gravity waves found

[david lambright]

generator

the way i have my device set up is not quite right yet. the segments need to be attached to a metal plate instead of the HDPE. i also think i need more metal mass below the device, possibly partly stationary [like the engine block & crankshaft]. i am getting FLOW of this energy, and it is getting stronger. using a magnet at the equator to pull some of this energy off works well also. so far, i have been able to get the bottom link of a small steel chain to jump up off the next link, holding it at the point of vortex about 12 inches above my device. this upflow energy is what i have been looking for all along. thanks EVERYONE for helping me get it this far, david

[freepenguin]

A food of thoughts:

Two colliding magnetic fields distort the gravitational field around the objects. This is well-known phenomenon many many years ago at least 60 - 70 years ago.

To check the air movement by possible heat, measure the temperature of the device while in operation right on the surface and middle of the rotational axis.
Having exact same temperature would tell the optical illusion by air.

To find out whether it's optical illusion or real gravitational field distortion, you need use a test object that has a specific mass that doesn't bend or move around by air movement from (supposedly) heat. (A metal ball or something does free fall straight in the air.)
Another option is to install laser beam near the center of rotational axis. If there is no significant gravitational distortion, the laser beam will shoot vertical to the top (zero angle.) 0.5 degree of the gravitational field distortion - actual bending of space - will make incline straight line and you will definitely see reverse triangle of the laser beam. Otherwise, it would be cylinder / pole shape of the laser beam.

Also you need to measure the weight difference of the objects one inside the field, the other one in outside. Gravitational distortion, of course how big it is dictates the weight difference, does affects the weight of objects. For example, the test object is 1 Kg, it will be less than 1Kg under artificial gravity.

One thing I can tell the mainstream sciences and technologies are heavily distorted and cut out especially energy generation and propulsion systems. Google "Electrogravitics" for half hour, you will find great amount of information.

I used to have one big question "How much do they know? How much we haven't been told?" Cause I had been down the rabbit hole really deep almost twenty years for my curiosity. In modern days, the science became the religions. Nowadays I only hope and try to have a real free energy device and have off-grid living once and for all.

Only the open-minded individual learns and discover new stuff.

[david lambright]

hey

It should be relatively easy to determine if it is producing artificial gravity or not. Using a solid rest,balance two objects of the same weight on a arm,one over the device and the other ouside of the devices influence. If gravity is involved,it should upset the balance of the two objects. Making the one above the device rise and the one outside fall. It would not take much gravity difference to cause a reaction in a balanced beam.Good Luck. stealth

i do think it will work this time and i also will try to explain why i had difficulty with the balance/scales before. around these devices is like a bubble or shell with an inner shell or boundary layer. when i was holding objects above or at the plane, the object was always in contact with both layers/boundary's. i could feel a weight difference when i was moving the object through these layers, but a scale, not moving, showed no weight change. the inner layer is the upward convective flow, and can be coaxed into flowing in a wire like i did in the video. now that the energy is flowing, there is no need for movement of an object to feel the weight difference or measure it. i am getting my setup ready, longer pipe in the ground, rotor mods etc. and i believe i will get the results i seek. thanks again, david

[Van T Stride]

This time it will work...

i do think it will work this time and i also will try to explain why i had difficulty with the balance/scales before. around these devices is like a bubble or shell with an inner shell or boundary layer. when i was holding objects above or at the plane, the object was always in contact with both layers/boundary's. i could feel a weight difference when i was moving the object through these layers, but a scale, not moving, showed no weight change. the inner layer is the upward convective flow, and can be coaxed into flowing in a wire like i did in the video. now that the energy is flowing, there is no need for movement of an object to feel the weight difference or measure it. i am getting my setup ready, longer pipe in the ground, rotor mods etc. and i believe i will get the results i seek. thanks again, david

David-
Something to think about... if your testing aparatus has two objects balanced on a beam (or plank) and you move one end of that into the "apex" of the flow, how do you know that the "levity" force will not be applied equally to both ends of the beam (and the beam itself)? What I'm saying is that a balance test may not work due to the effect being shared throughout all parts of the balance beam.
I would also try with a helium baloon. Use a small weight (a marble or stone?) to get it neutrally bouyant - essentially floating. Set this above the wheel with the weight in or very close to the point where you beleive the force to exist. Watch the baloon for signs of reduction in weight. Make sure this is not due to airflow being introduced by the wheel (or due to sunlight warming the baloon - run the test indoors).
Thanks,
-Van

[Van T Stride]

Still there?

