Gravity - just pure plain GRAVITY

[Aaron]

The ball falls to the ground; why?

Aaron

I can accept moving a mass displaces the aether, but if we pick a ball up from the ground, thus displacing the aether, what causes the ball to fall to the ground when released? The aether is pushing towards the center of mass.

The ball is a smaller system within a bigger system of the Earth's displacement. The overall push is towards the center of the Earth and not the ball. The ball will have an asymmetrical push towards the Earth since the Earth takes away some of that rebounding effect on the side of the ball facing the Earth.

"Two pieces of matter/mass cannot occupy the same space." That is almost like a cliche and would be correct in conventional circumstances. However, two things with mass CAN and WILL influence at the same time and in the same space the the common aether between them.

The aether is pushing back on all sides of the large object (Earth) and the small object (the ball - but on the ball not as symmetrically). The Earth has a more dominant mass and is taking away from the aetheric push on the ball on the side of the ball that happens to be facing the Earth. Meaning, the symmetry of the would be aether, if that ball was out in space away from anything else, is now broken. There is an asymmetrical push on the far side of the ball pushing towards the Earth's direction.

When this happens, less is pushing on the ball on the side facing the Earth since on that side, the Earth takes away from it causing a depletion that disrupts the would be symmetry around it - again, like the ball in outer space away from anything.

As a note, the Earth is also not PERFECTLY symmetrical in it's displacement effect from it's mass. The ball offsets the symmetry of the Earth so does the Earth move towards the ball? Conceptually yes, but only like an ultra small percentage of the amount that the Earth influences the ball, proportionately.

Ball has small impact on Earth. Earth has large impact on ball.

[CloudSeeder]

When I hit the ground it did indeed feel like the Earth had hit upward me!

xxxxxxxxxxxxx cccccc

[CloudSeeder]

nnnnnnnnnnn yyyyyyyyyy

[Inquorate]

Aether vortex

I've said this a few times on different threads, and I'll say it again here;

Imagine a bath tub full of water, and pull the plug. A water-less vortex forms.

This is equivalent to mass. Mass is a form in space, sustained by the mass-less aether.

By rushing in to mass, the aether sustains it. It spends some of it's energy doing so, and radiates the rest as heat etc, which is why hydrogen is still fluid at zero kelvin.

A large vortex will pull other vortices to it.

High voltage dc will interfere with the flow of the aether, and objects will decrease in apparent mass, as well as deteriorate.

Love and light

[CloudSeeder]

jjjjjjjjjj rrrrrrr

[CloudSeeder]

Gravity Effects: Humans were more of a liquid we would be a walking vortex also.

sssssssssss ttttttttttttt

[cody]

It does appear that gravity can be influenced by high voltage as well as rotational forces. Bruce DePalma did some experiments with rotational mass in gravitational fields with some interesting results. Here is a link to that work, might be worth a read.

http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/spinni...experiment.pdf

[CloudSeeder]

Changing voltage could be used as a potentiometer to dial up the level of magnetism:

dddddddddddddd

[morpher44]

gravity rant...

@john mayer
Gravity is working against me
And gravity wants to bring me down
...
Oh gravity has taken better men than me how can that be?

@tom petty
I wanna free fall out into nothin'
Gonna leave this world for awhile

@coldplay
Oh the way that gravity turns on you and me

---

To work out how to lift something, you need the center of mass.
Knowing this, you can apply a force that apposes the most dominant
gravitational force. If you tried to do this only at that point,
however, there would be a very large instability since balancing
something on a needle is very difficult -- unless your W. C. Fields.
So, plan B. would be to distribute those forces around the
mass, with the intent that their vector sum would have the NET
counter-apposing effect.
If the object in question has a large horizontal-to-earth component
and a narrow vertical-to-earth component, it stands to reason
that the forces you use around the object can all be small forces ..
but you need many of them.

Gyroscopes don't like to be tipped. The energy put in to
keep them spinning has the benefit of also keeping the object
steady -- stable.
With a gyroscope, it is easier to balance it on a pin.

[morpher44]

inertia

If you could develop craft that had a shield that protected it from the influence of any and all external forces, you could move that craft at a constant velocity.

In space you don't have air friction .. but you do have gravitational forces ... depending upon your proximity to large masses.

A collision is defined to be
"an isolated event in which two or more bodies (colliding bodies)
exert relatively strong forces on each other for a relatively
short period of time".

It seems to me that if you are a traveling body, and you want
to avoid collisions with other bodies out there, it might make
sense to reduce your mass -- your inertia -- down to zero --
i.e. to become pure energy.

[CloudSeeder]

The entire outside hull could be considered the first stage of a futuristic turbine.

gggggggggggggggggg

[morpher44]

Bruce L. Cathie

I have had "Anti-Gravity and the World Grid" on my bookshelf for many
years.

Recently I'm rediscovering Bruce L. Cathie's work. He keeps
popping up as I google for various things.

Cathie argues that at the time of Pythagoras, and perhaps even earlier,
they had worked out various units such as "arc minutes",
"number of degrees in a circle" and the "speed of light".

Harmonic of speed of light -- 144.
Half-wave -- 72.
Apply to Pythagoras right-angled 3, 4, 5 ...
you get
216 - number of minutes of arc in a circule
288 - (144 x 2) or 2C were C is speed of light
360 - degrees in a circle

He claims that it can't be an accident that these units
were selected that way.

[CloudSeeder]

hhhhhhhhhhhhh

[morpher44]

coast to coast am

I've never heard of him but sometimes I listen to Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, late night, and he had a fellow on who was recounting many numbers dovetailing like that also. Might have been around 3-4 months back. My memory isn't real good from so many concussions in my life but they have accessible archives (at a small fee) or you can call in and ask. I don't recall the gentleman's name either. It was astounding what he was saying.... something about a "universal number".

Yes I'm a big fan of the show.
You can simply go to
Shows - Coast to Coast AM
to find the show in question.
And these too are good shows:
Whitley Strieber's Unknown Country
and Dreamland or
Laura Lee
Laura Lee Show

[Aromaz]

If you could develop craft that had a shield that protected it from the influence of any and all external forces, you could move that craft at a constant velocity. In space you don't have air friction .. but you do have gravitational forces ... depending upon your proximity to large masses....

I have thoughts in the similar direction. But rather than a shield, would think of a closed loop electronized gas flowing in defined and controlable directions - within the shell of the hull and such then 'redirect' the radaint energy around exterior. i.e. the hull of such craft is a double hull with example mercury vapour flowing from forward to back; this will create a flow of ions in same direction near exterior of craft - ionic wind - vacuum in front, pressure on back. As for the craft; complete closed circuit propulsion system.