gravity waves found

[witsend]

i know you knew.....mainly for the readers david........witsbeginning?!.......

LOL More like witsending I've been rolling.

[witsend]

using a blue screen on my tv as a back ground this wave is visible...now i know this works i can improve upon it....please let me know if anyone can see this any better.....look at the lines on the screen....distorsion like heat wave........david....i am still having trouble posting links potatoheadist channel on youtube has any one seen these yet...........david

Finally I found this. Yes indeed. There's definite evidence of an interference pattern that seems to be applied from your rig. Very interesting indeed. It's all so amazing.

I also saw your brief video on the toroid. Frankly I'm so impatient to get my hands on the apparatus to test that I'm already exhausted. Can't wait to find out more.

[Jetijs]

Hi all
Ok, I am back and have something to report. I visited some sensitive persons yesterday and showed them both of my devices, the large one and the small one mounted on a fan. We tried many different experiments and the sensitives told us how the field is affected. Anyway, the bottom line is that it seems that no matter of how you energize your coil (I mean no matter where the plus and minus of the battery goes), if you rotate it clockwise it always makes a kind of standing wave coming out from the sides of the wheel, like orbits. One was about 3m in diameter, the other was about 5m in diameter. There are more standing waves further away, but they are not so stron as the first two. Also the faster you rotate the wheel, the stronger the standing waves can be felt, but their diameter does not change. If you rotate the wheel counter clockwise, there is a beam of energy coming up from the center of the wheel and it is about the same diameter as the wheel itself and it goes up vertically. This beam seems to change the charge of a rock that is placed in the beam, this is according to the sensitive persons. Also when the rock was held in the beam for longer time, it indeed did feel a bit lighter than it should be and everyone witnessed it. But again, could be just as well be a subjective feeling because when put on scales, no decreased weight was showed.
Another thing, if you energize the coil with opposite polarity, then the same is true but with the exception that now if you rotate the wheel counter clockwise, the beam of energy goes down rather than up.

This is some food for thought, but at this time it should not be taken too serious. More experiments need to be done. I left the wheel for the sensitive persons to play around with. Will see what they will find out. Also my wheel was compared to Davids wheel on a picture I gave them, and they said that Davids wheel is much stronger than mine, this might explain why I am not seeing anything and only very sensitive persons sees and feels the field

That's it for now.
Thanks!

[Cherryman]

Hi all,

Just some thinking outside the box.

Water.

As Leedskalin used coral rocks only, why? I do not know coralrocks but does it has an "open" structure?, can water penetrate that?

If that is the case, it could also explain some of the other occurences.

- "visible waves" The moving of tiny water particles in the air
- Temperature difference Again moving water
- Water is in our body, sensetive persons might pick up the "pulling" at the water moleculs.

Maybe someone try this with a bag of water above it?

Good luck!

[david lambright]

Keizer demo...

Hi, Jet... I'm impressed. Great work. We WILL amplify this so that everyone can see it. I'm looking forward to the Keizer demo. I'm waiting for good weather and a few day's advance notice so that as many people who want to come can be there. ALL cameras will be welcome and wanted!!!!Please let me know when you get your pipe. I will wait to start the build till then....I still have not resolved my computer issues...Windows 98 just does not do it for me....tomorrow is a new day.... but today is the day of discovery....could someone track the weather ...Saturday works for me...if the weather holds....I just saw Matt`s comments on my utube..Thank you Matt...I would like to talk to matt some way ....he knows ED. it was matt that inspired me to seek the truth/answers about ED..........david

[nat1971a]

standing waves hey.....sounds like Tesla built the original ford magneto then....who knows


anyway i assembled the orginial ford magneto the way it should be on the weekend and was a good opportunity to study it. Unforntunately i will have to source something to rotate it with as it is really heavy

What is apparent is that the neutral centres of the 16 V magnets are all connected to the base via the 16 bolts. According the the documention i have looked at is the base is magnetically isolated from the remainder of the v magnets.

Could it be that the neutral centre requires more mass for more power to occur. It then became obvious that ED moved the magnets further out on the rim of the base but used different bolts but gained more mass for the neutral centre.

anyway...the guessing game continues.

