gravity waves found

[Van T Stride]

Disintegration of Magnets

Hi. Recently I placed a small (alnico?) refrigerator magnet in physical contact with a locked PMH, and I think this may have caused the side of the magnet that touched the PMH to physically break-down?

Basically this magnet was very small, might have been a rare earth magnet, I'm not sure, but when I took it away from the PMH the shiny metallic surface quickly began to wear off exposing the dull, grainy interior.

I realize this is a not very scientific observation, but I'm wondering if others have observed similar results with composite magnets?

[Van T Stride]

Replicated

So, do we have any other people, in the past 60 pages or so, who have replicated this and felt / seen the same effect?

I noticed one guy who got it from David said he did see/feel a small effect and he son and wife saw it too. Any other stories like this?

As I stated before I felt a very similar push on a stone suspended over a spinning PMH (a simple circular / ovoid shape). I used a drill to create the spinning force in the vertical axis, and could see - barely - a glimmer as David described. I don't think the digital video I have seen on Youtube does it justice.
What is needed is to observe the PMH / wheel from the side, and focus the eyes well beyond it, say 10-12 feet, and observe the upper edge of the device as it comes in close contact with a stone. David is using a (quartz ?) geode. I'm using a heavy dark-green (serpentine? ) crystalline stone. I have tried Quartz but have not had great success with it (so far) in my attempts - just bought a piece of Rose Quartz that I will be testing with. I don't have any quartz geodes. Tried an amethyst geode, but didn't detect the field with it. Planning to visit Dave at some point so I can try his wheel with the geode.
Van

[david lambright]

hi

....i was using a small piece of calcite and what i feel now is similar to 2 opposing magnets...holding the calcite about 1/4" above the HDPE center...when i feel the push, i keep it in the same spot and the effect starts to grow, it pushes back harder....i cannot tell if it is being pushed or like Ed said about it being magnets that control muscle contraction...in any case it is a very strange sensation....the calcite splits light into 2 streams..Ed did say the streams had to be divided...and then run them against each other...that makes sense with what i have felt...with a convex mirror at the plane, i feel a pushing .but it is so small... just a part of this energy can be reflected...just as X and other waves penetrate materials, i believe this energy will do also..if the streams can be separated using calcite that would be interesting... to separate the N and S into streams, the PMH is used....gravity and levity are like a vortex to a point to vortex...temperature is the zero point ..the PMH is also at that point. ..lets say N = levity, S = gravity...L and G can only go one way so reversal of the polarity at the point and changing the dominant stream of magnetic current, with the PMH...is the how....when a PMH is energized ,an orbit starts...ring the bell a second time and dominance is reversed....if the dominant stream has been reversed properly, the PMH acts as the zero point ...now if the PMH is spun, the gravity does what it knows and goes to the plane but now its carrying the N ...and, levity at the pole and S...any pull of G + N results in a S + L push...these streams would prefer to travel in the metal....so put a S magnet at the plane, just like in the photo of Ed, and spin the device so gravity and the N at the plane...levity and S at the pole that can now be collected at the wire above the device, flowing upward [like heat convection] into the mass above...as the magnet and the rotor pull N and gravity, S and levity flow up the wire , from above the generator, to be used at the quarry..the S being attracted to the north, flows into the stone bringing L with it...i believe that weight, as we experience here on earth, is due to the gravity to levity ratio...this can be changed .every thing has a zero point...at the quarry, the wire that comes from the mass above the pole is copper...steel, i believe was used to cut the stone, but i think the wire was connected to the flat bar he used at the quarry...i also think that because the S attracts N. the flow of L+ S from the tool softened the stone making it easier to work?.......i am pretty sure that this is how it was done..... i have found that the PMH is multi functional and ...i want to prove that this, how Ed .built his castle....david

[david lambright]

hey

YouTube - bubbles the video is not the best but you can kindof see how the surface vortices when the crystal is above it...the crystal and bubble are Not magnetic...there is an amazing amount of repulsion between the bubble surface and the crystal...the video i want to see is the one where the stone is made more buoyant or lighter!!!......david

[Van T Stride]

Gravity as nested waves

David-

Take a look at this page: Research proposal- Producing Aerodynamic Thrust using Conic (Recursive) ( and IMPLOSIVE) arrays of capacitors.
The main problem I had with this page is that it's hard to follow, I think Dan Winter may be one of the most intelligent humans alive today, but he seems to have ADD and his thoughts seem to jump from concept to concept assuming we can follow it.
Scroll about 10% down the page - look for this image: http://www.goldenmean.info/phiricais/relativity.gif - VERY interesting concept. By creating recursion (repeating a shape within a shape) and adding a charge, this leads to nested waves which leads to implozion. They are saying "charge acceleration" = "Gravity." (!)
-Van

[Harvey]

YouTube - bubbles the video is not the best but you can kindof see how the surface vortices when the crystal is above it...the crystal and bubble are Not magnetic...there is an amazing amount of repulsion between the bubble surface and the crystal...the video i want to see is the one where the stone is made more buoyant or lighter!!!......david

Hi David,

What was your bubble made of? I noticed what appeared to be smoke inside it.

