Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Did anyone already propose to test a simple pendulum's period/frequency in proximity of the device?
    I am still looking forward to feedback on some of the other simple tests that others and yours truly have proposed, to true and verify a real effect.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by broli View Post
      I love the smell of sanity.
      Ed could apparently lift large boulders with a slightly bigger sized model yet all this does is show a questionable optical effect?

      Still a little soar from the mylow bandwagon.
      Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. I don't think the optical effect is questionable. Bruce said he and his family also sees the glimmer. What is questionable is Ed's device being a true anti-gravity system. Why the pulley system? Why is there a chain next to the clover bowl? There is more evidence pointing to a mechanical system being used instead of a true anti-gravity device for lifting those large boulders.

      Ed said he figured out how the pyramids were built. Assuming Ed's device is a true anti-gravity system and was based on how the pyramids were built, then the Egyptians and Mayans had anti-gravity also.....but there is no sign of them taking to the skies or doing other things that would be possible with such a device. This is a severe case of not utilizing the full potential of a device or system.

      If I had a true anti-gravity device, I wouldn't be lifting boulders.......I would be building OU devices and spacecrafts to take to the skies along with the other numerous things that could be done with such a device.

      Now, after saying all of this, the optical effect needs to be studied.

      GB
      Last edited by gravityblock; 07-17-2010, 07:00 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gravityblock View Post
        Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. I don't think the optical effect is questionable. Bruce said he and his family also sees the glimmer. What is questionable is Ed's device being a true anti-gravity system. Why the pulley system? Why is there a chain next to the clover bowl? There is more evidence pointing to a mechanical system being used instead of a true anti-gravity device for lifting those large boulders.

        Ed said he figured out how the pyramids were built. Assuming Ed's device is a true anti-gravity system and was based on how the pyramids were built, then the Egyptians and Mayans had anti-gravity also.....but there is no sign of them taking to the skies or doing other things that would be possible with such a device. This is a severe case of not utilizing the full potential of a device or system.

        If I had a true anti-gravity device, I wouldn't be lifting boulders.......I would be building OU devices and spacecrafts to take to the skies along with the other numerous things that could be done with such a device.

        Now, after saying all of this, the optical effect needs to be studied.

        GB
        yup very true, but where did the mayans and egyptians go...anyone?.. hehe

        Yeh its a long shot that anti-gravity was found by these people but still a mystery needs to be answered on how they truely built what they built.

        Regards
        Adie
        Always thinking outside the box!

        ASUS M4A87TD motherboard
        AMD Phenom II x6 Turbo Core 2.8/3.3 Ghz Overclocked to 3.5 Ghz CPU
        RIPJAW 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Memory
        Gforce 9800GT 1GB Graphics
        Windows7 64bit OS
        20" LG LCD 1680x1050 Monitor

        Comment


        • I've seen haramein nassim's lectures and there he suggests something quite different. From the evidence and facts that have been found on the pyramids, sphinx and other constructions. It is deduced that the "Egyptians" that we know of from the textbooks had nothing to do with them. The structures are much older than historians lead us to belief. Many thousands of years before Egyptian times.
          This is why Egyptology is in the same boat as physics when it comes to a dogmatic belief system.

          I wouldn't be surprised if the same went for Mayan or any other unexplainable-for-its-time-behemoth-construction.

          This would imply the some terrestrial or extra terrestrial species rectified these and some unknown thing happened which led us back to our current APPARENT primitive phase.

          But this information would get us nowhere, it's not technical in any way and most people who have invented things relating to it have seen it in "dreams" or "visions" and are dead.

          To progress we need to look at our current position and possibilities. Many people have suggested good experiments that deserve to be on the front page to keep things organized. A forum thread is not the most efficient collaboration and information tool. If it drags on for too long it usually ends up in a perpetual phase of zero accomplishment.

          Comment


          • The Secret of the Universe 1 of 6

            GB

            Comment


            • Do PMH need to be a multiple of 6?

              Comment


              • hello everyone...

                let me start by saying that this effect is real. not just the glimmer, but the other effects i stated also...there are some people who will try and discredit every thing i have stated, but this fact remains, THIS IS REAL....i have shown about 50 people this device, most see the glimmer right away. a small percentage of people do not see it yet, but given more time they would, and yes i am talking about northwind, but he did feel something...i built a copy and sent it to bruce, he and his family saw the effects, i do wonder where he went to?...witsend built a device,different in design, but she was getting the gravitational anomalies like my device does...spiralout followed my step by step instructions, built a device and got the same glimmer effect...these people have shown the device and its replications to others i am sure, so to even hint that this is not real,at this point, is ridiculous....i have been locked out of another thread on thunderbolts i am not sure why , but they flat out lied about what i had said, i must say its funny. just to discredit my findings and not even doing the experiments...one of them lives 30 miles from me and wont see for him self,that my device works....the title of this thread, "gravity waves found", i wrote to say that this glimmer effect has never been explored fully....i guess i should have put, "something strange found", as the title, but the first one is sure to get attention...witsend was getting the same type of effects where every thing felt magnetic in the field of my device...so if a non magnetic material feels as though it is being pushed and or pulled, what is it?...magnetism?...electricity?...static?...and the glimmer, what is causing it?....many people try to explain away these effects saying that it is caused by heat, magnets, etc....where is the energy coming from to distort the image...my device does not have to be moving to see the effect. the amount of heat energy to create the same distortions that my device produces would have to be a whole lot because my device produces this wave form 24-7 non stop with no extra input and no loss of output....a birthday candle when burning will cause heat type distortions...my device produces more distortions than a single candle, but for simplicity, lets say one candle. how much heat energy would it consume in one day, 24 hours....now i am not saying my device produces heat but it produces the wave form we associate with convection...this must take some type of energy to produce....so what i am saying is my device has a constant output of energy....this needs to be explored further....david

                Comment


                • Well said David!

