Donald Smith Devices too good to be true

[BroMikey]

prof Meyl did an incredible work .. an example
he was able to calculate particle using his vortex model , even in quantum mechanic this is not possible ..!!

Where is this math proof break through? I didn't see it in the video.
DO you have another website where DOC shows us all his calculations?

Simple algebra is not that hard guys unless you are part of the dumbed
down class of the 90's. Doc has to show, not just SAY.

Thanks MED

[med.3012]

There is a reason that those who have gone far in this field (starting with Tesla) have done their own experiments instead of just accepting others' theories,.

prof Meyl did an incredible work .. an example he was able to calculate particle using his vortex model , even in quantum mechanic this is not possible ..!! as you said nature don't care about the name we give the most important is to understand why this happen and how to control the phenomena for our benefit ..

[tswift]

If you wish to understand of what I am saying look at the work of Eric Dollard and his writing in this very forum. Also the writings of Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Also Oliver Heavyside and his equations.

I agree. I have read most everything Dollard has written and I am in substantial agreement with him. I believe the "longitudinal magneto-dielectric" energy he refers to is exactly the same stuff I'm calling phase-conjugate electricity, and what Tesla called radiant energy. I hope that perhaps my term is a little more physically descriptive of what it actually is and does, but nature doesn't care what we call it. It only matters what it really is, and what can be verified and reproduced by experiment. There is a reason that those who have gone far in this field (starting with Tesla) have done their own experiments instead of just accepting others' theories, even if those were published in reputable college textbooks. The works of Steinmetz and Heaviside are now old enough to be out of copyright and are available in scanned book form from archive.org. I have read most of them and recommend them although they are math-heavy for the unprepared.

[med.3012]

Look

Mohamed,

I applaud your efforts in research for a free energy solution and your willingness to share that information with others.
But to post incorrect information that is misleading at best is no service to anyone.
Dr. Konstantin Meyl is incorrect in his definition of Scalar as it is a propagation constant and therefor not a wave. This is misleading anyone who follows him and will not lead you to the answer you seek.
If you wish to understand of what I am saying look at the work of Eric Dollard and his writing in this very forum. Also the writings of Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Also Oliver Heavyside and his equations. You will see there that this is not as you are lead to believe from Dr Mely.
And yes it does make a difference as a lie is not the truth. Even a half truth is misleading.
I wish you the best in your research.

Jeff

Thank you , i think it's better to return to the old name given by Tesla which is Radiant energy, in some interview Dr Meyl state the name scalar waves is wrong but they keep it to refer to free energy possibility or to Tesla work but unfortunately any new discoveries or science has a lots of enemy in other words a big scientific community is ignoring this science so they close a big door for new energetic possibility or even new kind of healing system because our body use radiant electricity to communicate so it's possible to send healing information ...!! , i used the same name to refer to Dr Meyl work since i found a very interesting common point between his work and Don Smith free energy invention , the key is three requirement

1) transmitting
2) receiving
3) storing


it appear this kind of energy treat the information the same way it treat the energy , this is why it's possible to kill cancer cell by sending only an information, and this lead us to think that the universe is full of information !!!

[ricards]

Scalar Wave

firstly the term "Scalar Wave" is misleading

Term "Scalar"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_(physics)
quoting from that link
"A scalar or scalar quantity in physics is a physical quantity that can be described by a single element of a number field such as a real number, often accompanied by units of measurement. A scalar is usually said to be a physical quantity that only has magnitude and no other characteristics"

Term "Wave"
[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave[/URL]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave
quoting from that link
"a wave is an oscillation accompanied by a transfer of energy that travels through a medium"

Scalar wave is like saying a wave that is not a wave.

It literally has no meaning but people that use the term to define something, must be describing something they want other to look at. my opinion is It should be re-termed to make some sense.

Its really no different in saying "Free Energy". we fairly use the term to define a phenomenon we don't fully understand, a device that outputs more energy that it uses or simply an energy source that is "Free". but in conventional science its non-sense specially if you are aware of the Laws of thermodynamic. or simply just the law of conservation of energy. nowadays we call it "Overunity" or "COP>1", which make much more sense now.

I think if people keep using the term "Scalar Wave" chances are It will be ridiculed even more.

[BroMikey]

I never said SCALAR WAVES did not exist, I never said that, what I
said was Doc in the video selling digital boxes made no case for
their existence.

This is the definition and you could call it whatever you like. You
could just say that OTHER ENERGY operates or you could say that
NEW ENERGY is working beyond normal designs.

Inner space, counter space, space between your ears

Whatever you want to call it this stuff is outside the box, past the
2+2 Pablo force fed to yuppies. Science defines as


SCALAR =
A vector space equipped with a scalar product is called an inner
product space. The real component of a quaternion is also called its
scalar part. The term is also sometimes used informally to mean a
vector, matrix, tensor, or other usually "compound" value that is
actually reduced to a single component.



Here we find the real nitty gritty. I never said they didn't exist.
http://lasotaenergy.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Dokumentation-4.pdf









----------------------------------------------------------

[j dove]

Look

you see you know something i don't know but i know something maybe you don't know, finally you don't know what you don't know, there's a very important point i am focusing on , the good news it's not bad if it's a waves or a field , Dr Konstantin Meyl call it a waves, the important is over unity research we are doing .