[Harvey]

David-

Take a look at this page: Research proposal- Producing Aerodynamic Thrust using Conic (Recursive) ( and IMPLOSIVE) arrays of capacitors.
The main problem I had with this page is that it's hard to follow, I think Dan Winter may be one of the most intelligent humans alive today, but he seems to have ADD and his thoughts seem to jump from concept to concept assuming we can follow it.
Scroll about 10% down the page - look for this image: http://www.goldenmean.info/phiricais/relativity.gif - VERY interesting concept. By creating recursion (repeating a shape within a shape) and adding a charge, this leads to nested waves which leads to implozion. They are saying "charge acceleration" = "Gravity." (!)
-Van

I just scanned over the website. You are correct, the site is not very well organized and there is a ton of repeated information there.

That being said, there is no doubt that Dan Winter has done a tremendous amount of data gathering and pattern matching. Of particular interest is the relationship of geometry to frequency within nature. I think his diagrams speak volumes, especially the animations. It's amazing as to how just a few frames (like the EKG overlap) can bring us into understanding his thought processes.

As regards the Gravity being related to acceleration, of that I am already convinced. However, I don't know if it is specifically related to charge acceleration. Personally, I think it is more closely related to time acceleration, assuming of course that time is a vector that follows the fabric of space which curves around mass. Thus time must accelerate (change in velocity) where it follows that curvature assuming it has a constant speed but difference in direction.

I see capacitors on his page, but I don't seen any demonstrations of them in use, unless I missed it. Was there some real data showing gravitational differences?

As regards the gold inlaid ostrich egg and his voltage question, it follows the same Van de Graaf experiments that prove an electrical charge inside an enclosed sphere will be zero so any charges introduced interior will be pushed to the exterior and that includes cosmic and vacuum interactions that result in charges on the interior surface. So it makes sense that a voltage would become present there.

Thanks for sharing the link

[david lambright]

hey

more theory.....magnetism is not quite equal...one pole is stronger than the other.....pulsing a PMH twice changes the polarity of the dominant stream...lets say Earth has a dominant N...in my experiments with a toroidal PMH show that polarity is connected to thermal convection...a PMH with a dominant S has thermal convective flows reversed from what is natural on Earths surface...these flows are visible with the naked eye as they dissapate back into the field, like a mirage...the flow has been seen and recorded by many people...this flow of convective force is not connected to heat....just like a magnet, this flow has polarity but its polarity can be reversed...unlike poles attract....so the PMHs dominant S is attracted to Earths N...if you want, try this....energize a PMH two times...take a piece of calcite and lightly hold it near the PMH....you will find that there are places on the ring [circular PMH] that will repel the calcitce crystal...try this cheap and easy expirement for yourself.. .in a PMH, the force flows in the center of the material...we know that this force is magnetic in its nature, holding the keeper on PMH and lighting a bulb shows us this...this ENERGY,being a bi-directional flow.and being magnetic in nature is attracted to the poles of a magnet and since it likes to flow in metal can be coaxed to flow in a wire...everyone has seen the photo of Ed with his hand on his "rotor" right?...why is there the mass of metal ABOVE his device?...this metal mass had to be above the rotor for this polarized flow to accumulate into....a wire from this over to his quarry ...this half of the flow being polarized S but now it carries upward convection, is attracted to Earths N like an upside-down siphon...spinning the rotor started the flow which would continue to flow from the S wire as long as the siphon didnt break...this flow could then be used to fill the stones with S polarized, upward convective force [levity]....and the same way heat is absorbed, a stone could be filled to its buoyancy point and moved...as the stone "cooled" its weight comes back...this flow of energy is distinct ....it can flow forever...we know that super cooled matter does this, by cooling them to their reverse buoyancy point.....as they warm back up their weight returns....Ed did this exact thing, using the earths natural fields....this is my theory these conclusions were arrived at through experimentation and rediscovery! thanks.......david

[david lambright]

jetijs!

hi...if you email matt your address, he will send you the device...and good news, he and his son both see it!....here is his e matt@magneticuniverse.com thanks for your interest!...david

[AllPhase]

David, Thank you for sharing the results of your unit. Could you please try a couple of things:

1. After you start the unit, try measuring the AC VOLTAGE of your copper coil using a DMM or Voltmeter (same 2 wires you use to start it up).

2. Also try measuring the AC VOLTAGE across the unit. Example: If you have 20 Metal U Plates, try measuring between Plate #10 & Plate #20, etc.


Thanks.

.

