Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by david lambright View Post
    jet..try this ..no spin...hold something heavy,7 kilos of steel above axis.slowly lower and slowly raise...... any result?..if not try a neo magnet ...hold magnet N about 20-30 cm away from equatorial plane of your model...rotate slowly by hand ...you should feel a pulse either pull or push of the magnet....if so ..spin by hand [i do not have an rpm meter] about 60-100 rpm and try the steel again you should feel a "pulling down" over center of axis.. best at 10degrees off toward N....here is some pics....keep at it....curious
    Ok, now you have a picture with something we all can see and discusss

    So to what do we attribute this squashy left side pipes and big round right side pipe with the rest leaning away from that big round right side pipe? Think before you answer that - pay attention to the background and the photo centering (focus of the lens).

    This is . . .
    "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

    Comment


    • you are onto some thing!! today is the day of discovery!......my charged pmh or generator does not exibit any color change even next to the screen of myTV...DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME...anyway would any one any one like to know how he used those coils.....perhaps a video demo?....my videos suck,but the effects ARE there ...as the video uploads it seems like the distortions are easier to see at first.....polishing ..great idea ...whatabout a parabola ereeeka

      Comment


      • u-reeka ...the energy in a pmh wants to orbit in a circle but likes to move in metal . the inside of each segment is parabola ,if the orbit is where the segments join ...parabola is below center line.....i was thinking {again]about jon depew and his work on magnetic resonance could a small pmh "seed" a larger one......i think yes

        Comment


        • Strange Parallax

          I've done a quick markup:

          Blue Dot is vanishing point for camera lens

          Red Dot is center of picture

          Yellow intersects are from the edge points of each element to the visual center of the wheel (note light blue lines intersect each 90° element at that center point)

          Green Lines give twist vector of each element - most are well adjusted but a few are really twisted. Also, the height differential between each element is seen from this.

          There is an obvious distortion of where the true center of things are in this picture. Also noteworthy is the missing attachment screw - I would guess that a piece of paper has been cut and laid inside the rig.

          First impression is that the right side of the rig is closer to the camera and the image is distorted accordingly. Very odd visual effect
          Attached Files
          "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

          Comment


          • Either that pic is showing some of the strange effects of the PMH or it was an odd combination of a wide angle lens camera being held very close to the PMH and a little to the right of center with the camera tilted slightly to the left. I think that might explain the distortion if it's not the effects from the PMH.
            There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

            Comment


            • @jet

              In my notes of the ford ignition system it is mentioned that the core of the coils in the ford Model T is made of soft swedish iron no. 20. I would assume it is the same for the magnets but who knows. Leedskalin always talked about using soft iron as it would produce the most magnets. I will post the link later with the exact details.

              Cheers
              Nat

              Comment


              • Originally posted by nat1971a View Post
                @jet

                In my notes of the ford ignition system it is mentioned that the core of the coils in the ford Model T is made of soft swedish iron no. 20. I would assume it is the same for the magnets but who knows. Leedskalin always talked about using soft iron as it would produce the most magnets. I will post the link later with the exact details.

                Cheers
                Nat
                I've read that also, in fact I think it said it was made of soft Swedish Iron wire no. 20.

                The thing is, soft iron is great for magnetic cores where induction is wanted but horrible for permanent magnets. The domains in soft iron revert easily losing the magnetic effect. A hard magnet (permanent) needs to not do that. Instead, you want the domains to remain locked in the magnetic orientation even after the H field is removed.
                "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                Comment


                • Has anyone noticed in a couple of david's videos when the PMH is spinning that it looks like it suddenly freezes for a millisecond? I think it seemed to happen most often when he holds the quartz over it. I don't know if it's just youtube, video hickup or possibly some effect from the PMH.
                  There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

                  Comment


                  • Hi all,

                    A picture is worth many many words. Here is what the core looked like in those good old days. I did squeeze it with a little twist so the wires show.

