Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SR 193 / SR193 - Study of the Device, Theories, Diagrams, Schematics & Experiments

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well, let me introduce myself: I have been following the SR for long time. Now i starting develop my own replica, based on SR version. Powered up with 9-12v. Anyway, it's not important how the engine starts. The point we need to concentrate is

    a) the coil with Fe and various windings.

    B)automatic re-oscillating by and extra Coil winding (the small coil under the main coil of SR device: the kickcoil?)

    C) it's fact that's not just a few transistors, resistors .... It's and intelligent reoscilating circuit with additional logic counters ic4011...

    Anyway that just my opinion, hope this thread is not dead. I fell It that we close to made it working.

    Fell free to contact me

    Comment


    • Trawnik

      Can you post what schematic do you plan to use ? I'm especially interested in push-pull circuit and how you plan to synchronize it all.

      Comment


      • Путь к Истине

        Путь к Истине находится по адресу: truenewworld.ru
        (Внимание! Это не реклама сайта - это "реклама" Истины).

        Comment


        • How come nobody is noticing how the outer radiator coil is stepping up everything inside that field?

          20KV stepped up way above 100KV in short pulses produces a neutron and that carries far more energy than an electron or photon.

          Therein lies the secret according to Hector. At 80KV is where the neutron starts to form. At 50KV an x-ray is created. That would sure explain the use of ~40KV high voltage wire for Kapanadze.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
            Trawnik

            Can you post what schematic do you plan to use ? I'm especially interested in push-pull circuit and how you plan to synchronize it all.
            Use a 3 rail AC power source. Use an op amp to determine if you are above or below the zero volt line. From there use an H-Bride to power the flyback. The output from the op amp will control the polarity of the H-bridge.

            It is what Stan the man Meyer called electron bounce phenomena.

            To get the ultra short pulses, use a flip flop (both outputs Q and Q-NOT connected to an AND gate. A flip flop has both inputs high or low for about 4ns during transition.

            Meyer called it a burst wave and used a flip flop in his circuits. Hubbard did the same basic thing along with EV gray. Therein lies the big secret IMO.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dr Poppy View Post
              Use a 3 rail AC power source. Use an op amp to determine if you are above or below the zero volt line. From there use an H-Bride to power the flyback. The output from the op amp will control the polarity of the H-bridge.

              It is what Stan the man Meyer called electron bounce phenomena.
              This part I don't understand. What I need is sinewave powerfull inverter.To get pure 50hz sinewave.What i'm using now is very pure sinewave but not much power and very complicated : I use Wien bridge sinewave generator with one stage amplifier using LM358 and then car audio dedicated audio-amplifier chip from TDA series.I've got 20W of pure sinewave with less then 0.5% distortion. I would like to test other method with higher power , I need probably 100-300W sinewave inverter with resonable 1% distortion.

              To get the ultra short pulses, use a flip flop (both outputs Q and Q-NOT connected to an AND gate. A flip flop has both inputs high or low for about 4ns during transition.
              Here I say that I completely agree with you ! In fact I have started my adventure with free energy from 555 chip and that was very bad mistake all people are doing all the time. Frequency is not important,could be from very wide range while fall and rise time is what matters.At least in some class of devices.

              Meyer called it a burst wave and used a flip flop in his circuits. Hubbard did the same basic thing along with EV gray. Therein lies the big secret IMO.
              Can you point me where Meyer called it burst wave ? This is extremally insteresting! I've never found such statement made by Stan.

              Comment


              • You would have to watch his videos to hear him use the term burst wave.

                Kapanadze is most likely using TV parts such as the verticle deflection because it contains a high speed op amp.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Dr Poppy View Post
                  Use a 3 rail AC power source. Use an op amp to determine if you are above or below the zero volt line. From there use an H-Bride to power the flyback. The output from the op amp will control the polarity of the H-bridge.

                  It is what Stan the man Meyer called electron bounce phenomena.

                  To get the ultra short pulses, use a flip flop (both outputs Q and Q-NOT connected to an AND gate. A flip flop has both inputs high or low for about 4ns during transition.

                  Meyer called it a burst wave and used a flip flop in his circuits. Hubbard did the same basic thing along with EV gray. Therein lies the big secret IMO.
                  Interesting theory, thanks for sharing

                  How do you think Hubbard pulsed his device back in the days before op amps?

