Donald Smith Devices too good to be true

[soundiceuk]

[VIDEO]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZQcLJjpdrI&t=33s[/VIDEO]

One of the many sources of radio ions to transform into electromagnetic electricity.

Another...

[VIDEO]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e3fqE01YYWs[/VIDEO]

Moray was right, we are literally surrounded by a sea of energy.

The sound contains it.

It is being freely transmitted.

Now it just needs to be received and instead of converted to sound, converted to electromagnetic energy.

[SlickDick]

Still not convinced ?

No.

Nice quotes, though misplaced, out of context. The word "abuse" comes to mind.

Tariel Kapanadze showed zero, nada, nothing. Don smith ditto.

Carry on

PS Soundiceuk? Where are you when you are actually needed?

[boguslaw]

Still not convinced ?

"I am, of course aware that it has been proposed to obtain static charges from upper strata of the atmosphere, but such charges are recognized as of widely variant potential and have thus far proved of no practical commercial value, and the present invention is distinguished from all such apparatus as has heretofore been employed for attracting static charges by the fact that this improved apparatus is not designed or employed to produce or generate irregular, fluctuating or other electrical charges which lack constancy, but on the other hand I have by actual test been able to produce from a very small apparatus at comparatively low elevation, say about 50 or 60 feet above the earth's surface, a substantially constant current at a commercially usable voltage and amperage. This current I ascertained by repeated tests is capable of being readily increased by additions of the unit elements in the apparatus hereinafter set forth, and I am convinced from the constancy of the current obtained and its comparatively low potential that the current is dynamic and not static..."

Roy Meyers

[boguslaw]

Tell Tariel Kapanadze that he must learn Dirac equations to build his device

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
Nikola Tesla

"We have an energy device that takes electrons that are available just about everywhere and converts some into useful energy (...) When you move our energy source away from the background like moving water up to hill it will always come down(...) Ambient of Earth ground is unity and anything that you see other then that - is overunity"

Don Smith

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or_wCy2OzWk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pk4HWwb88E


"When I arrived in Washington and laid my plans before the patent office experts, they merely smiled and told me that I would have to build a model and demonstrate my claims --- that it seemed strange that I, unknown as I am in the electrical world, should have accomplished the things for which Edison, Tesla and other experts have been striving for years.
They could not grasp the meaning of my drawings nor the explanation I tried to make to them."

Roy Meyers
Roy J. Meyers: Absorber (Atmospheric Electrical Generator)

Static is not static. Using static electricity , create "static" (containing no energy) machine which is useless. That's not how lightning is created....

"Gray describes the operation of his EMA motor as 'similar to re-creating lightning.' "
http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/engine_runs_itself.pdf

[bistander]

Infinite density

Attention: boguslaw and bistander

Your comments, or quotes, or whatever they are; do not seem to make any sense - in context that is.... ???

If they were just meant to be the "typical stupid stuff" then that would explain it!

? waste ?

Hi Mr. Solarlab,

I've looked over the link to Dirac equation which you supplied. I cannot follow the math. Either I never had the prerequisites or it's been too long ago. However, infinite density, regardless of context, is something which I do understand. And it's not going to happen.

Anyway, thanks for some interesting posts.

bi

[Solarlab]

Bogaslaw and Bistander:

Attention: boguslaw and bistander

Your comments, or quotes, or whatever they are; do not seem to make any sense - in context that is.... ???

If they were just meant to be the "typical stupid stuff" then that would explain it!

? waste ?

[Solarlab]

No White Paper - however...

F.Y.I.

No White Paper at this time but here is an example of using Dirac equations in COMSOL:

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Applications Using The Time Independent Dirac Equation In COMSOL
A. J. Kalinowski *1 1 Consultant *Corresponding author: East Lyme CT 06333, kalinoaj@aol.com

https://www.comsol.com/paper/downloa...wski_paper.pdf

Consider 5.1 Model Parameters - in particular particle velocity (plane or cylindrical wave) where E [sub} p is particle energy (set up by HV - so called antenna of TT). This paper seeks steady state [SS] - I do not believe the telescope coil (the FE/CE system) peak performance operates at SS - TBD.

