gravity waves found

[Cloxxki]

So hands feel increased or reduced weight inide the field, but the scaled can't tell a diffference. Who'd got an idea what "it" is, then?
A local inertia reduction of sorts? Only working on moving objects?

I had a lucit moment earlier tonight, where I figured gravit was made up of various components, previously understood as one, as they'd never been isolated on earth's surface. Something is amiss in out current understanding!

[jonnydavro]

Hi I think this thread is the most fascinating i have read and pray that this can be replicated by the great minds here.
I have been trying to read up on Ed leedskalnin and have found some great vids on utube by scotty7129 which show a close replication of ed's pmh using the ford magnets and also a great demonstration of the retention of the magnetic current.
Also in the scotties pmh and vee magnet vid,there may be some distortion.What do you think?Jonny.

YouTube - Edward Leedskalnin's pmh 23lbs.MOV
YouTube - Ed's flywheel replication
YouTube - pmh and vee magnets

[Harvey]

So hands feel increased or reduced weight inide the field, but the scaled can't tell a diffference. Who'd got an idea what "it" is, then?
A local inertia reduction of sorts? Only working on moving objects?

I had a lucit moment earlier tonight, where I figured gravit was made up of various components, previously understood as one, as they'd never been isolated on earth's surface. Something is amiss in out current understanding!

As David says, he doesn't think there is a weight change but he can "feel" a difference.

This can be caused by interactive forces involved and may (quite probably) be attributed to some type of energy interactions with his muscles. I'm certain that adrenaline also plays some factor as it would be nearly impossible to contain ones excitement on seeing a phenomenon that was not previously known to them (this is what makes little kids jump up and down when they are excited). Perhaps there are T-Rays interacting with the muscles giving the sensation that the object is changing weight. This also may be the vibration he feels.

Naturally, all of this is conjecture on my part and would need to be validated scientifically.

[Stealth]

Check out the Oregan vortex at this website VortexMaps.com
This could be what is causing some of the effects David is experiencing with his pmh. Good Luck. Stealth

[Bruce_TPU]

As David says, he doesn't think there is a weight change but he can "feel" a difference.

This can be caused by interactive forces involved and may (quite probably) be attributed to some type of energy interactions with his muscles. I'm certain that adrenaline also plays some factor as it would be nearly impossible to contain ones excitement on seeing a phenomenon that was not previously known to them (this is what makes little kids jump up and down when they are excited). Perhaps there are T-Rays interacting with the muscles giving the sensation that the object is changing weight. This also may be the vibration he feels.

Naturally, all of this is conjecture on my part and would need to be validated scientifically.

A knowledgable friend of mine, and I were discussing this, and the idea of it being a type of longitudinal compression wave, caused by a static magnetic field in some way. There is a fellow with a paper on this, and will post that info when I get my hands on it. It certainly fits the description of a type of compression wave.

We must make this effect reproducible to figure out what it is, and what to do with it. It would be interesting to figure out at what frequency this wave is, also.

David hopefully will have this second one built soon, and have it working. As he builds it he will be eliminating other "possabilities" of what is allowing it to work. Just to rule out every possible influence but the design itself. We need to rule out the rotor as well, and someone made that suggestion and I think it is a good one, and hope that David can try that tonight.

Cheers,

Bruce

[Stealth]

Here is a good example of this phenomena at work. It is a distortion of our perception. Ancient people would have called this magic. This would account for some of the megalithic structures being built on these sites. Reminds me of what aurora borealis would be percieved as, if it were close to the ground. Oregan vortex is in close proximity to David's location. Good Luck. Stealth

[Bruce_TPU]

Here is a good example of this phenomena at work. It is a distortion of our perception. Ancient people would have called this magic. This would account for some of the megalithic structures being built on these sites. Reminds me of what aurora borealis would be percieved as, if it were close to the ground. Oregan vortex is in close proximity to David's location. Good Luck. Stealth

My friend and I discussed this also and unfortunately, it is possible. I certainly hope not. David did share with me that he has taken it "other places" and it still worked, but my guess it that the other places were still in State.

Cheers,

Bruce

[FuzzyTomCat]

I would have to agree that there is some geographical connection between many world sites. Glen Lettenmaier has done a great deal of research and documentation on this in his Tesla Wireless thread here at EF. His findings are quite thought provoking. He has discovered a mathematical relationship between these sites and the current world coordinate system.

