Gravity - just pure plain GRAVITY

[elias]

Interesting Video

Thanks Aaron,

This was really interesting, and many info in it, This is the Page about Eric Laithwaite: Eric Laithwaite -- Gyrocsope levitation.

But something that didn't amuse me so much is the myth-buster type of approach the video had. Aiming at discrediting things, when one case is a hoax it doesn't mean that all of the cases are hoaxes. More like how the scientific method works, they observe a finite amount of cases and conclude that the case is valid for every case, which leads to a faulty science.
Nevertheless it has some interesting information in it.

Elias

[Aaron]

posting in this thread

@All: I deeply apologize for posting questionable content. It seems if I post my own stuff it appears as if I am promoting only my own ideas excluding everyone else but when I then post something else I must be promoting that. I will private mail Aaron from now on for permission to post anything further here, which works out real well since I have no further comments anyway. I don't need my character or intentions being bashed over a point of ignorance. I apologize for my ignorance, not for my character and intentions that were soundly and incorrectly bashed.

Magniworks and their associated scam pages are aggressively marketing with great affiliate promotion material so it is difficult to know it is a scam unless you are familiar with what they're claiming is theirs.

No need to email me. For this thread, anything that is specific to gravity would be great...levitation, anti-gravity, etc...

Actually, it is up to the creator of any thread to define its purpose. Here is Aromaz's first post:

Upon two suggestions; I propose this tread dedicated to GRAVITY. This is NOT about engines, drives, systems or any other than the sole purpose to try understanding and learning as much as possible about the phenomena generally called “Gravity”. Surely this will not be an easy task because there are just no clear definitions about gravity.

Included off course we can look at ‘anti’-gravity or as I prefer to say ‘counter’-gravity or 'shifting'-gravity. On this scope the most interesting part should be the possibility of ‘controlling’ or re-apply gravity. The Stan Deyo explanations of gravity movement; in particular about the smoking ‘O’ comes to mind.

[Aaron]

gyroscope

Elias & Al,

Yes that's him! lol, been a while.

Just the simple demo of him lifting a super heavy gyroscope up over his head using one hand ought to demonstrate that gyroscopes certainly have the potential, no pun intended, to counter gravity.

[CloudSeeder]

Pulsed Gravity Drives?

Understanding Gravity is a

[CloudSeeder]

zzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzz

[CloudSeeder]

The opposite of dropping a rock into the ocean.

zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz

[CloudSeeder]

Instantaneous Displacement-Replacement? Aether Cosmic Pressure Exceeds Ocean Pressure

zzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz

[CloudSeeder]

Opposed Portholes, for Craft Balance <> Capacitor+Suction Engine:

You'd want to zzzzzzzz

[CloudSeeder]

Aether-Turbine Engine? Yep, plus it charges the capacitor

type of aether-turbine engine

[elias]

Bruce Depalma

Hello,

Bruce Depalma had done some interesting experiments about gravity and spinning balls. He found out that a spinning ball falls faster than a non-spinning ball. If you trow it upward it will also rise faster to a more height than a non-spinning ball.

Here is his article: SpiningBall(Understanding)

Spinning Gyro Experiment: Gyro Drop Experiment

I think that spinning somehow makes the aether cause less influence on the object (making it have less inertia) and maybe it makes the object "drill" into the aether.

Elias

[elias]

David Wilcock has an intersting article about gravity: CHAPTER 06: GRAVITY, MAGNETISM AND ROTATION - THE MISSING LINK

And Joseph Newmans theory about gyroscopic levitation: FALLING GYROSCOPE EXPERIMENT

Bruce Depalma states that, falling and rising both speed up for a rotating gyroscope, but David Wilcock points to an experiment performed by the Japanese and says that the gyro loses weight. More experiments has to be done to draw a good conclusion about gyroscopic gravity control.

[Inquorate]

Falling magnets

When I first entered the aether / free energy scene, I watched a video about a guy's work with falling boards.

He had a wooden board filled with lines of Ferrite magnets arranged like fins - I can't remember how the fields were arranged but I think uniformly -, and another board arranged exactly the same except with non magnetized Ferrite.

Same weight; the magnet board fell slower which he showed using a pressure plate timer system.

I'd forgotten about it until now.

[Aaron]

ferrous vs. non ferrous

Non ferrous metals falls lower than ferrous metals. The counter currents
induced into the non-ferrous metal by the Earth's magnetic field repels it
slightly.

The effect is there; small but measurable.

[elias]

David Wilcock has an intersting article about gravity: CHAPTER 06: GRAVITY, MAGNETISM AND ROTATION - THE MISSING LINK

And Joseph Newmans theory about gyroscopic levitation: FALLING GYROSCOPE EXPERIMENT

Bruce Depalma states that, falling and rising both speed up for a rotating gyroscope, but David Wilcock points to an experiment performed by the Japanese and says that the gyro loses weight. More experiments has to be done to draw a good conclusion about gyroscopic gravity control.

Nobody has mentioned the direction of rotation of the gyroscope, it may have different results. Clockwise or anti-clockwise?

[CloudSeeder]

Spinning creates an Aether Barrier Reduces Amt of Aether reaching the Spinning Object

xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx