Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fleet - solid state generator using Lead-Out principles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hi Wrtner
    Would there not be some flyback to be had without the mags. maybe the mags.would increase the flyback,I don't know.
    peter

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by petersone View Post
      Hi Wrtner
      Would there not be some flyback to be had without the mags. maybe the mags.would increase the flyback,I don't know.
      peter
      It is to be welcomed. It is all extra energy. Properly handled, it won't
      ruin the 555. The diodes will need to be the 1000v ones used by the
      Bedini boys.

      Comment


      • #18
        Lawrence Tseung torroid

        Hi All,
        I have tested the square (rectangular) torroid as proposed by Lawrence Tseung.
        Used laminations from transformer company provided to me.
        I fed square waves input to input coil.
        Found for this particular construct, that 100 kcs is the best resonant frequency. Above and below this, output voltage drops off.
        However, the output is 14 times LESS than the input wattage.
        This is similar in some ways to Tom Beardens MEG which STILL hasn't been shown publically after all this time. Why not ???
        It also has elements of the Flynn device whch is a variation on the MEG.
        I also tried both polarities of the ceramic magnet that is inserted in series with the iron laminations.
        This makes only a slight diference to the output voltage.
        I have serious reservations on this devices workability.
        I wanted Lawrence to communicate with me directly via email, but he says to do it on Overunity.com.
        This site is permanently "stalled" regardless of what time of the day or night
        you try to access it !
        The output coil produces roughly sinewave output even though square waves are fed into the input coil.
        Another one bites the dust I think.!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by stebra@xtra.co.nz View Post
          Hi All,
          I have tested the square (rectangular) torroid as proposed by Lawrence Tseung.
          Used laminations from transformer company provided to me.
          I fed square waves input to input coil.
          Found for this particular construct, that 100 kcs is the best resonant frequency. Above and below this, output voltage drops off.
          Good, but what about the output circuit? This also is a LR circuit
          driven by an alternating source. It must run at its resonant frequency
          whilst the input cct runs as above, at resonance.

          Comment


          • #20
            Lawrence Tseungs device

            Hi wrtner,
            as I stated, the best frequency for my particular unit is 100kcs.
            Above and below this, the output voltage drops off, so this IS the resonant frequency of the set-up.
            I am about to try connecting a cap. to the output coil to actually "tune" the output coil to the 100 kcs to see if this increases output voltage.
            So far the output is 14 times LESS than the input which is very dissapointing.
            Nothing like the claimed 1.5 COP !!
            It's easy to make claims.
            This has to be bourne out by practice or is of no use.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by stebra@xtra.co.nz View Post
              Hi wrtner,
              as I stated, the best frequency for my particular unit is 100kcs.
              Above and below this, the output voltage drops off, so this IS the resonant frequency of the set-up.
              Yes, this is the resonant frequency of the primary (input circuit).

              But the secondary (output) circuit also has to resonate. Is your secondary circuit also in resonance?

              Whilst leaving the primary circuit alone, you could connect variable inductors and/or capacitors in the seconday cct. and keep measuring the current. You should get a hump.

              Don't forget that the output power in a LR circuit is not that easy to arrive at.

              Comment


              • #22
                Lawrence Tseung device

                Hi wrtner
                The resonant frequency of my output is still 100 kcs with no input to the input coil.
                I tried adding capacitance to the output coil to see if it could be tuned to this frequency, but it of course only lowers the frequency.
                The output coil and the iron laminations set the output coils natural res. freq.
                I fed the output coil only with signal to find the res. freq.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by stebra@xtra.co.nz View Post
                  Hi wrtner
                  The resonant frequency of my output is still 100 kcs with no input to the input coil...
                  This cannot be right because the input coil is driving the output coil.
                  You need to be setting up the output coil while it is being driven by
                  the 100Khz supply going to the input.

                  This figure is a bit of a round number. What is the exact frequency?
                  Do you have a LCR meter to measure inductance and capacitance as well?
                  Paul-R

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Cores in the UK can be found here:
                    Transformer core manufacturer - Wiltan Ltd the UK's leading maufacturer of magnetic components
                    I am starting with the ferrite toroid from the scaning coils
                    off an old TV. they come aprt into two halves very easily.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X