everyone is free to say what they think in this thread, whatever it is!
My personal point of view, and im am free to share it... is that STEORN is a big fake, and extremely well educated liars!
here his my comment allready posted...
"personally,
i dont believe them...
first a mechanical device, then a permanent magnet motor, and now an "attraction" motor?
if they lied in the first and second, why now would be different?
in the public demo, they showed overunity in the scope, but come on...
with just one generator coil they were getting more output that input?
that does not fit in my head!
and the more funny thing, Sean have sayd that the rotor did slow down when he aproached the generator coil to the rotor on the demo... so if it was there 4 coils on load, maybe the rotor will completely stop?
a lot of people think they canceled BEMF... yes shore, but just in the drive coils, the toroids will never be affected by an outside magnet...
but... lets see what happens!!"
if they have found something 6 or 7 years ago... then it will not be just improvements of the same device?
rather of desperate attempts to blynd investors with completely different concepts of devices along ther way?
My personal point of view, and im am free to share it... is that STEORN is a big fake, and extremely well educated liars!
here his my comment allready posted...
"personally,
i dont believe them...
first a mechanical device, then a permanent magnet motor, and now an "attraction" motor?
if they lied in the first and second, why now would be different?
in the public demo, they showed overunity in the scope, but come on...
with just one generator coil they were getting more output that input?
that does not fit in my head!
and the more funny thing, Sean have sayd that the rotor did slow down when he aproached the generator coil to the rotor on the demo... so if it was there 4 coils on load, maybe the rotor will completely stop?
a lot of people think they canceled BEMF... yes shore, but just in the drive coils, the toroids will never be affected by an outside magnet...
but... lets see what happens!!"
if they have found something 6 or 7 years ago... then it will not be just improvements of the same device?
rather of desperate attempts to blynd investors with completely different concepts of devices along ther way?
Comment