GAP Power - Magnetic Neutralization

[Karl_Palsness]

GAP Power - Magnetic Neutralization

I Came hear looking for more info on the Gap Power motor and did not find a link hear....so hear it is.

Looks very interesting, and has very similar design and operating principals to Richard Willis Magnacoster design. At lest from his patents I think.

GAP Power, Magnetic Neutralization

YouTube - FREE ENERGY # 24 Working Magnetic Overunity Device - Magnetic Neutralization

GAP Power magnetic amplification and neutralization illustrates regauging

http://www.gap-power.com/videos/Full...th%20Video.wmv

Note he is not capturing any of the energy form the coil when it is deactivated! This would be easy to do...







Have fun with this one...

Karl Palsness

[ashtweth]

Thanks man bee good if you could move all your stuff to here
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ead.php?t=6135

[Matthew Jones]

That guy does some nice work. He had rotary version at one time I can't seem to find it on his website.
I have tried several times to replicate this effect on a small scale and it doesn't have the same power out ratios. But its easy to see how it can scale into something much larger with greater output.

Cheers
Matt

[gyula]

Hi Matt,

the rotary version is here:

GAP Power, Magnetic Amplification & Neutralization and the videos for it are here:

GAP Power, Magnetic Amplification & Neutralization

rgds, Gyula

[Matthew Jones]

Thanks alot

Matt

[synchro]

Bedini's Device and Method.

First of all, not only is Art not catching any flyback, but his Power Coil is a simple end to end solenoid wrap. The Tesla High Voltage Bifilar, with the end of one wire connected to the beginning of the other, would double the magnetic strength. the new HV coil would double the magnetic strength for the same amount of wire length and input. That simple measure alone would cut Art's power consumption in half. A fly back pulse recovery loop circuit would add another %80 to the efficency. This motor is very similar to Wesley Gary's current reversing magnet repusive and attracting linear motor of the 1800's.

Bedini's patent for his "Device and Means", uses a Flynn paralell path stator that switches flux direction on it's own, when the pulse dies. This permits rotor spin, and multiplies force. The inclusion of this feature, would allow for even more input reduction.

[Matthew Jones]

First of all, not only is Art not catching any flyback, but his Power coil is a simple end to end solinoid wrap. The Tesla High Voltage bifilar, with the end of one wire connected to the beginning of the other, would double the magnetic strength. the new HV coil would double the magnetic strength for the same amount of wire length and input. That simple measure alone would cut Art's power consumption in half. A fly back pulse recovery loop circuit would add another %80 to the efficency. This motor is very similar to Wesley Gary's current reversing magnet repusive and attracting linear motor of the 1800's.
Bedini's patent for his "Device and Means", uses a Flynn paralell path stator that switches flux direction on it's own, when the pulse dies. This permits rotor spin, and multiplies force. The inclusion of this feature, would allow for even more input reduction.

How do you come across all that info? Apparently you didn't get that from the clip that is shown.
I heard him say in the clip that he was recovering BEMF which is a common term for flyback or anything else that comes out after the charge.

Matt

[synchro]

bemf

@Matthew Jones:

I'm working on the statment Karl Palsness made above that: "He is not captureing any energy from the coil when it's deactivated". Apparently there dosen't appear to be any recovery circuit in the video picture. How does the wrap look to you?

[Matthew Jones]

He said he was.
You can't see the circiut as it is probably in the box. All you have to do is charge the coil via a transistor or something to that nature then let it discharge back into the battery bank. So its not a big deal and most likely it would be close to the switch.
Remember that how you step up voltage. The inductor is storage device. You put the energy in then take it back out. All the while utilizing the magnetic field. It very efficient and depending on how much work your doing and how much energy recover you can go overunity easy. It not even a trick and its fits with electrical engineering standards.

You can look in my signature at the simple motor. Thats what it does. or go to WikiPedia_Boost converter . 93% of everything you take out of the bank can be transfered to the other bank. And if the apparatus generated a a charge that only adds to it. After that your only dependent on the efficiency of the battery.

Matt

[theremart]

Looks to be a Large improvement...

On the piston of the Bob Boyce motor. Suffers the same problem as his device, as there are times of low torque, but the way that is overcome is to offset multiple pistons turning the shaft.


To be over unity you need to produce more than what the unit requires to power the device. If the output from the torque of the motor ( run another generator ) and the back EMF combined is greater than what is consumed in the battery then you have OU.

Very interesting device.

[theremart]

As I think about it...

You could take a SSG and put neos on the back side of the coils and have the same setup as you suggest.

[synchro]

Current reversal.

@Theremart

Art's motor amplifys the attraction, 2.9 times what the electro magnet would give along with the neutraliztion. The current goes in the other direction to accomplish that. You need to add an DPDT switch to do that. Bit more complex than just the SSG and a magnet.

[theremart]

RE: setup

@Theremart

Art's motor amplifys the attraction, 2.9 times what the electro magnet would give along with the neutraliztion. The current goes in the other direction too to accomplish that. You need to add an DPDT switch to do that. Bit more complex than just the SSG and a magnet.

Ok you are saying he is flipping the polarity of the coil. ( went to the web site, and it appears that is what is being done.

I thought about that with the SSG. if you could flip the polarity at the right time ( say with the bearingless Bedini ) you could obtain better results.

Still would like to see how much amps it takes to run this device.

[EgmQC]

Ok you are saying he is flipping the polarity of the coil. ( went to the web site, and it appears that is what is being done.

I thought about that with the SSG. if you could flip the polarity at the right time ( say with the bearingless Bedini ) you could obtain better results.

Still would like to see how much amps it takes to run this device.

There no AC on the coil so no XL to calculate, the coil act like a resistor with a constant DC apply to it, when the coil energize, the max power it can consume is 45/10.5 = 4.285A so 45 * 4.285 = 192.825 W when activated. http://www.gap-power.com/photos/Schematic-1.jpg

Best Regards,
EgmQC

[EgmQC]

What scare me a bit is the size of the battery , its oversized if the information he gave is true and the fact that he use a cold roll steel core on his coil , the Remanence can be a real problem with that core to get a good switching time.

Best Regards,
EgmQC