[Harvey]

The center of the V would be magnetically neutral, representing the heel of a horseshoe magnet which is just a curved equatorial center of the dipole.

However, this region of the material does contain magnetic flux.

This is true also in David's rig. Even though the pipe elements are not hard magnetized, they are held in that mode by the closed loop flux path. Therefore, while the group is locked together, the flux path routes through the heel of each pipe.

Now for something new, which has not been discussed in this thread:

It is well known both to academia and to experimenters and even those of us who work in the fringe areas in between, that a change in magnetic flux within a conductor produces charge separation at the end lengths of that conductor.

David's specific geometry, unlike Ed's or Ford's has a closed loop path for the flux - but, that path is not circular. As David himself stated, it is a series of hyperbolic curves joined at the hip so to speak. This may seem innocuous at first, but bear with this thought. Between each element is a permeable space made up primarily of the vacuum with interspersed air particles which is always laden with some percentage of water referred to as the relative humidity. When the rig is spun, the vacuum does not spin with it. We may push the particles along with the rig, but they move through the vacuum of space. Space and Time remain relatively stationary as it is dragged with the surface of the Earth.

Therefore, as the rig is spun, Space-Time experiences a change in flux. A series of hyperbolic cross sections pass through it. For any given point in that path, there will be a B and an inverse B except for the path of the heel and the hip of the elements. In the spatial circle where the heel and hips pass, that region will experience an off and on of B with a slight curvature, but of the same average vector each time, 24 times per revolution. In the case of the spatial circle between the heel and the hips, this will see 48 On-Off-On cycles per revolution with each ON reversing (with some offset angle) the direction of the B.

If Paul Dirac is correct, and the vacuum is a sea of energy filled with particles of all sorts, then those particles will be acted upon by that alternating and fluctuating flux. The excitation of those particles, in that environment could then result in energy transfers between them and the environment, including the air with all its elements.

In this way, I see that David has a new and sole discovery apart from Leedskalnin or any others insomuch as David's specific geometry is unique and his observations have not been previously recorded by any before him. Therefore, on those principles, he has not (RE) discovered, but has instead a New Discovery.

From an academic viewpoint, any energy that is radiated would be a conservation of the energy put into the spinning. And that would be the academic approach to the situation - an endeavor to calculate all of the energy put in and compare it to all of the energy that is taken out. The two should always balance according to conservation of energy laws. However, even the most skeptical scientist must acknowledge that if the vacuum does contain a large energy store, then opening a pathway to that reservoir does not invalidate the conservation of energy laws. It only enlarges the enclosure by which we make our measurements from. It is as if we have two containers on our kitchen table, one empty and one full. We can move the contents from one to the other and we see that we always have the same contents. Then, we attach one container to the ocean. We must now include the entire ocean in our contents conservation calculations. So it goes with tapping the energy of the vacuum - if it is there, and if it is possible to do so. Both of which I believe are true.

[teslaproject]

..Windows 98 just does not do it for me.............david

Still better than Vista

Regards

TP

[david lambright]

new videos

3 new videos ...the 3rd one shows the same effect as the previous pic....RE;THE KEIZER DEMO......if you are close to here, or if you know someone close to here, i suggest you try and see this .....this is just the beginning.....Today is the Day of Discovery................david

[david lambright]

harvey...

and it only gets better......I stand in awe.....

[david lambright]

is anyone excited about this?

what is being said on other sites?........this is my reply on another thread;...there you go..adding electricity to the equation..you know how to tell if some one knows Anything about this?....no talk of electricity / voltage/amps etc....when you stop trying to make electricity with his generator,you might start to under stand this new technology, and embrace,advance, document , write about something revolutionary....think about it ....if this nothing,then it will fall apart....but it will not... watch this unfold!!!this is the break that all of physics has been looking for. We all knew it was there ,[those not looking for electricity] and so many were so close to this ,you know who you are....I was following Ed material like every one else and finally got it. has any one been playing with a PMH and thought you saw wires "moving"? if so you saw this wave....you will see,everyone will see, this is the dawn of a new age ....or it will fall apart...........Today is the Day of Discovery...................david" so many have got caught up in electrical complexities when studying what Ed did.....stop looking for electricity first! there is more than electric energy.......its simplicity deceives!....that is why it was so hard to see....it was right in front of us the whole time......almost funny.....david