                    Take care,

                    Michel
                    Attached Files
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA

                    Comment


                    • Magneto---is composed of 16 "V" shaped permanent magnets, mounted on, but magnetically insulated from the flywheel, and sixteen coils wound of insulated copper tape, one quarter of an inch wide and .015" thick, 25 turns to a coil, mounted on bosses on the magneto frame. The coils are wrapped with cambric, with fiber inserts in the center, and bristol board insulating washers beneath when mounted on the bosses. The coils are connected with the winding of consecutive coils in opposite directions.
                        Magnets---are mounted with similar poles of adjacent magnets together making 16 magnetic poles each, having twice the strength of a single magnet pole, so in each revolution of the flywheel the magnetism in the boss of each coil reverses sixteen times, producing sixteen electrical impulses, which at ordinary engine speed produces a continuous alternating current of a much higher frequency than is used for house lighting. Because of this fact it is possible to operate lights from the magneto.
                      The Coil Unit
                        The coil unit consists of a soft iron core, primary coil, secondary coil, condenser, and the upper and lower bridge. The coil unit is also called an induction coil. Induction is the process by which a current is produced in one wire by another current running in another wire, near the first but not touching it.

                      Construction---The soft iron core is made up of 160 to 170 pieces of No. 20 Swedish soft iron wire and well insulated from the primary coil, which is wound around it, by a heavy paper tube in which the core is packed.

                      Primary Coil---is made up of two layers of No. 19 insulated copper wire, the first layer having 112 turns and the second 110 turns. The primary coil is then impregnated in hot paraffin and rosin for 20 minutes. This cements the pieces of wire in the core together, insulates and holds the windings of the primary in place.

                      Secondary Coil---is composed of 16,400 turns of No. 38 enameled copper wire, and between each two layers are three layers of paper insulation. The coil is wrapped in two spools with forty-one layers on each spool. The reason for building the coil in two spools is because there will not be as many volts difference between the consecutive layers at the same end of the coil as if it was wound in one spool. By wrapping in two spools the difference in voltage between the consecutive layers at the same end is just half as much as if it was wound in one spool, and consequently, the thickness of the insulation between the layers is reduced one-half and the diameter of the coil is reduced proportionately. The secondary coil is then placed in a vacuum tank for twenty minutes at 220 degrees F. to make sure all moisture is drawn out; then it is submerged in hot wax. A heavy piece of wax paper is wrapped around the primary coil and it is placed within the secondary coil, making the induction coil complete.


                      Here's the link
                      Ford

                      Comment


                      • JET, great work on those prototypes

                        dont forget to also try having the copper of the coil touching the actual steel (or whatever materials your using ) of the rings.

                        Comment


                        • Hi Harvey,

                          Please take a look at the second picture!! I have blown it up. Look carefully at the top of the pipe pieces. The rotor is not moving! It is in the exact position as the first picture! Look at how clearly defined the grass...

                          It appears to be a near perfect circular distortion...

                          What say ye?

                          Cheers,

                          Bruce
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • Just a question

                            Hello David,

                            Being silent doesn't mean that I'm not very curious about what you're describing. But having no mean at hand to make any test, I'm just waiting forward for other people's attempts... Or to just see what you see from your
                            videos and photos.

                            And about the two pictures above : is the blur of the wheel because it was rotating, or... ? Since if it's spinning, you then managed to take 2 pics at moments when the wheel is in the exact same position ! Or I'm wrong ?

                            I just ask, with the hope that these pics clearly may show at last what you're claiming with such enthusiasm. Keep the faith for your (re)discovery.
                            -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
                            M.E. Who else ?...

                            Comment


                            • Here's my progress. No proper attempts to energize yet, still need to bend more steel. I'm trying to keep as close to the original spec as possible: 2" Galvanized steel Sch40, partly sanded.



                              -Reiyuki
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Bruce_TPU View Post
                                Hi Harvey,

                                Please take a look at the second picture!! I have blown it up. Look carefully at the top of the pipe pieces. The rotor is not moving! It is in the exact position as the first picture! Look at how clearly defined the grass...

                                It appears to be a near perfect circular distortion...

                                What say ye?

                                Cheers,

                                Bruce
                                David will need to comment on this so we can be sure, but if I were to ascertain the motion or non-motion forensically I would have to go with the former, that this is moving. There are 3 indicators that stand out to me in this regard:

                                1. Outer wall overlap of the elements in join area
                                2. Continuous circular striation visible for 120° on the tops of the elements
                                3. The blurred Ty-Wrap nub on the lower right corner of the picture.

                                I would guess that the device was spinning CCW, but I would probably be wrong as this assumption would be characterized by shutter aperture being wider at the end of the exposure and thus produce a more solid image - however with newer digital systems it may be the inverse is true.

                                I am concerned however that if we are getting such large size and angle distortions from the close up lens how we are going to separate that from the effect - or is it the effect

                                Still, it is a very interesting thing to analyze
                                "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X