Did this thread die again? What happened with the levity test? Any new videos?

-Van

[david lambright]

100 grand

coming up on 100,000 views!

[gravityblock]

"Second Sound" (Wave motion of Heat)

David,

If I remember correctly, you said the glimmer effect was similar to a heat wave coming off the surface of a hot road. In addition to this, there were reports of Singing or Sound coming from the coral. Second sound is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which heat transfer occurs by wave-like motion, rather than by the more usual mechanism of diffusion. Heat takes the place of pressure in normal sound waves. This leads to a very high thermal conductivity. It is known as "second sound" because the wave motion of heat is similar to the propagation of sound in air. Heat and electrical transport both involve the free electrons in the metal.

The Wiedemann–Franz law states that the ratio of the electronic thermal conductivity κe to the electrical conductivity σ at a given temperature T is equal to a constant called the Lorenz number or Lorenz ratio, L0=κe/σT=(π2/3)(kB/e)2 and reflects the fact that thermal and electrical currents are carried by the same fermionic quasiparticles. This empirical law is named after Gustav Wiedemann and Rudolph Franz, who in 1853 reported that κ/σ has approximately the same value for different metals at the same temperature. The proportionality of κ/σ with temperature was discovered by Ludvig Lorenz in 1872. Qualitatively, this relationship is based upon the fact that the heat and electrical transport both involve the free electrons in the metal. Bristol physicists break 150-year-old Wiedemann–Franz law and for more information, Gross violation of the Wiedemann–Franz law in a quasi-one-dimensional conductor. As heat is transported by entropy (spin and charge) and electric current by charge alone, spin–charge separation is a viable mechanism for the violation of the WF law.

The electrons have (among others) two properties: charge and spin. When you have a bunch of electrons together, the combined charge behaves in a way that makes it easier to explain things if you think of that accumulated charge as acting independently of the combined spin, as if you had two separate particles (Quasiparticles, theoretical descriptions of excitations in the collective behavior of electrons). What the above articles are talking about is an effect observed when you have plenty of electrons packed in a small thin space. The collective behavior is similar to that of a fluid consisting of two types of particles, one carrying only charge, and another that carries the spin. It's still electrons vibrating, spinning and all - it's just that the WAY they behave is better described by this spin-charge separation instead of more classical descriptions which misses some subtle effects which has now been observed in the experiments of the above articles. I think Ed's "magnetic currents" is this wave-like motion of heat known as "second sound", where the accumulated charge is acting independently of the combined spin (spin-charge separation).

GB

[general]

a higher being

How can you explain people healing others and not believe in a higher being? When does logic come into play?

[Van T Stride]

Vibrational Energy

Hi-

I have not seen anything about this yet, and hope all the usual suspects are still reading the thread...

Has anyone tried to energize a PMH while introducing extra energy into the system?

Example: place a large metal bell near the coil and strike it as just before the battery is applied to the copper wire.

Every metal bell has a particular unique sound, and will also create sympathetic vibrations in other metal objects. I'm interested to know if this is what Ed meant about "ringing the bell twice."

If you look at the photos of Coral Castle you will see the bell that hung by the door with a copper wire running through it. I keep thinking that if you can create the right harmonic while energizing the PMH, and possibly introduce more energy - in other forms (heat / infrared, incandescent light, ultraviolet light, etc.) rather than being additive, it might create an exponential increase in stored power.

