Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Donald Smith Devices too good to be true

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • soundiceuk
    replied
    What I mean is, to the layman it is an antenna and ground in the patents.

    To advanced researchers like yourself you see the wood through the trees because of further studies.

    Therefore, perhaps it was done this way to prevent the patent being seen as a threat.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    this is a re - posted



    just to share my experience about capacitors charging , the device i am using is the extended Tesla bifilar coil in short the ETBC , it's L 1 or the reactor coil , after trying for a long time to take some power from L2, all what i had is pure voltage without any electric current trying to light a 100 W bulb was like a dream ...

    all the previous experiments was done with the following ETBC where the center tap was opened, this mean CD is open, normally i use a spark gap there to achieve the resonance in high voltage but unfortunately something very important is missing ...






    after working very hard the problem was solved with easy only when closing the position CD as the follow drawing :







    the ETBC in short is special parallel LC that oscillate in twice the normal frequency of equivalent parallel LC circuit , the resonance frequency of this special coil is this :





    double frequency mean the magnetic flux behave differently from ordinary electromagnetic oscillating system .. another quote from Don smith :








    Don smith system is based on electron spin balance where the spark gap is created naturally through electrons spin separation mechanism ... only when i closed the junction CD the device start to give useful power that can light a 100W light bulb ... in my opinion it's all about energy balance exactly as a permanent magnet . when the resonance is achieved both magnetic or electric flux can present in huge amount !

    Leave a comment:


  • soundiceuk
    replied
    Originally posted by radioionics View Post
    Take a look at the transformer configuration in Tesla's two radiant energy patents. Something look out of place? You probably wouldn't have noticed until I just pointed it out to you. The primary and secondary appear that they are reversed. Are they? Read Tesla's description. Both patents read the same. If the description is correct you will have to think what you have been lead to believe from the distractors over the years. When you do I would like to hear what you have to say about your oversight.
    Let me shed some light on this:

    High to low voltage (antenna to ground) uses a step down configuration.

    Low to high voltage (ground to ground) requires a step up configuration.

    Now why would Tesla hide in plain sight the ground to ground and disguise it as an antenna?

    Leave a comment:


  • fan1701
    replied
    Hi all, I just want to agree with SoundiceUK. Don's circuits are LETHAL. The energy will sit in there on the machine and manafest in ways that you wouldn't think. I watched a test meter explode like a bomb in my brother's hand and he never made a connection to the machine but with one lead. I'm not joking one bit. As much as I wanna work with it more 1I know it will kill easily even if you think you know electricity because what it generates can get you through a single lead. Please be careful.

    Leave a comment:


  • soundiceuk
    replied
    Bruce's actual R&D is 43 years old!

    Older than me! Haha

    Leave a comment:


  • soundiceuk
    replied
    Originally posted by ricards View Post
    @soundiceuk & bruce
    From what I understood, You guys are suggesting to extract free ions (free electrons,.. whatever it is) from the air to ground (or ground to ground), are you encouraging people to Invoke an Electron Avalanche (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_avalanche). Through a PPV, an Antenna and Good grounding (by providing a least resistive path to the earth) how can free Ions collected by antenna through PPV go to ground if there is no physical connection? are the schematics on on-going revision?. and how come you are suggesting supercap banks to collect energy at the secondary rather than High voltage low farad caps as what don smith have used?. wont it just spark its way through the dielectric?.

    I hope you could answer my questions.
    The circuit operation is explained in Bruce's document.

    The proposed circuits are educational circuits to allow experimenters to evaluate and understand the basics of what Bruce has termed 'Radioionics'.

    Radioionics is ion circuits.

    Electronics is electron circuits.


    Bruce's circuits are a combination of both.


    There are more advanced circuits but let's see what the good folk here at energetic can achieve with the basic circuits.

    For example: there is no point a beginner trying to build a 500,000,000v Tesla coil. Instead they learn by building a joule thief or slayer circuit and then maybe a small Tesla coil.

    So the best thing is to build and understand the basic circuits and grasp a feel for what Radioionics is.

    The super capacitor role will become clear when we have a successful replication.

    You shouldn't have to wait long.

    Don's capacitors and circuits were lethal!

    Bruce's circuits are much safer!
    Last edited by soundiceuk; 01-23-2017, 08:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • soundiceuk
    replied
    Apologies. Text can sound very blunt and emotionless sometimes.

    I guess emoji type pictures help here.

    What I wrote wasn't a dig at anyone.

    Everyone here has some experience to offer.


    I haven't got internet at home and I'm trying to do everything on my phone but struggling.


    I can multitask on a PC but can't on a phone so my communication isn't brilliant lately.


    Dragon, you are extremely welcome here and your wisdom appreciated.

    This thread seems to attract the best of the best and doesn't suffer with the egos of some other threads.

    I am greatful for this.

    The technology is still yet to be proven by a third party but Mwtj is the closest. Tswift coming up behind him. Serendipitor has freezing weather so Wistiti might catch up.

