Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

radient energy - static electricty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    There isn't much information in the net.
    But I have a good news! I have found the book scanned in my hard disk.

    Yes, I'm Magnethos in overunity.com
    I was magnethos also here, but I didn't know why I cannot post with that user. I emailed to the webmaster a couple of times, and for that reason I created this username.
    I will upload some jpg in some minutes.

    Comment


    • #32
      uploading pictures...

      Book cover


      Uploaded with ImageShack.us

      Table of contents


      The third and last one (for the moment)

      Origin, essence and law of the propagation of electromagnetic nodulation (photon)
      Maybe here could be better to say "scalar nodulation".
      I don't know exactly what is a "nodulation". But someone said me that nodulation is like a spacetime curvature.
      Last edited by MrMagAmp; 08-15-2010, 12:57 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        I think by definition of the word in this case is a small rounded or irregular shaped mass. Seeing how the accepted view of a photon can be either an em wave or particle at any give time, then nodulation could be an appropriate term.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Iotayodi View Post
          I think by definition of the word in this case is a small rounded or irregular shaped mass. Seeing how the accepted view of a photon can be either an em wave or particle at any give time, then nodulation could be an appropriate term.
          But what a nodulation exactly is?
          I know, by reading other papers about pseudoscience, that there are different photons.
          We usually refer as "The Photon". But maybe there are different kinds of photons.

          Comment


          • #35
            But what a nodulation exactly is?
            From what I understand by its usage here is an em wave gathering mass as it travels through space and the aether. Thus protruding up from the aether itself creating a node.
            Yes there are different states of photons including a faster than light photon according to scientists.

            Comment


            • #36
              Electron Versus Photon

              While the electron and photon share similar characteristics (wave particle duality) they are quite different electromagnetically and materially.

              The photon is considered to be massless while the electron has been measured to have a mass of 9.10938215(45)×10−31 kg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram).
              The photon posses both electric polarities and magnetic polarities at different temporal (Time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) assignments whereas the Electron exhibits a continuous negative polarity independent of time. While the photon enjoys a duality of magnetic polarity akin to its electric polarity in that it shifts spatially, the electron tends to keep its magnetic dipole oriented in one direction spatially in accordance with its movement rather than any wave function.

              So we need to be careful when we try to assign the characteristics of one to the other.

              On the 27th day of September in 1905, Albert Einstein "deduced inter alia" with the principles of Maxwell's equations that the kinetic energy of a body is reduced by the emission of light in his work entitled "DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY CONTENT?". In his deduction he showed that the energy of a body viewed from two different systems moving relative to each other where that body is at rest in one of the systems, can have a differential that differs from the kinetic energy of the body with respect to the other system. The results of the deduction are as follows:
              "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c²"

              Einstein indicated "that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy-content; if the enrgy chanes by L, the mass changes in the same sense by L/9 x 10^20, the energy being measured in ergs, and the mass in grammes"

              He then stated "It is not impossible that with bodies whose energy-content is variable to a high degree (e.g. with radium salts) the theory may be successfully put to the test."

              And then, to drive the point home he finishes with the following statement:
              " If the theory corresponds to the facts, radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies."

              It is important to realize in this case, that he is referring to electromagnetic radiation, i.e. photons. Thus, he is stating that photons take inertia from one system and give it to another.

              Comment


              • #37
                Neutrinos Are Tachyons

                In response to the assertion of "have different states of photons, including such that travels faster than light" see the theory of Dr Eugene Jeong, Ph.D. Dipole (Anti)Gravity, Magnetic Gravity, true Gravitomagnetism

                Other theory is magnet unipole LEEDSKALNIN.COM: MAGNETIC CURRENT RESEARCH

                ---------------------------------'-'-----------------------------


                Electromagnet energy is the debris left over from the destruction of Magnet Flow/Magnet Currents. That means that there must have been a Magnet Circuit operating! So that means that a greater “Magnetic Permeance” is what is important!!! Would not that be the energy we are looking for? Magnet Pressure is the amount of energy flowing through a magnet circuit. So in that case you would be able to make changing state of that circuit by using shunts to send the currents into different parts of your circuit at will. (Karl Palsness' insight)

                Now, according to T.E.Bearden, the secret of the overunity is (compare the parts in bold and each other the parts in italic):

                1) TAP THE VIRTUAL PHOTON SPRAY.
                [Elapsing various steps]
                6) ORGANIZE, GATE, AND APPLY THE POTENTIAL SPRAY TO THE EXTERNAL CIRCUIT, WHERE IT WILL ATTACH TO AVAILABLE ELECTRONS, FORMING
                FORCE FIELDS, VOLTAGE, AND CURRENTS TO PUMP ELECTRONS AROUND THE CIRCUIT
                .
                Last edited by Freemen; 08-15-2010, 05:09 PM. Reason: grammar error

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MrMagAmp View Post
                  Why do you say that?
                  You've obtained Radiant Energy while replicating the Correa Converter. Not?
                  No, correa converter double the output by mixing in a bit of normal electricity. This charge battery much better though maybe like 1 vs 4 hours.


                  I look forward for the translation too .

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    In simple terms, Radiant Energy is Longitudinal Dielectric waves. Transverse Electromagnetic waves are not radiant energy.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      And lighting is nothing more than a "capacitive dielectric breakdown" or a very large spark gap between two charged bodies.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        static elec

                        Originally posted by Iotayodi View Post
                        Radiant energy is a broad term but it deals with energy from electromagnetic waves. What is Radiant Energy?

                        There are meters that are made for static electricity.
                        Detection of Static Electricity - Succeed in Understanding Physics: School for Champions
                        HI I CAME ACROSS THIS BOOK FROM GOOGLEBOOKS WELL WORTH A LOOK
                        Full text of "Theoretical and practical electrical engineering; comprising a course of lectures given at the Bliss electrical school upon the principles and applications of both direct and alternating current apparatus"

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          there is allot of discussion here that seems to want to go back to what we are told about electrons and some good discussion about the actual field workings.
                          myself i feel that Tesla was right that the term static electricity is a miss nomar as it is indeed very active.
                          if i look at the earth it gives a clear example that the magnetic and electric are deffinately two different states.
                          the magnetic maintains two poles that move with the globe rotation and are relatively fixed and we should be glad for that or electronics would have real problems.
                          the electric fields on the other hand build and are fairly evenly dispersed about the globe and react to a different set of laws for there action and effects on the enviroment builting layers some may call chakras but these correspond to charge density within the layers moving outward from the earth center much of what is called white noise is generated by charge neutralization flux change across the surface layer.
                          the two fields to me are totaly different and have different laws governing them and there actions and we have all to often confused this difference by lumping them together as EMF.
                          Martin

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X