Introduction
The purpose of this topic in the forums is lay out what technical knowledge I have obtained of analyzing Otis T. Carr's work. I have read much of Carr's work, and it's helped me put together a clearer picture of how his devices operate. After analyzing many transcripts of radio interviews, listening to interviews of witnesses in the story of Otis Carr's work (Ralph Ring, Jim Murray, etc...), and reading many documents associated with this, I believe there is enough available information now to engineer PROPER working models of the OTC-X1 Circular-Foil Spacecraft. However, due to how scattered information of the OTC-X1 is, it has lead to many misconceptions and false trails surrounding it. I will attempt to clear all of those in this topic by setting people on a clear path and with a clear picture in mind.
No pyramid-power utron stuff...
No homopolar dynamo junk...
No interjecting useless new components...
No unneeded "improvements"...
No Bedini motor and back e.m.f....
No "Radiant Energy" or "Cold Electricity"...
No worshipping wild and unproven "theories"...
Just a simple battery-powered pulsed D.C. motor, with a few new components that add a little twist to things. This should be very SIMPLE, just as Otis Carr wanted it. Seriously, after researching for many hours on this subject, I've come to the conclusion that the "motor" used in the OTC-X1 is a variation of a D.C. pulse motor. There are several differences however, and I will get into the details in future posts. For now I want everyone to trash all the useless concepts, if the final goal is to engineer a proper working model of the OTC-X1, we need to DROP all the ideas that will interfere with this process. All I did to find this information is to READ and LISTEN to Otis Carr with his other associates, but look and listen CAREFULLY or you will miss things that many others have. All the information is there, at least what's left in the remnants. I'm surprised I never heard of anyone else coming to the same conclusions as I have, I sure hope it's not that I'm the only one who read and listened carefully to most of the work of Carr.
Of course, everyone has their own little conclusions of things, perhaps there may be things I've missed or not considered before. But, do not be mislead by Otis Carr's own words. I've found his own theories to be traps that many people seem to fall into, then you're just a dog chasing your own tail. So, DO NOT go in with the preconception that all of Carr's ideas are correct, along with other preconceptions that have formulated over the years. We cannot put these ideas or people on a pedestal and expect us as "followers" to be correct in every way. Just read and listen to the material from Otis Carr, then start putting the pieces together as I have done over time, but do your research and think carefully.
There is more to come soon, the next post will be a summarization of the main/noticeable components of the OTC-X1 Circular-Foil Spacecraft.
The purpose of this topic in the forums is lay out what technical knowledge I have obtained of analyzing Otis T. Carr's work. I have read much of Carr's work, and it's helped me put together a clearer picture of how his devices operate. After analyzing many transcripts of radio interviews, listening to interviews of witnesses in the story of Otis Carr's work (Ralph Ring, Jim Murray, etc...), and reading many documents associated with this, I believe there is enough available information now to engineer PROPER working models of the OTC-X1 Circular-Foil Spacecraft. However, due to how scattered information of the OTC-X1 is, it has lead to many misconceptions and false trails surrounding it. I will attempt to clear all of those in this topic by setting people on a clear path and with a clear picture in mind.
No pyramid-power utron stuff...
No homopolar dynamo junk...
No interjecting useless new components...
No unneeded "improvements"...
No Bedini motor and back e.m.f....
No "Radiant Energy" or "Cold Electricity"...
No worshipping wild and unproven "theories"...
Just a simple battery-powered pulsed D.C. motor, with a few new components that add a little twist to things. This should be very SIMPLE, just as Otis Carr wanted it. Seriously, after researching for many hours on this subject, I've come to the conclusion that the "motor" used in the OTC-X1 is a variation of a D.C. pulse motor. There are several differences however, and I will get into the details in future posts. For now I want everyone to trash all the useless concepts, if the final goal is to engineer a proper working model of the OTC-X1, we need to DROP all the ideas that will interfere with this process. All I did to find this information is to READ and LISTEN to Otis Carr with his other associates, but look and listen CAREFULLY or you will miss things that many others have. All the information is there, at least what's left in the remnants. I'm surprised I never heard of anyone else coming to the same conclusions as I have, I sure hope it's not that I'm the only one who read and listened carefully to most of the work of Carr.
Of course, everyone has their own little conclusions of things, perhaps there may be things I've missed or not considered before. But, do not be mislead by Otis Carr's own words. I've found his own theories to be traps that many people seem to fall into, then you're just a dog chasing your own tail. So, DO NOT go in with the preconception that all of Carr's ideas are correct, along with other preconceptions that have formulated over the years. We cannot put these ideas or people on a pedestal and expect us as "followers" to be correct in every way. Just read and listen to the material from Otis Carr, then start putting the pieces together as I have done over time, but do your research and think carefully.
There is more to come soon, the next post will be a summarization of the main/noticeable components of the OTC-X1 Circular-Foil Spacecraft.
Comment