    Just keep going 😎

    Your all doing great!

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    As you know, Paul, I don't blindly follow - I do my own work, build my own knowledge based on these experiences. What I share is also based on 30+ years of research and development - both Bruce and I are as old as dirt although I carry a few extra years being born shortly after Tesla died.

    If you find I'm not being helpful simply say so outright and I will leave. I have no need to be here other than entertainment and/or helping someone out now and then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wistiti
    replied
    Originally posted by soundiceuk View Post
    It is written clearly in the document Bruce wrote.

    No mention of some of the words others have used to describe it recently.

    Use Bruce's document as a reference.

    If you want to know what a word, sentence or paragraph means from Bruce's document please ask.

    I know it frustrates Bruce greatly when substitute words are used to describe what he has already written.

    A lot of effort has been put into that document. Thirty years plus of research and development.
    Good point!!!
    Is there some people still working to replicate the exact device Bruce have share..?

    I will ,as soon as i'll recieve all the part i need to do this.

    I think the first thing to do is to replicate exactly as shown in the pdf. After that, if it work as they say, we can theorise and try different way to acheive or improve the result.

    Leave a comment:


  • soundiceuk
    replied
    It is written clearly in the document Bruce wrote.

    No mention of some of the words others have used to describe it recently.

    Use Bruce's document as a reference.

    If you want to know what a word, sentence or paragraph means from Bruce's document please ask.

    I know it frustrates Bruce greatly when substitute words are used to describe what he has already written.

    A lot of effort has been put into that document. Thirty years plus of research and development.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Referring to Bruce's original circuit (v5.4.7) you should be able to charge C1 to a high voltage and remove the HVM entirely. Once the dipole is created, in theory, C2 can be charged and discharged indefinitely without depleting C1. The power achieved in the circuit is based solely on the ability of nature to neutralize the imbalance continuously.

    In reality, C1 will loose some of its charge to the environment ( nature again ) so you have to maintain the dipole with an external source.

    Now, if you think of the coils and circuit as a crystal radio receiver ( receiving an AM station ) operating in the 500khz range you can tune it to your local station and it should oscillate freely without any assistance of another energy source.

    The pulses created through the PPV, timed to match the oscillations or a harmonic of the receiver, acts as an amplifier. Think in terms of the Armstrong "tickler" circuit to amplify a signal.

    Bruce needs to jump in here and fill the knowledge gaps so people have a better understanding of what's going on to make possible a successful build. Do I need to email you a smack on the forehead?
    Last edited by dragon; 01-23-2017, 05:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Instead of trying to charge a massive bank of supercaps why not charge a cap that contains all the energy needed for one pulse of the HVM. Charging large capacitors takes huge currents to make any real difference in voltage gain and wastes lots of energy.

    If the resonant circuit is running at 500,000 hz and the HVM is running at 75,000 hz then you have an almost 7:1 difference. That is, the resonant circuit is ringing 7 times between each pulse of the HVM. The charging cap only needs to contain enough energy to fire the next ringing sequence... the charged cap then needs to achieve a 14 -17 volt charge in 1/75,000th of a second - you have 7 pulses to achieve this charge.

    If the cap is to small the voltage will rise beyond your needs and likely destroy propitiatory electronics , if it's to big it will never meet your needs - find the perfect balance...

    A small experiment... take one turn of heavy wire ( 10 ga or larger ) and clip a light bulb to the 2 ends and move it up and down your tesla arrangement... are you getting enough current to light the bulb? Is the voltage enough to make it bright? If you have a variable power supply you can take a mental note of its intensity and power it to match your mental image - not super accurate but gives you a rough idea of the energy available.

    If the bulb light's but isn't bright then you'll need more turns to increase the voltage but with each turn you diminish the current equally. For instance lets say you have a tesla coil of 500 turns with 20kv surging through it. Each turn would represent 40 volts (+ or -) equally if the current flowing through the coil is say 1ma and you could put a clamp meter around the entire bundle it would read 500ma or 1/2 amp turn. Your 1 turn coil should represent the 40 volts per turn on the secondary and the 1/2 amp/turn not including any losses from the transformation.

    Since there are always losses you need to find the difference of that your recycling from the circuit and the overall losses. So if your circuit is using 20 watts and you can successfully harvest 18 watts then you need an outside source to make up the 2 watts lost to achieve unity.

    In this example you have 7 cycles to achieve 1 pulse.... Time is unity...

    Leave a comment:


  • tswift
    replied
    Originally posted by tesluh View Post
    What would happen if you put the load you were trying to charge in series on the tesla coil secondary ground wire as opposed to the top end of the secondary? Just an idea I would try myself if I had a functioning tesla coil here...I have a slayer tesla coil sitting here but not up and running yet.
    Hmm, that's an interesting idea and a configuration I don't think I have ever played around with. There are certainly current pulses at low voltage going back and forth on the ground wire lead at the base of the coil, that's how the slayer exciter works (because you use them to drive the base of a transistor directly).

