On the aether and it's properties

[Inquorate]

Have you compare transistor switching speed with different trigger mechanism?

for example comparing the signal fall speed when triggered by 555, by optocouple, by scr, by other transistor, and by mechanical. Or your scope can not detect this?

i haven't compared switching speed on my scope. I've seen definite differences between 1n4148 and uf4007 diodes and most others, because most other diodes leak a little before stopping reverse current flow. Kinda like a weak bladder. The forward or leading voltage spike is a tiny fraction of a percent of the absolute minimum 'on' time for a 555 timer. To make use of electron bunching and it's associated aether pulse/spike, we'd need something that could switch in the ghz range. I don't know of a device (transistor, etc) or of a signal generator that will work. Even a spark gap working means electrons are flowing, and preceding the Dielectric breakdown, there is no conductor present to channel the preceding voltage spike. That's why i devised a circuit that takes advantage of more that the effect of electron bunching, given my budget. However, don't let it stop you from doing experiments into the effect. If you do, i'd be very interested in any data.

[Jbignes5]

yes, everything needs to be in boiled oil to suppress corona leaks from the high voltage. I made a high voltage proof of concept magnetic diode, the principle of which could be extended into an Electromagnetic transistor.. However, i've had success at lower voltages, so all the difficulties that come with kilovolts seem an Unneccesary hurdle.

Ok then you tried it like Tesla did with the magnetic arc gap in an oil bath? Because that is exactly how Tesla explains that he could switch at gigahertz speeds and still be able to control the leakage. The magnetic arc gap is the tool to use.
Also one note is that Tesla explains that the event happens on the large conductor before the gap. The magnetic arc space has to be in a certain orientation as well. The magnets have to be polarized in the like polarization. Meaning north on north 90 degrees from the arc space. This concept makes a magnetic diode that rejects one polarity and allows the other to be accelerated and puffed out faster. The arc space must be one polarity only so dc pulses need to be used. with one polarity being shunned this allows a pure impulse from the thick copper before the arc space only drawing one polarity and rejecting the other. Any little leakage in the other voltage and it all gets ruined.
Remember that Tesla used conical coils as well that were also 90 degrees from the thick copper wire and equal in mass to the copper conical coils for resonance. The potential on one end of the coil is much lower then the focused end of the coil, much like my descriptions of the most fundamental shape of the conductor at the quanta level. So to get the potential difference one would need to take both ends of the conical coil to use as a potential difference as the unit is running. This process is not the same as Tesla's ac high voltage and is setup a lot different then the traditional coils seen.
Except for Gray I have not seen anyone duplicate this process and Gray's setup doesn't have key components that Tesla says to make sure this event happens.
Look at this link ad read down past the patents to the heading of shocking discovery and you can see the progression twords the real system that Tesla was heading to.

Nikola Tesla - The Complete Patents of Nikola Tesla - The Man who invented the 20th Century

[sucahyo]

i haven't compared switching speed on my scope. I've seen definite differences between 1n4148 and uf4007 diodes and most others, because most other diodes leak a little before stopping reverse current flow. Kinda like a weak bladder.

Thanks. any square diode I have do leak a lot on 12V batteries, 10V in blocking mode, the cilinder one still 1V short.....

About Ghz, I guess we do have to test mercury stream switch. With nano seconds required I wonder why people always thought that using optocoupler microseconds switching is a good idea if very fast switching is needed. The transistor speed in the spec usually apply for average or minimum without mentioning maximum. And people drive this transistor with 100 times slower component...

[Aromaz]

Aether

@Inquorate;
Though I am back in the boat world; against my wishes but due to financial requirements, I am still following, reading and in thinking stage with energy. I hate walking past my top rate lab and tools twice each day; and not digging in there. Thus too much theory …

On the issue of AETHER / UNIVERSAL ENERGY / RADIANT ENERGY / SEA OF DIRAC - I am fixed in my perception that all is exactly the same simple explanation. Some people keep on looking for a complicated elusive ‘discovery’ while the reality engulfs them completely. In the same it comes back to one of my earlier statement – we have to look at the WHOLE picture, not merely segments of it.

Regardless of how many people will argue with me, this is my statement:

The AETHER is not the carrier of electromagnetic energy – it is the full spectrum of electro-energy , energy being radiated from all matter in the universe. It consists of a complete soup of radio waves (Shock pulses), light waves (Photons), nuclear radiation – (Alpha, Beta and Gamma particles) – and possibly other forms of radiated electro-energy. It carries electrical charges and as such result in the phenomena of MAGNETISM. The movement of the Aether, as it is always radiated out and away from matter, results in the force of GRAVITY. The same electrical charge is also the cause of reactions we see between Electrons/Positrons and Matter/Anti-Matter; Annihilation.

