Edward Leedskalnin was born January 12, 1887, according to World War I draft registration records, in Stāmeriena parish, Latvia. Little is known of his childhood, aside from the fact that he was not wealthy and achieved only a fourth-grade education. However Edward was a sickly boy, and often spent his time inside reading books — eventually leading him to discontinue his schooling as it "bored him". For Ed, his development of a yearning to obtain knowledge became a passionate and potent driving force in many endeavours throughout his later life.[2] At the age of 26, he was engaged to marry Agnes Scuffs, a girl ten years younger.[3] However, the girl that Leedskalnin referred to as his "Sweet Sixteen" broke the engagement the night before their wedding, so he emigrated to North America[4] where he found work in various lumber camps in Canada, California, and Texas.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style
Collapse
X
-
-
Experiment
Here is a smaller version of the process that anyone can try to see if it works.
-A PMH, preferably built to Ed's specifications
-The size of the stone: 3"D x 4"H x 8"L
-The type of stone should be part of the experimentation
but try a non-ferrous stone like limestone or a calcite-crystal first.
-12-Volt Car Battery
-Floating Container like a plastic or glass bowl.
Charge up the PMH by tapping the switch on the negative terminal. Then pull the keeper/crossbar off the PMH. The theory is that the water level will change on the container holding the stone. If you reverse the poles you should notice the water level change in the opposite direction. This setup should lighten the stone by using static-discharge or magnetic-discharge?
Peter
Cheers to Ed.
Comment
-
-
Great Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
Cheers,
"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harvey View PostGreat Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
This theory only uses the PMH as its tool.
Cheers,
I wouldn't say it has anything to do with gravity but i guess it could if you look at it like that. This is a magnetic effect.
Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs..
When you discharge the chain you are discharging equal amounts of neg/pos magnets into the stone adding to its static-charge and thus reducing it's mass until the stone reaches equilibrium again with its surroundings.
This may be a wet dream but I believe in a Magnetic Universe and this is completely possible using magnetic particles as the lifters.
Just because something isn't attracted or repelled by magnets does not mean it cannot be affected by them. After-all anything made of Atoms can be altered by magnets and if you have access to the magnetic particles then anything is possible.
PeterLast edited by remelic; 05-23-2010, 04:04 PM.
Comment
-
"A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' "
Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comment
-
I will be experimenting so I will document the findings either way. If it goes well or not, it may answer other questions that have no relation so it's worth trying.
I will keep you posted but don't expect results too soon. Maybe a month or two.
Thanks.Last edited by remelic; 05-23-2010, 04:05 PM.
Comment
-
Hi Peter,
You have quoted me above, but then you have inserted a few lines there in my quote - essentially making it appear that I have said those things whereas I have not.
This is a common mistake when quoting posts and is easily corrected.
Edit your post and simply remove the lines you have inserted that appear before the '[/quote]' tag and add them after that tag and all will be fixed
Best Regards,
Harvey"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
Comment
-
Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.
Comment
-
Originally posted by remelic View PostSorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.
No worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
Harvey"Amy Pond, there is something you need to understand, and someday your life may depend on it: I am definitely a madman with a box." ~The Doctor
Comment
-
Originally posted by remelic View Post....Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs.....
Peter
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.
Cheers
Matt
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harvey View PostNo worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
Harvey
Originally posted by Harvey View PostI too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
Originally posted by Matthew Jones View PostLets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers.
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.
Cheers
MattLast edited by remelic; 05-22-2010, 03:31 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by remelic View PostI guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.
If that were the case it wouldn't pick up rocks. It wouldn't pick up anything. The generator creates negative energy, charges the PMH and the PMH emits an anti gravitational field. The charge come from a combination of magnetic fields.
This can't be done with energy in its definition. EMF, Iron Induced magnetism, radiation, or anything the like. This is another beast altogether that is opposite of our understanding. It the same source for the constant acceleration and expansion of the universe. Planetary rotation and so on.
And magnetism is not static in any form. Iron induced magnetics have constant rotating fields. If it were static there would be no more effect from the magnetism.
One of the primary reasons people have to go over and over with the theory of this whole area of study is do to the semantics that everyone has to come up with every time we have a discussion. New words that could mean anything flying off the shelf as fast as one can imagine them.
We have clear and well used definitions for most of this stuff, why can't they be used.
Keep it simple, ya know?
I apologize for being petty.
Matt
Comment
Comment