Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by CatLady View Post
    This is really a strange one. I did the same exact test and my phone rang just fine. Here's a video of my experiment.

    YouTube - Testing Mobile Phone Inside Home Made Faraday Cage


    TheTruthBeKnown
    Hi Cat. I did not get this. I'd video it but it could be discounted as 'proof'. I'm inclined to think that perhaps you have 'tin foil' and I have aluminium? Maybe?

    But since your foil - whatever it is - allows a signal - why not try the whole of that experiment? It would only cost you 6 batteries. It would be really good to see it replicated. And Dave's already hinted that it's a worthwhile test. When it's light again I'll go and check on the manufacture of my own foil. If there's a way of finding out its constituents I'll let you know.

    Comment


    • This is NOT Gravitational Lensing:
      YouTube - Weather phenomenon - Halo/ Sundog/ 5. suns

      This IS gravitational lensing:
      YouTube - Abell 1689.mov

      This is near infrared Fluorescence:
      YouTube - Operation Green Light

      This is sonoluminescence:
      YouTube - Sonarluminescence- is this nuclear fusion?

      This is chemiluminescence:
      YouTube - Chemiluminescence

      This is electroluminescent:
      YouTube - systm - Demystifying Electroluminescence



      Now, I don't know how any person here misunderstood my comments regarding the photon ATOMIC reaction and confused that with gravitational bending, but it just goes to show they don't read.

      So . . . when light REFRACTS or REFLECTS what is the photon action at the first ATOMIC layer of the material (as in galvanized pipe)?




      "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

      Comment


      • it is a concern of mine that any claims to get nearer to the 'source' or the actual properties of gravity would be an enormous threat to those who are most anxious to withhold discovery of its properties. The reasons for this are that - if better understood and possibly even shown to be useable - then we will, unquestionably, have the means to circumvent its constraints - which would, at its least, result in new and exciting uses of that energy. There are those who prefer the status quo - relating to energy - and those who are paid to frustrate this knowledge. We're all aware of them. There is no real reason for our energy monopolists to forgo their control if they can manage it.

        By the same token it would be unfair to accuse anyone who argues against effects relating to gravity - to fall into either of the two camps listed. it may well be that the questions, or arguments are volunteered in a sincere effort to better understand the 'facts' - to get to the essential truths of the matter. But any such opinions are not - of necessity - a fair reflection of the facts. To me the litmus test is if the counter arguments conform to known physical effects. Or indeed if they were to simply conform to common sense. Were they to do so I would be inclined to support them.

        As mentioned, it is my opinion that the Lambright Glimmer is the result of light being 'bent' by some anomalous juxtaposition of opposing magnetic fields. This is perhaps even better and more clearly evidenced by the shape distortions of the rig. Perhaps we can group this evidence under the general banner as the Lambright Effect. But the effects are strange. The more so as the only thing known to bend light is gravity. To prove any and all of this one would need to transcend the small evidence and make it 'more' evident - more repeatable. Hopefully Bruce can help us out here. What is of interest is that there is actually no known precedent of this glimmer to the best of my knowledge. And both this glimmer and this distortion are only evident in connection with the rig itself. Therefore I'm inclined to believe that this rig of Dave's deserves our full attention. I'm also inclined to see this in the nature of a discovery that properly belongs to Dave. But that opinion is based on the fact that I know very little about Leedskalnin's theories and even less about his work. Only what I see in the coral castle and his extraordinary feats of impeccable engineering. But I'm reasonably satisfied that he did not point us, the public, to such subtle visual effects from any of his experiments. I am open to correction.

        But back to the point. It seems that all discoveries are also accompanied by critical counterclaims - some valid - some not so much. And the hope is that if this is a discovery - that it survives this. Meanwhile I will wait patiently for Bruce's skills and experimental know how. Always happy to learn more especially as it relates to Dave's rig.

        All's good guys. It would be a shame to let this impeccable thread relapse or this interesting subject be killed by counterclaim before it's thoroughly explored.

