Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blue No More

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #17
    Rainbows

    I have noticed for some time the "odd" reflective rainbows created by these man-made "haze clouds".
    I would like to now point your attention to something that I noticed some time ago, but never could get anyone to "entertain".

    I first became interested in researching and replicating so called "Over-Unity" devices because I was overwhelmed with the conclusion I came to. Many "conspiracy theories" are in fact, "conspiracy truths". The evidence abounds, and, if one isn't afraid to acknowledge the facts...quite clear. So, to battle my mounting depression I turned to "free energy" as a means to break the choke hold "organizations" have on us.

    Amidst my research into conspiracies, I found rather irrefutable evidence that certain "interests" were dumping unknown chemicals/elements into the air. I have attached "their" defense story...it's in the form of a patent, one which they outline battling "global warming" by dumping white metal oxides into the air to reflect Ir radiation. First by complicated sprayers...then by putting the metals/chemicals in the fuel...to use the engines as dispersal mechanisms. (check attached PDF.)

    Among my search into these issues I found this...(many may have already seen this)

    The Denver Airport sports a rather disturbing mural...one which I believe depicts some sort of "chem-trail" upheaval. Take this pictures into consideration. Also, one should note that the Airport was built by the Order of the "Freemasons"

    Notice the "Nazi-Esque" figure sports an American Eagle on his hat...you can't see it but, it's facing down. (facing Left means Peace...facing right means war...facing down means ???) Also notice the swipe of the Middle Eastern Saber...its a hazy streak that turns to a rainbow. Notice the section of this swipe towards the saber, it's squiggly, not a constant swipe...looks more like a smoke, or wispy chemtrail cloud. Notice the sick/lethargic/dead people, symbolizing genocide. Also notice the saber is impaling the white dove in the @$$.



    It goes on to show various peoples of the world in turmoil, along with injustices to nature.


    Take notice of this closeup of the Mayan God Quetzalcoatl


    This particular mural ends with the youth of the world rising up and defeating the "Nazi-esque" figure in a very triumphant manner. All under an untainted "pure" rainbow.


    Notice they are giving all the weapons to the "Iron-fisted German boy" who is beating them into plow shears.


    Finally the last panel of the Mural...all Earth's peoples united and harmonious, with each other...and nature, all focused around the tree of life.


    This Mural is a commissioned piece of artwork from a young American Immigrant named Leo Tanguma

    Biggest Kicker of All....The Building and it's contents are dedicated to the "New World Airport Commission"...and, the art piece is named "Death in the Air"

    I offer these images and the patent...along with this link
    Denver Airport mural - Google Search

    Do some research...look at ALL the different Murals...and ponder them intently.
    My conclusion is that this is a bold piece of intent (a plan if you will)...to create conflict, create a convenient scape-goat, possibly destroy the manipulated and now world-wide reviled America...with an ultimate goal of creating a Singular "New World Order", one in which weapons are removed...and it's all done willingly...maybe even begged for.
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #18
      I'm in Europe. I seem to remember growing up under a ski littered in airplane trails.

      Just weeks ago, my well-marked, non-military flight crossed a few hundred meters over another plane (above the Alps I think), and could see the trail being produced, right out of its engines. It's a lot of it.

      I've noticed how there are so many layers of clouds. I've seen 4 or 5 on one location, quite thin each. It's not strange to think that the natural trails could be stuck at a given altitude (due to temp and pressure, etc), and be left to spread out as pictured.

      But, if the photographed are supposed to be all normal plane trails, please let someone post flight numbers. Should not be so hard. Europe of course has many flight paths mapping it. But if I just look up, I can already make a decent bet from where the flight took off, and where it's headed. In Australia, that should be easier, I suppose? If no flights can be thought of, explanations are required.

      If no flights come over this area, then flying up there yourself might be allowed by air control? Get up there for some samples!
      Also, could a good telescope manage to take a picture of the leading plane puling such a trail? At least we know there to look to "shoot" a secret plane, it it leaves such a big trail.

      Comment


      • #19
        Flight paths

        Originally posted by Cloxxki View Post
        I'm in Europe. I seem to remember growing up under a ski littered in airplane trails.

