Design flaw in MEG control circuit (as well as Flynn replications)

[lamare]

Maxwell had no error, per se. He wrote down Ampere's law for Magnetic intensity in the electrical system of measurement. Why did he do that? Probably wasn't definitively sure, or it would have been too revolutionary (in principle it is still revolutionary now)

Actually, he made two errors. He added a term for "displacement current" to Ampere's original law, as explained on Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations

The original law of Ampère states that magnetic fields relate to electric current. Maxwell's addition states that magnetic fields also relate to changing electric fields, which Maxwell called displacement current. The integral form states that electric and displacement currents are associated with a proportional magnetic field along any enclosing curve.

Maxwell's addition to Ampère's law is important because the laws of Ampère and Gauss must otherwise be adjusted for static fields. As a consequence, it predicts that a rotating magnetic field occurs with a changing electric field. A further consequence is the existence of self-sustaining electromagnetic waves which travel through empty space.

And he equated the curl of the electric field to the time derivative of the magnetic field.


Both of these are incorrect, because they are in violation of the fundamental theorem of vector calculus aka the Helmholtz decomposition, which establishes a fundamental separation of linear (longitudinal) and angular (rotational) fields. The linear half of the Helmholtz decomposition is curl free and compressible, while the angular half is divergence free and incompressible.

The linear half involves the divergence operator over a closed volume resulting in a scalar potential, while the angular half involves the curl operator over a closed surface resulting in a vector potential, since rotation always goes around an axis which has a direction. Anyone who maintains that the electric field should have a curl and that a "displacement current" should be included in Ampere's law simply has not understood the definitions of these operators nor the (spatial) consequences thereof. A closed volume is simply not the same thing as a closed surface and that's ultimately why one cannot make the additions Maxwell did!

What Maxwell did is like having Pythagoras theorem:

a^2 + b^c = c^2

and Maxwell writes:

a^2 + b^c = c^2 + db/dt.

One simply cannot do things like that!


The proper relation between space and time is much more fundamental than on the one hand forcing the curl free half of the Helmholtz decomposition, the electric field, to have a curl and on the other hand to add (the time derivative of) a curl free term to the curl of the magnetic field. What I discovered is that the time derivative of any given vector field is given by combining the quantum circulation constant k with the vector Laplacian:

dF/dt = -k Delta F,

with Delta the vector Laplacian, *the* second spatial derivative in three dimensions.

And as I wrote in my (very preliminary) article:

https://github.com/l4m4re/notebooks/..._physics.ipynb

Obviously, the units of measurements match: [/s] = [m^2/s] [/m^2].

This is very significant, because it enables us to define higher order Laplace and Poisson equations in three dimensions and it also gives us the opportunity to obtain a much deeper understanding of the Nature of space and time in our Universe.

In other words: **this is the fundamental equation that will one day be recognized as one of the biggest scientific breakthroughs of the 21st century**, because there is simply no argument to be made against such a simple and straightforward application of the vector Laplacian.

From there, we can define the acceleration field a by:

a = -k Delta v,

and the jerk field j by:

j = -k Delta a,

to obtain second order fields and then the (full 3D vector) wave equation becomes:

a/k + j/c^2 = 0,

indicating that the relation between the fields is actually much more complex as what Maxwell wrote and involves second order fields, of which current density J is related to the second order vector potential representing turbulence, while the second order scalar potential is related to temperature.

[Rakarskiy]

Actually, he made two errors. He added a term for "displacement current" to Ampere's original law, as explained on Wikipedia:

[.

Mate, you're completely wrong. Don't pull your sock over the globe. Everything has to be in its proper place. Where did you see Maxwell's global view of fields in his equations. He solved the electrodynamics of such a phenomenon as electromagnetic induction (for Electrodynamics). And induction is precisely what happens if the fields change.

This is the problem of modern physics, they have put a sock on the globe and do not want to take it off.

I will also note - how does the magnetic field of a generator change? which is excited by a permanent magnet or electromagnet (in fact, a constant field). Do you think there is an alternating magnetic field at work in the generator? No, there at the point where the wire is placed the magnetic induction changes, which is statically different in the magnetic flux of the permanent magnet. That's the point of the wire that Maxwell wrote his equations for.

[JenkoRun]

Hi Rakarskiy, the math is not my area so I cannot comment on that so if possible please simplify what those equations mean or explain what the fields are doing over using math, I'm not sure if there's a communication error between us but if you had an explanation for why stimulating the core without power in the windings is able to stimulate the windings themselves, as experimentally verified, I didn't see it.

The experiments have showed me without a doubt that the core alone is able to stimulate windings with an EMF from physical stress, if you say that is impossible then this goes against experimentation which I cannot ignore. Please explain?

Regards -R

[lamare]

Mate, you're completely wrong. Don't pull your sock over the globe. Everything has to be in its proper place.

Nope, I'm correct since everything has to be in its proper place, indeed.

