What energizer/machine to build for car/house etc..?

[Matthew Jones]

This is the video. It not running with the motor on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKrmM0skif

The motor is a 24 volt 1.5 horse power. If the batteries are run cnvetional it discharges them in a little under 2 hours. On the switch they ran 32 hour. I have mechanical load on it so it is working not just free wheeling.

Don't mind anybody who sound on the defensive we just got done running a bunch of people out of here and we are weary of anybody new. You'll see how it gets when you hang around a bit. Alot of people come here to distract and not to study.

Cheers
Matt

[Bit's-n-Bytes]

This is the video. It not running with the motor on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKrmM0skif

The motor is a 24 volt 1.5 horse power. If the batteries are run cnvetional it discharges them in a little under 2 hours. On the switch they ran 32 hour. I have mechanical load on it so it is working not just free wheeling.

Don't mind anybody who sound on the defensive we just got done running a bunch of people out of here and we are weary of anybody new. You'll see how it gets when you hang around a bit. Alot of people come here to distract and not to study.

Cheers
Matt

Hi Matt, just tried the video but it said it has a "malformend video ID"

Thanks

Jeff

[Matthew Jones]

@Bits....Its the same thing I posted at the Tesla Switch Thread.
You already seen it. I don't know whats wrong.
Heres another link though YouTube - mjones7947's Channel

Matt

[Bit's-n-Bytes]

@Bits....Its the same thing I posted at the Tesla Switch Thread.
You already seen it. I don't know whats wrong.
Heres another link though YouTube - mjones7947's Channel

Matt

Thanks Matt, thought I was missing something, but I did see this.

Jeff

[adamo21]

dont agree with that...

the more heavier is the rotor, more energy it will need to achieve higher rpm... more out, but more in also...

imagine this case, you put 3V in a system, you have a small rotor with small magnets, the rpm will be very high... but if you put big magnets in that rotor, it will be more heavy, and at the same input it will be much more slower rpm.

So because the magnets are stronger you should have more output, but because it is turning at slower rpms the energy will be almost the same!

how do you plan to achieve OU? because you will have uncle lenz when using generator coils that will slow down your rotor!

good luck with your project

hugs

Sorry i cant imagine that, thats too close minded for me.

Its really simple. When an object is in motion a vacuum is created that is relative to the mass of the object. The more heavier the object the more energy you get from the vacuum, simple as that.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, Hi adamo21, I think you may be correct about the rotating mass idea causing excess energy. There is an article from awhile back, i have it saved somewhere, where experiments were done like this. They measured the input power and time required to rotate a heavy flywheel up to a certain speed, then allowed the flywheel to rotate for a given time under power, then they stopped the flywheel and started rotating it again taking the same measurements and found that it took far less time and/or input power to rotate up to the same speed and if they let the flywheel sit too long between the two tests, the results went back to normal. So, it does appear that the vacuum or ether or whatever is being affected to aid the rotation, similar to stirring water in a cup maybe. There are too many accounts similar to this idea. I think Joseph Newman's motor takes advantage of this also and many others. And the acceleration experiment I pointed out would be the key to understanding it, something science doesn't include in it's models of reality it seems, this interaction with the unseen. Though pulses may help to extract the energy more effectively. Just a few thoughts.
peace love light
Tyson

[Mark]

Don't mind anybody who sound on the defensive we just got done running a bunch of people out of here and we are weary of anybody new. You'll see how it gets when you hang around a bit. Alot of people come here to distract and not to study.

Cheers
Matt[/QUOTE]

Hey Matt and Bits in case your not aware Trantric is Juju he just changed his user ID.

[Matthew Jones]

Oh well sounds like he is building and thats what matters. Research.

