Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1872, Elihu Thomson - anyone got this document in scientific american 1872??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Here's a device comparison.The theory behind it is really open at this point.

    All these devices have something in common...oppositely wound coils with probable high resistance causes a probable bunching effect...or polarity cancellation perhaps which in theory produces the radiant shock wave.

    Enjoy!
    Last edited by nat1971a; 05-15-2010, 12:55 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Nat,
      It's probably bleeding obvious but where did you get the picture of the Thomoson/Houston apparatus? Also great thread!

      Raui
      Scribd account; http://www.scribd.com/raui

      Comment


      • #33
        raui,

        2nd link post 4 of this thread.


        Nat

        Comment


        • #34
          More info on thomson/ houston experiment

          pages 173-174
          pages 23-25



          The Chemical news and journal of ... - Google Books

          Comment


          • #35
            IMO do not look the answer too far from electricity. Radiant energy must be a form of electricity also.

            Baroutologos
            Last edited by baroutologos; 01-06-2010, 10:30 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Not necessarily . I've posted possible explanation some time ago. It's a sonic effect - creating bubble in a steady-state magnetic field and collapsing it surely produce shockwave. Such bubble could be seen as magnetic or electric phenomena but it has to have very short life.
              The exact equivalent of sonic collapse like that one : YouTube - Pistol Shrimp

              Comment


              • #37
                http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post65325
                I think it is also related to mass, in other words : it has to be connected with natural orientation of atoms and electrons in Earth magnetic field.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by nat1971a View Post
                  More info on thomson/ houston experiment

                  pages 173-174
                  pages 23-25



                  The Chemical news and journal of ... - Google Books
                  Great!
                  DO YOU SEE ? It's Edwin Gray "spliting the positive"

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    OMG i just noticed in edwin grays patent inductors 23 & 28 also (in the attachment of post 31 of this thread)...I know how this works now!!!!

                    Did you notice the symmetry too....
                    Last edited by nat1971a; 03-21-2010, 07:35 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by nat1971a View Post
                      OMG i just noticed in edwin grays patent inductors 27 & 28 also (in the attachment of post 31 of this thread)...I know how this works now!!!!

                      Did you notice the symmetry too....
                      Please post a link to that post.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        http://www.energeticforum.com/79939-post31.html

                        Heres the link. Review the attachment...And compare the inductors either side of the spark gaps to the thomson/houston device.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Regarding this coil wound opposite. If you study bedini's patent (not the monope , but the weird device one) he is using the opposite wounding style.

                          Also the Kromrey converter as depicted by Bedini in the board at EFTV 10, coils are wound oppositively, and if you think about it, a cancelation of polarity should occcur ( i have said it in the past also).

                          I do not have much hope(personally) the opposite wound coils have anything special to say. By the way, someone willing to experiment on that is cool i suppose.

                          Baroutologos

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            magnetic current

                            Originally posted by nat1971a View Post
                            OMG i just noticed in edwin grays patent inductors 27 & 28 also (in the attachment of post 31 of this thread)...I know how this works now!!!!

                            Did you notice the symmetry too....
                            I built that variation in the Gray patent - it is what beshires was so gung ho about in the Gray Tube Replication thread. It is following the exact principle
                            of colliding two positives and forcing them to common ground (between the
                            caps). That patent says those 2 coils are wound in the same polarity.
                            And the coils 23 & 24 is a bifilar choke in my opinion. Anyway, it worked
                            just about identical to all the other Gray circuits I built. But, that is with
                            the information provided and my builds never included anything that is
                            missing in the Gray patents, which of course, there is probably a lot
                            missing.

                            The experiment described in The Chemical News article sounds like it is
                            magnetic current.

                            What is A (capital A)? It is not defined in that article.

                            P is the spark gap in the "dark box" but what is the wire at the left side
                            going to? Just open to the air and not connected back to anything?

                            It is interesting they're pulling this "aetheric" force from the magnet cores
                            just like Ehrenhaft was with magnetic current:

                            Felix Ehrenhaft: Magnetic Current --- 9 articles



                            Ehrenhaft was able to charge a soft iron core
                            with LIGHT.
                            Sincerely,
                            Aaron Murakami

                            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              A is a bar of iron/steel or cadmium as used by edison

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                block diagrams

                                Thanks!

                                What about the wire coming out of the left side of the dark box connected
                                to the left side point?

                                Does it just go to earth ground, ground on the circuit, open air or something
                                else?
                                Sincerely,
                                Aaron Murakami

                                Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                                Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                                RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X