* recall briefly:

- {from previous post} "However, if Vo > E+mc^2 then the transmitted wave is a plane wave in Region II which, normalized to respect the continuity condition, is directed toward Region I, so that the total reflected current appeared to be greater than the total incident current."
- Tesla Transformer sets up HV pulses [particle {e} velocity/energy;
- Telescope coil {slow wave - long wire equivelant} operates in Standing Wave [SW] mode;
+ see Vyacheslav Gorchillin's site for FE/CE related details:
General - Google Translate
Calculations - Standing Waves in Long Lines - Google Translate

Again; analysis of SW using Maxwell only does not appear to yield equivalent measured results.

- Asymmetric system design in general; for a detailed discussion refer to
Vladimir Utkin notes or see https://translate.google.com/transla...j-texniki.136/ all the subjects by AAbramovich.

- There is lots more that I'm sure I have left out or do not yet know...

NOTE: My FYI's are meant to only provide some possible assistance in understanding and discovering the theory behind FE/CE. The information is not intended nor meant to be an "FE/CE Cook Book."

Sorry to disappoint the many "lurkers, lamers and nay-Sayers" here... but with a little work and perseverance I'm convinced you CAN figure it all out for yourself one way or the other!

Anyway; I must move on... Have a great day and good luck to you all.

FIN

[bistander]

Infinite density

...
• The negative energy electrons will have uniform (infinite) density so the net electromagnetic field is zero. ...

Does not infinite density end the universe?

[boguslaw]

I like this approach. Shooting fly with a rocket science.

[tswift]

With a very good degree of confidence I believe we now have a viable link between
the "practical application" and the "engineering science" underlying Ruslan's FE/CE
generator. Furthermore, there appears to be an accurate, usable, method of tying the
hardware and theory together using recent computer aided engineering (CAE).

Wow, you have really done a lot of work on this! I wasn't previously aware of the COMSOL software, if there is a way to make off-the-shelf software model overunity devices then THIS IS HUGE. I assumed it would be necessary to write new software from the ground up, which would be an unbelievably massive undertaking. In a former career a long time ago now, I was a computational modeling engineer with a Silicon Graphics Indigo workstation on my desk. I am quite familiar with finite element modeling software, is there any way you can write a white paper or at least a short "how to" describing what to do within COMSOL to achieve the results you're getting?

Unfortunately the COMSOL package appears to be high-dollar commercial software, any idea how much they want for a license?

[Solarlab]

Dots Connected...!!!

F.Y.I

So as not to leave this approach hanging - - -

With a very good degree of confidence I believe we now have a viable link between
the "practical application" and the "engineering science" underlying Ruslan's FE/CE
generator. Furthermore, there appears to be an accurate, usable, method of tying the
hardware and theory together using recent computer aided engineering (CAE).

Although not completely polished and vetted yet; a combination of Maxwell's equations
and slightly modified Dirac equations are providing good answers that correlate to
physical apparatus bench and insitu testing with the design parameters indicating some
very good development. This is still a work-in-progress but so far is very encouraging!

Briefly:

Analysis of Ruslan's device by physically modelling it in CAD - Solidworks - and
using EM analysis programs like CST, Ansys Electronics, FEKO, etc. they all came up
somewhat short. Under the (undisclosed) skin of these packages it appears, for the
most part, that they rely primarily on Maxwell's equations in one form or another and
can not be modified at the equation level. Note that since I do not have a working
model of Don Smith's device; it has not yet been a target for analysis.

Also, owing to the extremely long simulation times and huge meshing requirements
(e.g. meshing a telescope coil) even analyzing a scaled, symmetrically reduced, version
on a multi-core network took what felt like a lifetime and yielded little of any technical
or scientific value.