[witsend]

what is being said on other sites?........this is my reply on another thread;...there you go..adding electricity to the equation..you know how to tell if some one knows Anything about this?....no talk of electricity / voltage/amps etc....when you stop trying to make electricity with his generator,you might start to under stand this new technology, and embrace,advance, document , write about something revolutionary....think about it ....if this nothing,then it will fall apart....but it will not... watch this unfold!!!this is the break that all of physics has been looking for. We all knew it was there ,[those not looking for electricity] and so many were so close to this ,you know who you are....I was following Ed material like every one else and finally got it. has any one been playing with a PMH and thought you saw wires "moving"? if so you saw this wave....you will see,everyone will see, this is the dawn of a new age ....or it will fall apart...........Today is the Day of Discovery...................david" so many have got caught up in electrical complexities when studying what Ed did.....stop looking for electricity first! there is more than electric energy.......its simplicity deceives!....that is why it was so hard to see....it was right in front of us the whole time......almost funny.....david

Hi Dave. Frankly I think what your rig points to is the basis of all the forces, including electricity. And, because of this it should also be applicable to all the forces. Certainly you've started a buzz here that's eventually going to be heard everywhere.

[witsend]

What is intriguing about Dave's rig is that there are magnetic fields established - induced - that are both attractive and repulsive. This seems to induce a variety of phenomena that are usually associated with gravity. Not only that, but the effect, though widely apparent and continuous, does nothing to dispell that early 'locked' condition of those magnetic fields. Effectively it's a permanent condition. Just that. A unique combination of attractive and repulsive magnetic fields that somehow combine into a unified whole. I would predict that if that rig could be hung by a thread to develop its own 'spin' - it would do so and do so continuously. But what does one use to hang it on? It's heavy and the sections may not be that perfectly balanced. Alternatively, if one could position the spin so that it could move horizontally to the earth - like a bicycle wheel? Again. I would predict that it could generate it's own spin.

But what also teases the mind is that our Earth's magnetic field runs in a continual line - so to speak, north to south. If one considers this carefully, it also means that we, on earth, have only ever experienced that single justification. It seems to move in a consistent direction. So. In a way it's also a magnetic monopole. The second half of that orbit is hidden inside our Earth's fields. In the same way - by having two opposing magnetic fields - as in this rig - one has separated a north from a south. Spatially we have two magnetic monopoles. This means that one or the other on Dave's setup will oppose our earth's fields, and one will marry with the earth's fields. But then we have the added complication that neither of the two fields in the rig - do anything but repel each other. To my way of thinking it's a +(our earth) linked to a -(inside or outside Dave's rig) and another - (inside or outside Dave's rig). That leaves an imbalanced -. It's just a question of finding the right angle to see how it may respond to the earths' fields.

If it does not develop a self-propelled spin, so to speak, then it may mean that the inner or the outer fields are somehow neutralised. Since a spin is desirable - I would suggest that a pure toroidal field, without the opposing inner field - may then generate a spin. And if this also does not work, then there is a possible final configuration where one introduces a pressurised ionised gas into the toroidal space to ensure a continual interaction with what may be weak magnetic fields. This may clinch it. Certainly this is what Dave's configuration points to. I hope to do my own tests towards this object.

I also think that it may be possible to increase the strength of the effect by increasing the magnetic fields - also as Dave has proposed. What is very evident is that this very subtle effect is yet very clearly evident and well worth exploring.

Anyway that's my tuppence worth. And many thanks to Jet for his research into this effect. It is such a pleasure dealing with open minds and honest research. And as ever. Thank you to Dave for this extraordinary piece of research.

[david lambright]

real "gravitational" lens

i have been working on a lens-less optical focusing device...the "area"in front of the ccd is "bent"using........???...this optical device,looking `too crude to do much .......well,i like it......david

[witsend]

i have been working on a lens-less optical focusing device...the "area"in front of the ccd is "bent"using........???...this optical device,looking `too crude to do much .......well,i like it......david

Hi Dave. Is this in another video upload? I can't seem to find it.