If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ed did say in his writings that magnets were what caused the muscles to contract...last page of mineral, vegetable and animal life...this might be something to think about...if it is a magnetic force contracting our muscles then what is it doing to the material around it?...david...also i contacted a guy who works at FLIR...he seemed interested in trying to image this energy, trying different wavelengths etc....i believe this will help...david
Yeh i know electric runs through us. Give someone an elecric shock and it disturbs the function of this electric and makes muscle tense up. What i was meaning was this projected power. Why didnt both guys have this power in their arms, they were both stood in direct line of the coral rock gap.
Zoom Picture
Top View of Triplet With Button Magnets (Strange Glare)
=============================================
Zoom Picture
Same as Above - Different Perspective
===========================================
Zoom Picture
All Slotted With The Jig I made To Slot Them
===========================================
Zoom Picture
Cleaned Off The Oxide Where They Will Touch (or so I thought )
==================================================
Zoom Picture
Another One - The texture is different between those two
===========================================
Zoom Image
This one is really badly corroded - probably why it doesn't lock easily.
================================================== ==
After doing this, I had a realization that there could be a specific ratio between the flux path length and the individual elements that makes things work better.
I noticed that Davids HDPE is very close to 2Pi in diameter (inches) while his elements start out close to the golden ratio in diameter (prior to being cut and bent). Perhaps there is some fundamental relationship between the inner circle diameter, the element diameter and the wavy flux path his rig enjoys.
If so, then these tiny replications like my triplet (where the ratio is badly inverted) may be going off in the wrong direction.
Any thoughts on that?
Last edited by Harvey; 06-30-2010, 06:34 AM.
Reason: Fixed Zoom Link
"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
I see a lot of similarities in this and David Hamel's spinner. If you would turn this PMH upside down and use a smaller ring magnet and a steel ball,I wonder if it would work the same way.When I get mine built, I will do some experiments to determine what it will do.I also see a lot of similarities between this arrangement and the arrangement of Stonehenge. I have more ideas in mind also,but will reserve them for myself when I get mine built. Good Luck. Stealth
That's a really apt reference Shamus. Golly. I actually thought that the 'glimmer' was evident to everyone on Dave's penultimate video. Certainly there was no difficulty seeing it on this side. I must still ask another two people if they see it. I'll get back on this. Until those last three members - I assumed it was widely apparent to everyone.
I'll tell you what. Once seen - it doesn't go away again. But I understand more and more why Dave was so anxious to show this. It's compelling viewing. Entirely fascinating. I have never seen the likes.
I have seen this video before and I DID NOT see the gorilla until it was brought to my attention. Interesting stuff
Cat - just a question. That phone in a glass number. Could you repeat that whole experiment and see if it levitates with six batteries around the glass? I'd gladly do the experiment but it does not work off my foil. Just a thought. I know Dave has suggested that this may be worth looking into. One never actually knows if we're being duped by these videos or if they're based on some truth.
btw - I was entirely unable to find out the properties of our foil as it's imported and it seems that none know except obviously the manufacturer. And I'm not that interested that I'll pick up the tab for an international call.
Casimir himself was a mathematician. He proposed that on a really small scale - materials would be able to 'lock' or 'bond'. His theories were tested and proved on metals. In effect - with really small samples, it's possible to get this bond which is not easily broken. 'Sticks Like Crazy'.
Anyway - both the proposal and the observation are profound. The 'bond' seems to 'knit' two amalgams together with a force that requires nothing more than proximity to each other. No electromagnetic or gravitational force accounts for it. And obviously the distances involved rule out an influence from the strong or weak nuclear forces. Which means that on a really small - albeit measurable level - there is an apparent attraction between materials that is not accounted for by known forces.
My own proposal is that this force may be accounted for by small magnetic fields that are extraneous to the atom itself. But to argue this I first need to suggest that the magnetic field itself is a force with it's own energy and it's own matter making up that force. Then. For Casimir effect one can just as well say Magnetic effect. In my view two magnetic fields will always find some method to bond given that there are no restrictions to that requirement - or to their movement.
What we also know about permanent magnet interactions with other magnets and with any kind of magnetic material - is that they will always reach a rest state. If one is looking for perpetual motion - then any superficial alignment of permanent magnets - no matter how they're configured - will inevitably find that 'rest' state. While any of those magnets in that alignment can experience the earth's magnetic fields - they will, mathematically and inevitably, find that position that best expresses a balance between those fields. And for that balance to be perfect, then the objects themselves must also be somehow - either immediately or systematically - rendered motionless. A magnetic field, in my book, always looks to find perfect balance and can move objects to achieve that balance. Which is why I, personally, do not subscribe to magnetic motors as being wholly perpetual motion machines. To work there must always be the introduction of some applied electric field or some applied force to sustain an imbalance.