Another Approach:

Looking for a better analysis and integrated design approach, a colleague introduced COMSOL.
Offering a broader, more scientific oriented CAE suite this package allows complex "equation
modifications" as well as insitu inter-dicipline integration both internally and parametricly with,
for example, the physical Solidworks model. By modifying the Dirac equations and invoking
Maxwell's equations where needed,
preliminary analysis and design results so far look great!!!!

Conclusion:

In short - these results, and this approach, are of great value - and appears (so far at least) to
allow the "connecting-of-the-dots."

I will not attempt to provide any further details in this forum - too equation orientated
and far too expansive.

A great deal of related information and the long development approach is outlined to a large
extent in my previous posts (spanning several years) both on this forum and the OU forum,
as well as several foreign forums, should there be further interest. Much work still left to be done...

FIN

[Wistiti]

Hi twsift!
Glad to see you are still working on it after all..... ;-)
Just let you know I am also slowly on it.( with the poor free time I have for now)
Lets us share our finding for the benefit of all......!!!

Sincerly
Wistiti

[tswift]

Paul Dirac was awarded a Nobel Prize for his work in discovering the Positron. This area of discovery may also have considerable significance in helping explain and characterize FE/CE.

Yes, I agree! I think we have hit some real pay dirt here, this is a lever whereby establishment folks schooled and indoctrinated into conventional concepts, can begin to get a handle on our research here at forums like this. I think you struck gold with this discovery about the Dirac equation, it seems to directly confirm that "electrons", as we usually think of them, can have both a normal and a phase-conjugate character. There are four terms in the Dirac equation, the two "electron" terms and the two "positron" terms and they are all related. It's not too big a stretch even for physicists to admit that conventional electricity, carried through conductive metal wires by "electrons", can change character and be essentially a "positron" current, or some blend of the two characters at the same time. This isn't a positron in the conventional sense of an antiparticle to the electron, it's a positron in the sense Vasiliev uses the term and that it seems to appear in the Dirac equation. We essentially have this Janus electron, with two faces, two completely different sides to its character. Under the right conditions it will show you the other face.

[tswift]

Hi guys!
Im curious if some of you have already play with aluminum as a screen or mirror
Like say in the PDF ? And if so if you whant to share your experiment..?

Thank you!

No, I haven't tried anything with the aluminum screening idea yet. I have read the Vasiliev PDF again more closely this time, it's kind of like a cookbook. There are some partial recipes and whole bunch of building block components, but not a completely detailed plan to follow. I agree with Vasiliev's approach that developing an understanding of the physics at work is absolutely crucial, because otherwise all one can do is follow someone else's recipe without understanding why. To paraphrase an old credit card commercial, "Plans to build a working Don Smith device.... incredibly valuable. Knowing what Don Smith knew? Priceless!" Still, it would be nice if Vasiliev gave more details.

So far all I've done with replication is to wind an asymmetric transformer of the kind referred to in the text. On page 99, figure 35 gives an illustration of a Kacher oscillator (basically the same as a slayer exciter, a low power CW solid state Tesla coil), combined with a C-shaped aluminum sleeve to pull energy up from the ground, with an output transformer in the ground line as I have referred to before. Many folks around this thread will probably recognize this as the same as Zilano's "radiant harvesting without diodes". I have tried this arrangement before without success, but in the text Vasiliev goes on to say (poorly translated from the Russian) "As soon as the ground rule of the circuit or use a standard transformer (not using a longitudinal winding), the construction stops working." So there is something important about using an asymmetric transformer, Zilano just described a 1-turn toroidal transformer by using two metal strips with a stack of ferrite cores, one inside and one outside. Vasiliev doesn't give any design information for the asymmetric transformer but he does give a picture, so I tried to emulate this. I had a 3-inch powdered iron core handy from previous experiments, so I built a small wooden jig to hold the turns while winding and rewound it Vasiliev's way. The core is a micrometals T300-52 core, 3"x0.5"x0.5" toroid, with 52 mix (about 75 permeability).

