gravity waves found

[SuperCaviTationIstic]

David,
after checking your machine, i noticed the shapes of the metal on the sides resemble ankh signs.

ankh - Google zoeken

As being known in ancient egyptology, i know the egyptians used this ankh to levitate stones with. somehow they pointed the ankh on a stone and floated it to its position. in your design the straight end rod is missing, and magnetism flows straight out of the circular shape. i have to think about it what it means, but it might very well be that if we charge an ankh with coils, we can direct a wave an make thing lose gravity.
has anybody thought about this ?

regards
Oliver

exactly.... that's why I suggested earlier/ or on an other thread maybe it was, that the iron rod placed in front of the generator in the picture with Ed standing turning it, was what conducted the energy out of it... Also, think about the way a cyclotron particle accelerator works, with the final linear particle accelerator at the end to shoot stuff out when it gets up to speed.

Take a look at the thread I started about Ed's generator being a magnetic analog to a Tibetan singing bowl, and like a magnetron configuration. http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ging-bowl.html

[renevanderlende]

Hi David,

I have not been long into magnetism, so my knowledge is quite limited, but you might be interested in getting in contact with Prof. Andre Geim, who discovered that a very strong EM is albe to levitate organic matter (frog, cheese, piece of pizza. saw it on Discovery just yesterday).

Also Jerry Lamb of Magna Force Inc., who invented "Adjustable Speed Coupling" (some frictionless magnetic drive for turbines), might have some answers for you.


This is my first post on this forum, but you have certainly caught my attention. I am a photographer with a keen interest in physics and also very curious to discover what you are showing us.

I have watched your last video and I see a faint movement above your device (at 720p). From a photographic standpoint you will probably get much better video results when you print a few sheets of paper with a grid of black vertical and horizontal lines and put these in the background (not too close). Video at an angle where you can only see (part of) your device and the grid, then theoretically the waves should distort the grid. Also, play a bit with the lighting: place a main lightsource 1 or 2 feet on either side of the camera and dim the rest a bit. With a bit of luck the waves not only distort the grid, but also reflect light.

I hope this works...

Cheers, Rene

[Van T Stride]

Ankhs?

Isn't an "ankh" a closed loop resting on a cross-shape? Like a "T" with a teardrop on top?

Seems like a stretch to me. But then I also don't think it very likely that a giant invisible sun is poised on the edge of the solar system ready to redistribute our planetary boides (...in fullfilment of biblical prophecy).

Call me a "doubting Thomas" if you like.

So, if an anhk sign can levitate stones, and with the popularity of the ankh as a form of jewelry, why do you think others have not discovered that they have this ability?

Van

[sucahyo]

David, if you still want to see the energy try this:

Also note that this photo was taken in a perfectly dark room with a time exposure of about 1 to 3 minutes, (our information regarding the technical details is very limited).

Info shared by robur.

I think you should try to take the picture (video not possible) with very long exposure on completely dark room. Some camera that support manual shutter speed is canon and benq. Set is as long as possible and maybe with night mode as well.

[Harvey]

David, if you still want to see the energy try this:


Info shared by robur.

I think you should try to take the picture (video not possible) with very long exposure on completely dark room. Some camera that support manual shutter speed is canon and benq. Set is as long as possible and maybe with night mode as well.

I thought that was discussed already and David told us he was going to use his Brownie. I even gave him some links to the the 620 film retailers.

[sucahyo]

I thought that was discussed already and David told us he was going to use his Brownie. I even gave him some links to the the 620 film retailers.

Am I correct that no one try this yet with digital camera? Anyone willing to try it on object like magnet or people?

[Harvey]

Am I correct that no one try this yet with digital camera? Anyone willing to try it on object like magnet or people?

I think experimentation has completely stalled because the "working" units were never properly corroborated by those they were sent to.

As regards the exposure, do you have specific digital camera models that support time lapse prolonged exposure?

Personally, I think any recording of this will require a wide band superimposition detector ranging from low RF to above UV.

Also, I think there are patterns setup in David's (and others) Persistence of Vision ocular networks that are converted to colors, patterns or other imagery that the average person simply dismisses. The ability of the brain to do this was shown in the early LSD studies (and hence exploited by the entertainment industry) where this acid enhances the visual imagery associated with motion - specifically, color trails were noted to follow the motion of ones hands and other moving objects.