        Just weeks ago, my well-marked, non-military flight crossed a few hundred meters over another plane (above the Alps I think), and could see the trail being produced, right out of its engines. It's a lot of it.

        I've noticed how there are so many layers of clouds. I've seen 4 or 5 on one location, quite thin each. It's not strange to think that the natural trails could be stuck at a given altitude (due to temp and pressure, etc), and be left to spread out as pictured.

        But, if the photographed are supposed to be all normal plane trails, please let someone post flight numbers. Should not be so hard. Europe of course has many flight paths mapping it. But if I just look up, I can already make a decent bet from where the flight took off, and where it's headed. In Australia, that should be easier, I suppose? If no flights can be thought of, explanations are required.

        If no flights come over this area, then flying up there yourself might be allowed by air control? Get up there for some samples!
        Also, could a good telescope manage to take a picture of the leading plane puling such a trail? At least we know there to look to "shoot" a secret plane, it it leaves such a big trail.
        Good point cloxxki..

        Aircraft travel north to south and vice versa where I live, excepting west east for some military aircraft I've seen (holsworthy army base).

        One can always see the insignia on the tail. I'm far enough away from sydney airport that you can't hear them but you can clearly see them.

        These ones were so high they were the size the engines usually are.

        The ones I filmed were travelling east west AND north south - but not north-east to south-west; all trails were perpendicular and parallel, except when 2 aircraft were laying trails quite close (the trails were joined for half the sky sphere), one deviated at a 10 degree angle while I filmed.

        Commercial aircraft do not fly so close. Never. And there's never enough traffic to lay so many trails.

        It's not commercial airliners, imho.
        Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

        Comment


        • #20
          I would think there are more plane spotters out there than free energy researchers. Might not be so hard to get them on board to help find flight details, or better : pictures. Get on your local spotter forum, I would say.

          If it's not commercial, and not military, then it doesn't exist. Thus, we can fly our balloon or private craft there as it suits us. I would donate for such a "mission". If the trails would cease to appear once spotters get organized to get close, well, isn't that a won battle?

          Comment


          • #21
            Thanks for your post Radiant Science, that Patent sure spells it out.

            Love the artwork as well, I have always been fascinated in the symbolism used in art these days.

            Regards
            "Once you've come to the conclusion that what what you know already is all you need to know, then you have a degree in disinterest." - John Dobson

            Comment


            • #22
              Your welcome Ren...

              In my 24yrs of life, I too remember the airplanes as I grew up...but, their trails were nothing like I've been seeing in the past 4-6yrs.
              It's a given that the regular contrails are not pure water vapor...so much so that the majority of women across the globe have traces of Kerosene in their breast milk (Jet fuel is highly refined kerosene).

              However, Kerosene falls down readily because it is hydrophobic... this is because it's an oil (oil and water do not mix). Whatever is coming out now is Hydrolyphic...this allows the particles to bind with water vapor and form lingering clouds. Hot water vapor from a normal contrail quickly reaches equilibrium and disappears at a uniform rate...as seen here



              The kerosene remains unbound and falls to Earth (a separate well know pollution problem).

              Chemtrails are not Contrails...no matter what the pressure/temperature...the hot water vapor will reach equilibrium with the environmental water vapor and the contrail will fade at some linear rate. The Kerosene WILL NEVER create a cloud as it does not bind with water vapor...at the most all that COULD EVER HAPPEN would be a sort of emulsion...which will separate...NOT LINGER INTO HAZY CLOUDS!!!!!!!

              THIS IS NOT NORMAL!!!

              Comment


              • #23
                so much so that the majority of women across the globe have traces of Kerosene in their breast milk (Jet fuel is highly refined kerosene)
                Says Who? Could you point me to some study results or a study announcement concerning this issue.

                Matt

                Comment


                • #24
                  I read it in a medical journal some time ago...I cannot produce the article sorry (couldn't find it on the web)...not to say it isn't there...just not my point.

                  But, many environmental pollutants are found in breast milk, general consensus is that the levels are insignificant and should only be considered if in a high risk environment. Pollutants include pesticides, organic mercury and lead, DDT, dieldrin...and yes kerosene.

