gravity waves found

[witsend]

What if? When looking at Leedskalnin photos, he had his device mounted on a tripod something like 6 meter high? What if that contraption actualy act to deflect gravity push towards earth? Like I stated before and still stand on: "Gravity is a result of universal EM pushing force".

Hi Aromaz. I entirely agree. But the gravitational pull on Earth - I see it as a 90 degree deflection from our earth's magnetic field towards the centre of a field. The same in space. But more difficult to find that centre without first knowing the overall shape of space itself. Be difficult to draw a map without knowing if there are boundaries. LOL.

And then, interestingly, if this is correct then antimatter would move at 90 degrees away from the centre. So. If space does have boundaries that would put antimatter at the edges and all that 'matters' somewhere in the middle. Anyway - not sure that this is still on topic. Just to let you know - your ideas definitely resonate with me.

EDIT I should add that these assumptions are based on the idea that our aether may just be vast magnetic fields.

[david lambright]

here is the link

Leedskalnin Image Archive

[Aromaz]

Leedskalnin Image Archive

Photographic reaction of chemicals. You will often find similar effects on old photos. In this photo I would say the additional shade of the tripod caused the background to have less brightness; over time it discolored to reddish.

Nothing to read in that coloring.

However there is another issue most people overlook. Leedskalnin not only moved the rocks - but he also CUT and DRILLED them with results that are even to this day difficult to achieve - including high tech water and laser cutting.

Oh yes; there is one more effect I wonder about: SOUND. It was sometimes noted that there were 'weird noises' from his place. Now add to this the Buddhist monks that moved huge boulders with trumpets and drums. Makes me wonder if sound waves might have something to do with the deflection/shielding/reflection of 'gravitons'

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

[david lambright]

finally captured?

check out my latest video....this may be the one........david....YouTube - toroid PMH

[witsend]

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

I'll look forward to viewing this.


LOL Unlike you I actually ONLY need that 90 degrees. But I need way more than 3 dimensions. In fact I need 10. But I still think this is probably way off topic. Nonetheless, I'd love to learn more of your thinking here Aromaz. Very intrigued. I'll look out for a link to be posted in due course. Can't wait.

[Cloxxki]

@Aromaz,
I have read your posts before, and thought (hurt my head) about pushing gravity. The way you word it in this thread, finally seems to solve the riddle I mentioned here earlier, being the lack of drought on the poles, and huge flooding at the equator. The spin at the equator fights against the push of gravity at equal rate to its spin itself. It equals out perfectly, after all?
If gravity AND centrifugal force are both reigned by a (relative) constant, being the density of the aether, it's not a big surprise these would cancel out. Their magnitude is a seperate one from the push onto earth, which I intuitively agree with you is a product of size, density, material etc.
Rotation however, might be taken from your list if what I'm babbling here, is of any substance.

That everyday object seem to lack this spin-balancing counter aetheric gravity push, could be due to the way size and distance are taken up in the formula. Double an object's diameter (distance from surface to center), and you'll see the mass increase by factor 8. Earth has the advantage here with size. And its proximity to our hand held object (say a 5kg shot put steel ball), might even effect the self-balancing force on an object orbit the ball. A relatively simple experiment could see this repeated in deep space. But how to convince NASA to take up a 6kg experimental setup consiting mostly of a steel ball with a bearing, strain gauge and glass kids marble... :-)

If Remelic is on the right track with his theories, there is a lot more complexity to Ed's inventions than met the eye. And hey, objects in David's house are not yet shooting out the roof. So he may have uncovered the source of the energy, it's still a long way from matching Ed's claimed feats.

If I continue on my hypothesis of the loacked magnetic ring acting as a lense of sorts, Ed may have tuned it to transform the wave form from a field of substantial volume, to a ray of miniscule width. If EM gravity push can be countered, perhaps similar technology can disassociate particles inside a cut. Like a 1-dimensional (ray) zipper. A ray of such strength would seem greatly detrimental to me, unless it was contained within a limited range. Say, existing between 2 generators, or between a genrator/lense and an absorbing "grounding device" of sorts.

Sorry for the loose thoughts. Greater and fruther developed brains than mine are welcome to use them as a leaping board. I can throw you in orbit, but you can stand on my head if that helps.

[david lambright]

Photographic reaction of chemicals. You will often find similar effects on old photos. In this photo I would say the additional shade of the tripod caused the background to have less brightness; over time it discolored to reddish.

Nothing to read in that coloring.

However there is another issue most people overlook. Leedskalnin not only moved the rocks - but he also CUT and DRILLED them with results that are even to this day difficult to achieve - including high tech water and laser cutting.