Take this as the basic law and see how everything fits within this law. Then go back and think of Tesla and others expectations of omni-present electrical forces that can drive machinery of the future, “obtainable at any point in the universe”.

Let me use a favourite experiment which originally failed but since has proved some success. Michealson Inferometer (MMI). If you measure all of the aether (if you can) it will have both results because not all ingredients in the soup reacts the same. Some are like pea’s which you can pick up with a fork, others will fall through, some like lentils which can be caught by a smaller fork etc. Some are type Alpha – does not penetrate, some are Beta which has some penetration into some matter, others are Gamma which does penetrate all matter, but least into water.

What will happen with Alpha particles if measured with MMI on surface of earth? - They will deflect because they bounce off the rotating surface, less so but still will happen with Beta - but Gamma will not deflect much, if at all. Same with light wave-particles.

Also in this aether you have photons – some light WaveParticles (WF) goes through glass, some does not, some like X-Ray can even pass through most matter … Therefore the MM-Experiments worked and failed at the same time.

The original purpose of the MMI was to measure the AETHER DRIFT. If you measure by light it will have a different refraction, but minutely small. If you measure by Alpha particles it has a definite drift, by Beta it has some drift by Gamma almost no drift. Hallo here is a reality check!

To conclude I state, right or wrong; but accept until proven wrong by physical experiments: Aether = Radiation. Everything is ‘light’ as in Photons.

It is omnipresent and not only the carrying medium for EM forces – but it is the complete Electro-Energy. That is why scientists fail to find the 'Graviton' - because it does not exist, Gravity is a result of Aether.

This theory will pass the test of any obstacle you can throw; from the Big Bang to the Black Hole.

[Schpankme]

Aether.. It is omnipresent and not only the carrying medium for EM forces – but it is the complete Electro-Energy.

.. and based on excitation by frequency the Aether can be made to manifest as gas, light or ray.

- Schpankme

[sucahyo]

The AETHER is not the carrier of electromagnetic energy – it is the full spectrum of electro-energy , energy being radiated from all matter in the universe. It consists of a complete soup of radio waves (Shock pulses), light waves (Photons), nuclear radiation – (Alpha, Beta and Gamma particles) – and possibly other forms of radiated electro-energy.

what about aura? It said to have an effect on human?
Alternate Health: Cure for Insomnia from Odyle Perpective - Associated Content - associatedcontent.com

It is a monopole of either has positive or negative effects. It do not have the same property as magnet or electricity or heat or light.

This is may be irrelevant for our search of free energy, but some people show that it can be captured with capacitor (orgone research).

I already start implementing odyle knowledge to my family. The effect is real, the explanation is hazy. Some people call it orgone but I found orgone science to be too immature compared to odyle. When orgone just beginning to differentiate between DOR and OR, odyle already state the polarity of matters and object 150 year ago.

[Aromaz]

what about aura? It said to have an effect on human?

You are right in all aspects.

But Aura is well similar to and compatible with Aether but it is not the same thing; Aura is a force of LIFE; it is GOD. In a large sense it is also electric and it is also radiation but on a dimension we do not know much about.

Anyway there I do not believe it can help with motive-energy.

[Inquorate]

devil's advocate

great to have your comments here aromaz, when I think of your comments, it is hard to differentiate between aether = SOURCE of electromagnetic radiation (ie causes mass) and aether = IS electromagnetic radiation (ie caused by mass).



Both seem to be equally true with what we know and what we have to judge by. both even could 'explain' the temperature loss in say dr stiffler's experiments.

But in a vacuum, there is little difference. Even there, where real equates to virtual, again your theory could hold.

Only one thing definitive comes to mind at the moment; how could emission of electromagnetic radiation by mass cause a gravitational field that would overcome the electromagnetic radiation expelled by the sun?

This I understand to be opposed in my theory (and alternatively explained) but not to be explained in the idea you have thus far exposed.

Peace love and light, your friend, Ben

[Inquorate]

electromagnetic energy and motion

for example, the geissler tube? The vacuum tube that has panels painted black on one side and white on the other spinning about a point, where direction of radiation = direction of motion. This is the antithesis of radiation = opposite to gravity, which would be required if mass is the causal property of the aether.

[Bodkins]

for example, the geissler tube? The vacuum tube that has panels painted black on one side and white on the other spinning about a point, where direction of radiation = direction of motion. This is the antithesis of radiation = opposite to gravity, which would be required if mass is the causal property of the aether.

Hi Ben

A black piece of wood shaped like a boat hull will only spin in one direction.
spin it the other way and it rocks and changes direction.....
try it,
if you change the colour the boat may spin the other way?

its shaped like a Canu-boat.....

back in the house
getting up to speed

[Inquorate]

welcome back bodkins

you've been missed. I didn't know that about canoes. Quirky.

