Originally posted by IndianaBoys
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gravity waves found
Collapse
X
-
"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
-
Originally posted by witsend View PostAdie - I have been trying to get my mind around your centrifugal force number. I watched your Youtube link. Again. Superb graphics. I'm sort of beginning to see how you look at things. And you're in really good company. Clearly many think like you do. I've been watching those videos by SpreadingtheMuse - I think by Bernard Finnigan? Not sure of the first name. Very good indeed. Have you seen them? May be worth a 'look in'.
YouTube - The Physics of Starship Battles: Artificial Gravity and Centrifugal Force
Hey, I just watched this same video posted in #964. Maybe thats where you got it from?
TheTruthBeKnownLast edited by CatLady; 06-27-2010, 07:28 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by witsend View PostMy only concern is that it depends on 'imagined' faces - facts.
Help us all better understand what "your cup of tea is"?
What is your purpose in discounting this without doing the exercise?
You provide an armchair opinion of "imagined" without giving it a whirl.
It is very much in line with assisting Dave and those with PMH's to see waves emanating from it.
The idea behind using a blue light allows for an easier time to see the waves emanating from the PMH. The use of blue has been used in the past to help train the eyes to see electromagnetic radiation by Walter John Kilner. That idea carried forward to the glasses used in the movie "They Live".
Walter John Kilner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IndianaBoys
Comment
-
Originally posted by witsend View PostLOL Adie. I never knew this. At its least it shows us that either the Big Bang theory is wrong or that they've got the dates wrong. Or that the speed of light is somewhat greater than C - God forbid. Priceless piece of informtaion.
update of same Hubble Deep Field a little wierdly editted with clips of other youtube vids but this one mentions images of 78 billion lightyears away.
Also as Catlady commented, Harvey posted that battleship video at post #964Last edited by Adie123; 06-27-2010, 10:24 AM.Always thinking outside the box!
ASUS M4A87TD motherboard
AMD Phenom II x6 Turbo Core 2.8/3.3 Ghz Overclocked to 3.5 Ghz CPU
RIPJAW 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Memory
Gforce 9800GT 1GB Graphics
Windows7 64bit OS
20" LG LCD 1680x1050 Monitor
Comment
-
Hi again Adie. I watched these last links of yours. Very nice indeed.
In some ways your ideas on centrifugal forces are not unlike my own. I also need orbits - but I need magnetic fields to orbit. Which, in the first instance, means that I need them to be extant away from electric fields. And I propose three different types of magnetic field - being 1, 2 and 3 dimensional. We know of and use the 3 dimensional field - which always takes the fundamental shape of a toroid. The other two are hidden within and around the atomic structure itself. The 1 dimensional field I attribute to the Casimir effect. They keep matter bound - in one condition - and loosen their grip in another. But the only localised spin - in my own thesis - is in the fields themselves. In other words the electron is pushed into an orbit. Our planet is pushed into an orbit. And so on And since I see the biggest toroidal field - being the whole of the universe - then technically it's also spinning. But Adie - I can't get my head around a centrifugal force unless it's also somehow made of 'something' - some material. But that speaks to my own limitations. Not yours.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IndianaBoys View PostWitsend,
Help us all better understand what "your cup of tea is"?
Originally posted by IndianaBoys View PostWhat is your purpose in discounting this without doing the exercise?
Originally posted by IndianaBoys View PostYou provide an armchair opinion of "imagined" without giving it a whirl.
Originally posted by IndianaBoys View PostIt is very much in line with assisting Dave and those with PMH's to see waves emanating from it.
Comment
-
Hi all
A little update from me. I finally got the laser cut plates. They are 200mm in diameter and 6mm thick. I guess I will have to wind more than one coil on these plates, because the overall flux path length in this plate is way longer than in the bent half tube setup. I have three of such plates. Will keep you up to date.
Thanks,
JetijsIt's better to wear off by working than to rust by doing nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jetijs View PostHi all
. . . I guess I will have to wind more than one coil on these plates, because the overall flux path length in this plate is way longer than in the bent half tube setup. . . .
A special PMH could be used to magnetize the poles on your laser-cut-rings. The pole faces of the PMH would need to be ground to 82.5° so they would lay flat against the poles of your elements. Iron Powder can be used to fill any gaps and ensure a good path for the magnetic flux. In this way, you can get the same magnetic arrangement that Ed had, without the permeable gaps in between. Each V becomes the cross bar for the PMH and that magnetizes the V. Simply alternate the PMH on each neighbor V charging each in succession.