[sucahyo]

David, can you check my pm? It contain somthing related to spinning.

thanks

[david lambright]

theory

hey, this is part of a thesis/ theory that i have been working on forever it seems...i think that these ideas will change physics...i hope you too will find simple answers to the problems that plague the classic and quantum models... there are 2 energy streams and they are polar by nature....the singularity is split into a ring...this ring is bi-directional, super-fluid and equal, effectively cancelling each other....twist this into an 8 [infinity] and you have two lobes..take a pen...draw an infinity sign...there are 2 streams so draw it again...the streams still cancel each other...take your pen and draw that sign again this time draw two circles on top of each other and then at the point where you started and draw two more circles finishing the infinity sign...you see the lobes do not cancel now but you have a direction to move from< the point>....move either direction and we have attraction/repulsion N and S,magnetism etc....movement causes this attraction/repulsion so one lobe is bigger ...doppler...[that is why one pole is stronger}...so now we see that from the singularity we get a ring [or disc] bi- dimensional/directional..add movement and you will have time behind you, space ahead....the only reason we experience any of these forces is the difference in lobe size ...due to acceleration/spin,one lobe is dominant [red shift problem]....this theory was written by david lambright on Thur.1/20/2011... we KNOW about super fluidity, conductivity etc...these forces are all easily manipulated...convection is temperature dependent but bi-directional....the floor you stand on consider even or rest temperature, and one foot =1 degree....bring a point into the room five degrees warmer, and you will have a spike or if colder a pit...vortex/anti vortex...convection pulls down the point till it reaches an even temp...this is the same mechanism that is gravity....one lobe bigger than the other to create the attraction/repulsion that we feel as gravity..there are two supreme forces that all the forces arise from ...the math will prove this.... ...the 90 degree or linear to radial interaction;...a particle, at absolute zero, moving through space becomes a line....any interaction with anything takes energy from it, but since energy can only be transfered,any interaction with a boundary, turns into rotation, bi directionally....there will be a lot more about this and the experiments that led me here....thanks...david

[david lambright]

Edward Leedskalnin &amp; a new physics model

he really did find the secret! 7129 squared out is.99999999999999999999999999999998.....then 1....try it with 6105195.....you end up with .99999999999999999999999999999998....then1...the missing ones are the angle of incidence...square out 3.14 and you get infinity......square .314 and you get .99999999999999999999999999999999 then 1...move the decimal on the first 2 numbers....they dont change...now try moving the decimal point on pi to .314....multiply times .7129...you will get infinity.. .6105195.....same deal....Ed knew about an infinite point....and check this....a random number 5974, squared out is 1 ....30 zeros ...and 1....these numbers are a parabolic curve that is equal to 2 [duality]....the spherical reflection is equal to 4...this should be the universal expansion rate,..1 times 4 times 4.......from the singularity to infinity...the math tells us we have a infinite point that is a bi- directional line that can become an infinite bi directional disc or plane #1...the spin of the disc gives us attraction and repulsion, which gives rise to all other forces...now because we started with an infinite point, the line and disc also are infinite also...

[Van T Stride]

The math...

David-
7129 squared (the number multiplied by itself) is 50822641.
6105195 squared is 37273405988025.

If you meant the square root, then the results are:
84.433405711246777825245949948396 and
2470.8692802331733226991332786293, respectively.

Your last couple posts seem a bit "out there." I tried to follow, but think I lost your train of thought? If you are spending lots of time with your wheel device, I hope that you will take a short break and make sure you're OK.

Thanks,
-Van

[david lambright]

Physics Model

Hey Van, what i meant was square the numbers by squaring one hundred times any other number ends in a nine before it goes back to one. Try this with both numbers, .7129 and .6105195. That point is the infinite point. Super conductivity and super fluidity show us that the infinite exists. Any number that you do this with with either come up ones and zeros, or nines. Pi shows us the infinite by squaring the numbers .7129 all the way back near zero you will get 98. That is the point of incidence. Square the next one, .61059195 and you will get the same thing, .99998. then it goes to one?????Every other number squared to the end becomes.99999 one. EVERY ONE BUT THOSE 2....try it...pull up your windows calculator and see for your self ....see how they are a line of either 99999s or 0000000s Notice how the ones and zeros co-relate to the shape of inside a sphere. The inside of the sphere is equal to one. draw a circle....imagine 99999s with their tails sticking through with a 0 on the outside ...with a value of 1....a FULL sphere ..EVERY WHERE BUT 2 POINTS....do the calculations again .... But yet, every quarter is equal to one. now multiply .1 times .314 We know about super fluidity, super conductivity etc. This proves infinity. expansion at a ratio of one to four Leedskalin's numbers show us the angle of the infinite ray. Think about it like this, you are standing on a bubble and the floor is zero degrees and infinite. At eye level is the next boundary level. An infinite point is an infinite line, inside of a sphere is equal to a point mathematically. Pi times radius squared. Now you realize that it is a reflection of the infinite. No matter what number you put in a computer calculator etc. and square it a hundred times only two numbers end in 98 before they go to one, this proves the infinite ray mathematically. Infinite ray is unidirectional, infinite line is bidirectional. Infinite line can become infinite disc, infinite bi-directionality gives us spin which gives us attraction and repulsion which is magnetism and gravity. Why is pi only infinite at one point? Because it is a perfect mathematically correct reflection of the infinite. Phase shift problems with parabolic mirrors, the reflected ray from a parabolic mirror does not phase shift again. The main ray upon reflection shifts. This proves reflection. The Electron Phase Shift some of this theory applies also.....i need to post this but my next posts will be Leedskalnins method .....and the experimental proof that is irrefutable......pull up your windows calculator in the mean time and see......david