Tweet
Hi folks, thought this may be of value. I'll copy and paste my previous posts from other thread.
Hi again folks, i decided to try a quick test of that idea except solid state, instead of a rotating magnet to create a flux diverting loop i just put another coil/core in between the coil/core and permanent magnet stack. And with some quick manually pulsing, the output is better when causing a repelling field towards permanent magnet stack. What i am seeing here i think is what Bill Muller showed in a video where a steel ball was attached to a permanent magnet then he let another steel ball be quickly attracted to the first steel ball and the ball that was quickly attracted quickly repelled from the first steel ball. In my case the coil/core that has the magnet stack at one end and another coil/core at the other, the middle coil/core if quickly energized repels to some degree or neutralizes the flux and it drops away from the other coil/core but if you continuously hold power to that middle coil/core then the other coil/core attracts normally as one would expect. I think i made that clear, i hope. Let me hear your thoughts.
Hi folks, After doing a few more tests and thinking about why this may be occurring, the magnetic field pole, say north that is extending through both coil/cores, i think that the last coil/core's flux from this extended field is neutralized briefly because the flux is retreating backwards toward permanent magnet stack wanting to make a flux loop with the south pole now created. Here is a pic showing the setup, the coil/core to the left is the gen. coil and the one attached to permanent magnets is pulsed and using the 2 AA nimh in series shown, the coil/core on far left drops away and the magnetic field is neutralized briefly to generate electricity. Let me know what you folks think of this.
Hi again folks, i decided to try a quick test of that idea except solid state, instead of a rotating magnet to create a flux diverting loop i just put another coil/core in between the coil/core and permanent magnet stack. And with some quick manually pulsing, the output is better when causing a repelling field towards permanent magnet stack. What i am seeing here i think is what Bill Muller showed in a video where a steel ball was attached to a permanent magnet then he let another steel ball be quickly attracted to the first steel ball and the ball that was quickly attracted quickly repelled from the first steel ball. In my case the coil/core that has the magnet stack at one end and another coil/core at the other, the middle coil/core if quickly energized repels to some degree or neutralizes the flux and it drops away from the other coil/core but if you continuously hold power to that middle coil/core then the other coil/core attracts normally as one would expect. I think i made that clear, i hope. Let me hear your thoughts.
Hi folks, After doing a few more tests and thinking about why this may be occurring, the magnetic field pole, say north that is extending through both coil/cores, i think that the last coil/core's flux from this extended field is neutralized briefly because the flux is retreating backwards toward permanent magnet stack wanting to make a flux loop with the south pole now created. Here is a pic showing the setup, the coil/core to the left is the gen. coil and the one attached to permanent magnets is pulsed and using the 2 AA nimh in series shown, the coil/core on far left drops away and the magnetic field is neutralized briefly to generate electricity. Let me know what you folks think of this.
Comment