    I had to shut down the experiment earlier, I was uneasy leaving it running unattended. There were enough streamers coming from the top turn of the coil into the air that with the exposed cardboard tube it could have been a fire hazard so I shut it down. The supercaps had only charged to about 2V over several hours, so pretty slow charging. I doubt it's enough current to run the PVM12 even if there were some magic happening and the PVM12 was seeing essentially a "no-load" condition. In Bruce's configuration the step-down coil provides current to charge the cap bank directly instead of using charging by induction like I was with this setup. Charging from ground that way is quite power inefficient. I was hoping that having essentially two gain stages that should be producing cold electricity would be useful, but if it can't provide enough current to run the HV supply then it's not going to work. So probably next I will play around with the L1/L2 coils as wound on the cardboard tubes for Bruce's device, but powering the primary the way I was for this experiment, with AC through an avramenko.

    Once before, several years back, I saw on the bench what I considered a clear anomaly. Over my time experimenting I have seen some interesting stuff even though I've never been able to clearly and unmistakably measure a power gain. I have seen self-charging happen briefly and once I got shocked by a discharged and grounded cap. Anyway, the experiment I was running at the time was almost identical to this setup. I had a smaller 12V car neon sign transformer (the 35 KHz kind), going through an AV plug to charge a cap (a surplus microwave oven cap of around 1 uF), and then a spark gap to discharge the cap when it reached a couple thousand volts. The spark gap would short the cap into a coil, which in this case was a large powdered iron toroid I have used from time to time for experiments. With a bigger cap like this the spark gap was only firing a couple of times a second, with very loud pops. Within a few seconds of turning on the NST I heard a strange hissing noise so I stopped the experiment. I double-checked all the connections but nothing seemed wrong. I ran it again with the same result. The hissing seemed to be coming from the toroid so I turned off the lights (this was at night thankfully) and finally I spotted the problem. It wasn't coming from the toroid itself, it was a teeny tiny wire crumb on the mat next to the toroid. Just a piece from some finely stranded wire, a single strand maybe a millimeter long and a few millimeters away from the toroid. It was glowing and spitting out little sparks and hissing for some seconds after I cut off the NST. Now, I'm sure all of you here already know that with a toroid the magnetic field is completely contained inside the toroid (technically only complete if a couple conditions are met), so there was no way this could be related to magnetic induction. The HV pulses going through the coil somehow did it even without contact. My workbench is covered in an antistatic mat that is conductive although with fairly high resistivity, and is terminated into an earth ground. So what caused this effect? Is this the static charging effect sometimes associated with radiant energy in some of the literature? I'm not sure, but it was odd enough that I clearly remember the setup even now quite some time later. It was almost identical to what I'm doing now except that now I have a better driver, better diodes, and better caps, and I'm using an air-core coil instead of the big toroid.

    Again, just following through this hypothesis to its logical conclusions, then charging a cap with HV AC through an avramenko is somewhat analogous (at AC) to what Bruce's device does at DC with the antenna and ground. You create a dipole and then capture the INCOMING charges from the surrounding environment which are counter to your dipole. If I am correct then these charges should be different than ordinary electricity, and generating them is as easy as what I'm doing with an AV plug. It's not that the AV plug is magic in any way by itself whether being used from the HV source or from ground, it's the nature of the incoming charges. And it's only a theory, but one that's simple enough to test. Certainly my little benchtop Tesla coil seems improved by being powered this way, but there are plenty of other possible explanations for this so it's far from conclusive. Measuring a power gain and ultimately running looped will be the real proof.

    Leave a comment:


  • tesluh
    replied
    Originally posted by tswift View Post
    So let's use the supercap bank already at hand with another avramenko, this time to ground, and place it close to the hot end of the coil, about as close as we can get it without streamers jumping from the coil. .
    What would happen if you put the load you were trying to charge in series on the tesla coil secondary ground wire as opposed to the top end of the secondary? Just an idea I would try myself if I had a functioning tesla coil here...I have a slayer tesla coil sitting here but not up and running yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • ricards
    replied
    Originally posted by Mwtj View Post
    This all with the same input.

    On the dielectric. I used 4400uf 500v capacitors with 10kV without breaking the dielectric. Charging them slowly to 300 volts. . Even used a 1F 12v booster cap. Did not charge much but did not break. Guess we need to offer up a supercapacitor.

    Just stating. I think there is a explanation for all of this but i do not have all the answers.
    Hi Mwtj,

    Yes I can see that we can charge mostly any capacitor with high voltage, but how can we be sure its not rupturing the dielectric inside? and shorting all that we are storing into the capacitors? I'm actually stuck with this problem. I noticed a degrade in performance when I have used the capacitor in high voltage experiments, when I opened it I found a black burnt spot and I think that is where the arcing happens,

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X