Another idea is: what if the bell itself was a PMH? I'm not sure whether most bells are made of bronze, but if the bell were steel or some other iron-rich metal, there might be a means of attaching a steel or iron ring using the PMH technique, and then the whole piece would trap the flow of "magnets" in a hysteresis loop.

Last thought... I have seen that when creating a PMH, if the copper wire remains on the metal core, even after the bar is removed the core continues to act as a relatively strong magnet -- as long as the copper wire is not removed. (Interested to know if others have seen this too.) Take the wire off and the metal core stops acting as a magnet (or greatly reduced).

Why does having the copper wire wrapped around the core cause this effect? What would a physicist say about the relationship between the two materials?

-Van

[david lambright]

hi, yes i am still around. and yes i am still working on this stuff. check out my latest videos MAGNETIC LEAD ! - YouTube thanks

[david lambright]

About the line of thought that changing the sign of time in equations is changing the orientation of gravity:

The work of Fran De Aquino, freely published on the ArXiv, contains thorough description of experiments to reproduce the effect he discovered, Euegen Podkletnov mentionned him in his interview; since then, the work's more solid: here are the three main papers with two abstracts.
=-=-=
Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Field through Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure
[physics/0701091] Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Field through Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure
Fran De Aquino
(Submitted on 8 Jan 2007 (v1), last revised 17 Feb 2011 (this version, v14))

It is shown that the gravity acceleration just above a chamber filled with gas or plasma at ultra-low pressure can be strongly reduced by applying an Extra Low-Frequency (ELF) electromagnetic field across the gas or the plasma. This Gravitational Shielding Effect is related to recent discovery of quantum correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass. According to the theory samples hung above the gas or the plasma should exhibit a weight decrease when the frequency of the electromagnetic field is decreased or when the intensity of the electromagnetic field is increased. This Gravitational Shielding Effect is unprecedented in the literature and can not be understood in the framework of the General Relativity. From the technical point of view, there are several applications for this discovery; possibly it will change the paradigms of energy generation, transportation and telecommunications.
=-=-=
Gravity Control produced by a Thermoionic Current through the Air at Very Low Pressure
[physics/0610075] Gravity Control produced by a Thermoionic Current through the Air at Very Low Pressure
=-=-=
Mathematical Foundations of the Relativistic Theory of Quantum Gravity
Fran De Aquino (Maranhao State University, Brazil)
(Submitted on 9 Dec 2002 (v1), last revised 24 Oct 2011 (this version, v41))
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0212033v41
Starting from the action function, we have derived a theoretical background that leads to the quantization of gravity and the deduction of a correlation between the gravitational and the inertial masses, which depends on the kinetic momentum of the particle. We show that the strong equivalence principle is reaffirmed and, consequently, Einstein's equations are preserved. In fact, such equations are deduced here directly from this new approach to Gravitation. Moreover, we have obtained a generalized equation for the inertial forces, which incorporates the Mach's principle into Gravitation. Also, we have deduced the equation of Entropy; the Hamiltonian for a particle in an electromagnetic field and the reciprocal fine structure constant directly from this new approach. It was also possible to deduce the expression of the Casimir force and to explain the Inflation Period and the Missing Matter, without assuming existence of vacuum fluctuations. This new approach to Gravitation will allow us to understand some crucial matters in Cosmology.
=-=-=

[Harvey]

Thanks David,

It would seem that Fran de Aquino has put a great deal of thought into his work.

I personally do not subscribe to the notion of Dark Matter per se, but it is interesting to entertain the mathematical treatise he has provided there.

Too bad it doesn't adequately address the Plasma Puzzle.

I was hoping it may have something in there to answer that. But at least it is following along those lines, that gravity and the spatial orientation of matter in a plasma state are inter-related in ways that supersede the current base of understanding.

Thanks for sharing the links!