There is a reason that the Egyptians used the Sexagesimal numbering system which has found its way into our clocks and circular mathematics even today. A Radian is 180/pi and our global coordinates are divided into two axial 180° sections, E & W and two radial 180° sections, N & S. 360° / 60 is 6 and 6 is exactly 1/10 of 60.

The Prime Meridian currently runs right through France, but it was originally 2°20′14.025″ to the East of where it is now. (See Paris Meridian
and Prime Meridian History).

The meter as we know it today is also different from that originally calculated by the french to be 1/10,000,000 of the distance from the equator to the North Pole (see Metre - Meridonal Definition ) which was off by 1/2 mm because of miscalculations regarding the flattening of the Geoid we call Earth.

It would appear that Glen has discovered a mathematical factor that relates our current coordinate system to that of the ancients where the current degrees minutes and seconds align with ancient structures in a predictable way.

According to Glen's calculations, David is within 3 miles of such a site.

Personally, I am very fascinated by all of these developments and look forward to having everything revealed - but as always, with knowledge comes responsibility and I am pondering if mankind is responsible enough to acquire and utilize this knowledge at a time where almost all new technology is applied to war and the purpose of harming other humans.

I sincerely hope that the developments are weighted such that the outcome is overbalanced toward the greater good.

Hi Harvey,

This is true that I have been working on this inside of the Tesla's wireless electricity transmission , with some fairly good explanations in POST #74 and POST #76 and basically it's still somewhat a work in progress but here is the theory .... and possibly a explanation for the "Earth Motor" or Earths Rotation.

There are one hundred and twenty (120) sets of three (3) circular arcs for each phase or 120 degrees, the three circular arcs per set are connected in a "delta" or "star" more commonly known as a "Y" configuration A-B, B-C, and C-A inside the earth. The one hundred and twenty (120) Y connected sets of three (3) circular arcs are totally separate being one degree (1) apart for a total of three hundred and sixty (360) degrees (Tesla Poly). This would verify 100% of what Tesla said that was possible to send radio waves, electricity, video or photos and energy waves and more as there are one hundred and twenty (120) Y connected sets of three (3) circular arcs to work with as long as you have a "EARTH" ground to gain access on land with each of the one hundred and twenty (120) per phase Y connected sets of circular arcs.

Positive lines of "Flux" Circle or Ring radius points which are on every full degree points [(E-W)XX 00' 00"] around the globe on the Equator rotating CW, three connected in a "Y" or delta, each 120 sets are separate.

Negative lines of "Flux" Circle or Ring radius points which are on the 30 minute mark [(E-W)XX 30' 00"] around the globe on the Equator each rotating CCW, three connected in a "Y" or delta, each 120 sets are connected (ground)

Earths Circumference is 40,075.16 Km

Elliptical circle diameter - 13358.38 Km
Elliptical circle radius - 6679.19 Km

Flux width is approximately 10 (min) to 15 miles (max) depending on any lunar effects on the Earth, centered in the elliptical "flux ark radius's or 5 x 5 (five by five) wide.

David Lambright is in a negative set

W77 30' 00" A-Phase (*)
E42 30' 00" B-Phase
E162 30' 00" C-Phase

(*) W77 30' 00" with a 6679.19 Km radius puts him approximately 3 miles from the radius center line at his home or experimental location.

So anyone on a Negative line of "Flux" Circle or Ring radius points which are on the 30 minute mark [(E-W)XX 30' 00"] around the globe from the Equator "theoretically" should see the same thing as David.

Just A Thought,
Glen

[Jetijs]

Interesting Glen,
can you look at Latvia and tell me where the best point would be to test this device in my country?
Thanks,
Jetijs

[Jetijs]

Jet - Your work is amazing. But just a point. If you look at the position of your 'lock' if one can call it that - then the amount of mass in the 'closed' circumference is not equal to the amount of mass in the open 'legs'. If you look at the proportions in Dave's set up - you'll see that the mass in the legs and that 'closed circumference' are just about proportionate. I wonder if this proportionality is required for the effect. No idea though. Just a thought. I'm still inclined to see two entirely opposing fields or 'monopoles' in each section on either side of that lock - and I think that this may have been what Leedskalnin intended in his own design. In which case it may be required to separate each piece in the steel cut out that you're intending. Otherwise I see a kind of 'resolution' or a balancing out of the two opposing fields in the base of the leg and this may mitigate against the effect. Just a thought. In any event you'll be able to try both options, presumably.