Oh yes; there is one more effect I wonder about: SOUND. It was sometimes noted that there were 'weird noises' from his place. Now add to this the Buddhist monks that moved huge boulders with trumpets and drums. Makes me wonder if sound waves might have something to do with the deflection/shielding/reflection of 'gravitons'

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

i agree with witsend.....i have been working on a theory for some months now and the 90 degree/laminar to turbulent effect plays a key role...a rock falls....laminar...into a pond ....waves radiate at 90 degrees...i am compiling my work inbetween videos....hope to have them done soon....i have only read a tiny fraction of witsends work...trust that her work will be KEY in building the new physics model!!!...........david

[witsend]

i agree with witsend.....i have been working on a theory for some months now and the 90 degree/laminar to turbulent effect plays a key role...a rock falls....laminar...into a pond ....waves radiate at 90 degrees...i am compiling my work inbetween videos....hope to have them done soon....i have only read a tiny fraction of witsends work...trust that her work will be KEY in building the new physics model!!!...........david

Hi Dave. My son tells me that the understanding of my model increases in an inverse proportion to the number of people who read it. LOL The worst of it is that he's right. But I need to sit back and see where your experiments go before I get too carried away. But you're right. I'm really excited at where this seems to be pointing. Who knows. Perhaps you've got the ingredients to antigravity, self propelling generators - who knows? I've been flirting with these concepts for ages. You've simply and very elegantly - put this together in an easily readable rig with an aplomb that simply blows me away.

It may interest you to check out the thread COP>1 by Inquorate. It's definitely off topic - but yet it isn't. The guys, Inquorate and GroundLoop are doing some amazing things - also with very elegant simple circuitry. I LOVE SIMPLICITY. And I really love this thread.

[david lambright]

this time i got it

using a blue screen on my tv as a back ground this wave is visible...now i know this works i can improve upon it....please let me know if anyone can see this any better.....look at the lines on the screen....distorsion like heat wave........david....i am still having trouble posting links potatoheadist channel on youtube has any one seen these yet...........david

[SDK]

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me

Hi Guys,

Ehm, there may be something to the galvanized pipe. It is hot dip galvanized, which is the standard. Hot dip galvanizing makes steel somewhat brittle, even though not hard, especially where it has been previously mechanically stressed by bending, which is the case with welded pipes. It is not unusual for all kinds of bent brackets to crack in a few days after in their bends after hot dip galvanizing without further stressing, as opposed to brackets of the same shape from the same material, which have not been hot dip galvanized. Standard of the alloy will be listed on some professional website, including the limits of the component metals.

Ciao, Slavek.

[david lambright]

dissimilar metals

months ago working with PMHs.....single junction,circular toroid, iwas using Aluminum foil in the junction and the foil now sticks to a magnet.....BUT..the effects seem to increase with a dissimilar metal in the junction...the zinc is quite thick in places, thicker than foil anyway...by

effects

, i mean visibility of this wave and an increase in interaction with metals.....we WILL get this.....and by this.....well you know.....david

[david lambright]

stainless?

Wow Dave. You've done way more here than I realised. I would love to see some results when you're good and ready. Also, can you give us a link to that #5 number of Leedskalnin. Ashamed to admit it but I'm entirely 'link' dependent.

We're also testing variations of your device - all in stainless steel - but I'm awaiting delivery of a whole lot of shapes that I hope to photograph and test. Great fun here Dave. You've opened a whole new world. What I find exhilarating is that it's so easy to establish a magnetic field. I simply never realised this. Simply can't thank you enough. On a thousand different levels.

i never could get SS to lock...but there are different types...magnetic and non.....david

[witsend]

i never could get SS to lock...but there are different types...magnetic and non.....david

I mean STEEL. DEFINITELY NOT STAINLESS STEEL. I'm moggy and aged. Bear with me. LOL

[david lambright]

building #2

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me If you could mail me those pipes I would be glad, I will PM you my address.
Also tomorrow I will meet some very sensitive persons and show my device to them, but so far they have "connected" to the device only though a photo and they say, that there is a very powerful field around that device with some odd properties. Will learn more about this tomorrow and post the results, might be interesting
Thank you!
Jetijs

...

i am waiting for jet to recieve his mail!.....more soon.........david

[david lambright]

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me If you could mail me those pipes I would be glad, I will PM you my address.
Also tomorrow I will meet some very sensitive persons and show my device to them, but so far they have "connected" to the device only though a photo and they say, that there is a very powerful field around that device with some odd properties. Will learn more about this tomorrow and post the results, might be interesting
Thank you!
Jetijs

I mean STEEL. DEFINITELY NOT STAINLESS STEEL. I'm moggy and aged. Bear with me. LOL

i know you knew.....mainly for the readers david........witsbeginning?!.......