                  After all...what goes up, must come down

                  Comment


                  • #25
                    Rocket-Fuel Chemical Found In Breast Milk.

                    Hi Ted,

                    Here are some links:
                    Rocket-Fuel Chemical Found In Breast Milk

                    Rocket-Fuel Chemical
                    Found In Breast Milk
                    By Marla Cone
                    LA Times Staff Writer
                    2-28-5


                    Scientists on Tuesday reported that perchlorate, a toxic component of rocket fuel, was contaminating virtually all samples of women's breast milk and its levels were found to be, on average, five times greater than in cow's milk.

                    The contaminant, which originates mostly at defense industry plants, previously had been detected in various food and water supplies around the country. But the study by Texas Tech University's Institute of Environmental and Human Health was the first to investigate breast milk.

                    The findings concern health experts because infants and fetuses are the most vulnerable to the thyroid-impairing effects of the chemical.

                    Breast milk from 36 women in 18 states, including California, was sampled, and all contained traces of perchlorate.

                    Perchlorate blocks the nutrient iodide and inhibits thyroid hormones, which are necessary for brain development and cellular growth of a fetus or infant. A baby with impaired thyroid development may have neurological defects that result in lower IQ or learning disabilities.

                    The researchers recommended that pregnant and nursing women block the effects of perchlorate by taking iodine supplements as a precaution.

                    At the levels they found in breast milk, the scientists reported that 1-month-old infants would take in enough perchlorate to exceed a safe level, called a reference dose, that was established last month by a panel of the National Academy of Sciences.

                    "It is obvious that the NAS safe dose will be exceeded for the majority of infants," the report published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology says. Some infants would ingest so much that they would exceed levels that altered the brain structure of animals in laboratory tests.

                    The findings come as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is developing an enforceable limit on the amount of perchlorate in drinking water based on the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences panel. Currently there is no national standard.

                    "This is not just another study," said Renee Sharp, a senior analyst at the Environmental Working Group, which advocated a strict national standard. "It ends the questions about whether women are passing along perchlorate to their kids through breast milk, and the sky-high levels the scientists found put more than half the kids over the safe levels the NAS now recommends."

                    Environmentalists have urged the EPA to set its standard based on the body weight and perchlorate intake of an infant rather than an adult. Toxicologists said that would probably mean a standard of a few parts per billion. Pentagon officials have said that would shut down many water systems across the country and cost the military and its contractors billions of dollars in cleanup costs. They have instead lobbied for a standard of about 200 parts per billion based on thyroid studies of adults.

                    The new findings "will practically force EPA officials to write a drinking water standard that protects infants ó not just healthy adults," Sharp said.

                    California has set its own public health goal of 6 parts per billion but it is not an enforceable limit.

                    The Texas Tech researchers, led by Andrea Kirk, reported that the perchlorate in breast milk was not linked to the water the mothers drank. Instead, the main source was probably food, which apparently was tainted by irrigation water.

                    The finding that perchlorate is pervasive in breast milk and reaches high levels is somewhat of a surprise to toxicologists, because, unlike many other industrial chemicals, it does not build up in tissues over time.

                    Instead, it appears that the amount passed on to the infant in breast milk is determined by what the mother has just eaten.

                    Perchlorate levels are particularly high in the lower Colorado River, which supplies irrigation water to almost 2 million acres of cropland. The river, government officials believe, has been tainted by leaks from a Kerr-McGee plant near Lake Mead.

                    The highest perchlorate levels, one reaching 92 parts per billion, were found in the breast milk of two women from New Jersey. The average was 10.5 parts per billion, compared to 2 parts per billion in cow's milk. Forty-six of 47 samples of dairy milk purchased in 11 states, including California, contained perchlorate.

                    Sujatha Jahagirdar, clean-water advocate at Environment California, an advocacy group, said it was "absolutely appalling" that a component of rocket fuel was found in mother's milk.

                    Toxic Rocket Fuel Found In Milk Samples From Texas Supermarkets

                    Toxic Rocket Fuel Found In
                    Milk Samples From
                    Texas Supermarkets
                    Environmental Working Group
                    9-23-3

                    LUBBOCK, Texas -- A toxic component of rocket fuel has been found in supermarket milk at levels exceeding the federal government's currently recommended safe dose for drinking water, according to a peer-reviewed scientific study published today.