[david lambright]

Ed

Ed Leedskalnin said he figured out how the ancient stone masons cut and moved HUGE blocks of stone. places like puma-punku, balbek in lebanon etc. i believe him. working with variations of his PMH and the generator at coral castle, i found that these devices generate a visible radiation field around them. i posted videos on how to build these devices on my youtube channel, DIAMAGNETIC ALUMINUM ! - YouTube . replicators built copies and verified my findings. what i see is a field around the devices that looks like a mirage or the "heat" coming off a hot object. this distortion is usually seen where there is energy moving upwards, like convection, away from gravity. it has been seen above electrical devices that produce large magnetic fields. it seems that where this distortion is, there is energy associated with it. i believe that Edward Leedskalnin's generator was able to make a flow of what he coined "magnetic current". not electricity, but a flow of magnetic energy. Fran De Aquino, has shown that there are different ways to achieve gravity control. i believe that John Hutchinson's effect uses the same energy as Aquino and this is the same energy Leedskalnin used with his devices. in my videos, i have a 14 pound quartz geode that i can spin with just two fingers when held near my device. i have tried to capture this energy on video but it is very subtle. Hutchinson has made metals do strange things, like get soft, come apart and levitate. i believe that Leedskalnin was able to use these currents to "soften" the stone before he cut it. some of the marks left on the stones he cut look like they were "melted". because the energy field i re-discovered is visible, is very important since the meters we have today have a hard time detecting these current flows. Aquino stated; "From the technical point of view, there are several applications for this discovery; possibly it will change the paradigms of energy generation, transportation and telecommunications." i believe this to be true. i believe that Leedskalnin's device is able to make a PURER flow of energy, made without the use electricity, using centrifugal force to start a flow of magnetic current. i believe he was able to make this energy flow in a wire, so he could use it at a remote location. a flame burns away from gravity, artificial or natural. a flame on a centrifuge burns towards the center axis. i am searching for the energy we see in rising heat,[convection?]. i believe that energy in heat is a separate thing and can be made separately. i also believe that this energy is all around us, is what every thing is made of, and very very strong. every day more and more evidence is coming to light to prove this. i am not very smart, but i am very curious and there are so many things we know nothing about. i just hope that what i have found/seen in my experiments will help us all to understand gravity/magnetism a little better. thanks, david

[Cloxxki]

Dave,
Early on, it seemed that the non-visual effects you are experiencing are inertia-related?
Did you even have experiments to try and find anomalous measurements?
I would consider timing free fall in proximity of a device, both magnetically locked and normal. Also, I'd be very interested to learn how an alternatively accelerated object fares. Both horizontal and vertikal. Below, at, and above G. And, and this is more intuitive than scientific of me: exponential accelerations. Increasing or decreasing velocity increments per time unit.
When you handle a quartz around the device, you're not moving it on-dimensionally or parabolically. The humans arms are much more eratic, and will pick up anomalies, as you seemed to experience. If you can feel it, it mut be possible to measure it.
It's take a very precise timing system, and a setup that allows for movements of a weight, preferably power by another weight placed out of range, acted upon by regular gravity. Leverage (levers, seesaws, cords) can make the test-weight perfect all kinds of movements, powered by external gravity, counter-acted by possibly manipulated gravity. If you can find consistent timing differences, you have something worthy of publishing in the most difficult journals.
Seeing the rays themselves has been difficult to get recorded consistently, but may not even be as important, or just a by-effect of the main effect.

[david lambright]

cloxxki

all the methods you describe are needed to validate these findings. my problem is severe lack of funds. my device is ready to take to the university in corvallis, or. , the vortex shaped field is very visible when i hold a iron sash weight above the axis of a spinning device. i know that when the physics students get a look at the visible optical distortions and how they can be coaxed into a spinning vortex, they will have to take notice. then the real testing can be done. i am not sure if i said any thing about the laser before, but a low power led pointer aimed at the rotor puts out a tangible energy. at least 10 people have felt this effect. cloxxki, thank you for all that you have contributed to this thread, and i too feel that this is worthy of a paper, only after it has been explored further/ better than i have means to do. i will post any news about corvallis as it comes. thanks