The hack reality howto

[lamare]

Hi all,

Over at this thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...und-bible.html some mind-blowing concepts are bubbling up.

It appears that we can and are influencing reality, the reality we percieve as a person. Some of this is excellently explained here: What the Bleep Do We Know!? & What the Bleep!? - Down the Rabbit Hole

It appears that our thoughts carry energy with them, which makes that once a thought, an idea, has been thought once, it springs up everywhere. Now what is a thought, really?

Of course, I don't really know, but if we consider that our brains are all about signals and connections, it is tempting to assume that a thought is some kind of electromagnetic wave phenomenon inside our brains. Since it appears to be located/bound to our brains, one can assume that they can be considered to be similar to matter, atoms, objects.

If that is true, thoughts can be seen as dynamic objects that probably share characteristics with "charge carriers". As has been shown by Prof. Turtur ( http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf ), charge carriers constantly interact with the vacuum and there is an energy flow to and from the vacuum in the form of an electric field.

Now suppose our thoughts behave similar, they interact with the vacuum. Now wouldn't it be possible that these energyflows are not just energy dissipations, but communication channels, that thoughts are somehow "coupled" across space (and time?) if they "resonate" together, as in Tesla's magnifying transmitter?

If that were the case, then it seems possible that by synchronising our thoughts, we can boost the energy (information) streams these emit, and thus making it easier for other brains to "connect" and "resonate" with the thoughts in question, making it easier for other brains to "grasp" the thought once they encounter it elsewhere?

If that were the case, then we could easily use modern communication techniques to synchronize our brains on interesting topics, for example by using twitter. If we were to follow eachother on twitter and post information we think would be interesting to others, then this information would be "amplified" if multiple people read it at more or less the same time.

I know it sounds crazy, but the theory suggests it may just work....

So, I just drop it here, and see wether or not it starts to "resonate"

[dambit]

Hi Lamare,

The Law of Attraction explains all of this (although not in any specific scientific terms). Thoughts truley are powerful and I live my life using this laws principles.

Cheers,

Steve.

[lamare]

The Law of Attraction explains all of this (although not in any specific scientific terms). Thoughts truley are powerful and I live my life using this laws principles.

Thanks. Aaron has some deeper info on this:

Law of Attraction | Secret of Law of Attraction
http://www.feelthevibe.com/synchronicity.pdf



It looks like I have to take a look in the other areas on this forum...

[Cherryman]

Hi all,

...
If that were the case, then we could easily use modern communication techniques to synchronize our brains on interesting topics, for example by using twitter. If we were to follow eachother on twitter and post information we think would be interesting to others, then this information would be "amplified" if multiple people read it at more or less the same time.

I know it sounds crazy, but the theory suggests it may just work....
...
So, I just drop it here, and see wether or not it starts to "resonate"

Okay.. Lets say it's true:

And now with this knoledge think about the impact that the MSM has on the people all around the world.. every minute.. every day..
Most of the news is bad news.. war, corruption, terror, crisis.. so if it works as stated.. then the current information stream is a hughe amplifier of "evill" ..



For the renewable energy community, it meens that we have to talk the most simple setup, and all start telling eachother it will work. Forget difficult cirquits, forget invincable forces.. Just think: Mix sand and water in a tube, and put a wire trough it. (Edit: That might make the beach a dangerous place.. ;-) It's an example, but i guess most of you will understand that)

This is not to be funny, although it might seems that way.. It's about maximizing the possibillity if it is true..


Happy thinking!

[Cloxxki]

I've encountered this a couple times myself. Most notable was making an invention, working it out with a friend, and getting it patented. A solution to a problem that had been sought for more than a century.
Later we found out that a guy an ocean away had the exact same idea as my original idea (which we had substatially improved upon), and was already marketing it.
I gave the guy a call, and it turns out his idea came to live a matter of days before or after mine, not more.
I made a point of it to my friend to have the patent filed ASAP, as I had a sense of someone breathing down our necks. In the end, we could mutually agree that our designs were significantly different, and we were not in each other's ways, moreso because we'd really abandoned that first design which he had stayed on, with all it's downsides. He never seems to have persued his idea much further, and we're still working to get the design perfected before shelling out the proto costs.

Great idea to organize mass thought transmissions. As a kid I tried to get thoughts across to unsuspected objects of my thought, and that never seemed to work. Perhaps it's about being compatible and "searching" for the message in question.

Let's construct a thought scipt very specific about doing our part for the world, using ou unique talents to the fullest to come with a technology or idea that will help mankind to make progress.
Versions would be in the spirit of economists, electric engineers, aerodynamicists, etc, etc. With some basic concepts that deserve further exploring. And motivational thought on where to dig the energy from.
When it works, people won't know they were addressed, but get drawing, writing, and building.
Of course the mass thought sessions should be well-timed and directed, as well as registered, to later see if people ca recognize thoughts.
Important part of the prioject should be to realize that the recipients are greater talents than ourselves, or in better position to make things happen for whichever reason. And recipients should realize this as well, as a duty to mankind.

[Cherryman]

I've encountered this a couple times myself. .....

Of course the mass thought sessions should be well-timed and directed, as well as registered, to later see if people ca recognize thoughts.
Important part of the prioject should be to realize that the recipients are greater talents than ourselves, or in better position to make things happen for whichever reason. And recipients should realize this as well, as a duty to mankind.

The idear is not new, many groups are already worldwide doing things alike.

Last monday, for instance, there was a call for all people to think positive at 2100 GMT. Positive, peace etc.. It has been tried and still going on. The internet is a great medium to connect and plan. The same internet also gives the problem of too many idears, too many variations.

