FWIW scribD tried to put no less than 20 cookies on my machine... 20!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gravity waves found
Collapse
X
-
This may be a stretch, buy maybe having PMH lock is the secret to the Roy Meyers Absorber device? See here:
Roy J. Meyers: Absorber (Atmospheric Electrical Generator)
In the photograph of the mockup model of a large unit, it has the same physical configuration as Leedskalnin's magnetic wheel. A large number of V-shaped magnets arranged in a circle. Perhaps Roy's secret was lockup of all magnets?
For those of you who have lockup of some kind, maybe you could experiment with zinc plates and some iron wire as per the patents and see if you collect power?
Maybe the glimmer effect is not due to radiating energy, but absorbing energy?
Who knows?
Comment
-
Forgot to include quote from articles.
"While there are some details of the device which the inventor refuses to make public, yet there are many general features that may be explained. It is planned that the machine, to be set up in Phoenix, will generate sufficient power to light the city, and will consist of a 200 foot tower upon which is placed the "absorber". The latter consists of a series of magnetized steel plates set in a circle (the manner of preparing them is kept secret) and this mechanism attracts the electricity from the atmosphere. This is carried by wires to a transformer in the engine house below and thence is applied to produce either power or light after the usual manner.
In an authorized statement Meyers says: "The flow of electricity is constant. When it emerges into the transformer it is in the form of a direct current. It will absorb the electricity day and night and will work whenever the wireless will work. I can put up a plant to supply such a building as the Adams Hotel for about $1500, and one of the principal items of the expense is the cost of the towers, the wires, the magnetizing of one set of plates, which is part of the secret of the treatment which makes it respond to the accumulations of the atmosphere.
"
***************
Could be describing the way Dave got magnetic lock?
Tishatang
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatLady View PostHave we lost contact with David and Bruce?Always thinking outside the box!
ASUS M4A87TD motherboard
AMD Phenom II x6 Turbo Core 2.8/3.3 Ghz Overclocked to 3.5 Ghz CPU
RIPJAW 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Memory
Gforce 9800GT 1GB Graphics
Windows7 64bit OS
20" LG LCD 1680x1050 Monitor
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cloxxki View PostThat's the inherent risk when playing with anti-gravity. You might be too late to be able to reach the off switch...
Will the device head for the skies, or all around it?
Adie - you may want to look through his videos. I think it'll resonate. He's brilliant. I edited my earlier comments on this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tishatang View PostForgot to include quote from articles.
"While there are some details of the device which the inventor refuses to make public, yet there are many general features that may be explained. It is planned that the machine, to be set up in Phoenix, will generate sufficient power to light the city, and will consist of a 200 foot tower upon which is placed the "absorber". The latter consists of a series of magnetized steel plates set in a circle (the manner of preparing them is kept secret) and this mechanism attracts the electricity from the atmosphere. This is carried by wires to a transformer in the engine house below and thence is applied to produce either power or light after the usual manner.
In an authorized statement Meyers says: "The flow of electricity is constant. When it emerges into the transformer it is in the form of a direct current. It will absorb the electricity day and night and will work whenever the wireless will work. I can put up a plant to supply such a building as the Adams Hotel for about $1500, and one of the principal items of the expense is the cost of the towers, the wires, the magnetizing of one set of plates, which is part of the secret of the treatment which makes it respond to the accumulations of the atmosphere.
"
***************
Could be describing the way Dave got magnetic lock?
Tishatang
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatLady View PostHave we lost contact with David and Bruce?
TheTruthBeKnown
Dr. Darcy Babyola
I've been wondering the same thing ..... looked around and found this .....
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found
I hope David is "ok" ..... the Open Source community does have some brutal people out there that don't care about anyone but themselves ..... that thread is locked .....
Best Wishes,
GlenOpen Source Experimentalist
Open Source Research and Development
Comment
-
Hi Dave,
It is my opinion that there is absolutely no point in posting links to other forums that are SO awful that their own moderators have locked them. Not sure of the object in doing this. I see absolutely no value to it at all. Perhaps I'm missing something.
That you are getting attacked Dave - is a really good thing. It means that you're close to something. And the harder the attack the closer the truth. It's an inverse proportional relationship. LOL. I should know. Check out Tishatang's article. It's VERY INTERESTING. And ignore those horrors. There's nothing so jealous of a lateral thinker than a mind that cannot think outside the box.
Kindest regards,
Rosie
EDITEDLast edited by witsend; 07-13-2010, 05:33 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by witsend View PostAnd interestingly - especially for you Adie - is that this effect was shown and proved through rotating ceramic discs over super conductors that evidenced a velocity close to light speed.
Adie - you may want to look through his videos. I think it'll resonate. He's brilliant. I edited my earlier comments on this.