                    A team of five researchers from the Institute of Environmental and Human Health at Texas Tech University report in the journal Environmental Science and Technology that perchlorate was "unambiguously detected" in seven of seven cow's milk samples from Lubbock grocery stores.

                    LINK: http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/do...1021/es034735q

                    Perchlorate levels in the milk ranged from 1.7 to 6.4 parts per billion - all higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's most recent proposed safety standard of 1 ppb. Enforceable federal standards are not expected for at least five years, but the State of California has set 4 ppb of perchlorate as the "action level" at which a public water supply should be shut down.

                    Perchlorate, the explosive main ingredient of solid rocket and missile fuel, can disrupt the thyroid gland's ability to make essential hormones. For fetuses, infants and children, disruptions in thyroid hormone levels can cause lowered IQ, mental retardation, loss of hearing and speech, and motor skill deficits.

                    Perchlorate, most of it leaking from military bases or defense plants, contaminates more than 500 drinking water supplies in at least 20 states, serving well over 20 million people. Among major perchlorate-polluted sources is the Colorado River, which is used to irrigate 1.4 million acres of cropland in California and Arizona. Earlier this year, a study for the Environmental Working Group, conducted by the same team from Texas Tech, reported that about 1 in 5 samples tested of winter lettuce irrigated by the Colorado had perchlorate levels averaging four times the EPA's draft safety standard. (EWG Home | Environmental Working Group.)

                    "These troubling results are the first indication that perchlorate is not only contaminating drinking water and irrigation water, but that livestock can pass it on to humans," said EWG Senior Analyst Renee Sharp. "How much more evidence do we need before the government takes action to protect our water, our food and our selves from this toxic chemical?"

                    The milk samples represented six different brands, four packaged locally at the same plant and two at separate plants outside Texas. Researchers also found perchlorate in one sample of evaporated cow's milk (1 ppb) and one sample of human breast milk (about 4 ppb), but none was found in a sample of reconstituted powdered milk.

                    Levels of perchlorate in Lubbock-area drinking water range from below the limit of detection to 4 ppb, with the average about 2.5 ppb. Previous research by the Texas Tech scientists has shown that feed crops such as alfalfa can take up and concentrate perchlorate to high levels. The researchers have also documented perchlorate contamination of field-grown wheat, blackberries, chinaberries, mulberries and in lab-grown lettuce, soybeans, strawberries and cucumbers.

                    "The significant occurrence of perchlorate in all milk samples analyzed at levels that are comparable or even greater than the current California action level for the concentration of perchlorate in drinking water came as a considerable surprise to us," wrote the authors. "Based on this limited study, it is not clear how widespread perchlorate contamination of milk may be, but clearly such a study is warranted."

                    EWG renews its call for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Department of Agriculture to fast-track a definitive study of perchlorate contamination in the U.S. food supply, and make all results public. All future drinking water standards, such as those currently under consideration by California, must adequately reflect the potential for exposure through food. Farmers and ranchers must be fully compensated for lost profits and property values.

                    Copyright 2003, Environmental Working Group. All Rights Reserved.

                    http://www.ewg.org/issues/perchlorate/20030919/

                    See also next post.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA

                    Comment


                    • #26
                      suite.

                      Rocket Fuel Chemical Found in Breast Milk of Women in 18 States | LiveScience

                      View all headlines Subscribe to RSS
                      Health
                      Rocket Fuel Chemical Found in Breast Milk of Women in 18 States

                      By Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Senior Writer

                      posted: 24 February 2005 01:43 pm ET
                      Buzz up!
                      Add to delicious del.icio.us
                      Digg It! Digg It!
                      Save to Newsvine Newsvine
                      Add to reddit reddit
                      Comments (0) | Recommend (0)
                      States with perchlorate contamination in drinking water. Credit: Environmental Working Group
                      Full Size
                      Previous Image Next Image
                      1 of 1

                      States with perchlorate contamination in drinking water. Credit: Environmental Working Group

                      Updated 3:38 p.m. ET

                      A toxic component of rocket fuel has been found in breast milk of women in 18 states and store-bought milk from various locations around the country.