        Comment


        • Everyone assumes that gravity waves are verticle in nature. What if it were found that they were instead,not vericle or horizontal,but at some angle in between. Since gravity waves have never been observed,and neither has magnetic waves, it could be that they travel in the same plane,possibly together in parallel, or intertwined as in a helix. Throw in aetheric waves, and we could end up with a double helix.It would not be absurd to think these three waves could not only travel together, but could spin as they traveled.If David's machine sonehow intersepted,reflected,or refracted these wavelengths,then the colors that they produce could be duplicated by the corresponding frequency of the colors.This would gvie us ample opportunity to study these waves in more detail.Maybe these waves are invisible, but only because the we are yet to deveope the correct geometric shape machine for detecting these. Or, they could not even consist of waves at all,but some other highly evolved systems that we have yet to discover. It is very possible that the pyramids were able to use these waves as power. If we could increase David's machine to the power of Leedskalnin's. then we may be able to produce unliminted power from the wheelworks of nature, just as Tesla described.Good Luck. Stealth

          Comment


          • Using a lens with a thin layer of sandwiched ferro colloidal fluid to map a magnetic field via optic affects of the field on the magnetic fluid. Blue LED's of the apparatus are spaced at 9 degrees, facing inward directed at the edge of the lens. Notice when the ring magnet (poles facing front/back of the ring) is perpendicular to the fluid plane inside the lens, it then greatly bends the light from each of the leds. I've never seen anything bend light like the magnets in this video. Note -- Most of the time in this video, the magnet is on edge and it is the profile view of the magnetic field we are seeing!

            Red, yellow and green radial LED's are spaced evenly; facing inward into the edge of the lens. The light from the LED's warps around the magnets as it passes through the fluid.

            For additional information on the above technique for viewing magnetic fields in real time, youtube user SirZerp has released an excellent pdf article titled, Photographing Magnetic Lines of Constant Scalar Potential. Also, there is a thesis.zip at the bottom of this page, which is four years of work (120 page thesis with supporting file), by the author in a single 1 GB file. Here is a quick overview of the technique.

            There is also a technique for viewing the magnetic field lines in 3D with the Dynamic Etalon method. Here's a video showing the real-time holographic representation of magnetic flux is clearly visible to the observer or image recorder.

            GB

            Comment


            • If the magnetic domains of the iron would align more readily when hot, perhaps someone should try heating up a ring to red hot and energize it. (I was thinking about the rings of power being forged in fire. [the hobbit] ) With the added softness of the metal, it would make better contact in the gap too!

              Comment


              • hi...

                bruce...try taking a piece of plexi glass and move it around near the device...you should feel a cool sensation from the edge of the plexiglass.....or use a glass jar..hold the mouth of the jar at equatorabout 12" away.....i am at work right now ...more when i get home....david...PS, the transparent medium serves as a wave guide....

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SuperCaviTationIstic View Post
                  If the magnetic domains of the iron would align more readily when hot, perhaps someone should try heating up a ring to red hot and energize it. (I was thinking about the rings of power being forged in fire. [the hobbit] ) With the added softness of the metal, it would make better contact in the gap too!
                  Actually just the opposite is true. As the material is heated, the kinetic energy overwhelms the domains and prohibits them from aligning due to all the random vibrations. This is called the Curie Point, or Curie Temperature.

                  Here is a video demonstrating this truth:
                  YouTube - M.I.T. - Walter Lewin - Ferromagnetic Curie Point

                  "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by CatLady View Post
                    This is really a strange one. I did the same exact test and my phone rang just fine. Here's a video of my experiment.

                    YouTube - Testing Mobile Phone Inside Home Made Faraday Cage


                    TheTruthBeKnown

                    This is explained very well by this lesson from MIT:
                    YouTube - Lec 5 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002

                    At 48 minutes Professor Lewin actually demonstrates the exact same thing and tells us why a Faraday Cage will not block all frequencies.

                    We can take this a step further from Professor Lewins lesson and look at the radio waves as photons. A photon is an Electro-magnetic charge carrier. While the Faraday cage (even those with openings all over the place) work very well to keep the Electric charges outside, they do absolutely nothing to keep the magnetic charges outside. Now, if you were to make your cage of some highly permeable material like HyMu-80 or Nanoperm, then the cage can route the magnetic field away from the interior, but Aluminum has a permeability only 0.00022µ above that of a vacuum. So Aluminum is practically non-reactive to magnetic flux compared to the 20,000µ of mu-metal. You can easily prove this by placing a magnet inside your aluminum covered glass and rattle it around using another magnet outside. The fields penetrate the aluminum no problem. But try and do that with an electric field and it won't work because the interior is electrically zero (unless you put a power source inside).

                    So when the Cell Phone Tower sends those EM photons to the foil what really happens? Interesting question, because the electrical component cannot penetrate the foil and is essentially stopped at the surface. But what happens to the magnetic component? We already know that it would like to pass right through, but can it? Is the photon split apart leaving the electric component behind? I'll let you ponder it for a while

                    ETA:How Radio Waves Are Produced


                    Last edited by Harvey; 06-23-2010, 11:44 PM.
                    "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                    Comment


                    • David, can you test with candle light and see if it move them?

                      I ask because yesterday I play with high voltage DC dominant that blow a candle fire. HV bare wire do not suck the fire when the bare wire is placed inside the fire. It seems HV at large area attract the light when far.