                  How do you capture and use the neutrons to power electrical home loads once you generate them?

                  Cheers Mike

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by vrand View Post
                    Interesting theory, thanks for sharing

                    How do you think Hubbard pulsed his device back in the days before op amps?

                    How do you capture and use the neutrons to power electrical home loads once you generate them?

                    Cheers Mike
                    Good question re: Hubbard and I am sure there is a good answer. I don't know what it is, but Hubbard had a control box that generated the frequency that drove the high voltage. Maybe Hubbard used a rectifier and only bounced half the wave?

                    What Hubbard did that was similar to Kapanadze and SR is place a step up coil inside a step up coil. This multiplies the C2 against C2 in E=MC2 and why you keep hearing that 1600% efficient number.

                    I have a pretty good explanation of the math but don't feel like writing it all out as it would take pages to explain. Just understand the power of exponential multiplication and that electricity is created from cavitation and when you break the mach levels and larger particles form, more energy is produced. It is not linear as the people that replicated Hubbard figured out through experimentation. It is all about acceleration as Quarktoo AKA TheBuzz preached to deaf ears for years. Higher voltage (tension on the electron sea) moves the electron at higher speed. Acceleration.

                    Here are the places where the magic happens:
                    • 50KV x-ray is produced.
                    • 80KV neutron is produced.


                    A bit about neutrons from Wiki:

                    While bound neutrons in stable nuclei are stable, free neutrons are unstable; they undergo beta decay with a mean lifetime of just under 15 minutes (881.5±1.5 s).[4] Free neutrons are produced in nuclear fission and fusion.

                    wDedicated neutron sources like research reactors and spallation sources produce free neutrons for use in irradiation and in neutron scattering experiments. Even though it is not a chemical element, the free neutron is sometimes included in tables of nuclides.[5] It is then considered to have an atomic number of zero and a mass number of one, and is sometimes referred to as neutronium.[citation needed


                    Neutron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Dr Poppy View Post
                      Good question re: Hubbard and I am sure there is a good answer. I don't know what it is, but Hubbard had a control box that generated the frequency that drove the high voltage. Maybe Hubbard used a rectifier and only bounced half the wave?

                      What Hubbard did that was similar to Kapanadze and SR is place a step up coil inside a step up coil. This multiplies the C2 against C2 in E=MC2 and why you keep hearing that 1600% efficient number.

                      I have a pretty good explanation of the math but don't feel like writing it all out as it would take pages to explain. Just understand the power of exponential multiplication and that electricity is created from cavitation and when you break the mach levels and larger particles form, more energy is produced. It is not linear as the people that replicated Hubbard figured out through experimentation. It is all about acceleration as Quarktoo AKA TheBuzz preached to deaf ears for years. Higher voltage (tension on the electron sea) moves the electron at higher speed. Acceleration.

                      Here are the places where the magic happens:
                      • 50KV x-ray is produced.
                      • 80KV neutron is produced.


                      A bit about neutrons from Wiki:

                      While bound neutrons in stable nuclei are stable, free neutrons are unstable; they undergo beta decay with a mean lifetime of just under 15 minutes (881.5±1.5 s).[4] Free neutrons are produced in nuclear fission and fusion.

                      wDedicated neutron sources like research reactors and spallation sources produce free neutrons for use in irradiation and in neutron scattering experiments. Even though it is not a chemical element, the free neutron is sometimes included in tables of nuclides.[5] It is then considered to have an atomic number of zero and a mass number of one, and is sometimes referred to as neutronium.[citation needed


                      Neutron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                      Thanks for the info, I am reading up on TheBuzz over at overunity.com

                      Interesting theory of Buzz's that suggests that FE devices convert mass into the atomic energy (E=mc^2) contained within the mass (cavitation), in all its forms, is where the free energy comes from.

                      "Energy does not come from nowhere, it has to have a source. Mass = energy - Maxwell. It is stored potential and in order to unlock it, you need to create a cavitation. All free energy machines cavitate mass somewhere in the process. No exceptions.

                      Tesla liked to work with high pressure nitrogen as a mass source. Free energy devices have been produced in the past using nitrogen by others. Any element from 56 down will transmute just fine if you know the techniques used to do that."

