Fred A. Baldinelli | Dual Relay Charger

[Aaron]

foia

Hello Aaron,
as predicted they are going to afford me the info after I submit my name and app to the department of records for a release of the info regarding Fred A Baldinelli. Unfortunately they also stated that info of this age MAY no longer be available due to age and storage facilities. I will be submitting a request in writing within the next couple of days, fingers crossed!
regards, Chuck

Chuck,

So did you find something too exciting to post about it?

[ewizard]

Maybe send Chuck an email as I'm guessing he may not check in here too often. Hopefully he hasn't been harassed for asking questions.

The fact that this was shown to Ford Motor company may mean it has been thoroughly erased from any available sources.

As a possible related device I once saw a unit on eBay that claimed to be an energy device in a box using alternators and a battery. It was stated it could power a home. I was hesitant to bid on it although it was certainly affordable. I later contacted the winner to ask him if it really worked. He said it was indeed working so far and that it had (IIRC) 5 or so alternators in it. I have lost track of the person or info related to this but apparently Baldinelli's device was a battery and modified alternator. I have never come across another item like this for sale on eBay. I guess that's no surprise.

[Aaron]

ebay

Very interesting!

How long ago was that ebay auction?

[ewizard]

I've been an eBay member for a long time and unfortunately I'm not probably going to be able to pin down a time but I'm going to say it was at least 9 years ago or so. However I reserve the right to be wrong by at least 4 or 5 years

[1NRG24Seven]

http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/baldinelli_article.pdf

Please re-download this file, Peter received a clearer
copy of the article of the Globe from the Globe.
It is now in that pdf.

I found that in the article they mentioned they were building in a feature to self destruct.
One would only place a self destruct mechanism within the device if its components and or circuit were so basic and simple that anyone could duplicate it. Otherwise why else would someone think to do that? Many simple devices have been patented that did not have a self destruct feature. Seems this would stem from a fear of very easy duplication to me.

24

[boguslaw]

Yes, because it has to be easy ! So many inventors without any background , lab or help discovered extra energy during this 100 years.