                      If the effect move candle light, then the effect has electric feature.

                      Only picture, sorry.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Stealth View Post
                        Everyone assumes that gravity waves are verticle in nature. What if it were found that they were instead,not vericle or horizontal,but at some angle in between. Since gravity waves have never been observed,and neither has magnetic waves, it could be that they travel in the same plane,possibly together in parallel, or intertwined as in a helix. Throw in aetheric waves, and we could end up with a double helix.It would not be absurd to think these three waves could not only travel together, but could spin as they traveled.If David's machine sonehow intersepted,reflected,or refracted these wavelengths,then the colors that they produce could be duplicated by the corresponding frequency of the colors.This would gvie us ample opportunity to study these waves in more detail.Maybe these waves are invisible, but only because the we are yet to deveope the correct geometric shape machine for detecting these. Or, they could not even consist of waves at all,but some other highly evolved systems that we have yet to discover. It is very possible that the pyramids were able to use these waves as power. If we could increase David's machine to the power of Leedskalnin's. then we may be able to produce unliminted power from the wheelworks of nature, just as Tesla described.Good Luck. Stealth
                        Everyone?

                        Your point is well taken, but actually Gravity Waves are very tiny things caused by extremely massive objects light years away and they are longitudinal like sound waves. So they are neither vertical nor horizontal but instead are detected as changes in space-time along the propagation path.

                        From the link above:
                        Since the waves are so weak when they reach us, scientists had to use their imaginations to come up with instruments sensitive enough to detect such slight variations in space-time.
                        Question for Readers:
                        How much mass would an object need to have to create a measurable gravity wave on Earth?

                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7Babitv4Fg&feature=fvw


                        Imagine that Gravity is not leaking into or out of other dimensions, but rather is sliced up in time. Now, imagine that the strong nuclear force is really Gravity at full strength. How could that be? Because the Nuclear assembly exists in the same exact infinitesimal time (in phase) while the rest of the atomic particles and even other nuclei in the same material are out of phase and exist in other extremely minute time slices. Therefore, the gravitational effect is only an average of many very small time slices that overlap each other by some value. Only those things that are in perfect time experience full force of gravity and those things that are out of perfect time with all other particles experience none.

                        Gravity does not bend light.

                        Mass bends space because it displaces it.

                        Gravity is curved space.

                        Light follows space whether it is straight or curved.

                        Space is curved around subatomic mass. Light follows those curves and interacts with the atom electromagnetically. The photon never touches the atomic particles - it exchanges energy electromagnetically. Light does not 'bounce' off of a mirror. It is absorbed and re-emitted at the atomic level.

                        It is electromagnetism and curved space in the atom that alters the path of the photon during reflection and refraction.

                        Therefore, the bending of light around a massive star and the gravity of that star are both caused by the same thing: The curvature of space caused by the mass displacement. You can have all the mass in the universe in a single place and if it does not bend space, light will travel in a straight line right past it unaffected. So it is the curvature of space that bends the path of light, not gravity.



                        "Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor

                        Comment


                        • check this out...

                          thoughts...looking at some OOPartifacts...small helical metal pieces..could they be wave guides?...Ed said that MC runs flows in metal easier than in air....just a thought...david...i am looking for the link...

                          Comment


                          • Some idea.

                            Gravity happen because earth is generating electricity. Rotating current/voltage around the equator make magnetic induction and produce north polarity at earth south pole attracting magnetic north to earth north pole. Rotation also force the outside part become more positive than the inside. The atmosphere is positive, the earth center is negative. Huge earth voltage potential create gravity. Things get attracted by HV negative mass but blown away / repelled by pointed one. Uneven ground insulation property make different electric potential, this create uneven gravity accross the surface of the earth.

                            What David Lambright observe is a magnification of effect using device that store usable voltage potential as a magnetic link.

                            The above is just what I have in mind now .
                            Last edited by sucahyo; 06-24-2010, 04:12 AM.

                            Comment


                            • New Gravity is a theoretical model for gravity based on the aether by Distinti. I think the theory is sound.

                              GB

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by gravityblock View Post
                                New Gravity is a theoretical model for gravity based on the aether by Distinti. I think the theory is sound.
                                Too many equation lol.

                                However, I don't agree with gravity as electromagnetic force. Because the candle fire is blown straight by the negative HV point, I say gravity is an effect of electricity, kind of strong ion wind but not caused by the magnetism that produced by current. In my opinion, gravity goes perpendicular with voltage, a product of huge voltage, not current.

                                Since the earth center is negative, gravity goes straight down to earth. There is less gravity in space because there is less electric polarity in space.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X