                      The chemical, perchlorate, can impede adult metabolism and cause retardation in fetuses, among other things. It leaches into groundwater from various military facilities.

                      Previous studies have found perchlorate in drinking water, on lettuce, and in cows milk.

                      The new research, announced this week, suggests perchlorate is a bigger problem than thought, scientists said.

                      Texas Tech University researchers studied 36 samples of breast milk from women in 18 states and 47 samples cow's milk purchased from stores in 11 states. Every sample of breast milk contained perchlorate, as did all but one sample of dairy milk.
                      The highest levels were found in women from New Jersey, New Mexico, Missouri, Nebraska and California, in that order.

                      The results are detailed in the online version of Environmental Science & Technology, a journal of the American Chemical Society. The work was led by Texas Tech biochemist Purnendu Dasgupta.

                      "We've got to come to grips with the perchlorate situation quickly,'' said California Senator Dianne Feinstein in a statement. "And EPA has to move quickly to set a national drinking water standard that protects the health and safety of all Americans.''

                      The details

                      Perchlorate occurs naturally and is also a primary ingredient in solid rocket fuel, munitions and fireworks. Perchlorate does not build up in human tissues over time, scientists say, but there has been speculation it could accumulate in breast milk.

                      In excess, the chemical can interfere with iodide uptake in the thyroid gland, disrupting adult metabolism and childhood development, scientists say.

                      In fetuses, it can potentially cause mental retardation, loss of hearing and speech, and motor skill deficits.

                      The average perchlorate concentration in breast milk samples was 10.5 micrograms per liter. The dairy milk average was 2.0 micrograms per liter. No definitive national standard exists, although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had suggested a limit of 1.0 micrograms per liter in drinking water.

                      The study also found that high levels of perchlorate in the breast milk samples were indeed related to low levels of iodide. Low iodide levels can inhibit thyroid function in nursing women. Scientists admit there is limited data, but Dasgupta and colleagues said the levels found in the study are "sufficiently low to be of concern."

                      They suggest that the recommended daily intake of iodine for pregnant and nursing women may need to be revised upward.

                      The report should not raise undue alarm, said Ed Urbansky, a former Environmental Protection Agency chemist who was not involved in the latest study.

                      "It's very difficult to determine what the findings might be other than to know it might be in so many milk samples,'' Urbansky said.

                      In your water

                      Perchlorate is in the drinking water of at least 11 million U.S. residents, other research has shown. The chemical is present in the Colorado river, which provides water to Los Angeles, Phoenix and Las Vegas and is used to irrigate 70 percent of the nation's lettuce crops, according to the Environmental Working Group, which studied the problem in 2003 in cooperation with scientists at Texas Tech.

                      An overview study of perchlorate released in January by the National Academies' National Research Council (NRC) tried to assess the risk, but scientists continue to argue about how much of the chemical is too much.

                      Also in January, a study out of Russia claimed children near Kazakhstan's Baikonur Cosmodrome, where rockets are launched, are twice as likely to require medical attention as other children in the region.

                      The Associated Press contributed to this story.

                      Take care,

                      Michel
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA

                      Comment


                      • #27
                        Wrong user mentioned.

                        Sorry Ted, the above post should be for Matthew Jones instead of Ted.

                        Take care,

                        Michel
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA

                        Comment


                        • #28
                          Chemtrails on tv

                          Ok, so I watch too much tv. In my defence, I have to lie down a lot - at least for a while yet.

                          But I watch documentaries (mainly - scrubs and family guy etc are hard to not watch) and I've been noticing Chemtrails all over the freaking world:

                          Chemtrails on tv documentaries all over the world - Vox

                          And yes, that's a toilet.

                          Love and light
                          Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                          Comment


                          • #29
                            Here in Holland I've asked around, and everyone responded "nah, they've been like that since our childhood".
                            I don't trust my own memories, but they tell me of skis littered with trails.

                            Comment


                            • #30



                              The skies before the snows came.

                              Thx Russia

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X