This is why effects such as the Lambright Effect are so significant. Here there is the clear introduction of a field that, without being itself 'overtly' magnetic, it somehow generates a magnetic response in a wide variety of materials. Which is not to say that alignment may still result in a rest state. It's just that the interaction itself is more varied. If it's based on these 'small' magnetic fields then balance cannot really be achieved unless these fields - themselves - extrude the material where they were previously hidden or housed. And what I believe we are seeing in the Lambright Effect - is precisely that extrusion. What is interesting is that it is associated with the emanation of that distinctive 'glimmer'.
Interesting . I also experience the missing dot too lol.
I now developing a method to extract "aura" from a picture. Not PIP because I can not get color, I can only get silhouette. But I don't know if it really aura or not.
If my method is valid the Jetijs right PMH have stronger effect.
And child has lower aura, notice that glow only emited from hair/body but not cloth.
Wether anyone consider this as fake or not, if it is possible, I like someone with postive result to post picture illuminated by uniform and very bright white light taken in front of uniform white background.
. . .
Wether anyone consider this as fake or not, if it is possible, I like someone with postive result to post picture illuminated by uniform and very bright white light taken in front of uniform white background.
That is interesting - I wonder if your technique would work on my recent wobble video - perhaps there is something there that I cannot see.
The lighting was not real bright - but much of the background was white and clear plastic.
"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
I see a lot of similarities in this and David Hamel's spinner. If you would turn this PMH upside down and use a smaller ring magnet and a steel ball,I wonder if it would work the same way.When I get mine built, I will do some experiments to determine what it will do.I also see a lot of similarities between this arrangement and the arrangement of Stonehenge. I have more ideas in mind also,but will reserve them for myself when I get mine built. Good Luck. Stealth
Hi Stealth,
Yes the 'gap' in the Hamel Ring seems to show up in many different places. Unfortunately, many of us have replicated his 'spinner' and found out it was a hoax. The magnetic ring simply levitates the ring magnet which is never perfectly centered because of imperceptible motion in the hands, as a result it drags the ball along the surface and friction causes the ball to spin. Very precise systems were built to test this and it was found that when the human muscle was removed from the equation, the spin failed. So the general consensus among a very large group of persons evaluating this, was that the device is essentially human powered.
The closest thing I've seen to a perpetual Magneto-Gravitic motor is the Finsrud Perpetuum Mobile which is kept locked in a Vault. This works because it splits the two fields into non-conservative parts and extracts energy from those parts midway through their cycle.
I now developing a method to extract "aura" from a picture. Not PIP because I can not get color, I can only get silhouette. But I don't know if it really aura or not.
Love to see this.
Last edited by witsend; 06-30-2010, 06:20 AM.
Reason: LOL Kept repeating the same editing error with the quotes over and over
@Harvey
Nice simple build, I was very interested in slotted pipes like you crafted.
I expected though from your pictures that you'd place the slots on the outside as described near the end of the video.
Recently I read that current is subjected to some sort of centrifugal force, taking the most outward path around a bend. I can imagine at some ratio, also flux might take the outside path, despite some hurdles to overcome, to a least stay on the outside.
Does your PMH have magnetic attraction to iron filings etc? The effect on the overhanging magnet becomes either more or less significant dependin on your answer, I suppose.
It's got discussions strongly in support of 'vortices' - and sundry that I am certain conform to your thesis on centrifugal forces. Very interesting.
The following extract which points to a 'WELL WORN COMPLAINT'.
On September 20th, 1985, Hastings issued an affidavit to the effect that ...
On September 19th, 1985, the motor was operated at 1,000 and 2,000 volts
battery input, with output powers of 50 and 100 watts respectively. Input
power in these tests were 7 and 14 watts yielding efficiencies of
700% and 1,400% respectively...
Searl, Schauberger and Newman, working independently, all discovered
the same thing, vortex motion produced free energy in apparent defiance
of the laws of thermodynamics. The free-energy machines they constructed
are called OVER-UNITY machines because they operated in excess of
100% efficiency.
The experiments of Searl, de Palma, Trombly, Schauberger and
Newman have not been repeated in the university establishments
nor have their claims been taken seriously by professional scientists
on the basis that it is impossible to get energy out of nowhere. Free
energy researchers have either been opposed, ignored or labelled
as pseudoscientists and their apparatus dismissed as
'perpetual motion machines'.
@ sucahyo
It seems that the Hutchinson effect was an accident - developed from Hutchinson's experimentation with Tesla coils. I thought he had a basic thesis. It seems that the thesis followed the experiments and may, therefore, have been imposed on the experimental evidence. Very interesting effects and certainly not confined to motion. So. The thesis itself is not exclusively - as you refer to it 'scalar'. He has wood bonding into metals. Metals disassociating into powder. He clearly is showing effects that do not conform to known thermodynamic principles. The question is how he generates those fields to create the effects. Is this info available. I see on that thread that there's a general invitation for the public to duplicate the experiments - within the constraints of your average supply grid.
Comment