Then when you are done, you can energize the entire ring using David Lambright's technique, first one way, then the other. This could set up an oscillation in the ring because half of the V magnets face the opposite direction, but the domains want to align with the circle flux. That demagnetization causes a flux change which results in eddy currents in the material that could result in a reversal of the flux and the possible oscillation. Conventional physics would expect the oscillation to dampen as energy is dissipated, but with Leedskalnin, who knows what may happen.
I might add too, that Ed could have understood thermocouple action well enough to force dissimilar metals into the gaps between magnets and that could have converted ambient heat to electric current in the ring.
"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
Comment
-
7 Circle Geometry continued
Originally posted by Harvey View Post. . .
Now - how many 2" circles can you fit inside that big 13.38" center circle? Will they be nicely fitted? How does that relate to the 7 circles? What unique geometry occurs on the third layer from the center? Why?
Zoom Picture
You will notice that in the first layer we have a single circle.
In the second layer we have six circles around the first layer. A true circle can be plotted through the center of each of those circles using the first layer center as the larger circle center.
In the third layer however, the real geometry emerges. Here we find that we cannot plot a circle through all 12 third layer circles. Some have a different distance from the group center.
In the forth layer we learn that the geometry is scaling. From here on, it will be a larger and larger hexagon as noted by the RED line.
Note that the Blue Line is an equilateral triangle. This is true of every layer from two onwards. You will notice that the number of circles for any given side of the triangle increases by one for each layer. So, the second layer has 2 circles on each side of the triangle, the third layer has 3, the fourth layer has 4 and so on.
So in answer to my questions above, you now you know the unique geometry and why and also know that the circles will not fit nicely into a circle arrangement because there are gaps along the hexagonal faces and the superscribed circle.
Last edited by Harvey; 06-28-2010, 04:11 AM."Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
Comment
-
Originally posted by rave154 View Postjet..is your latest photo..all cut out of a single piece of steel?????????
Originally posted by Harvey View PostI noticed after carefully looking at Ed's setup that he has 4 coils 90° apart. They are embedded under the 'stucco' but wrap around the 'clover leaf' at each dip.
A special PMH could be used to magnetize the poles on your laser-cut-rings. The pole faces of the PMH would need to be ground to 82.5° so they would lay flat against the poles of your elements. Iron Powder can be used to fill any gaps and ensure a good path for the magnetic flux. In this way, you can get the same magnetic arrangement that Ed had, without the permeable gaps in between. Each V becomes the cross bar for the PMH and that magnetizes the V. Simply alternate the PMH on each neighbor V charging each in succession.
Then when you are done, you can energize the entire ring using David Lambright's technique, first one way, then the other. This could set up an oscillation in the ring because half of the V magnets face the opposite direction, but the domains want to align with the circle flux. That demagnetization causes a flux change which results in eddy currents in the material that could result in a reversal of the flux and the possible oscillation. Conventional physics would expect the oscillation to dampen as energy is dissipated, but with Leedskalnin, who knows what may happen.
I might add too, that Ed could have understood thermocouple action well enough to force dissimilar metals into the gaps between magnets and that could have converted ambient heat to electric current in the ring.
Originally posted by Agent.A View Post@ Jetijs
JetijsIt's better to wear off by working than to rust by doing nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harvey View PostRather than leave everyone hanging - and since a picture is worth a thousand words, I thought I would put this up:
Zoom Picture
You will notice that in the first layer we have a single circle.
In the second layer we have six circles around the first layer. A true circle can be plotted through the center of each of those circles using the first layer center as the larger circle center.
In the third layer however, the real geometry emerges. Here we find that we cannot plot a circle through all 12 third layer circles. Some have a different distance from the group center.
In the forth layer we learn that the geometry is scaling. From here on, it will be a larger and larger hexagon as noted by the RED line.
Note that the Blue Line is an equilateral triangle. This is true of every layer from two onwards. You will notice that the number of circles for any given side of the triangle increases by one for each layer. So, the second layer has 2 circles on each side of the triangle, the third layer has 3, the fourth layer has 4 and so on.
So in answer to my questions above, you now you know the unique geometry and why and also know that the circles will not fit nicely into a circle arrangement because there are gaps along the hexagonal faces and the superscribed circle.
Are you able to explain the (apparentlycounted to be) 4 poles in the 24-section PMH, when your design here offers anything but 90 degree angles?
Ed's 4-clover layer I believe should be vital towards understanding what he did, and how to take it to his level of operation. I could speculate to the point of some special constant overbalance, but would not be able to even argument it.
@Jetijs, I can't wait to learn of your progress! :-)
Seems you'll be energizing it without segmenting it? I wonder if that will affect performance in any way. Good luck with your work on this!
Comment
Comment