                      - Where the SR193/Tapanadze copper coil tubes are actually filled with magnetic oxygen gas or Ruggero Santilli's Magnegas gas, then being blasted with HV pulses to create neutrons that then are captured somehow to power light bulbs and motors, is a fascinating design concept.

                      Here is Ruggero's demonstration of the magnetic properties of his magnetic gas:

                      Testing the Magnetic Nature of MagneGas
                      Testing the Magnetic Nature of MagneGas.mp4 - YouTube

                      - That oxygen has the same magnetic properties as iron, on a per weight bases.

                      - That the atoms of the ferrite ring core inside the SR193/Tapanadze coils are also "compressed" by the Philo T. Farnsworth's multipactor effect.


                      As the wiki neutron article says, that one has to somehow protect oneself from neutron emissions, maybe that is why Kapandze is sick?

                      If the above is what TK and SR193 actually did in their devices, has it been confirmed by anyone? It seems like a really complicated design to prove this theory?

                      Is there a way to shield the TK/SR193 device so it is not a neutron emitter outside the device?

                      Is there an easier way to get free energy from the cavitation effect than the TK/SR193 device designs for the creation of neutrons/electrons?

                      This whole field of neutron generation by +80kv pulses to magnetic gases needs to be researched more. Ron Cole replicated Santilli's Magnegas gas and has mobile demonstration unit on a trailer, but does not claim free energy output, only that one can turn waste sewer gas into a natural gas type of fuel to power car engines (ICE) and it needs additional outside energy such as wind or solar energy input. Also Ron only creates the magnetic gas and has not pulsed it with +80kv pulses to see what happens.

                      Cheers Mike
                      Last edited by vrand; 09-28-2011, 01:03 AM.

                      Comment


                      • How we can easily check if there is any neutron radiating from ferrite core from SR device ? I heard he was ill after exposing himself into the operating device for few hours.It may be due radio waves though.
                        It is very important to be safe.

                        Comment


                        • New generation hosting

                          The best free hosting for your site!
                          New generation hosting is all your new site needs!
                          A New World is what the new generation needs.
                          The path to a New World starts here - Новая страница 1

                          Comment


                          • It is mandatory to have safe gears against X-rays and Gamma radiation when experimenting with devices that produce HV of 50+KV or 80+KV, otherwise you will soon be a dead man expossing to those letal radiations.
                            You actually are operating an X-ray machine and a neutron( Gamma) radiator within inches from your body.
                            Now this is serious, men!
                            I do not mess with this kind of HV stuffs because I have kids and family in my house. And I do not want my wife to become widow too early!!

                            Comment


                            • Danger

                              Originally posted by aaron5120 View Post
                              It is mandatory to have safe gears against X-rays and Gamma radiation when experimenting with devices that produce HV of 50+KV or 80+KV, otherwise you will soon be a dead man expossing to those letal radiations.
                              You actually are operating an X-ray machine and a neutron( Gamma) radiator within inches from your body.
                              Now this is serious, men!
                              I do not mess with this kind of HV stuffs because I have kids and family in my house. And I do not want my wife to become widow too early!!
                              Yep, but have you looked at the spark gap on the SR? It's about the size of a spark plug gap.

                              Since we're talking about potential dangers, here's a few other things to consider:

                              How much radiation is your automobile's engine producing? My truck has six spark plugs. How much radiation am I getting from them?

                              By the way, microwave ovens turn food into poison. The Soviets outlawed them in the Seventies, and for good reason. They understood how dangerous they were.

                              And, if you use a cell phone, you're bombarding your brain with microwave energy. Not too smart.

                              And, if you have a wireless router in your home, your also exposing yourself to a high dosage of ionizing radiation.

                              And, if you have a Smart Kilowatt Meter on your home, well, they output microwave radiation too.

                              So, there you have it.
                              Regards,

                              VIDBID

                              Comment


                              • ion drive

                                I could be completely off basis but this seems to me to be an ion drive. If it is you wouldn't want to draw any energy from it you would want it to exponentially increase until it naturally releases energy. The released energy would probably be ion / plasma and would be a great source for space travel / propulsion considering the build and simple components. Also if the man is using ferromagnetic rings then he could be trying to polarize the ionic / plasma field to condense the output into a specific impulse. Just a though, think it through and kick it around.

                                ,Shawn

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X