Mohamed

Mohamed,

I applaud your efforts in research for a free energy solution and your willingness to share that information with others.
But to post incorrect information that is misleading at best is no service to anyone.
Dr. Konstantin Meyl is incorrect in his definition of Scalar as it is a propagation constant and therefor not a wave. This is misleading anyone who follows him and will not lead you to the answer you seek.
If you wish to understand of what I am saying look at the work of Eric Dollard and his writing in this very forum. Also the writings of Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Also Oliver Heavyside and his equations. You will see there that this is not as you are lead to believe from Dr Mely.
And yes it does make a difference as a lie is not the truth. Even a half truth is misleading.
I wish you the best in your research.

Jeff

[med.3012]

Please do some research first before posting such incorrect information.
There is no such thing as a SCALAR WAVE!!! Scalar is a field as such there is NO WAVE!!!

Jeff

you see you know something i don't know but i know something maybe you don't know, finally you don't know what you don't know, there's a very important point i am focusing on , the good news it's not bad if it's a waves or a field , Dr Konstantin Meyl call it a waves, the important is over unity research we are doing .



Mohamed

[j dove]

just to put some ideas without discussing the above posts, the aim is to find a common key that maybe helpful,
the idea will be divided into several parts but in the last you will have a good idea about what is the meaning , some info from Dr konstantin meyl presentation about scalar waves.

let's start by the first drawing which show two different systems, number 1 is the conventional induction mechanism where a very tiny part of electric field reach the receiver.. in this case it's difficult to achieve even a unity because there's a lot of wasted radiation as clear from the drawing





number 2 is the most interesting mechanism because all the radiated electric field will be received , the waves used is scalar electric waves or Tesla waves in this case unity can be achieved very easily but the most important is that over unity can be achieved if there's an interaction with the environment !!!

Please do some research first before posting such incorrect information.
There is no such thing as a SCALAR WAVE!!! Scalar is a field as such there is NO WAVE!!!

Jeff

[BroMikey]

let's see one of Don Smith famous experiment:

so all the electric field lines is directed to the receivers through scalar resonance not the electromagnetic resonance, to understand the difference between the two please watch this presentation of Konstantin Meyl :

Watching video now, THX

The first part of video talk deals with trying to find out if scalar does
exist and to find this he goes on about classical math. Basically the math
can show that the waves are there.

Dr. refers us to the equations in books counting scalar as a zero.

Throws out terms suchas

plasma waves, noise particles, sound waves, acceleration not constant

speed of light and faster, pointing out what he says are flaws.

He goes on to inject his "could be this and based on that could be"

Speculative and I am lost at minute 13. The video stops and the man
seems to be being corrected about something he may have missed?
Not sure.

Minute 25 emergency notation:

He points out how so many of our circuits are 80 percent efficient
which we all agree and proceeds to state that the other 20 percent
counted as noise is SCALAR.

Minute 26 he says that scalar waves exist based on his delivery this
far and honestly very weak proof. But still I am glad for something,
anything to study at all, since I know he is right.

Minute 35 brings out some digital boxes and continues his claims with
no basis that I can find. Like putting candy out to children and asking
them if they can taste it yet.

[med.3012]

high efficiency can be achieved when we have a transmitter and a receivers, but what if i need more power than i put in say about 1000 times more ! do i need a 1000 receivers ??

no we don't need all this number of receivers if we realize some conditions , we need a system that work as a transmitter and a receiver the two at the same times , you still need another harvesting mechanism that suit this system but this is not the point i want to discuss here :

the system need three requirement

1) it's a transmitter system that send a scalar electric waves
2) it's a receiver that could receive scalar waves
3) it form a kind of storage device to balance between the two !


keep in mind all the discussed drawing to see what's the key, if you only send power unity can be achieved even a little more but this is not what you want, the reception of power don't solve the problem because you need to furnish power to keep the flow of energy , we need a system can balance between the two state of transmitting / receiving but another factor is needed between the two state which is the storage .. storage is needed to let the system balance between the two state , now it's clear the receiver will be a transmitter the next phase and the transmitter do the same job, the harvesting mechanism only watch what's going on and count the power for you !


we have the same mechanism within our body, the DNA is a transmitter/ receiver / and a storage device.

[med.3012]

let's see one of Don Smith famous experiment:





it's clear the above system has a high efficiency , so it's possible to replicate the power according the receiver you have, in this case we have three receivers , 3 times more power than the input but all work in a resonance mode and the waves received have to be scalar waves so all the electric field lines is directed to the receivers through scalar resonance not the electromagnetic resonance, to understand the difference between the two please watch this presentation of Konstantin Meyl :



https://youtu.be/AFtU4FVpXVs

[med.3012]

the following image show the details :

[med.3012]

now we usually use a resonating transformer to accomplish our experiments to seek for over unity effect, let's start again by some drawing to analyse what's happening and what's needed to success ..





in the above drawing nothing new a resonance circuit composed of an inductor and a capacitor but If the two electrodes of the condenser are pulled apart, then an electrical field stretches between both. The lines of flux begin at the ball, the transmitter, and they bundle themselves with the receiver again. Thus a high efficiency and a very firm coupling are to be expected, the following drawing :

[med.3012]

just to put some ideas without discussing the above posts, the aim is to find a common key that maybe helpful,
the idea will be divided into several parts but in the last you will have a good idea about what is the meaning , some info from Dr konstantin meyl presentation about scalar waves.

let's start by the first drawing which show two different systems, number 1 is the conventional induction mechanism where a very tiny part of electric field reach the receiver.. in this case it's difficult to achieve even a unity because there's a lot of wasted radiation as clear from the drawing





number 2 is the most interesting mechanism because all the radiated electric field will be received , the waves used is scalar electric waves or Tesla waves in this case unity can be achieved very easily but the most important is that over unity can be achieved if there's an interaction with the environment !!!