The problem of Maxwell's entanglement of Faraday's law with the fundamental medium model is that this results in only one wave equation that limits the propagation speed of electromagnetic phenomena to the speed of light, which leaves Tesla's longitudinal mode, propagating at pi/2 times c through the medium, literally out of the equation. And Dr. Steffen Kuehn recently demonstrated it is entirely possible to transmit and receive information at a speed of 3 times c in electrically short coaxial cables and did the math as well as the experiment:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342150114

Based on classical circuit theory, this article develops a general analytic solution of the telegrapher’s equations, in which the length of the cable is explicitly contained as a freely adjustable parameter. For this reason, the solution is also applicable to electrically short cables. Such a model has become indispensable because a few months ago, it was experimentally shown that voltage fluctuations in ordinary but electrically short copper lines move at signal velocities that are significantly higher than the speed of light in a vacuum. This finding contradicts the statements of the special theory of relativity but not, as is shown here, the fundamental principles of electrical engineering.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335677198

In more recent work, he also demonstrated that a time shift between two demodulated audiosignals from the one and the same broadcast station can be detected with his plasma antenna, thus confirming the possibility of superluminal signal transmission through the medium as well:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361736479

Where did you see Maxwell's global view of fields in his equations. He solved the electrodynamics of such a phenomenon as electromagnetic induction (for Electrodynamics). And induction is precisely what happens if the fields change.

Yep, induction does happen, but not because of a fundamental property of the medium in the way Maxwell described it by entangling the circuit level Faraday law with the fundamental medium model, which is incorrect.

Electromagnetic induction happens because of the physics of the quantized vortices aka magnetic field lines in the superfluid medium called aether, whereby each vortex has a circulation equal to the quantum circulation constant k. And in order to get the aether to move in circles as in a vortex, a pressure gradient is required, which is known as the electric field, defined as the gradient of the scalar potential.

So, for electromagnetic phenomena, involving by definition a number of quantized vortices, there is indeed a 90 degree angle between the magnetic field, and the electric field, which is why Maxwell works quite well in practice for describing electromagnetic phenomena.

However, for Tesla's longitudinal sound-like wave through the aether there is no magnetic component and this cannot be described with the current Maxwell equations because of the errors I've pointed out.

[lamare]

Electromagnetic induction happens because of the physics of the quantized vortices aka magnetic field lines in the superfluid medium called aether, whereby each vortex has a circulation equal to the quantum circulation constant k. And in order to get the aether to move in circles as in a vortex, a pressure gradient is required, which is known as the electric field, defined as the gradient of the scalar potential.

I should have explained this a bit more.

So, what I've described here is the "static" situation. When talking about electromagnetic induction, we are talking about changes in the fields. So, what happens in that case is that turbulence is introduced, which results in adding or removing more quantized vortices aka magnetic field lines, just like what happens when changing the rotation speed of a superfluid forming quantized vortices:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7760

It is that turbulence we call current density J, an angular phenomenon, which by necessity also involves changes in the pressure gradient aka the electric field. Once the turbulence dies out, there's no more change in magnetic field strength nor is there any more change in electric field strength.

And the turbulence or current on the surface of the (coil) wire forms the interface between the internal of the wire and the external, so when we energize a coil, at first there is no differential between internal and external aether flow in and around the wire, so the turbulence (current) creates additional magnetic field lines aka vortices within the coil (turns), which on its turn results in an increasing differential between internal and external aether flow in and around the wire resulting in increasing dissipation within the wire aka Ohm's law until eventually all current / turbulence is being dissipated and turned into heat within the wire and no more change occurs to the magnetic field outside the wire.

And all this occurs at the circuit level and not at the fundamental medium level, so there is no direct fundamental relation between the (time derivatives of the) electric and magnetic fields the way Maxwell described it, since the electric field is a linear/longitudinal phenomenon and the magnetic field is an angular/rotational phenomenon that are related via the vector Laplacian and quantum circulation constant k.

[Rakarskiy]

How much simpler are static and dynamic fields? And what exactly is a force field phenomenon (electric or magnetic)? In what does the field phenomenon manifest itself?
When you discard all the tinsel and leave only the basic, you understand how it works, but the question arises, where is the source, how does this source create such phenomena as "implosion" and "explosion". Why is there a force line between the centres of these phenomena in a magnetic field, but in an electric field there is a third element zero.
I have come to the conclusion that we are completely ignorant of what these phenomena "electric field" and "magnetic field" are. We judge by the external factors by which these phenomena are manifested.
Therefore, there is no point for me to prove anything, I will accept only logical argumentation, which is logically woven into the grid of manifestations of the universe. .

[thaelin]

Hi Lamare:
In reference to your post #2, I see you had the same idea but many years prior to me. I have used this sort of circuit to obtain 90% return in some coil/cap pairs. By using dual steering diodes, you do away with the contention between both sources. I have taken this one step forward and found that using a zener diode on one of the lines after the cap, you keep a small amount to rebuild on. Ultra fast diodes off the coil to cap and then ultra fast on the ground line and zener on the positive side.
Wish I could have seen this back then but oh well. Did make a small SG run on 14 ma when it was orig around 350ma.
thay