I dont beleive that there is a cap on speed. Faster than lightspeed should be possible, and is because celestial bodies show to be travelling faster than the speed of light. i dont buy into the theory that 'space is expanding'. Objects are just moving away from one another. As for bending of light, try this example for size: (math and calculations arnt precise, only a rough guesstimate to paint a picture)
Your watching fireworks in the sky 1 mile away. The weather is calm and you hear the bangs from each firework 3 seconds after seeing it. Try this same thing on a windy day. Youll hear the sound sooner, later, muffled/wobbly or not at all, depending on the speed and direction of the wind. This is because the wind is blowing a sizeable percentage of the speed of sound but not of light and gives you what is known as the Doppler effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Now picture this- Light is said/proved/theorised to bend around large masses in space, light cant escape black holes etc. Why is this?... The reason/answer/my theory, is that mass in space is traveling and/or spinning closer or faster than the speed of light which is a sizeable percentage of light speed. The mass that is traveling is causing a gravity well or centripetal/centrifugal pull around it at high speed. This causes the light to bend.
A none spinning, none moving huge mass wouldnt have the same effect. There is no space fabric that the mass is sitting on to cause other matter to fall towards it. Its all down to a masses spin and travelling speed that draws other matter towards it.
K finished. hehe. Did i go off track there and/or was there something else i should commented on about alienscientist's video?
Regards
AdieAlways thinking outside the box!
ASUS M4A87TD motherboard
AMD Phenom II x6 Turbo Core 2.8/3.3 Ghz Overclocked to 3.5 Ghz CPU
RIPJAW 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Memory
Gforce 9800GT 1GB Graphics
Windows7 64bit OS
20" LG LCD 1680x1050 Monitor
Comment
-
Originally posted by FuzzyTomCat View PostHey CatLady,
I've been wondering the same thing ..... looked around and found this .....
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found
I hope David is "ok" ..... the Open Source community does have some brutal people out there that don't care about anyone but themselves ..... that thread is locked .....
Best Wishes,
Glen
Regards
John
Comment
-
hi
sorry for the absence....gremlins are the cause i am sure of it!...i just got back online and was reading the article tish posted...I AM FASCINATED...i never even heard of this before today...i fell a bit behind and will catch up ...i too have wondered what has happened to bruce, i trust he will pop up soon...BUT not to worry, even if he for some reason does not return, i will build a #3 to be sent to matt, jet, cat, and so on....no worries....wit, i just got this thing working again and will check my email as soon as i am done posting this...thank you again rose, you really are awesome and we will talk soon!....and about thunderbolt....well, those guys are funny!....and just a thank you to everyone who even took the time to read, post, replicate etc...all of you will look back on these times and say i was right there!.....just words cannot convey my emotion...i am humbled....david
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adie123 View PostI did notice he placed a pic of a whirelpool type effect at 6:14 and then later about thinking inside the box for quantum physics at 7:11 lol
Originally posted by Adie123 View PostI dont beleive that there is a cap on speed. Faster than lightspeed should be possible ... (math and calculations arnt precise, only a rough guesstimate to paint a picture)
Originally posted by Adie123 View PostNow picture this- Light is said/proved/theorised to bend around large masses in space, light cant escape black holes etc. Why is this?... The reason/answer/my theory, is that mass in space is traveling and/or spinning closer or faster than the speed of light which is a sizeable percentage of light speed. The mass that is traveling is causing a gravity well or centripetal/centrifugal pull around it at high speed. This causes the light to bend.
Originally posted by Adie123 View PostK finished. hehe. Did i go off track there and/or was there something else i should commented on about alienscientist's video?
BTW Hawking proposed that black holes in fact need to be emitting virtual particles. I think that was required to balance out the equations. This sort of argues that photons must be particles as opposed to pure wave phenomena which AlienScientist proposes. Unless they become those 'virtual particles' somehow - maybe in that the photon itself may be a composite of two or more fundamental particles. Which would make it a boson.
EDITEDLast edited by witsend; 07-13-2010, 06:06 AM.
Comment
-
Hi Jet, for when you get back here. Please take time out to read that link from Tishatang. It may give you some ideas on testing your earlier rig. It seems to be some combination of Dave's rig and what was written in that 'voltage from thin air' thread - and a whole lot of other correspondences as well. Maybe? Just another angle.
EDITED. Sorry - I should have added the link. Here it is.
Roy J. Meyers: Absorber (Atmospheric Electrical Generator)
Comment
-
I think that for those of us who have been subjected to ridicule, vexatious litigation, threats of vexatious litigation, and the rest - take heart. It seems that truth does out - albeit that it first has to struggle against some considerable odds. To resolve gravity would be to resolve perpetual motion which is the holy grail of physics research. Anyone, such as Dave, who has found any evidence of this will be subject to ridicule. Just too many competing interests out there. And it is my opinion that it will only actually be found by mavericks and outsiders. What's needed is different concepts from different foundations. Mainstream have definitely not got the answers yet.
Comment
Comment