-
-
Free energy does not exist and neither does electrical reactance. Both are fictions whose theorized existence has weathered our doubts for over a century of workable mathematics. This does not prove the existence of imaginary numbers, nor does it prove that they succeed at representing any variety of electrical reactance, free energy or otherwise. Instead, it demonstrates that we can “get by” without having to prove how to take the square root of a negative number. No one has a clue how to do that, and nobody expects to find out any time soon...!
Without this proof, we have no proof for the existence of free energy, and we have no proof for the existence of electrical reactance (since the two are closely related).
All we know is that the math works based on over a century of "street-wise" expertise.
I made a mistake with the math. Please take a look at the following link for its correction…
en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Draft:Free_Energy_does_not_Exist
shortcut...
https://is.gd/freedraft
...and for mobile phones...
https://is.gd/freedraftm
...and...
https://is.gd/draftfree
...and for mobile phones...
https://is.gd/draftfreem
...and...
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Vinyasi/sandbox
Backup copy/mirror ...
http://vinyasi.info/mhoslaw/Free%20E...20not%20Exist/
This next link is for fun. Both links are describing overunity. The first link, up-above, specifically covers electrical overunity while the following link is more broad about its treatment. Enjoy! …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vinyasi/sandboxLast edited by Vinyasi; 01-07-2023, 05:44 PM.Comment
-
Tech Sandbox
Comment
Tweet
Comment