gravity waves found

[el-tigre]

Prism Experiment

Hi David, Interesting field of study you have launched.

I have a thought for you. If the effect you are observing is based on some sort of frequency manipulation, you may want to try suspending a cheap prism

Glass Equilateral Prisms: Triangular & Right Angle from $2.95.

over your apparatus and projecting a bright spotlight through it. If you capture the spectrum on a white sheet of paper fixed in the background, it may help you to film any effects and also identify what frequency they may be occurring at. This may help you or others fine tune the size, shape, strength etc. of their test rigs to demonstrate and then optimize the effects.

Good luck.

[Jetijs]

Duncan
Thanks for the info - very interesting and valuable indeed


A quick update, I got my ford model T magnets today, two sets of 16 V shaped magnet cores. Some of them are magnetic, some are not and will need to be magnetized. They are dirty with oil, grease and other stuff from the engine, I will have to clean them before further use. At the moment I have other stuff going on, I hope that in about 2 weeks I will be free to continue to work on Leedskalnin stuff.
Thank you all!
Jetijs

[Harvey]

The Good news is my son not only provided the system to process the video, but he even volunteered to help get rid of the annoying background noise, lay some nice music and convert the AVCHD file (over 2GB) into a You-Tube friendly resolution and format. Many thanks to Phil for that

The bad news is that the file is still around 1.7GB uploaded in High Definition and You-Tube is still processing it. So . . . no telling if it will succeed or bomb.

YouTube - Lambright - 029

Cloxxki requested that we have a dual comparison of charged PMH rundown and uncharged PMH rundown. I figured it would be possible to do the entire sequence in a straight uncut video. The video is all there, but there were some very annoying background audio problems (Fan blowing on the mic, various talking in the back ground, planes overhead, and engineer doing something with a ceramic container and stirring instrument etc.)

So since the sequence can be a bit boring it was decided to liven it up a bit with some music. I particularly like the lyrics at the end

There has not been any interest in the ice melting - so I will forgo processing those videos and snapshots.

[Loadstone]

Hi all.
I'm posting this pic of the connections for a PMH according to Ed's notes.
Some people find Ed's words a bit confusing.
Notice also that the start winding (SW) is pointing West and the end winding (EW) is pointing East. Ed uses that setup in other tests too.

[Loadstone]

Hey JEDI, glad to hear you got your magnets. Like I said they are out there.
Pain in the arse to clean up though. I've still got dozens to clean myself.

[david lambright]

hi everyone...

@jet...the inner coil is insulated copper...where i was testing the coil was between one end of the inner coil and the outside of the tube....i did not detect any voltage when i checked the ends of the inner coil...only from one wire end of the inner coil, to the outside of the aluminum tubing....i am going to build one today, using 1/2" vinyl tubing and an inner coil...question; should i use thinner wire for my inner coil?.....david

[Jetijs]

Thanks Lodestone, yes, cleaning them is not easy, but I only need 24 of them
David, if this is a glavanic reaction then the bigger the surface area, the greater currents will be produced, of course still in miliamp range max. I think, that your coil wire is a good size But from what you told about voltage between aluminum and coil wire, this should be galvanic action between two dissimilar metals for sure, just like a potato battery with zinc and copper
P.S. your orgonite pendant is in the mail, you should receive it somewhere in the middle of next week

[david lambright]

jet...

with a galvanic action, an actual metal to metal contact is required? ....the coil on the device should be completely insulated from both the aluminum and the oxide core...have you checked your device to see if it is insulated with an Ohm meter?.......david

[sucahyo]

Anyone curious enough to throw in some quartz in the ice?


@Harvey, you mean the breaking part? What make it surprising?

[david lambright]

hi

question;....who all did i promise to build the oxide core devices for?.....i have had so much going on....please let me know....david

[Jetijs]

Hi all.
Today I cleaned some magnets and tried magnetizing them with my big neo magnets and a keeper. It magnetizes very good and strong, much better than any tool steel I have tried before. The magnetic strength is good, something like a ferrite magnet the same size.




Thanks,
Jetijs

[Harvey]

Anyone curious enough to throw in some quartz in the ice?


@Harvey, you mean the breaking part? What make it surprising?

Breaking Part? Surprising?

Sorry, I can't recall what this applies to - can you refresh my memory?

Thanks

[IndianaBoys]

Breaking Part? Surprising?

Sorry, I can't recall what this applies to - can you refresh my memory?

Thanks

Harvey,

I believe he is referring to the surprise ending of one your recent videos.

IndianaBoys

[Harvey]

Harvey,

I believe he is referring to the surprise ending of one your recent videos.

IndianaBoys

Of Course!

How could I forget that? Sorry Sucahyo, I just didn't make the connection - Thanx IndianaBoys for getting my brain back on track

Yes that was the surprise, when the whole ring fell apart -completely unexpected and surprising - it doesn't take much force if the lock is lost. But it did make me laugh when it happened and I thought it may bring a smile or two for those willing to endure the video to the end.

I've been thinking about how much flux is contained during the lock. As David has indicated, it is possible to get a good lock even with just a single turn of wire. I have two turns on mine. But more turns does cause more flux. I have been wondering if the effect is a by product of saturation and if part of the reason some of cannot see it in our rigs is simply because we have not reached the same flux density that David has. Recall that David charged the rig that went to Bruce and after a few days Bruce was able to see the effect.

I have an idea, to wrap each element, or every other element with two turns and wire them all in parallel using a copper ring for positive and a copper ring for negative. This way, I can use the same battery voltage - but the current flow will increase for the system. As long as the overall current is less than that used by a car starter motor, I think the battery will handle the surge just fine. This should multiply the flux.

An alternative method would be to wire the coils in series - but this would require a multiplication in voltage in order to keep the same current in the increased wire length. If my two turn coil requires 12V and I multiply this to every other element, say 12 elements then, we would need 144V for the same diameter wire (20AWG in my case). But, the current is extremely high for fractions of a second.

Speaking of fractions of a second, this can be a very important part of magnetic flux calculations. The formula:

Borrowed from Magnetic flux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia helps us to see that Voltage (ε)= the change in magnetic flux (dΦm) divided by the change in time (dt).

This means that since our voltage is relatively constant, a faster delta time must result in a greater delta phi m. In simple terms, the faster we apply and remove the constant voltage, the greater the change in magnetic flux.

This is one reason I think that dragging the arc across the wire can improve things. The objective is not to strike an continuous arc, nor to stay in contact with the wire through the movement - instead, the objective is to create as many independent arcs as possible during the strike. This can create hundreds of applications and removals of the voltage and the time at which that occurs can be nanoseconds which increases the flux.

This is also an advantage of the parallel application because the inductance is much lower and this affords much faster response times.



EDIT: Wow - that's completely backwards My gut nagged me when I posted it - and then I double checked the math - D'OH!

So to clarify things - (if possible) the delta flux = 12V * delta time. So the shorter the period of time that the voltage is applied, the lower the change in flux. This means that the voltage must be applied long enough to reach maximum flux value for that current flow.

So arcing it here causes a BEMF AC current effectively degaussing the rig and heating up the coil . Leaving the connection too long does the same thing. But arcing it does also emit a huge array of various EM wavelengths and perhaps those that the rig is tuned to somehow interact with it in a way that helps the lock?

[sucahyo]

So to clarify things - (if possible) the delta flux = 12V * delta time. So the shorter the period of time that the voltage is applied, the lower the change in flux. This means that the voltage must be applied long enough to reach maximum flux value for that current flow.

Thanks for the explanation. I forget that it supposed to be unbreakable. How long is long? Isn't leedskalnin suggest very long thin wire?