation U.S. (between the years 1962 and 1972) Generally speaking, the qualifying factors are:

• A minimum age requirement, which is 18 for most states.
• A requirement that one must be a United States citizen.
• A State and municipal residency requirement, which determines who may vote in a State election, and the location where they may vote.
• For purposes of ensuring a properly seated original jurisdiction Governor, an Elector should also be a landowner or Real Estate owner in their State of residence, as there is then no way their vote can be contested.

Likewise, your State’s pre-sub-corporation Constitution is the place to look to determine what the qualifying factors are for a person to run for Governor. This can vary from State to State, but for the most part it is much the same as the qualifications to be an Elector.

The movement to reseat and restore our lawful constitutional government in a lawful and peaceful manner began in 1993 when a Eric William Madsen of Colorado discovered that the original jurisdiction State Governors' seats were vacant. He ran for office as Colorado's original jurisdiction Governor, and was successfully elected and seated in 1994.

After serving one 4-year term, he was appointed to the original jurisdiction Senate of the United States of America in 1998, and his appointment was confirmed by the Governor who replaced him. As other State Governors were elected, and other Senators lawfully appointed, those Senators voted to elect Madsen as the original jurisdiction Senate’s President pro tempore, where, to my understanding, he still serves in that capacity. The Vice President is normally the highest ranking member of the Senate, but in his absence the President Pro Tempore of the Senate presides over its sessions or appoints another senator to do so. Currently, Daniel Inouye of Hawaii is the Corporation U.S. Senate's President Pro Tempore.

For those who might tend to think that the proposed method of restoring our lawful constitutional government is just a wild dream that can't possibly work, consider how far along it already is towards being realized, and that it is the only plan that can lawfully accomplish what needs to be done within the shortest possible span of time. And if you think that we could never succeed at being recognized as the lawful government of the United States of America, and having the full support of the military, just read Eric Madsen's description of the events that occurred after he became original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado:

I lawfully accepted the election and was seated in the original jurisdiction Governor’s seat. At that same time, Roy Romer was elected as Governor of the more commonly recognized private corporation known as, “The State of Colorado” (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to subpoena me to come and testify as the Governor of the original jurisdiction Republic State. I responded to most those subpoenas and so testified. After finding it next to impossible to beat us in court, the Corp. State’s sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that if they could get funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. On review, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who handed the matter over to the Military’s Joint Chiefs for review. About two weeks later, the Chief of the Joint Chiefs responded, “What Governor Madsen is doing out there in Colorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set out to do we will recognize that President of The United States of America as the President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the military and give them full military support.” Though the National Security Council is purely an advisory committee, having no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, they recognized the truth and responded with it to Congress who sent the supplicants away without funding; after that, the Corp. State started to leave us alone. The Corp. State and its courts, the United States 10th District Court, the United States Congress, the United States National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United States of America’s military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election as the original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado.

I don't think that anything more needs to be said about the validity of this plan. What it will accomplish, if we pursue it, is aptly stated by Eric Madsen as follows:

The results will be: All federal personal and corporate income taxes will cease! We will go back on the gold and silver monetary standard (which the nation never left but Corp. U.S. did). The alleged National Debt will be ended and what is owed to us will be returned. The Fascistic Regime operated by Corp. U.S., which they call a Democracy, will be peacefully and lawfully ended in favor of our national Republic’s Laws. This will happen when Corp. U.S. is brought back into our nation’s ownership and control. The real national government will be reset on our Constitution. All of your rights will once again be recognized and secured. Private Land will once again be secure to the individual sovereign nature of the people as their own private kingdoms. And, we will have our nation back!

In actuality, of course, that is just a short preview of the many positive changes that will take place once our lawful constitutional government is restored. The only question that must be asked is whether or not we are ready and willing to jump in, get involved, and ensure that it happens - and happens as rapidly as possible. I, for one, am willing to do whatever it takes, and I hope you will join me.

Best regards to all,

Rick

[Joit]

Another Video about the Exploitation at Capitalism,
actually shows how much they have allready implemented into the System,
and shows, there are Brains out there, what knows exactly, what they do.
‪Marxist and Austrian Class Analysis | Hans-Hermann Hoppe‬‏ - YouTube

And well, for blaiming the Peoples what did or what happens,
the simple Citizens dont have any Control about, what Politicans do, did they ever have? They only can put her Trust in it, that they do something right, in the sense from, at the Concern of the Peoples.
Therefor, more Case 3 is True, you even can see how hard it is today, to bring Peoples Politic closer, or to get them to think about, or even, understand.
And when some greater Minds criticise the System, they get even today mostly Shut down, so far as it can be done inconspicuous.
Brings up the Question, who really needs a Gouvernment.


And again sorry for dutchvico, since he cant watch Videos.

[aljhoa]

"Spin" by Brian Springer
One of the most important films
of the last 25 years
"Spin" "Spin" by Brian Springer
or
‪Media Spin by Brian Springer (Part 1)‬‏ - YouTube


6 Brainwashing Techniques They're Using On You Right Now
6 Brainwashing Techniques They're Using On You Right Now | Cracked.com

eHarmony Video Bio
61,440 likes, 17,359 dislikes
‪eHarmony Video Bio‬‏ - YouTube

Al

[aljhoa]

Fund-Raising Reports Reveal Presidential Candidate Haves -- and Have Nots
By Kathleen Ronayne and Tarini Parti on July 15, 2011 11:33 PM


Fund-Raising Reports Reveal Presidential Candidate Haves -- and Have Nots - OpenSecrets Blog | OpenSecrets


The Federal Reserve Bunk
By Harry V. Martin

CONCLUSION
No Congress, no President has been strong enough to stand up to the foreign-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. Yet there is a catch - one that President Kennedy recognized before he was slain - the original deal in 1913 creating the Federal Reserve Bank had a simple backout clause. The investors loaned the United States Government $1 billion. And the backout clause allows the United States to buy out the system for that $1 billion. If the Federal Reserve Bank were demolished and the Congress of the United States took control of the currency, as required in the Constitution, the National Debt would virtually end overnight, and the need for more taxes and even the income tax, itself. Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
The Federal Reserve Bunk

Federal Reserve Act
Section 31. Reservation of Right to Amend
1. Reservation of Right to Amend
The right to amend, alter, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved.
FRB: Federal Reserve Act: Section 31


Al

[aljhoa]

5.23. In designating the natives of the States, the following forms
will be used.
Alabamian Louisianian Ohioan
Alaskan Mainer Oklahoman
Arizonan Marylander Oregonian
Arkansan Massachusettsan Pennsylvanian
Californian Michiganian Rhode Islander
Coloradan Minnesotan South Carolinian
Connecticuter Mississippian South Dakotan
Delawarean Missourian Tennessean
Floridian Montanan Texan
Georgian Nebraskan Utahn
Hawaiian Nevadan Vermonter
Idahoan New Hampshirite Virginian
Illinoisan New Jerseyan Washingtonian
Indianian New Mexican West Virginian
Iowan New Yorker Wisconsinite
Kansan North Carolinian Wyomingite
Kentuckian North Dakotan
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...:chapter5.wais


A national government is the government of the people of a single State, or nation, united as a community by what is termed the social compact, and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign States, united by compact. The thirty-ninth number of the "Federalist," furnishes the following distinction between a national and federal government:
http://foundinglaw.com/pages/files/P...v.%20KNOUP.pdf


Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality
Section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
Unless otherwise provided in section 301 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens of the United States at birth:
(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
Section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality






Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided whether United States territories were subject to the provisions and protections of the United States Constitution.
Instead, the United States Congress had jurisdiction to create law within territories in certain circumstances, particularly dealing with revenue, that would not be allowed by the U.S. Constitution for proper states within the union. It has become known as one of the "Insular Cases".
Downes v. Bidwell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


182 U.S. 244 (1901)
DOWNES
v.
BIDWELL.
No. 507.
Supreme Court of United States.

The idea prevails with some — indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar — that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments; one, to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise. It is one thing to give such a latitudinarian construction to the Constitution as will bring the exercise of power by Congress, upon a particular occasion or upon a particular subject, within its provisions. It is quite a different thing to say that Congress may, if it so elects, proceed outside of the Constitution. The glory of our American system 381*381 of government is that it was created by a written constitution which protects the people against the exercise of arbitrary, unlimited power, and the limits of which instrument may not be passed by the government it created, or by any branch of it, or even by the people who ordained it, except by amendment or change of its provisions. "To what purpose," Chief Justice Marshall said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 176, "are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation."
Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 190 - Google Scholar

Al

[Farmhand]

What about the Central Banks in other countries

Hi Rick and guys, I am always interested in the information presented here about the Central banking system, for you guys in the U.S. it is the Federal Reserve for us in Australia it is the Reserve Bank of Australia.

My concern is that even if the U.S. gets rid of the Federal Reserve, how would that affect the buisness between the U.S and other countries that are still saddled with the central banking system, seems to me if the U.S. abolished the federal reserve and all the other countries still have thier Central banking system run by the same folks who run the Fed there would be problems.

It appears to me that the only way would be if all countries work together to abolish the whole system or at least a fair proportion of other countries would also need to abolish the central banking system or the U.S. would be all on it's own. And with the U.N. the I.M.F. and the world bank all tied up in the mess it would seem the system is booby trapped. If an attempt is made to disarm it might explode with the rest of the tied in entities/organisations coming to the aid of the fed in some twisted way.

Any thoughts on that scenario.

Seems to me if the Fed were abolished the U.N. the I.M.F. and the World Bank folks might get upset and try to do something about it.

Cheers

[Joit]

Still wonder about, where this Guys do come from, when they did take over Englands Economy with the Event of Napoleon 17xx, and later the rest from other from the other Countrys.

Or is it in the meantime a common Agreement, how you can easy control Masses of Peoples.

For now any Election is nothing more then, you can elect the one,
from which Guy you wanna get controlled.

Another Video from a Bohemian grove meeting, where you see, what sick Peoples that are.
‪Dark Secrets inside Bohemian Grove ( Alex Jones )‬‏ - YouTube