                  However, "energy output" may also be jumping to conclusions? It might as well be a conversion of some kind, with the glimmer as energy-neutral by-effect. It doesn not light up in the dark, does it? Then perhaps we're seeing a wave frequency shift more than an emission.

                  I wholeheartedly believe that the effect is real, and you deserve to have it named after yourself. However, WHAT exactly it is, or means, will need to be determined.
                  Even the gravitational/inertial effects you expereince near the locked device, might be conversions of energy more than an over unity release. We just may for the moment be unaware of the source, and unable to tap the output.

                  I'm sure the Lambright effect is a vital puzzle piece in the library of knowledge Ed took to the grave. But which puzzle piece, is yet to be determined. Permanent magnet electrical generator, or anti-gravity? Possibly even a part of his (sonical?) rock seperation system?

                  Comment


                  • Hi David, nice to hear from you.
                    Since Bruce does not show up anymore, there is no chance in telling when he will sen the device to the next person. Is there any chance for me to get one of your current devices for testing for a while? Of course I will pay for shipping and send it to the next person in line after that.
                    As for me, I got my laser cut wheels back and am hoping to put it on a rotating wheel and give it a spin to the max rpm's my motor can get this evening. I will then share the results
                    Thanks,
                    Jetijs
                    It's better to wear off by working than to rust by doing nothing.

                    Comment


                    • Probably the most simplest experiment is attached below and probably mentioned a few times in this thread. No advanced equipment needed.

                      The deflection angle gives you instant feedback on weight reduction and the effect of changing parameters like rotational speed.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by broli View Post
                        Probably the most simplest experiment is attached below and probably mentioned a few times in this thread. No advanced equipment needed.

                        The deflection angle gives you instant feedback on weight reduction and the effect of changing parameters like rotational speed.
                        I think David did something similar, with no effect. This leads me to believe that the effect he feels is more inertial in natural. To test that, the whole thing you've drawn might be hung from a pulley. If vertical jojo'ing should show off balance, that'd be HUGE. Horizontal movement, with the balance at 90º from movement, might also show something. At least I hope.

                        Comment


                        • broli.,. great idea for a test there

                          simple & to the point

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rave154 View Post
                            broli.,. great idea for a test there

                            simple & to the point
                            The test is simple, but can also only show one possible type of anomous effect that I see, a difference between the regular 9.81m/ss gravity, and whichever valid above or around the device. Gravity as it affects objects placed statically relative to the source (or horizon), being Earth.
                            Unless being brought in motion. And there may be deeper layers on which David's device works, making it hard to read them.

                            Just speculating, to indicate where the turth might go to. Perhaps the device can lighten an object, but only at the expense of another, connected object. To conserve energy. So, the rock feels lighter in David's hands at some stage, I'll accept that as fact. Who knows, his feet may feel heavier by the same amount, just less apparent when you feel anti-gravity messing with your hands. Or, the device itself becomes heavier. Stunning each way, but so much to learn and check before we declare it an energy source :-)

                            Comment


                            • hi jet

                              i will get back to you soon, i need to find out where every one went....david

                              Comment


                              • Personally I think the most important data to have come out of this thread is the video and snapshot showing the expansion and contraction of the device even at 90° camera rotation during filming. I don't think this is due to camera image stabilization.

                                This particular effect needs to be fully explored and documented because it is the strongest evidence that a true gravitational disturbance is present. Why? because a strong disturbance in the gravitational field can cause definitive Lorentz contraction and Doppler shifts where space-time is warped due to the disturbance. Such a manifestation will be representative of time changes, size changes and color changes in EM radiation (light) interaction with matter.

                                But what do I know? . . . I'm just some 52 year old guy on the internet somewhere. Of course IIRC, David's brother has a degree in physics, right David? So I would be interested in knowing if he agrees with me and if not, why?

                                Do EM fields affect muscles? John Hutchison and others in his lab have reported that moving their arms through his field felt like moving through some thick liquid. A friend of mine once told me that when he was walking through an intersection he felt as though he could not lift his feet, they "felt like they were 50 pounds each", he said. He found out that the problem was due to a lack of iron in his blood. Iron carries oxygen, that is how the red blood cells work and it is an electrical bond that causes that action. So, it is interesting that the mind associates a lack of oxygen in the muscles as increased weight. Similarly, when muscles are energetic and we 'feel strong', the mind perceives that things are 'lighter'. It is very possible that David's rig somehow affects the way that blood is bonding to oxygen in the body. It would be interesting to have that tested, a blood test after or during exposure to the rig. If the oxygen is elevates when exposed to the rig, then we may have some proof that the rig does affect the surroundings

                                David, if there is anything we can do to help you prove this, please ask. Glen has offered to put it up on a live show for you, I don't know if you saw his post, but he has access to a venue that can air up to 5 hours of continuous video and broadcast that in real time with a high speed up-link. Good stuff

                                I have limited resources here, but I will help however I can.

                                Cheers,

                                Harvey
                                "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X