[Allcanadian]

@Inquorate

for example, the geissler tube? The vacuum tube that has panels painted black on one side and white on the other spinning about a point, where direction of radiation = direction of motion. This is the antithesis of radiation = opposite to gravity, which would be required if mass is the causal property of the aether.

I believe you are referring to a Crookes_radiometer.
Crookes radiometer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gravity is a funny thing because our intuition or senses are always decieving us. Consider the age old question---a 10 Kg lead ball and a 1 Kg wood ball of the same size and air resistance are dropped from a height of 50 feet at the same time, which one hits the ground first? Our intuition tells us the lead ball must hit first but this is not the case, they hit at the same time -- but why?

Here is an interesting argument--

Assume we have a 10kg ball and a 1kg ball. Let us assume the 10kg ball falls faster than the 1kg ball, since it is heavier. Now, lets tie the two balls together. What will happen then? Will the combined object fall slower, since the 1kg ball will hold back the 10kg ball? Or will the combination fall faster, since it is now an 11kg object? Since both can't happen, the only possibility is that they were falling at the same rate in the first place.

So why do the 10 Kg and 1 Kg balls hit at the same time? because the gravitational masses and inertial masses are equal. Gravity pulls harder on the 10 kg ball because of it's mass but the 10 Kg balls inertia it greater because of this same mass, inertia resists changes in motion. If we tried pushing the 10 kg ball on the ground it would resist our pushing force more than the 1 Kg ball, thus the greater force due to gravity is countered with a greater resistance to acceleration due to inertia. The difference in mass and difference in inertia balance leaving us with a "constant" acceleration due to Gravity independent of mass. Here we can see that weight is an illusion as neither ball would have any weight in outer space but would still have mass and inertia, what we call weight is due to the force of gravity. We can also see that if any mass had no inertia it would take almost no force to accelerate it, this relates to Tesla's statement that if we could change the inertia of mass then we could gain energy through acceleration.
Regards
AC

[Inquorate]

@AC well said, I'd not considered the inverse mass and inertia relationship. But now that you've said it, it makes perfect sense.

Thankyou

[teslaproject]

Good Job!

Part 4, how to access the aether to do meaningful work, without destroying the originating condition.

YouTube - presentation on accessing the kinetic properties of the aether, part 4 in a series of 4

For more information, see


Bedini coil Tesla Switch Hybrid - Heretical Builders

Ps, a lot more people watched part 1 than watched part 2 or 3. I don't know if I'm boring to listen to or something, but part 2 and 3 were important.

Peace love and light

Great job Ben!

No, you are not boring mate but I think the majority of people want to basically be spoon fed the DIRECT answer and GIVEN everything these days (it's the ADD Generation) and because you are doing a bang up job of educating NOT spoon feeding, they lose interest. Don't change a thing.

I loved it and although I was familiar with the Tesla/Bedini/Bearden principles, it was a fantastic laymans language approach at teaching what has been previously been explained in Bearden confusing terminology, nice and elegantly.

Thanks again.

Tesla Project

[Aromaz]

@Inquorate
So why do the 10 Kg and 1 Kg balls hit at the same time? because the gravitational masses and inertial masses are equal. Gravity pulls harder on the 10 kg ball because of it's mass but the 10 Kg balls inertia it greater because of this same mass, inertia resists changes in motion . . .

Ahh, this is wonderfull. so what happens if the two balls are different in sizes, say the lead ball is 20 cm diameter and the woodball is 40 cm? Then why would they fall at different rates?

Let us then asume for a moment that gravity is a push effect - THAT would explain because the Non-penetrating wave=particles will hit the bigger ball more, thus push it faster.

@Inquorate: Radiations from the sun is huge when you are very near the sun, but the counter balance of radiation from all the other xx.... bodies in the universe is greater. So if you are somehwere in open space between galaxies you will have near equal preasure from all sides, but the closer you get to an object (sun or planet or ...) the more that will shield you from the non-penetrating WP's from that specific direction - thus the more you will be pushed towards the object. The bigger such object is the more it will shield you on one side and the more you will be pressed towards it. I will try to make a graph drawing of this concept when I got few free hours; will probably have to make a video and device some experiments. Time -Time - time; AND Money needed for living too.

Another thing to keep in mind is the kind of radiation. Why does a pulsar become so extremely strong in gravity; while also extremely strong in radiation? The majority of radiation from the pulsar is Gamma and similar; 'penetrating', therfore does not have so much pushing power; while the rest of the aether is a mixture the includes A and B and other non-penetrating wave-particles. These non-penetrating has greated pushing effect.

Once I noticed a small ball behind a jet-ski. Though the jetski is moving fast the loose floating ball stayed near the stern of the jetski, moving in the same position with the jet-ski; not by any means connected - called 'in the drag'. You find the same in water jet with some bubbles 'traped' on the surface.