Thats why i suggest to keep the idear as simple as possible, to prefent miscommunication or explenations going off track. We need focus.

The idear states it creates reallity, so why not focus on something extremely simple?

[Cloxxki]

OK, some OU suggestions.

"It's possible to use water to run a car, but it's only just being explored"
"Economy of lights can be greatly improved with existing circuits"
"Green energy is great"
"Your inventivity can benifit existence of mankind"
"Open Source it, no-one ever got rich off a truly great idea"

[Cherryman]

OK, some OU suggestions.

"It's possible to use water to run a car, but it's only just being explored"
"Economy of lights can be greatly improved with existing circuits"
"Green energy is great"
"Your inventivity can benifit existence of mankind"
"Open Source it, no-one ever got rich off a truly great idea"

Hello Cloxxki, I think you go one step to fast.

First we have to establish:

Can the "thinking" actually create or alter things. ( To put it simple, if we ALL think that water could be used as fuel, are we then able to put it in our cars without any modifications, just a mutual thinking)

Or

Will the thinking lead to more creativity with allready known physics.



I'm not sure if i make enough sence, but do you see the difference?

Rob

[jeanna]

I think the point is to visualize that it does work.
Keep seeing it working, not the details but the outcome, then it starts to play out and sooner rather than later, it does.
I have had this work many times in my life.
It is what our brains are made to do.
So, it is easier than you think it is if you have never done it.

I think, we think our brains cannot do this, and so...
... they cannot!

[Aaron]

misc...

Check out my 2nd post:
http://www.energeticforum.com/energe...-research.html

The negative media perpetuates and builds a horrible reality.

But the GOOD thing about this is the masses are PASSIVELY perceiving this
stuff...they're not putting real intentional thinking into that perception.

If there is a smaller of fraction of people that are having willful intention
into something, it is much more powerful.

Also, memory and recorded thoughts are not stored in the brain any more
than radio waves are not stored in the tuner.

[Cloxxki]

Yeah, I would rather see it as positivity that drags the result towards our reality. Not make an experiment that always failed before, suddenly work without altering its workings. That would be changing a law of physics before re-writing it, a bit much to ask.

A few brave visionaires made a box on wheels to fly, something mankind had dreamt of since before becoming homo sapiens.
One needs to aim high to accomplish something. Not all can succeed, and that's not needed. That at least has been my motto all my life. I may not have made it to the Olympics, but in my little way I did enjoy the big league. The Olympians need competition, preferably good competition (inspiration) at that.
Just aiming to finish one race, ever, is not much to ask if you have a talented fit body. Like replicating an pretty efficient Bedini setup would not be the suitable lifework for a multiple phd in physics. One needs to aim higher, dare to fight a dream, and take residence in that air castle.
So, break the atom, or better: the water molecule, with a feather. Pull the stop plug out of the sink, to get the vortex flowing.

[ren]

Great topic Lamare

I think Walter Russel and other visionaries would agree with you here somewhat. All there is mind.

It brings some light on the "negative" comments produced by some on various threads, not so much in this forum, but ever present in others. Negative comments and ridicule from indivduals could be intentional sabotage in some cases, the sabotage of the idea, a direct attack on your thoughts, before momentum increases them to reality.

Regards

[rickoff]

The "Mind Motor" experiment

You may be interested in an experiment that was conducted on October 6, 2003 by Coast To Coast live radio. I was listening to this show at the time, and participated in the mental experiment. With the participation of a large listener audience (typically 8 to 15 million people), an experiment was set up wherein a piece of tin foil was perched upon the top of the sharp end of an upright sewing needle, held in place by a wood clothespin, and placed inside an airtight container. The audience was told to image the apparatus in their minds, and attempt to move the foil in a clockwise direction. They were told to think of an air vortex effect, such as a swirling of leaves, that would turn the foil.
The experiment was successful, in that the foil did actually turn somewhat from its starting position, although it turned in the opposite direction (counter-clockwise). The opposite result did not surprise me, because a swirling leaf vortex naturally occurs in a counter-clockwise direction. Now what I see happening in this experiment is that the listeners were given conflicting instructions. In other words, those who simply thought of a swirling vortex causing the foil to move would be exerting a counter-clockwise force, while those who were more intent on visualizing the actual experimental setup, and instructed to move the foil in the desired direction would be exerting a clockwise force (I myself was in the latter group). So, the end result would be two large groups of listeners thinking in opposition to each other, and it looks like the "swirling vortex" eventually won out. Therefore, to my thinking, any such thought experiment needs to have very simple parameters that are also very specific in nature, so that everyone is thinking alike. You can see more about this experiment here: October 6, 2003 Mind Motor Group Focus - Neil Slade's Amazing Brain Music Adventure

An earlier experiment with Neil Slade on Coast To Coast radio dealt with influencing the weather. This occurred July 7, 2008. Florida had been suffering a severe drought period and raging wildfires, with no rain expected in weather forecasts. The audience was told to imagine the formation of large rain bearing clouds above Florida, and to imagine these clouds releasing a downpour amounting to 10 inches of rainfall. Clouds began forming within hours, and provided substantial cover the following day. The cloud cover grew ever larger the second day, and on the third day rain began to fall across Florida. The rain continued until 10 inches - the stated goal, had fallen. See more about "The Great Brain Weather Experiment" here: Brain Weather- Neil Slade's Amazing Brain Adventure

Also see this "Cloud busting" video made by Neil:
YouTube - Cloudbusting Cloudbursting Brain Power

Rick

[1NRG24Seven]

I am thinking this is what makes the Joe Cell technology work. Anyone here ever read about Joe Cells?

[Aaron]

Y Factor

The secret to Reich's orgone motor was the "Y-Factor".