Flux Compression - Doc Brown had it right!

[smoky]

Can you prove this principle with a simple experiment?

Here's a simple one called Oppositely Wound Coils demonstrated recently on You Tube.

opposite coils - YouTube

[wings]

Here's a simple one called Oppositely Wound Coils demonstrated recently on You Tube.

opposite coils - YouTube

interesting

[Rubberband]

bucking fields..

I guess I'll explain it by way of explaining one specific invention....

I'll use that Tesla circuit that I posted, because it is the most balanced design, whereas many copycats seem to reduce it to a halfwave function (not don smith though, but the grey tube does, and any pulsed DC backEMF scavenger does)

As you can see in the circuit, all components on the driver side (the step up transformer, spark gap, and 2 capaictors) are exactly symetrical...it works on both sides of the ac input wave. Notice I said the components are symetrical, but the flow through is is oscillatory, so it's only symecrical based on a cumulative average of the back and forth movement in a period of time consisting of multiple cycles(probably too much information)

Anyway, when those capacitors try to discharge and equalize through the split primary and it's spark gap, 2 opposing magnetic fields (either both North or both South) are set up. This is because the two halves of the primary are wound in opposite directions, so while the electric flow is unidirectional, the magnetic fields BUCK. They don't allow current to flow because they are equal, but in opposite directions. All the potential is stored in the bucking fields. Because they are balanced, they contain eachother.

Now the energy imbalance from the two capacitors is stored in a BALANCED static magnetic field. As soon as the capacitors begin a new cycle of charging....from the ZERO POINT, the capacitors once again become unbalanced....This creates an outside force acting upon the balanced magnetic field, destablizing it, and VIOLENTLY discharging it in one direction. This causes one of the opposing fields to overcome the other, and all the energy is transfered ALL AT ONCE....This extremely fast discharge is what causes frequencies unheard of to be set up in the secondary.

I'm sorry if I didn't explain it well.....Please ask questions so I can better formulate an explination. Maybe I'll make a video and put it on youtube. It would be easier for me to do some whiteboard drawings and point to them while speaking about it.

(on a side note, I guess if this works out I'm going want a job putting it into practice.....anyone want to hire a 22 year old college drop out mad scientist for cheap?)

Just started reading this thread, had a thought that this explaination is kinda like the way a laser functions in the respect that excited electrons are bounced from end to end of the exciter then they bust through one end.......yes?

[WeThePeople_USA]

...that use split secondaries wound in opposite directions
and center tapped....

I found out those type of transformers are called Differential Transformers.

These transformers can also be used to modulate and demodulate a carrier signal.

Differential quadrature modulation/de-modulation is an old Army trick.

But what you indicated here,
and got lost as many posts diluted it,
is a very important thing, and you found it.

If you are compounding reactive inductive forces,
in a tug-o-war (...actually shove-o-war)
thus forming a "Flux Compression" scenario.
(Good name BTW)

What do you think is happening at 90-degress to that ?

Thats a hint, heheh.

Measure two lengths of wire to be exact,
fold in half to assure center tap accuracy,
wind one on an air core (PVC) in one way,
wind a second over it in the opposite manor,
center tap connect them while winding them,
and of course connect the ends to each other.

Now wind a caduceus coil over these two primaries.

Next input a sinusoidal wave form into the differential primary pair,
and sample the caduceus secondary across a purely resistive load,
into an O-scope to see the results...

What you calculate should result from this,
and what will result instead is the answer.

It would take to long a post to explain why I found this out,
but it had to do (simply) with my testing of winding patterns
versus pickup coil styles to harvest various coil pattern primaries.

I'm way older, retired, and equipment-challanged to participate.

[WeThePeople_USA]

Yeah, that was kinda crappy, sorry.

Let me see if I can get a few to visualize one of these winding styles.

First, picture a winding style that is radial, not axial.

That of course would be Tesla's (flat) primary (pancake) winding style.



Here's how:
01 - Take a non-ferrous coil form, like an empty wire spool
02 - Cut a slot in the core tube end-to-end longitudinally
03 - Test-wind wire to be used on it counting turns to fill.
04 - Add 1 to the count to properly populate the finished coil.
05 - Test-wind against a spool side wall ala-Tesla pancake
06 - Stop 1/8" before the outer edge of the wire spool
07 - Measure wire length and cut as many as 3/4 above indicate
08 - Slide each one (one at a time) through the slot and out the end
09 - Super glue each to a temporary strip (in order) with 14" pigtail
10 - Upon completion. solder all pigtails to a braid, and discard strip
11 - Pull all strands back through slot leaving braid as inside rail
(Note: you now have a braid through spool's ID as a buss-bar)
12 - Wind all expect for the first wire (at either end) into a free-hand bundle
13 - Wind the first (and only) free lead in one direction as a pancake
14 - Super glue "pot" that first pancake winding into place
15 - Wind each successive lead incrementally in the OPPOSITE way
16 - Super glue soak each pancake into place as you progress
17 - Drill a hole in each end of the spool where the wires end
18 - Slide a larger solid wire from hole to hole as a buss
19 - Solder all ends to this second buss

You now have a Tesla pancake set per usual
but stacked in a cancelling winding pattern
that is a scaler emitter with "Flux Compression",
that cancels EMF by nature, leaving only scaler.

If wound correct, it will be useless as an electromagnet,
but will emit from It's core axis a field not recognized
by current accepted "Norms" of coil emission patterns.

The above is a kinda heavy project
a pain to wind being the worst of it,
but would still be a flux compression/cancelling coil.



This is similar to one of my tests years back,
I wound from end A to end B a layer.

I then super glue anchored the last wind,
and proceeded at a right angle to the coil winding,
(straight line from one of the spool to the other)
than after fastening at the winding's starting end,
winding all additional winding (layers) in the same direction.

Dramatic increase in electromagnet strength,
but problematic with other than a DC source.

As a freq-sweep was applied to this winding configuration,
very heavy null-points were present with this method.

To be clear here,
these were axial winding layers
from the end A to end B,
with a "null" transit buss
back to the beginning,
and another layer in the same direction
on top of the previous layer.



The magic is, and always will be (to me),
with flat (pancake/planer) induction fields.

But cancelling, hence, flux-compressing winding techniques
opens a huge door to removing what we should not have been using
for (well) over 110 years with dipole-busting circuitry.

<electron-centric people insert dissertation here>



For no reason that has been explained to me (to satisfaction)
at this point of fun in earlier youth I was convinced that
we don't really have electromagnetic interaction "pegged"

Something about this first post rocks me,
but I can't "peg" it though.

(Yes, this IS the short version,
I had funds/time/ambition/humor long ago)

The MEG is a simplistic version of what is actually available.

I'm handicapped, lost the right side of my brain in an accident,
and I have (always) spelled like crap (even before my accident),
but I feel I've made a fair attempt at a visualation excercise.