Aetheric / environmental feedback; not once, but more than twice?

[Inquorate]

I just got off the phone from Daniel on this forum, and he's got me thinking.

First off, I've had some success with developing an overunity system, and I'll explain how. Next, I'll take what I understand of what Daniel was trying to tell me, and point out how much more successful we can be.

First, I'll explain an experiment I did with a 10mhz sine wave oscillator sig gen using an crystal. I measured the energy used in calories over time; let's say it used 10joules per unit time.

Then I added an avramenko plug (two oppositely directed 1n4148 diodes) to the sine wave sig gen output, and put it to a capacitor.

When I measured the output, let's say I measured 1 Joule per unit of time. But I found that the energy used was 11 joules per unit of time.

In short, when I put a load on the oscillator, making the 'work done' harder to do, it took more energy.

In retrospect, it's like lifting a 10kg wheelbarrow vs lifting a 10kg wheelbarrow with a 1kg weight; you need to put in 10kg of work in the first instance, vs 11kg of work in the second instance.


Simple. Right?

[Inquorate]

Since then, I've been using 3 12v batteries, and an inductor; two in series, 24v, connected intermittently via the inductor to the third 12v battery.

That's 12v potential difference over the coil, using let's say 10joules. Now, the inductor IS NOT LOADED; So let's say I have 10joules going into the the charge battery positive, at 51% efficiency.

I have spent 10joules and recovered 5.1joules.

Then I cut the current to the inductor, and the aether sets up a new equilibrium, with magnetic field of 0. In doing so, it spins the electrons in the wire of the inductor, making them have higher (but negative) potential than previously.

Using a recovery diode, I transmit this negative potential to the charge battery negative.

The POTENTIAL ALONE causes the ions in the battery to develop their own momentum or current. The bedini sg motor showed us this is possible.

Let's say the bedini ssg or any inductive collapse mechanism that causes a voltage potential across a battery is 50 percent efficient at causing said battery to charge.

For 10joules, I have then caused a battery to charge up by 10.1joules. My batteries are only 12v/1.3ah, and after 2 1hr runs and rotating positions once, I had a gain of .03v. Not much, but there shouldn't be any gain.

[Inquorate]

So, using a method that only pushes the aether / dipole / magnetic or voltaic tubes of force - ONCE, unloaded, and using the collapse or resetting of aetheric equilibrium as a second charging mechanism, I have shown that a system can sustain itself.

Now, what if?

We know that a battery exposed to POTENTIAL ONLY, will via voltaic tubes of force, cause a current in the battery itself. We can charge a battery with voltage; don't need current.

What if?

We used a resonant series LC circuit to build the voltage higher, getting use of the environmental feedback MORE THAN ONCE?

My question is, how can we do that?

P.s., no trick, I don't have the answer. I just wanted to get it out there. Need to think some.

[sucahyo]

Ben, have you know which give best efficiency, charging two battery in parallel or in series when using radiant charger?

About voltage, Can we really use any voltage to fill battery current? Won't it transform the battery into capacitor?

[Inquorate]

Ben, have you know which give best efficiency, charging two battery in parallel or in series when using radiant charger?

well, radiant charger is mainly voltage, very little current. so, batteries in parallel would share what little current there is. No problem. Batteries in series would share the voltage, so each would have less potential to share. I'd charge batteries in parallel. I haven't tested this, just theorizing

About voltage, Can we really use any voltage to fill battery current? Won't it transform the battery into capacitor?

if you use current to push ions in battery, the voltage and current have to be small, otherwise the battery will heat up, boil, or explode. But if we apply voltage to the battery without current, we do not push the ions in the battery, we stretch the electrostatic field, and the ions in the battery start moving, just like a magnetic field will move a magnet. So, apply voltage without current, and the battery DEVELOPS ITS OWN IONIC CURRENT. With the voltage spike from a collapsing magnetic field, the battery is charging itself.

hope that helps Sucahyo. Ps, haven't forgotten those diodes, will send them when I can.

[boguslaw]

Congratulations Inquorate, you have got it right.
Now my dear EE fellows build a better Rosemary circuit with parametric oscillator LC circuit in face of battery and you will see dead battery working with DC inverter. I hope so.
This is what I believe Richard Willis from magnacoaster found at first.
But battery may explode and mosfet may fail.
It is very simple circuit : LC against battery with single mosfet and 555 driver

[Inquorate]

Congratulations Inquorate, you have got it right.
Now my dear EE fellows build a better Rosemary circuit with parametric oscillator LC circuit in face of battery and you will see dead battery working with DC inverter. I hope so.
This is what I believe Richard Willis from magnacoaster found at first.
But battery may explode and mosfet may fail.
It is very simple circuit : LC against battery with single mosfet and 555 driver

Thanks for the reply boguslaw, while the full extent of the final solution is still theory and armchair ponderings, the basis of the theory has been well tested in it's parts by the wonderful members of this forum.

I'll be struggling for time and resources in the coming months, with a move and a baby coming, so don't wait for me to get around to it.. I will, but in time.

The sec circuits, Ainslie device, space time energy pump, tesla switch and bedini devices all have the same operating principles, IMHO.
And all show gains from the environment, if not from part a to part e, then from part d to part e.

We're close.

[sucahyo]

Thanks Ben .

I ask because this is what I found on SLA (may be different on other battery)

Charging in series:
Higher impedance lower RO output power, less amp but higher voltage. Each battery will be charged with less voltage too. As result battery will charge at least twice longer.

Charging in parallel:
Lower impedance increase RO output power, more amp and lower voltage. However in measurement the current that goes to the battery is lower which result in less charging speed.

I don't have time to do proper comparison though.

Minimum required charging:
I found that charging bellow 10mA with my current RO do not charge the battery as good as I expect. At 10mA I don't notice the charging. I currently use 50mA to charge single 12V SLA in under 7 hour to 13.40V, 13.04V after resting a night.

[Inquorate]

Thanks for that info Sucahyo, maybe I will get better results in my 3 battery tesla switch bedini hybrid if I increase the duty cycle a little; the initial current to the charge battery may overcome the inertia of the ions, and the spike afterwards will just pull the ions along

I'm also wondering what will happen if instead of just using a coil, I use a series LC tank, and bleed off the positive and negative spikes into the right battery terminals using diodes.

So much to do