What blows me away is that there is any 'lock' at all. Magnetic fields don't just 'dissipate' into thin air. There must be a balancing field extending all the way through the length of those pieces. And they can't just 'alter' their justification. I sort of remember being told that a magnetic field will simply 'disappear' inside a hollowed cylinder. I think this design puts paid to that 'belief'. I'm inclined to suggest that perhaps we can't measure the field inside a cylinder because it becomes too 'balanced' to detect it at all. If you think about it - by the time a field is established all the way around that rig one half diametrically opposes the other half. That's perfect symmetry. This design simply introduces an imbalance through those legs. Which also means that the pure cylinder design proposed by cody may also be a monopole and may also give a good effect. Perhaps it just needs a stronger magnetic field to expose it.

Anyway. There's way more questions here than answers - which is always a good thing. And I just wanted to suggest that perhaps you need to look to those proportions - unless I'm reading the photos incorrectly - which is a real probability given my poor eyesight. LOL.

Thank you witsend
My current setup with the more compressed pipe halves is almost proportional as you suggest, but still no effect. I hope Glen can point me to the nearest "power line" to verify his theory, Leedskalnin also traveled far till he found the best spot for his castle

[FuzzyTomCat]

Interesting Glen,
can you look at Latvia and tell me where the best point would be to test this device in my country?
Thanks,
Jetijs

Hi Jetijs,

You are lucky to live up above the N55 parallel and have many options -

With the 6679.19 Km radius from the Earths Equator you have ten (10) possibilities theoretically through Latvia for a Negative "Flux" circle or ring ......

E54 30' 00"
E53 30' 00"
E52 30' 00"
E51 30' 00"
E50 30' 00"
E49 30' 00"
E48 30' 00"
E47 30' 00"
E46 30' 00"
E45 30' 00"
E44 30' 00"

Which ever radius your closest to with the Flux width approximately 10 (min) to 15 miles (max) [ 16.09 Km - 24.15 Km ] depending on any lunar effects on the Earth, centered in the elliptical "flux ark radius's or 5 x 5 (five by five) [ 8.05 Km by 8.05Km ] wide.

Best of Luck !!
Glen

[Jetijs]

Glen, thank you
But I am still a bit confused, those are the X coordinates, what do I use for Y coordinates?

Did re read your posts again and still am confused. I don't get the grid/line pattern. A drawing would be helpful
Thank you!

[FuzzyTomCat]

Glen, thank you
But I am still a bit confused, those are the X coordinates, what do I use for Y coordinates?
Thank you!

Hi Jetijs,

Those coordinates are the X being the Negative CCW circles or rings are all connected, and the "Y" coordinates aren't as important because there ground referenced as the "Positive" circle or rings "Y" coordinates as they are separate for some reason and as of now not yet determined why. I guess I'm saying it would be similar in a way to a motor rotor and stator (120 poles).

So any radius from the Equator of 6679.19 Km will do for a Negative "Flux" connection on a [(E or W)XX 30' 00"] where XX is from (E or W) 1 to 180 degrees at 30' (30 minutes) intervals.


Glen

[Jetijs]

So I can draw straight vertical lines (from north to south) on my computer map at those coordinates you gave me and it should work on all those lines across the country?
Still confused

[FuzzyTomCat]

So I can draw straight vertical lines (from north to south) on my computer map at those coordinates you gave me and it should work on all those lines across the country?

If you use "Google Earth" there is a ruler (use Km) "icon" that I use to map the radius from the Equator. This ruler takes in consideration for the Earths curvature.

So starting on the Equator using these ...

E54 30' 00" (east Latvia)
E53 30' 00"
E52 30' 00"
E51 30' 00"
E50 30' 00"
E49 30' 00" (central Latvia)
E48 30' 00"
E47 30' 00"
E46 30' 00"
E45 30' 00"
E44 30' 00" (west Latvia)

Use a radius of 6679.19 Km over Latvia from east to west finding the closest radius to your location or PM me with what city or town your in and I can tell you which Equator "longitude" to use.

Glen