So we don't know what 'motion' these fellows are seeing that they are able to convert. But I did find it interesting that more than one person noted a 'flowing' action down that tube and I was unable to see anything at all. And that was from the video that they saw that motion.

Honestly, I'm burned out on all of this myself - I've requested stuff from David that never arrived, Glen offered to provide live video feed and that never happened, who ever has the roving device hasn't posted their results, and those that had the device already posted vague results at first that seemed to get better with time.

All in all, the burden of proof rests in David's lap and we are only here to help him where we can (which from my end has been rather slim despite my efforts). David claimed in the beginning that we would not be disappointed. I have consistently stuck by him trying to get this identified in a way that could be accepted by mainstream and I find myself disappointed.

However, in David's defense, he really expected that what he was seeing would be readily observable by everyone and I'm certain that his claim that we would not be disappointed was laid on that solid foundation of what he and his associates were witnessing firsthand.

I think this thread has proven to be an expose of many different perspectives and perceptions more than that of gravity waves themselves, but still quite educational and definitely worth the trip. So from a learning perspective, it certainly has not been disappointing.

One day, with the right tools, perhaps the world will see what David sees

[mikrovolt]

to David Lambright,
The visible spectrum where we perceive with our eyes limits our
thinking to what we see. However there are other spectra that humans have explored visually with technical aid of devices. most of which are on the right and left of our visible spectrum. There are animals that have this ability.
please review these utubes as it is fairly unexplored territory with respect to visually percieved energy flow.

FLIR is used by police. The application I am presenting is examining energy attributes.
I wanted to remind about hot/cold since there is some relationship to the cells.
cold is the absense of heat.
YouTube - FLIR thermal infrared: the camera itself, + more demos

The clouds are able to show us existence of gravity waves.
with Leedskalnin it is a question of finding the what part of the spectrum.

[Oskar]

David. i haven't read every page just the beginning until you got the stone to "sing"... can you please get a tuning fork ? and use the tuning fork with the stone when its singing and see what happens, cause i think that you need one.
I have some theories but its better that you test this. I have to build my own generator first hehe. But i think a tuning fork can maybe do some tricks. So when you try the tuning fork, use the generator to get the "singing sound" from the stone, and try matching that tune with the tuning fork, so the fork gets the same sound, then use them together. maybe you need to magnetize the tuning fork, but test without magnetizing it then test with magnetizing it, get it to vibrate at the same tune or singing as the stone so they sing together. might get some interesting results..

[sucahyo]

As regards the exposure, do you have specific digital camera models that support time lapse prolonged exposure?

Sorry, I don't have digital camera yet.

Personally, I think any recording of this will require a wide band superimposition detector ranging from low RF to above UV.

I guess film camera is best for that?

Also, I think there are patterns setup in David's (and others) Persistence of Vision ocular networks that are converted to colors, patterns or other imagery that the average person simply dismisses. The ability of the brain to do this was shown in the early LSD studies (and hence exploited by the entertainment industry) where this acid enhances the visual imagery associated with motion - specifically, color trails were noted to follow the motion of ones hands and other moving objects.

Very interesting. It seems not related to people's different speed perception.

So we don't know what 'motion' these fellows are seeing that they are able to convert. But I did find it interesting that more than one person noted a 'flowing' action down that tube and I was unable to see anything at all. And that was from the video that they saw that motion.

I wonder if people who can see motion in video should be able to see motion in real things and the opposite.

One day, with the right tools, perhaps the world will see what David sees

Yes .

[Van T Stride]

What happened to Potatoheadist?

Hey, we might need to send somebody by to check on David. I'm worried that maybe the MIB got him. What if the unmarked aircraft came in the middle of the night and they confiscated Dave and his device?

Anybody know how to reach him?

Van

[occy30]

In late September 2010, WISE ran out of the coolant needed to chill its infrared detectors. How cold do the sensors need to be? I thought it was pretty cold in space. Just more lies to try and keep Tyche covered up.