Cheers
Matt

[adamo21]

Hi folks, Hi adamo21, I think you may be correct about the rotating mass idea causing excess energy. There is an article from awhile back, i have it saved somewhere, where experiments were done like this. They measured the input power and time required to rotate a heavy flywheel up to a certain speed, then allowed the flywheel to rotate for a given time under power, then they stopped the flywheel and started rotating it again taking the same measurements and found that it took far less time and/or input power to rotate up to the same speed and if they let the flywheel sit too long between the two tests, the results went back to normal. So, it does appear that the vacuum or ether or whatever is being affected to aid the rotation, similar to stirring water in a cup maybe. There are too many accounts similar to this idea. I think Joseph Newman's motor takes advantage of this also and many others. And the acceleration experiment I pointed out would be the key to understanding it, something science doesn't include in it's models of reality it seems, this interaction with the unseen. Though pulses may help to extract the energy more effectively. Just a few thoughts.
peace love light
Tyson

Yea thats interesting about the flywheel experiment. I havnt figured this out all the way yet but the coils, magnets and pulses are just a way to capture that energy from the mass, im sure there are better ways, i still gotta check out Joseph newmans work and im working on a SSG model in my garage which will help define whats really going on.

[TanTric]

...

sory if it seems closed mind, but im really an open mind being!

and i dont know it for speculations or imagination... i know from my tests and from what i seen in a practical way!

and what i mentioned is the truth, and thats what happened in my setup! if you dont believe me, thats your choice, try it yourself and then we can talk! but i have not experimented with mass or flywheel, just rotor with different weights of magnets!

if you search for a self runner that can output extra energy you can start from here:

YouTube - SelfRunning 10coiler.MPG

im pretty shore that bits did it!! its a combination of 10coiler, tesla switch, inverter and a transformer!

Sorry i cant imagine that, thats too close minded for me.

Its really simple. When an object is in motion a vacuum is created that is relative to the mass of the object. The more heavier the object the more energy you get from the vacuum, simple as that.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, I'm re-posting this cause it's so good. And this is what I would be working on and I think I already am, with the Garry Stanley pulse motor. Though this is more of what I'll be aiming for now.

Now, let us consider a device built by John Bedini, a very talented man in the USA. He built a battery-powered
motor with a flywheel on the shaft of the motor. This, of course, does not sound like startling stuff, but the crunch
is that this motor ran in his workshop for more than three years, keeping it's battery fully charged during that time -
now that is startling. What makes this arrangement different from a standard set-up is that the battery powered motor is not connected
directly to the battery but instead is fed with a rapid series of DC pulses. This has two effects. Firstly, that method
of driving a motor is very efficient electrically speaking and secondly, when a flywheel is driven with a series of
pulses, it picks up additional energy from the local environment.
One other unusual feature is the way that the motor shaft spins a disc with permanent magnets mounted on it.
These sweep past a matching set of coils attached to a stationary board, forming an ordinary electrical generator
and the resulting electrical power which is generated is converted to DC current and fed back to the driving
battery, charging it and maintaining its voltage.
Standard theory says that a system like this has to be less than 100% efficient because the DC motor is less than
100% efficient (true) and the battery is well below the 100% efficient mark (true). Therefore, the conclusion is that
the system cannot possibly work (false). What is not understood by conventional science is that the pulsed
flywheel draws in additional energy from the local environment, showing that conventional science theory is
inadequate and out of date and needs to be upgraded.
An American called Jim Watson built a much larger version of John's system, a version which was twenty feet (6
meters) long. Jim's version not only powered itself, but generated 12 kilowatts of excess electrical power. That
extra 12 kilowatts of power must be a considerable embarrassment for conventional science and so they will
either ignore it, or deny that it ever existed, in spite of the fact that it was demonstrated at a public seminar.

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6...ygenbedini.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6184/jimwatson.jpg
And as I said, many many other inventions use this same pulsing flywheel energy extraction method.
peace love light
Tyson

[SkyWatcher]

lets try that again
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6...ygenbedini.jpg

[SkyWatcher]

Here is a link to where i got that information, it's a large pdf book of Patrick Kelly's research you can download free.
Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices - eBook Download
peace love light
Tyson

[elias]

With the batteries I got now I am running a minute each way. But with little batteries its harder to go longer. You gotta switch fast like 10 hertz or so. And depending on the motor you can burn up some energy.

Thanks ...
Your explanation makes sense.