Once I have some more experimenting time I will rig this up to my slayer exciter and see what happens. If there is any hint of positive results it will probably be a useful exercise to play around with the number of turns in the circumferential/longitudinal winding to see how much of a difference that makes. I took a picture of the toroid as wound, note that there are only two contiguous wires that make up three windings. One wire wraps all the way around the circumference of the toroid for 8 turns, then makes a 90 degree bend (visible in the picture) and becomes a regular toroidal winding with 13 turns. The other winding is a completely standard toroidal winding with 13 turns.

[Solarlab]

more Dirac ...

F.Y.I.

Paul Dirac was awarded a Nobel Prize for his work in discovering the Positron. This area of discovery may also have considerable significance in helping explain and characterize FE/CE.

Discovering the positron
[timeline by CERN]

https://timeline.web.cern.ch/timelin...g-the-positron

Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field
by P. A. M. Dirac
Published 1 September 1931.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1931.0130

http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.o...21/60.full.pdf

Of interest: ss 3. Nodal Singularities. {page 66 of the journal}

... "as a result of which our theory becomes mathematically equivalent to the usual one for the motion of an electron in an electromagnetic field and gives us nothing new. There is, however, one further fact which must now be taken into account, namely, that a phase is always undetermined to the extent of an arbitrary integral multiple of 2 pi. This requires a reconsideration of the connection between the k's and the potentials and leads to a new physical phenomenon."
"The condition for an unambiguous physical interpretation of the theory was that the change in phase around a closed curve should be the same for all wave functions. ..."

ss 5. Conclusion {all}

Also, consider:

"The Dirac equation naturally conserves total angular momentum but not the orbital or spin parts of it. The solutions are not in general eigenstates of any component of spin but are eigenstates of helicity, the component of spin along the direction of the momentum." {a small closed curve}

From: The Dirac Equation

The Dirac Equation


Dirac's Prediction of the Positron: A Case Study for the Current Realism Debate

MIT Press Journals

" ... He (Dirac) found that if Vo < E+mc^2 then the transmitted wave decays exponentially in Region II, with some proportion reflected back,—just as one would expect if it obeyed the Schrodinger equation. However, if Vo > E+mc^2 then the transmitted wave is a plane wave in Region II which, normalized to respect the continuity condition, is directed toward Region I, so that the total reflected current appeared to be greater than the total incident current. This result seemed to be pure nonsense, and was deeply troubling from the point of view of contemporary atomic theory which (prior to the discovery of the neutron) explained the neutral charge of the nucleus by the hypothesis of electronic nuclear confinement. ..."

"Bohr wrote to Dirac in late 1929 posing this difficulty and expressed his concerns that a wide scale conceptual revolution would be required to resolve it. Dirac confronted the problem in his reply by proposing his ‘hole’ theory, which interprets the transmitted wave as the current of a positive particle moving right. His reasoning appeared as follows:

• Electrons may transition to negative energy states by spontaneous emission of radiation. However, low (negative) energy states will be stable against further descent since to jump back up requires incident high energy radiation.

• Since electrons are fermions they obey the Pauli exclusion principle so a state can be occupied by at most one electron. Suppose that (nearly) all of the stable low (negative) energy states are occupied. This forces positive energy electrons to remain in positive energy states.

• The negative energy electrons will have uniform (infinite) density so the net electromagnetic field is zero. Only deviations from uniformity will be observable.
• ‘Holes’ in the negative energy state distribution will act like they have positive energy, but with opposite (positive) charge. These are protons, which are annihilated when an electron drops into the corresponding negative energy state.
..."

As well, when considering the above, bare in mind the physical "Grenade (a.k.a. Telescope) Coil."

Misc:

http://physics.gu.se/~tfkhj/TOPO/DiracEquation.pdf

5.9 Spin and Helicity
6.3 Maxwell’s Equations
6.6 High energy e−μ− → e−μ− scattering
7.5 Charged Currents

NOTE: Since this chat board is near impossible to use for anything more than short text submissions; I will likely curtail further posting.
Thanks for reading - good luck with your projects and studies!

FIN