GB

I know this post is a little dated but space has no temp. It's a vacuum (not perfect but still mostly empty). You need matter to move in order to have heat or cold and space lacks it. This is also a big reason some people believe that we never walked on the moon. There is no way to regulate temperature in space. Basically the sun would continue to heat your craft (because it's made of matter and the radiation is exciting anything in the sunlight) and there would be no way to cool your craft down (think about how a thermos works). Air conditioners do not work in vacuums. So basically anyone who goes into space would be fried literally (and has happened as the Russians found out decades ago). When you consider this fact, really makes the moon landings look pretty fake.

[Harvey]

Thermal equilibrium is reached via blackbody radiation. What this means is that for a particular material in a vacuum, it will radiate all of its thermal energy by internally converting it to EM radiation until it reaches absolute zero - provided of course that no other external energy is supplied to it. In the case of our satellites, for example, they absorb some energy (that which is not reflected) on the sun facing side and radiate energy on the 'dark' shadowed side and thus find an equilibrium for their particular path and station.

Certain probes that have been sent as observers of the Sun, never did burn up and although have expired remain in their heliocentric orbits.

The common Thermos uses a vacuum barrier between the inner glass and outer glass or metals to prevent heat transfer by thermal conduction. However, they are problematic from a blackbody radiation standpoint and will eventually lose all internal energy. For this reason they generally have a reflective coating like a mirror to reflect most EM radiation at the common frequencies associated with their use. This reflective surface helps keep the energy from propagating the vacuum.

The Sun's energy traverses ~92.9 million miles through the vacuum of space to reach the Earth. Technically, this is radiative heat similar to that of a radiant heater. The term 'heat' of itself is a term representative of a transfer of thermal energy from one place to another place. The precise method of that transfer is not specific to the term and is often added with the term as a modifier to offer proper context. Infrared radiation is a well known carrier of thermal energy and is practically universal which is why IR thermometers are so widely accepted.

It is possible, I suppose, to inject energy into a mass (like a spacecraft) at a rate that exceeds the radiative ability of that mass to dissipate the energy. Such is the case of computer processors. The mass which comprises the processor is incapable of relieving the thermal energy produced internally and the temperature would eventually rise to the point of material state change (liquefaction) if the thermal energy were not removed by artificial means. In this case the removal typically involves three processes; 1. conduction into a heat sink, 2. IR thermal radiation, 3. Convection to the fluid air.

In space, radiative fins could be used to sink thermal energy away from the occupied craft via conduction and then those fins can radiate the energy back into space via EM radiation. However a well designed craft would put the thermal differentials to work rather than waste the available energy. This is especially true when we consider that the shaded sides are always losing energy to space at some EM frequency - some balance would need to be made to keep the occupants from eventually freezing to death.



Why do spaceships get cold if their heat turns off? What do they lose heat to if they're in a vacuum? - Yahoo! Answers

[gravityblock]

@Occy30 and Harvey,

Heat comes from the Sun, but in the form of high frequency waves, which are then transformed into heat waves. This transformation takes place in the atmosphere of the planets. They do not come from the Sun in the form of heat because heat will not travel through a vacuum. Even the heat on the Sun is bearable, it is merely a field in which electrical forces operate.

Besides the heat that is developed by the frequency of the Sun's rays, heat is also developed by the pressure of the light of the Sun. At sunrise the oblique rays of the Sun do not exert any pressure and one has the impression that the Sun is a large red disc of no power, but when it is at its zenith one can sense the intensity of its rays pushing against the ground.

The Sun's luminosity is not related to its heat. On Earth there are also sources of cold light. A neon bulb shows that light is not always hot. Many insects develop cold light, as well as certain vegetables which produce a luminescence by bacteriological action.

GB

[gravityblock]

Does light have to reach us, for us to be able to see a phenomenon taking place at a distance?

Here's an example. in an ordinary Geissler tube, electrons are unable to penetrate the walls of the tube, or for that matter, any other material except alumimum. This has been proved experimentally by placing a cross inside the tube in the electron beam. This cross causes a shadow, showing that the electrons were stopped. Even if this cross were made of glass, the electrons would not go through it.

So, if light or electrons are incapable of going through glass, how I ask, can one see shadows and Faraday bands inside the lighted tube. Light could not get out of the tube, yet one could see into it. We should not confuse light and image, because universal phenomena take place everywhere at the same time.

GB